以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 1-6.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.04.001

• 研究生园地 •    下一篇

重大传染病突发事件中护士伦理困境量表的研制及信效度检验

张钰琳, 朱向伟, 洪慧芳, 卢根娣   

  1. 上海中医药大学附属曙光医院,上海 201203
  • 收稿日期:2023-10-20 出版日期:2024-02-25 发布日期:2024-03-07
  • 通讯作者: 卢根娣（1964-）,女,上海人,硕士,教授,中医护理学研究所主任。E-mail：lugd2016@126.com
  • 作者简介:张钰琳（1998-）,女,上海人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,护士。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目（22BZX024）

Development of Ethical Dilemma Scale for Nurses in major infectious disease emergencies and its reliability and validity

ZHANG Yu-lin, ZHU Xiang-wei, HONG Hui-fang, LU Gen-di   

  1. Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China
  • Received:2023-10-20 Online:2024-02-25 Published:2024-03-07

PDF (PC)

143

赞

摘要： 目的 编制重大传染病突发事件中护士伦理困境量表,并检验其信度效度。方法 基于护理伦理原则,通过文献研究法、访谈法、专家咨询法形成初版量表。对全国6个省市大型三级综合医院842名参与重大传染病突发事件的一线护士进行调查,检验其信效度。结果 重大传染病突发事件中护士伦理困境量表共包括4个维度27个条目。量表总体的内容效度为0.914,各条目的内容效度为0.833~1.000;探索性因子分析共提取4个公因子,累积方差贡献率69.636%;量表总Cronbach α系数为0.929,折半信度为0.866;各维度的 Cronbach α系数为 0.800~0.907之间,量表整体的重测信度为0.943。结论 重大传染病突发事件中护士伦理困境量表具有良好的信度效度,可有效评估重大传染病突发事件中护士的伦理困境水平。

关键词: 重大传染病突发事件, 一线护士, 伦理困境, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To develop a scale of ethical dilemma for nurses in major infectious disease emergencies and test its reliability and validity. Methods Based on the principles of nursing ethics, the initial scale was formed by literature review, interview and expert consultation. A total of 842 nurses involved in major infectious disease emergencies in tertiary general hospitals in 6 provinces and cities were investigated for reliability and validity test. Results The ethical dilemma scale for nurses in major infectious disease emergencies consisted of 27 items in 4 dimensions. The overall content validity of the scale was 0.914, and the content validity of each item ranged from 0.833 to 1.000. Four common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 69.636%. The total Cronbach α coefficient of the scale was 0.929, and the half-folded reliability was 0.866. The Cronbach α coefficient of each dimension ranged from 0.800 to 0.907, and the overall test-retest reliability of the scale was 0.943. Conclusion The scale has good reliability and validity, and can effectively evaluate the level of nurses’ ethical dilemma in major infectious disease emergencies.

Key words: major infectious disease emergency, nurses at the front line, ethical dilemma, reliability, validity

中图分类号: 

  • R473.51
[1] 陈汝婕,王毅欣,刘晶晶,等.基于LDA主题分析模型的突发重大传染病事件医院抗逆力建设分析——以上海市为例[J].军事护理,2023,40(4):60-62;74.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.04.015.
[2] Norman SB, Feingold JH, Kaye-Kauderer H, et al.Moral distress in frontline healthcare workers in the initial epicenter of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States: relationship to PTSD symptoms, burnout, and psychosocial functioning[J]. Depress Anxiety,2021,38(10):1007-1017. DOI:10.1002/da.23205.
[3] Austin CL, Saylor R, Finley PJ.Moral distress in physicians and nurses: impact on professional quality of life and turnover[J].Psychol Trauma, 2017,9(4):399-406.DOI:10.1037/tra0000201.
[4] Epstein EG, Whitehead PB, Prompahakul C, et al.Enhancing understanding of moral distress: the measure of moral distress for health care professionals[J].AJOB Empir Bioeth, 2019,10(2):113-124. DOI:10.1080/23294515.2019.1586008.
[5] Cramer E, Smith J, Rogowski J, et al.Measuring moral distress in nurses during a pandemic: development and validation of the COVID-MDS[J]. Res Nurs Health, 2022,45(5):549-558. DOI:10.1002/nur.22254.
[6] Villa M, Balice-Bourgois C, Tolotti A, et al.Ethical conflict and its psychological correlates among hospital nurses in the pandemic: a cross-sectional study within Swiss COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Wards[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health,2021,18(22):12012. DOI:10.3390/ijerph182212012.
[7] Smallwood N, Pascoe A, Karimi L, et al.Moral distress and perceived community views are associated with mental health symptoms in frontline health workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health,2021,18(16):8723. DOI:10.3390/ijerph18168723.
[8] Sperling D.Ethical dilemmas, perceived risk, and motivation among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Nurs Ethics,2021,28(1):9-22. DOI:10.1177/0969733020956376.
[9] Hossain F,Clatty A.Self-care strategies in response to nurses’ moral injury during COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Nurs Ethics,2021,28(1):23-32.DOI:10.1177/0969733020961825.
[10] Dunham AM, Rieder TN, Humbyrd CJ.A bioethical perspective for navigating moral dilemmas amidst the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2020,28(11):471-476. DOI:10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00371.
[11] Evans AM, Jonas M, Lantos J.Pediatric palliative care in a pandemic: role obligations, moral distress, and the care you can give[J]. Pediatrics,2020,146(1):e20201163. DOI:10.1542/peds.2020-1163.
[12] Sriharan A, West KJ, Almost J, et al.COVID-19-related occupational burnout and moral distress among nurses: a rapid scoping review[J]. Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont), 2021,34(1):7-19.DOI:10.12927/cjnl.2021.26459.
[13] 郑卫军,何凡.现况调查的样本量计算方法[J].预防医学,2020,32(6):647-648.DOI:10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2020.06.028.
[14] Schadewaldt V, McElduff B, D’Este C, et al. Validating the Alberta Context Tool in a multi-site Australian Emergency Department nurse population[J]. PLoS One, 2019,14(4):e0215153. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0215153.
[15] 马珠月,姚珊珊,史妍妍,等.女性乳腺癌患者淋巴水肿风险感知评估问卷的编制及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2023,30(4):1-5.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.04.001.
[16] 刘丽萍,周春兰,吴艳妮,等.情绪抑制量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(8):6-10. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.08.006.
[17] 雷阳, 张静平.中文版Connor-Davidson心理弹性量表在糖尿病患者中的信效度研究[J].中国全科医学, 2016, 19(10):1188-1193.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2016.10.017.
[18] Forbat L, Mnatzaganian G, Barclay S.The Healthcare Conflict Scale: development, validation and reliability testing of a tool for use across clinical settings[J]. J Interprof Care,2019,33(6):680-688.DOI:10.1080/13561820.2019.1593117.
[19] 史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球.量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2012,37(2): 49-52. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007.
[20] Park S, Choi M, Kim S.Validation of the Resilience Scale For Nurses(RSN)[J]. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2019,33(4):434-439.DOI:10.1016/j.apnu.2018.12.004.
[21] Sasaki M, Ogata Y, Fujinami K, et al.Development of a Shortened Version of the Nurse Managers’ Empowering Behavioral Scale for staff nurses[J]. Healthcare(Basel), 2022,10(10):2112. DOI:10.3390/healthcare10102112.
[22] Yuwanich N, Akhavan S, Nantsupawat W, et al.Development and psychometric properties of the Stressor Scale for emergency nurses[J]. Int Emerg Nurs,2018,39:77-88. DOI:10.1016/j.ienj.2018.01.005.
[23] 胡雁,王志稳.护理研究[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2017: 120-132.
[24] Mattisson M, Johnson C, B?rjeson S, et al. Development and content validation of the Telenursing Interaction and Satisfaction Questionnaire (TISQ)[J]. Health Expect, 2019,22(6):1213-1222.DOI:10.1111/hex.12945.
[25] Cabarkapa S, Nadjidai SE, Murgier J, et al.The psychological impact of COVID-19 and other viral epidemics on frontline healthcare workers and ways to address it:a rapid systematic review[J]. Brain Behav Immun Health,2020,8:100144. DOI:10.1016/j.bbih.2020.100144.
[26] Chen X, Arber A, Gao J, et al.The mental health status among nurses from low-risk areas under normalized COVID-19 pandemic prevention and control in China: a cross-sectional study[J]. Int J Ment Health Nurs,2021,30(4):975-987. DOI:10.1111/inm.12852.
[27] 潘绍山,张金钟,张新庆,等. 《护士伦理准则》的起草、研究经过[J]. 中国医学伦理学,2014,27(4):471-473.
[28] 潘绍山,张金钟,张新庆,等. 《护士伦理准则》内容解读[J]. 中国医学伦理学,2014,27(4):468-470.
[29] 谢红珍,袁长蓉,沈园园,等. 《中国护士伦理准则》内容解读[J]. 中国医学伦理学,2020,33(10):1234-1242. DOI:10.12026/j.issn.1001-8565.2020.10.14.
[1] 宋彩妮, 郑尧, 宋英, 刘丽华. 癌症照顾者信息隐瞒量表的汉化及在肺癌患者照顾者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 17-20.
[2] 张国春, 李海云, 褚梁梁, 程雪, 王君芝. 产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 6-11.
[3] 候莹鸽, 李好正, 侯云霞, 汪子寒, 李静, 王松梅, 赵亚杰, 阎玲. 食管癌术后患者胃食管反流自我管理测评量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 12-17.
[4] 马珠月, 姚珊珊, 史妍妍, 陆宁宁, 邾萍, 程芳. 女性乳腺癌患者淋巴水肿风险感知评估问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 1-5.
[5] 董世攀, 梁小英, 黄兰怡, 梁善英, 梁锦波, 代炜, 赵玉玲, 黄沂. 功能性腹胀患者健康促进行为量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 11-15.
[6] 佘佳晨, 张金燕, 张瑞星, 梅永霞, 李洪峰. 工作中伦理型领导问卷的汉化及在护士群体中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 29-34.
[7] 余振威, 白雪, 鲁玉, 黄洁, 毛靖. 护理学生元认知能力量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(21): 13-17.
[8] 刘娜, 边彩虹, 杨晶慧, 甘秀妮. 护生伦理敏感性问卷的汉化及其在临床实习护生中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(21): 71-74.
[9] 张轶, 王艾红, 陈静. 中文版宿命观量表在恶性血液病患者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(20): 54-57.
[10] 苗康康, 陈勤. 儿童环境健康知识和技能问卷的汉化及信效度分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(2): 17-22.
[11] 华小倩, 黎巧玲, 党兆, 胡宏美, 李春莉, 皮晨曦. 脑卒中照顾者对卒中复发应急能力测评量表的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(19): 62-67.
[12] 侯爱琳, 宁宁, 陈佳丽, 李佩芳, 张林, 谢艳, 朱红彦, 屈俊宏. 膝关节骨性关节炎患者日常生活困难评估量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(18): 6-10.
[13] 沈傲梅, 朱飞, 张丽媛, 卞静如, 路潜, 强万敏, 符鑫, 张紫娟, 张力川. 修订版简版淋巴水肿疾病感知问卷在乳腺癌手术患者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(18): 54-59.
[14] 李娜, 黄懿炘, 刘美兰, 邓银辉, 邹小芳. 老年人健康促进行为量表的汉化及信效度评价[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 5-10.
[15] 苏闪闪, 董又鸣, 郑蔚, 王丹丹, 刘梦丽, 刘贺, 瞿小凤, 张苇. 癌症患者社会疏离测评问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 51-56.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
[1] 林嘉琪,吴桂丽. Morse跌倒风险评估量表的临床应用研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(13): 42 -45 .
[2] 潘婷, 陈艳, 孔方, 张爱玲, 陈丹蕾, 丁成亮. 克罗恩病患者及其配偶主观幸福感与婚姻调适的主客体效应分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 1 -5 .
[3] 张国春, 李海云, 褚梁梁, 程雪, 王君芝. 产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 6 -11 .
[4] 肖雅霖, 贾璐, 叶飞, 郭浩林, 李寒, 李雅璇, 张凡云, 刘艺, 李卫红. 19所高校护理专业学位硕士研究生培养方案的比较分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 12 -15 .
[5] 郑硕, 张卫青, 吴雅萱, 王鑫媛, 法宪恩, 宋洁露, 曹雅冰. 基于Q方法分析痴呆患者家庭照顾者对虚拟护理支持的偏好研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 1 -5 .
[6] 邢春凤, 李国新, 张广清, 刘雅鑫, 孙晓伟. 产妇产褥期乳房胀痛危险因素分析及风险预测模型构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 6 -11 .
[7] 张许婷, 罗彩凤, 魏兰芝, 邵校, 尚彬, 卞泽坤, 吕妃, 孙炜怡. 实习护生体面劳动感的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 12 -16 .
[8] 宋彩妮, 郑尧, 宋英, 刘丽华. 癌症照顾者信息隐瞒量表的汉化及在肺癌患者照顾者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 17 -20 .
[9] 曾慧, 杨娜娜, 李昌秀, 孙凌霞, 吴敏, 赵娅, 罗莎, 刘开鑫, 周静. 3 C引导性反馈下情境模拟教学联合反思提示卡在护理学导论中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 21 -24 .
[10] 商丽, 黄菲, 程利, 张桃桃, 王宏梅. 本科护生参与漫改剧学习体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 25 -29 .