工作中伦理型领导问卷的汉化及在护士群体中的信效度检验

doi:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.23.029

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的汉化工作中伦理型领导问卷(Ethical Leadership at Work Questionnaire,ELW),并检验其在护士群体中的信效度。方法基于Brislin翻译模式对ELW进行翻译、回译,经过文化调适和预调查形成中文版ELW。于2023年1—3月便利抽取郑州市4所三级甲等医院536名护士进行问卷调查以检验中文版ELW的信效度。结果中文版ELW包括以人为本、公平公正、权力分享与可持续发展、伦理指导、诚实守信、明确职责6个维度、37个条目。探索性因子分析提取6个公因子,累积方差贡献率59.906%。验证性因子分析支持一阶六因子模型假设,且模型适配度评价指标均达到了统计学标准。条目水平内容效度指数为0.830~1.000,平均量表水平内容效度指数为0.959。该问卷的Cronbach's α系数为0.958,折半信度为0.891,重测信度为0.957。结论中文版ELW具有良好的信效度,可用于评价我国文化背景下护士感知的伦理型领导水平。

关键词: 护士, 伦理型领导, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To translate the Ethical Leadership at Work Questionnaire (ELW) in nurses and to test its reliability and validity. Methods Based on Brislin's translation model, the Chinese version of ELW was developed through translation, back-translation, cultural adaptation, and pre-survey. A sample of 536 nurses from four tertiary grade-A hospitals in Zhengzhou was conveniently selected from January to March 2023 for a questionnaire survey to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of ELW. Results The Chinese version of ELW consisted of 37 items in 6 dimensions: human-centeredness, fairness and equity, power sharing and sustainable development, ethical guidance, honesty and trustworthiness, and clear responsibilities. Exploratory factor analysis extracted six common factors, with a cumulative variance contribution of 59.906%. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesis of the first-order six-factor model, and the evaluation indexes of model fitness reached statistical standard. The item level content validity index of the scale was 0.830~1.000, and the average scale level content validity index 0.959. It had a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.958, a split-half reliability of 0.891, and a test-retest reliability of 0.957. Conclusion The Chinese version of ELW demonstrates good reliability and validity in assessing nurses'perceived ethical leadership within Chinese cultural context.

Key words: nurse, ethical leadership, reliability, validity

中图分类号:

佘佳晨, 张金燕, 张瑞星, 梅永霞, 李洪峰. 工作中伦理型领导问卷的汉化及在护士群体中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 29-34.

SHE Jia-chen, ZHANG Jin-yan, ZHANG Rui-xing, MEI Yong-xia, LI Hong-feng. Translation of Ethical Leadership at Work Questionnaire in nurses and its validity and reliability[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(23): 29-34.

参考文献

[1] Brown ME, Trevino LK, Harrison DA.Ethical leadership: a social learning perspective for construct development and testing[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2005, 97(2):117-134.DOI:10.1016/ j.obhdp.2005.03.002.
[2] Yilmaz D U, Duzgun F, Yilmaz D.Relationship between ethical leadership behavior and work motivation in intensive care nurses: a cross-sectional study[J]. Galician Medical Journal, 2020, 27(1): E202011. DOI:10.21802/gmj.2020.1.1.
[3] Kalyar Mn, Usta A, Shafique I.When ethical leadership and LMX are more effective in prompting creativity the moderating role of psychological capital[J]. Baltic Journal of Management, 2020, 15(1):61-80. DOI:10.1108/BJM-02-2019-0042.
[4] Qiu S, Dooley Lm, Deng R, et al.Does ethical leadership boost nurses'patient-oriented organizational citizenship behaviours? A cross-sectional study[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2020, 76(7):1603-1613. DOI:10.1111/jan.14366.
[5] El-Gazar He, Zoromba Ma.Ethical leadership, flourishing, and Extra-Role behavior among nurses[J]. Sage Open Nursing,2021,7:23779608211062669.DOI:10.1177/23779608211062669.
[6] Arslan Gg, Özden D, Göktuna G, et al.Missed nursing care and its relationship with perceived ethical leadership[J]. Nursing ethics, 2022, 29(1):35-48. DOI:10.1177/09697330211006823.
[7] Kalshoven K, Den Hartog Dn, De Hoogh A H B. Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): development and validation of a multidimensional measure[J]. Leadership Quarterly, 2011, 22(1):51-69. DOI:10.1016/ j.leaqua. 2010.12.007.
[8] Kim S, Jeong Sh, Seo Mh.Nurses' ethical leadership and related outcome variables: systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. J Nurs Manag, 2022, 30(7):2308-2323. DOI: 10.1111/jonm.13726.
[9] 任仕泉, 陈峰, 杨树勤. 重复采样试验设计的样本含量估计[J]. 中国卫生统计, 1999, 16(4):194-196. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3674.1999.04.001.
[10] 袁中清, 王佳琳, 金曼, 等. 护士心理资本量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(1):74-80. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2023.01.010.
[11] Kim Je, Park Ej.A validation study of the modified Korean Version of Ethical Leadership at Work Questionnaire(K-ELW)[J]. J Korean Acad Nurs, 2015,45(2):240-250. DOI: 10.4040/jkan.2015.45.2.240.
[12] Brislin. Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials[M]. Boston:MA:Allyn & Bacon. 1980: 389-444.
[13] 王凯选, 李培宇, 王文远, 等. 心力衰竭患者照顾者自我护理贡献量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(13):1585-1590. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.13.008.
[14] 张佳惠, 庞书勤, 洪雪珮, 等. 老年前期人群退休规划过程量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(10): 1-6. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.10.001.
[15] 张晨, 周云仙. 我国护理测量工具文献中内容效度指数应用误区分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2020, 35(4):86-88. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2020.04.086.
[16] 刘言, 顾平. 母乳喂养动机量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(12):1531-1536. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.12.019.
[17] 董世攀, 梁小英, 黄兰怡, 等. 功能性腹胀患者健康促进行为量表的汉化及信效度检验[J].护理学报, 2023, 30(3):11-15. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.03.011.
[18] 苗康康, 陈勤. 儿童环境健康知识和技能问卷的汉化及信效度分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(2):17-22. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.02.017.
[19] Steinmann B, Nübold A,Maier GW.Validation of a german version of the ethical leadership at work questionnaire by kalshoven et al. (2011)[J]. Front Psychol, 2016, 7(1):446. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00446.
[20] Tsai A Yj, Tan A Yk.Exploratory examination of environmental protection behaviors in a hospital setting using the theory of planned behavior and ethical leadership[J]. Environmental Research Communications, 2022, 4(7):1-12. DOI:10.1088/2515-7620/ac7e31.
[21] 谭明杨, 李红玉, 赵瑞. 围术期病人隐私量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理研究, 2023, 37(4):619-623. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2023.04.010.
[22] 李峥,刘宇. 护理学研究方法[M]. 2版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2018.
[23] Barkhordari-Sharifabad M, Ashktorab T, Atashzadeh-Shoorideh F.Ethical leadership outcomes in nursing: a qualitative study[J]. Nursing ethics, 2018, 25(8):1051-1063. DOI:10.1177/0969733016687157.

相关文章 15

[1]	罗仕妙, 林美珍, 王慧欣, 练柳兰, 刘杨晨, 胡喜燕, 龚小珍, 魏琳. 新入职护士自主学习能力在组织支持与职业韧性的中介作用[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(9): 55-59.
[2]	潘姝丞, 卞丽芳, 骆华芳, 黄旭叶, 黄昉芳, 曾颖, 王薇. 护士深静脉血栓形成风险知识与预防实践现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(8): 7-11.
[3]	周瑜, 王励飞, 米元元, 王加谋. 精神科护士遭受医院II型暴力真实体验的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(8): 58-62.
[4]	郑静, 管玉香, 张瑛, 许娟, 邹冉, 王超. 安徽省873名中医院护士长变革型领导力影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 16-19.
[5]	谢婵娟, 熊静, 谌永毅, 张京慧, 李小燕, 王泽友. 精准护理内涵及其对护士的角色要求与机遇挑战[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 44-47.
[6]	陈佳茵, 郭军, 刘宁. 护士职业暴露预防与管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 53-58.
[7]	刘灵芳, 毛红波, 孙朵朵, 吴长蓉, 程真顺, 张青. 临床护士生涯适应力在职业使命感与工作投入间的中介效应分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 59-64.
[8]	陈玉平, 彭刚艺, 张莉, 何瑾云, 郑静, 林群燕, 王灵晓, 杨艳. 临床感控专科护士胜任力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(6): 15-21.
[9]	和青森, 曹珊, 井晓磊, 刘玲霞. 心理授权在服务型领导与临床护士工作旺盛感间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(6): 47-51.
[10]	朱玥, 汪张毅, 方治平, 王竞, 闫奕杉, 张亚军, 庞晓丽. 456名临床护士工作场所灵性现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 7-11.
[11]	候莹鸽, 李好正, 侯云霞, 汪子寒, 李静, 王松梅, 赵亚杰, 阎玲. 食管癌术后患者胃食管反流自我管理测评量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 12-17.
[12]	马珠月, 姚珊珊, 史妍妍, 陆宁宁, 邾萍, 程芳. 女性乳腺癌患者淋巴水肿风险感知评估问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 1-5.
[13]	李佳, 梁嘉仪, 冯如芝, 高钰琳. 公共卫生护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 16-22.
[14]	高芸芸, 刘芳, 刘维维. 公共卫生护士胜任力特征的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 23-28.
[15]	卫平莲, 陈孝云, 金利萍, 范孝陈, 陈培培, 刘安诺. 儿科传染病专科护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 29-32.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared