脑卒中照顾者对卒中复发应急能力测评量表的构建

doi:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.19.062

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的构建脑卒中照顾者对卒中复发应急能力测评量表,并检验其信度效度。方法以应急准备能力模型为理论依据,通过文献回顾、半结构化访谈、德尔菲专家函询法、预调查构建测试版量表。选取556名脑卒中照顾者进行调查,并进行信效度检验,形成正式版量表。结果最终形成的脑卒中照顾者对卒中复发应急能力测评量表包含5个维度,35个条目。经探索性因子分析,提取的公因子与理论框架构建的条目归属相符,累积方差贡献率为63.792%。验证性因子分析显示χ²/df=1.542,拟合优度指数（GFI）=0.873,近似误差均方根（RMSEA）=0.041,调整拟合优度指数（AGFI）=0.848,比较拟合指数（CFI）=0.920,提示模型拟和良好。总量表内容效度指数为0.935,各条目内容效度指数为0.780~1.000。总量表Cronbach 系数为0.882。结论脑卒中照顾者对卒中复发应急能力评估量表具有良好的效度和信度,可作为医护人员评价脑卒中照顾者对卒中复发应急能力水平的测评工具。

关键词: 卒中复发, 照顾者, 应急能力, 量表, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To construct a scale for evaluating the emergency response capability for stroke recurrence in caregivers of stroke patients, and to test its reliability and validity. Methods Based on the model of emergency preparedness capability, test version of the scale was constructed through literature review, semi-structured interviews and two rounds of Delphi expert correspondence and pre-survey. A total of 556 caregivers of stroke patients were selected for validity and reliability test to form the final scale. Results The final scale consisted of 35 items in 5 dimensions. Exploratory factor analysis showed that the extracted common factors were consistent with the attribution of entries constructed by the theoretical framework, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 63.792%. Confirmatory factor analysis showed chi-square/degrees of freedom (χ²/df)=1.542, goodness of fit index (GFI)=0.873, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.041, adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI) =0.848, comparative fit index (CFI)=0.920, indicating that the model fit well. Content validity index of the scale was 0.935, and t content validity index of each item 0.780~1.000 . Cronbach's coefficient of the scale was 0.882. Conclusion The assessment scale of emergency response capability for stroke recurrence in caregivers of stroke patients has good validity and reliability. It can be used as a tool for healthcare professionals to assess emergency response competency for stroke recurrence of the caregivers.

Key words: stroke recurrence, caregiver, emergency response capability, scale, reliability, validity

中图分类号:

R473.74

华小倩, 黎巧玲, 党兆, 胡宏美, 李春莉, 皮晨曦. 脑卒中照顾者对卒中复发应急能力测评量表的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(19): 62-67.

HUA Xiao-qian, LI Qiao-ling, DANG Zhao, HU Hong-mei, Li Chun-li, Pi Chen-xi. Construction of Assessment Scale of Emergency Response Capability for stroke recurrence in caregivers of stroke patients[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(19): 62-67.

参考文献

[1] 《中国卒中中心报告2020》编写组.《中国卒中中心报告2020》概要[J].中国脑血管病杂志,2021,18(11):737-743. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5921.2021.11.001.
[2] Duffy S, McCarthy R, Farrell M, et al. Per-pass analysis of thrombus composition in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy[J]. Stroke,2019,50(5): 1156-1163.DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023419.
[3] 汪勇,刘洋,刘仁玉,等.卒中院前急救体系研究进展[J].中国卒中杂志,2021,16(1):21-26.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5765.2021.01.004.
[4] Oh GJ, Lee K, Kim K, et al.Differences in the awareness of stroke symptoms and emergency response by occupation in the Korean general population[J].PLoS One,2019,14(6):e0218608. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218608.
[5] Saade S, Hallit S, Salameh P, et al.Knowledge and response to stroke among lebanese adults: a population-based survey[J].Front Public Health,2022,10:891073.DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.891073.
[6] 孙妍,谢林峻,郭丽霞,等.成都市居民脑卒中急救知识知晓情况及健康教育效果[J].护理学杂志,2021,36(14):12-15. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2021.14.012.
[7] 叶莉,苏永静,朱许琼.脑卒中患者家属院前发病症状处置知识掌握现状调查[J].国际医药卫生导报, 2021,27(10):1552-1554.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-1245.2021.10.035.
[8] Xu W, Hao Y, Wu Q, et al Community preparedness for emergency: a cross-sectional survey of residents in Heilongjiang of China[J].BMJ Open, 2015,5(11):e008479. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008479.
[9] Chen CY, Xu W, Dai Y, et al.Household preparedness for emergency events: a cross-sectional survey on residents in four regions of China[J]. BMJ Open,2019,9(11):e032462. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032462.
[10] 中国老年医学学会急诊医学分会,中华医学会急诊医学分会卒中学组,中国卒中学会急救医学分会.急性缺血性脑卒中急诊急救中国专家共识2018版(下)[J].心脑血管病防治,2019, 19(4):287-291. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.816x.2019.04.001.
[11] 国家卫生健康委脑卒中防治专家委员会.脑卒中院前急救诊疗指导规范[J].中华医学杂志,2018, 98(39):3138-3147.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.39.003.
[12] 国家卒中急救地图工作委员会,国家卒中急救地图共识专家组.卒中急救地图专家共识[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2019,28(1):2-11.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2019.01.001.
[13] 中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2018[J].中华神经科杂志,2018,51(9):666-682. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2018.09.004.
[14] Enders J.Measuring community awareness and preparedness for emergencies[J].Aust J Manage,2001,16(3):52-58.
[15] 华小倩,黎巧玲,胡宏美,等.脑卒中患者家属对卒中急性发作应急救援能力的质性研究[J]. 职业卫生与应急救援,2022,40(1):100-104.DOI:10.16369/j.oher.issn.1007-1326.2022.01.021.
[16] Geng Y, Zhao L, Wang Y, et al.Competency model for dentists in China: results of a Delphi study[J]. PLoS One,2018,13(3):e0194411.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0194411.
[17] 中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国各类主要脑血管病诊断要点2019[J].中华神经科杂志,2019,52(9):710-715. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2019.09.003.
[18] 赵秋利. 护理测评工具的开发与应用[M].北京:人民卫生出版社2014:8-18.
[19] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型:AMOS 的操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2018.
[20] Chang T, Ibrahim S, Ranasinghe HM, et al.Knowledge of stroke, its warning symptoms, risk factors and treatment among the general public and general practitioners in a south Asian population[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2020,29(5):104760.DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104760.
[21] 刘丽萍,周春兰,吴艳妮,等.情绪抑制量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(8):6-10. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.08.006.
[22] 朱心怡,赵梅,杨雅,等.临床护士营养护理能力量表的编制及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志,2021,56(11):1672-1679.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.11.012.
[23] Clark LA, Watson D.Constructing validity: new developments in creating objective measuring instruments[J].Psychol Assess,2019, 31(12):1412-1427.DOI:10.1037/pas0000626.
[24] 陈灵慧,谢裕芳,林婷,等.城市空巢老人居家安全危险因素评估量表的研制及信效度检验[J]. 中国实用护理杂志,2021,37(6):417-423. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20200519-02371.
[25] Wang F, Huang L, Zhang H, et al.Factor analysis and psychometric properties adaption of Chinese version of the Decisional Engagement Scale (DES-10)[J]. Patient Prefer Adherence,2020,14:2027-2034.DOI:10.2147/PPA.S266687.
[26] 杨丽潇,周春兰,屠燕,等.老年慢性病患者健康赋能需求评估量表的研制及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2022,29(3):67-71.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.03.067.
[27] 中国卒中学会急救医学分会. 脑卒中院前急救专家共识[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2017,26(10):1107-1114. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2017.10.002.
[28] Han CH, Kim H, Lee S, et al.Knowledge and poor understanding factors of stroke and heart attack symptoms[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2019, 16(19):3665. DOI:0.3390/ijerph16193665.
[29] 李胜德. 中国公众卒中知晓度及应对方式调查研究(FAST-RIGHT研究)[D].北京:北京协和医学院,2020.

相关文章 15

[1]	王美慧, 李雨馨, 潘一佳, 张琼琼, 汤胜男, 王庆妍. 元宇宙技术应用于老年痴呆患者照顾者的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(8): 44-47.
[2]	刘学, 李国新, 张广清, 李英娜, 刘婉珊, 肖娟. 220名维持性血液透析患者照顾者心理弹性现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(8): 63-68.
[3]	候莹鸽, 李好正, 侯云霞, 汪子寒, 李静, 王松梅, 赵亚杰, 阎玲. 食管癌术后患者胃食管反流自我管理测评量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 12-17.
[4]	马珠月, 姚珊珊, 史妍妍, 陆宁宁, 邾萍, 程芳. 女性乳腺癌患者淋巴水肿风险感知评估问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 1-5.
[5]	董世攀, 梁小英, 黄兰怡, 梁善英, 梁锦波, 代炜, 赵玉玲, 黄沂. 功能性腹胀患者健康促进行为量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 11-15.
[6]	苗康康, 陈勤. 儿童环境健康知识和技能问卷的汉化及信效度分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(2): 17-22.
[7]	侯爱琳, 宁宁, 陈佳丽, 李佩芳, 张林, 谢艳, 朱红彦, 屈俊宏. 膝关节骨性关节炎患者日常生活困难评估量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(18): 6-10.
[8]	沈傲梅, 朱飞, 张丽媛, 卞静如, 路潜, 强万敏, 符鑫, 张紫娟, 张力川. 修订版简版淋巴水肿疾病感知问卷在乳腺癌手术患者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(18): 54-59.
[9]	李娜, 黄懿炘, 刘美兰, 邓银辉, 邹小芳. 老年人健康促进行为量表的汉化及信效度评价[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 5-10.
[10]	苏闪闪, 董又鸣, 郑蔚, 王丹丹, 刘梦丽, 刘贺, 瞿小凤, 张苇. 癌症患者社会疏离测评问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 51-56.
[11]	蔡倩, 罗雯, 孙欣鑫, 陈荣, 宋慧子, 蔡业鹏, 张漪然, 廖月霞. 进食自我调节问卷的汉化及其在学龄前儿童中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(15): 11-15.
[12]	花芸, 王雯沁, 刘志梅, 冯国和, 杜沫晗. 癌症患者PICC置管支持性照护需求量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(15): 23-28.
[13]	张习习, 李漓, 梁丽婵, 廖小妹. 白血病化疗患儿主要照顾者参与用药安全行为水平及影响因素[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(14): 18-23.
[14]	周贵玲, 徐蓉, 边旭娜, 郑维. 中青年2型糖尿病患者健康素养量表的研制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(14): 73-78.
[15]	张咪, 吴艳妮, 黄秀娥, 杨晶, 王润, 杨玲莉, 赵慧慧, 周春兰. 失能老人和配偶照顾者健康素养与自我效能对生活质量的交互作用[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(13): 1-5.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared