癌症患者社会疏离测评问卷的编制及信效度检验

doi:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.17.051

护理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (17): 51-56.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.17.051

癌症患者社会疏离测评问卷的编制及信效度检验

苏闪闪¹, 董又鸣², 郑蔚³, 王丹丹³, 刘梦丽³, 刘贺³, 瞿小凤³, 张苇³

1.郑州工业应用技术学院医学院,河南郑州 450064;
2.广州中医药大学第二临床医学院,广东广州 510000;
3.郑州大学第二附属医院护理部,河南郑州 450014

收稿日期:2022-12-16 出版日期:2023-09-10 发布日期:2023-10-11
通讯作者: 郑蔚（1962-）,女,河南郑州人,硕士,教授。E-mail:zw112689zy@sina.com
作者简介:苏闪闪（1996-）,女,河南永城人,硕士,护师。
基金资助:
河南省医学科技攻关计划联合共建项目（LHGJ20220502）

Development and psychometric test of Social Isolation Assessment Questionnaire for cancer patients

SU Shan-shan¹, DONG You-ming², ZHENG Wei³, WANG Dan-dan³, LIU Meng-li³, LIU He³, QU Xiao-feng³, ZHANG Wei³

1. Medical School, Zhengzhou University of Industrial Technology, Zhengzhou 450064, China;
2. The Second Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510000, China;
3. Dept. of Nursing Administration, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450014, China

Received:2022-12-16 Online:2023-09-10 Published:2023-10-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的编制癌症患者社会疏离测评问卷,并检验其信度、效度。方法基于癌症患者社会疏离概念框架,通过文献回顾、半结构访谈、专家函询及预调查形成问卷施测稿;对434例癌症患者进行问卷调查,检验问卷的信效度。结果癌症患者社会疏离测评问卷包括自我隔离、孤独感、疏远感和无意义感4个维度,共17个条目,累计方差贡献率63.596%。问卷内容效度指数为0.923,Cronbach α系数为0.902,折半信度为0.840,重测信度为0.977,相容效度分别为0.847、-0.648,验证性因子分析结果显示该问卷结构效度良好。结论癌症患者社会疏离测评问卷信效度良好,可用于评估癌症患者社会疏离水平。

关键词: 社会疏离, 癌症, 问卷, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To develop a social isolation assessment questionnaire for cancer patients and text its reliability and validity. Methods This study was completed based on the conceptual framework of social isolation for cancer patients. The draft of the questionnaire was formed after literature review, semi-structured interview, expert consultation and the pre-investigation. A total of 434 cancer patients were surveyed to test the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. Results The social isolation assessment questionnaire for cancer patients consisted of 4 dimensions of self-isolation, loneliness, alienation and meaninglessness and 17 items, and the accumulated variance contribution rate was 63.596%. Content validity index of the questionnaire was 0.923; Cronbach α coefficient 0.902; split-half reliability 0.840, test-retest reliability 0.977, compatibility validity 0.847 and -0.648. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the questionnaire had good construct validity. Conclusion The social isolation assessment questionnaire for cancer patients has good reliability and validity, which can be used to assess the social isolation level of cancer patients.

Key words: social isolation, cancer, questionnaire, reliability, validity

中图分类号:

R473.73

苏闪闪, 董又鸣, 郑蔚, 王丹丹, 刘梦丽, 刘贺, 瞿小凤, 张苇. 癌症患者社会疏离测评问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 51-56.

SU Shan-shan, DONG You-ming, ZHENG Wei, WANG Dan-dan, LIU Meng-li, LIU He, QU Xiao-feng, ZHANG Wei. Development and psychometric test of Social Isolation Assessment Questionnaire for cancer patients[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(17): 51-56.

参考文献

[1] 严雪,刘倩倩,魏思琪.妇科癌症患者社会疏离影响因素的质性研究Meta整合[J].护理学报,2022,29(20):39-43. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.20.039.
[2] Moore S, Leung B, Bates A, et al.Social isolation: impact on treatment and survival in patients with advanced cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol,2018,36(34_suppl):156.DOI:10.1200/JCO.2018.36.34_suppl.156.
[3] Leung B, Shokoohi A, Bates A, et al.Patient-reported psychosocial needs and psychological distress predict survival in geriatric oncology patients[J]. J Geriatr Oncol, 2021, 12(4):612-617. DOI:10.1016/j.jgo.2020.10.001.
[4] Lutgendorf SK, Penedo F, Goodheart MJ, et al.Epithelial-mesenchymal transition polarization in ovarian carcinomas from patients with high social isolation[J]. Cancer,2020, 126(19): 4407-4413. DOI:10.1002/cncr.33060.
[5] Hawthorne G.Measuring social isolation in older adults: development and initial validation of the friendship scale[J]. Soc Indic Res, 2006, 77(3):521-548. DOI:10.1007/s11205-005-7746-y.
[6] Cornwell EY, Waite LJ.Measuring social isolation among older adults using multiple indicators from the NSHAP study[J]. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009, 64(Suppl 1): i38-i46. DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbp037.
[7] Nicholson NR, Feinn R, Casey EA, et al.Psychometric evaluation of the social isolation scale in older adults[J]. Gerontologist, 2020, 60(7):e491-e501. DOI:10.1093/geront/gnz083.
[8] 苏闪闪,郑蔚,王丹丹,等.癌症患者社会疏离的概念分析[J].中华护理杂志,2022,57(9):1088-1093. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.09.009.
[9] 梅永霞. 脑卒中照顾者获益感概念框架及其评估工具的研究[D].郑州:郑州大学,2018.
[10] 信博,赵秋利,王楠楠,等.消化系统癌症高危人群预防主动行为测评量表的编制与信效度评价[J].护理学报,2021,28(5):6-11. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.05.006.
[11] 罗伯特·F·德威利斯著.量表编制:理论与应用[M].席仲恩,杜珏译,重庆:重庆大学出版社,2016.
[12] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务——SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010:158-244.
[13] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型——AMOS的操作与运用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010:5.
[14] 周亮,黎芝,胡宓,等.ULS-8孤独感量表信效度检验及其应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版), 2012,37(11):1124-1128. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.11.008.
[15] Hays RD, DiMatteo MR. A short-form measure of loneliness[J]. J Pers Assess, 1987, 51(1): 69-81. DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa5101_6.
[16] Lubben JE, Gironda MW.Social networks and social exclusion: measuring social networks and assessing their benefits[M]. Hants: Ashgate, 2004: 20-49.
[17] Jang Y, Powers DA, Park NS, et al.Performance of an abbreviated Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-6) in three ethnic groups of older Asian Americans[J]. Gerontologist, 2022, 62(2): e73-e81. DOI:10.1093/geront/gnaa156.
[18] Chang Q, Sha F, Chan CH, et al.Validation of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale (“LSNS-6”) and its associations with suicidality among older adults in China[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(8): e201612. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201612.
[19] 张正敏,左倩倩,冯现刚,等. ICU护士职业死亡回避量表的编制及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2022, 29(1):53-57. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.01.053.
[20] 林蓓蕾,张振香,郭云飞,等.脑卒中患者复发风险感知评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志,2021,56(11):1666-1671. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.11.011.

相关文章 15

[1]	候莹鸽, 李好正, 侯云霞, 汪子寒, 李静, 王松梅, 赵亚杰, 阎玲. 食管癌术后患者胃食管反流自我管理测评量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 12-17.
[2]	马珠月, 姚珊珊, 史妍妍, 陆宁宁, 邾萍, 程芳. 女性乳腺癌患者淋巴水肿风险感知评估问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 1-5.
[3]	钱湛, 杨晓婷, 林觐民. 癌症患者生育忧虑体验的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 55-60.
[4]	董世攀, 梁小英, 黄兰怡, 梁善英, 梁锦波, 代炜, 赵玉玲, 黄沂. 功能性腹胀患者健康促进行为量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 11-15.
[5]	苗康康, 陈勤. 儿童环境健康知识和技能问卷的汉化及信效度分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(2): 17-22.
[6]	侯爱琳, 宁宁, 陈佳丽, 李佩芳, 张林, 谢艳, 朱红彦, 屈俊宏. 膝关节骨性关节炎患者日常生活困难评估量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(18): 6-10.
[7]	沈傲梅, 朱飞, 张丽媛, 卞静如, 路潜, 强万敏, 符鑫, 张紫娟, 张力川. 修订版简版淋巴水肿疾病感知问卷在乳腺癌手术患者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(18): 54-59.
[8]	李娜, 黄懿炘, 刘美兰, 邓银辉, 邹小芳. 老年人健康促进行为量表的汉化及信效度评价[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 5-10.
[9]	蔡倩, 罗雯, 孙欣鑫, 陈荣, 宋慧子, 蔡业鹏, 张漪然, 廖月霞. 进食自我调节问卷的汉化及其在学龄前儿童中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(15): 11-15.
[10]	花芸, 王雯沁, 刘志梅, 冯国和, 杜沫晗. 癌症患者PICC置管支持性照护需求量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(15): 23-28.
[11]	贾宇哲, 黄淑婷, 张广清. 癌症患者家庭照护者预期性悲伤干预研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(15): 48-51.
[12]	相军爱, 闫荣, 丁敏, 孟祥敏, 林雨婷, 柳文慧, 姜凯. 癌症患者临终关怀偏好的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(14): 37-41.
[13]	王文, 吴丹, 邰安婷, 钱金平, 胡迎新, 钱国安. 结直肠癌幸存者情绪调节策略在病耻感与社会疏离水平的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(14): 59-64.
[14]	周贵玲, 徐蓉, 边旭娜, 郑维. 中青年2型糖尿病患者健康素养量表的研制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(14): 73-78.
[15]	孙梦晨, 冯芳茗, 何佳倩, 范思雨, 杨颖, 季佳妮. 癌症患者自杀风险评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(13): 13-17.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

癌症患者社会疏离测评问卷的编制及信效度检验

Development and psychometric test of Social Isolation Assessment Questionnaire for cancer patients

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10