以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (16): 11-16.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.16.011

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

晚期癌症患者安宁疗护态度量表的汉化及信效度分析

刘凯莉1, 罗艳艳1, 姚桂英1, 朱智玲2a, 郭华2b, 杜诣深1, 秦立伟1, 吴慧敏1, 李佳波1   

  1. 1.新乡医学院 护理学院,河南 新乡 453000;
    2.新乡市中心医院 a.护理部;b.肿瘤内科二,河南 新乡 453000
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-18 出版日期:2022-08-25 发布日期:2022-09-07
  • 通讯作者: 罗艳艳（1965-）,女,河南新乡人,硕士,教授,新乡医学院护理学院院长。E-mail:13937315599@163.com
  • 作者简介:刘凯莉（1997-）,女,河南夏邑人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    2021年河南省研究生教育改革与质量提升工程项目（YJS2021KC23）

Translation of Palliative Care Attitudes Scale and Its Reliability and Validity

LIU Kai-li1, LUO Yan-yan1, YAO Gui-ying1, ZHU Zhi-ling2a, GUO Hua2b, DU Yi-shen1, QIN Li-wei1, WU Hui-min1, LI Jia-bo1   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang 453000,China;
    2a. Dept. of Nursing Administration; 2b. Dept. of Oncology, Xinxiang Central Hospital, Xinxiang 453000, China
  • Received:2022-03-18 Online:2022-08-25 Published:2022-09-07

PDF (PC)

429

赞

摘要： 目的 对安宁疗护态度量表（Palliative Care Attitudes Scale,PCAS-9）进行汉化,并检验其信效度。方法 通过Brislin模型汉化量表,经过文化调适后,选取440名癌症晚期患者进行测试,检验量表的信度效度。结果 中文版安宁疗护态度量表共有9个条目,探索性因子分析提取3个公因子,累积方差贡献率为81.518%。验证性因子分析显示模型的各项指标均达到标准,模型拟合良好。总量表的Cronbach α系数为0.863,各个分量表的Cronbach α系数分别为0.875、0.901、0.872;2周后量表总的重测信度为0.862,各个分量表的重测信度为0.762、0.747、0.910。结论 中文版安宁疗护态度量表具有较好的信效度,可用于测评晚期癌症患者对安宁疗护的态度。

关键词: 晚期癌症患者, 安宁疗护态度量表, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To translate the Palliative Care Attitudes Scale (PCAS-9) and to test the reliability and validity. Methods The PCAS-9 was translated according to the Brislin translation model. After cultural adjustment, 440 patients with advanced cancer were selected to complete the scale to test the reliability and validity. Results The Chinese version of the scale consisted of 9 items. Exploratory factor analysis was used to extract three common factors, and the factor cumulative variance contribution rate was 81.518%. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that all the indicators of the model reached the criteria and the model fitted well. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total scale was 0.863, and the Cronbach's α coefficient of each subscale 0.875, 0.901, and 0.872, respectively. After 2 weeks, the total retest reliability of the scale was 0.862, and the retest reliability of each subscale was 0.762, 0.747, and 0.910 respectively. Conclusion The Chinese version of PCAS-9 had good reliability and validity and could be used to evaluate the attitudes toward palliative care in advanced cancer patients.

Key words: patient with advanced cancer, Palliative Care Attitudes Scale, reliability, validity

中图分类号: 

  • R473.73
[1] Kavalieratos D, Corbelli J, Zhang D, et al.Association Between Palliative Care and Patient and Caregiver Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. JAMA, 2016, 316(20):2104-2114. DOI:10.1001/jama.2016.16840.
[2] Fulton JJ, Leblanc TW, Cutson TM, et al.Integrated Outpatient Palliative Care for Patients with Advanced Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. Palliat Med, 2019, 33(2):123-134. DOI:10.1177/0269216318812633.
[3] Gaertner J, Siemens W, Meerpohl JJ, et al.Effect of Specialist Palliative Care Services on Quality of Life in Adults with Advanced Incurable Illness in Hospital, Hospice, or Community Settings: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. BMJ, 2017, 357: j2925. DOI:10.1136/bmj.j2925.
[4] Szekendi MK, Vaughn J, Lal A, et al.The Prevalence of Inpatients at 33 U.S. Hospitals Appropriate for and Receiving Referral to Palliative Care[J]. J Palliat Med, 2016, 19(4): 360-372. DOI:10.1089/jpm.2015.0236.
[5] Shalev A, Phongtankuel V, Kozlov E, et al.Awareness and Misperceptions of Hospice and Palliative Care: A Population-based Survey Study[J]. Am J Hosp Palliat Care, 2018, 35(3):431-439. DOI:10.1177/1049909117715215.
[6] Colins A, Mclachlan SA, Philip J.Initial Perceptions of Palliative Care:An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Patients with Advanced Cancer and Their Family Caregivers[J]. Palliat Med, 2017, 31(9):825-832. DOI:10.1177/0269216317696420.
[7] Omilion-hodges LM,Swords NM. The Grim Reaper, Hounds of Hell, and Dr. Death:The Role of Storytelling for Palliative Care in Competing Medical Meaning Systems[J]. Health Commun, 2017, 32(10):1272-1283.DOI:10.1080/10410236.2016.1219928.
[8] Heydari H, Hojjat-assari S, Almasian M, et al. Exploring Health Care Providers' Perceptions about Home-based Palliative Care in Terminally Ill Cancer Patients[J]. BMC Palliat Care,2019,18(1):66.DOI:10.1186/s12904-019-0452-3.
[9] Wang LP, Li YJ, Yan WZ, et al.Development and Psychometric Testing Chinese Version of the Frommelt Attitude Toward Care of the Dying Scale, form B in Nurses and Nursing Students[J]. J Cancer Educ, 2016, 31(1):123-130. DOI:10.1007/s13187-015-0810-7.
[10] Bushunow V, Alamgir L, Arnold RM, et al.Palliative Care Attitudes and Experiences among Resident Physicians at Historically Black Colleges and Universities[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2022, 63(1):106-111. DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.07.005.
[11] Milne D, Aranda S, Jefford M, et al.Development and Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Perceptions of Palliative Care[J]. Psychooncology, 2013, 22(4):940-946.DOI: 1 0.1002/pon.3071.
[12] Perry LM, Hoerger M, Malhotra S, et al.Development and Validation of the Palliative Care Attitudes Scale (PCAS-9): A Measure of Patient Attitudes toward Palliative Care[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2020, 59(2):293-301.DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.09.008.
[13] Santo RM, Ribeiro-ferreira F, Alves MR, et al. Enhancing the Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation Process: Linguistic and Psychometric Testing of the Brazilian-portuguese Version of a Self-report Measure for Dry Eye[J]. J Clin Epidemiol,2015,68(4):370-378.DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.07.009.
[14] 侯艳, 张云, 高蓉, 等. 恶性肿瘤患者疼痛认知量表的汉化和信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4):62-66. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.04.062.
[15] 李铮, 刘宇. 护理学研究方法[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012.
[16] Mosier CI, Mcquitty JV.Methods of Item Validation and Abacs for Item-test Correlation and Critical Ratio of Upper-lower Difference[J]. Psychometrika,1940,5(1):57-65.DOI: 10.1007/BF02288561.
[17] Grant J, Davis L, Health. Selection and Use of Content Experts for Instrument Development[J].Res Nurs Health, 1997, 20(3): 269-274. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199706)20:33.0.CO;2-G.
[18] 刘丽萍, 周春兰, 吴艳妮, 等. 情绪抑制量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(8):6-10. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.08.006.
[19] Bentler P, Bonett douglas G. Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures[J]. Psychol Bull, 1980, 88(3):588-606. DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588.
[20] Barbaranelli C, Lee C S, Vellone E, et al.The Problem with Cronbach's Alpha[J]. Nurs Res, 2015, 64(2):140-145.DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000079.
[21] Polit D F, Beck CT, Owen SV.Is the CVI an Acceptable Indicator of Content Validity? Appraisal and Recommendations[J]. Res Nurs Health, 2007, 30(4): 459-467. DOI: 10.1002/nur.20199.
[22] 邱皓政. 量化研究与统计分析:SPSS中文视窗版数据分析范例解析[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2009.
[23] 李冬, 余丽丽, 张维, 等. 中文版医疗社会支持量表应用于不孕症患者的信效度分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(20): 66-70. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.20.066.
[24] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务:SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010.
[25] 史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2012, 37(2):152-155. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7347.2012.02.007.
[26] Field A.Discovering Statistics Using SPSS[M]. United Kingdom:Sage Publications Ltd, 2005.
[27] Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guilemin F.Guidelines for the Process of Cross-cultural Adaptation of Self-report Measures[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2000, 25(24):3186-3191. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
[28] Brislin R.Back-translation for Cross-cultural Research[J]. J Crosscult Psychol,1970, 1(3):185-216.DOI:10.1177/135910457000100301.
[29] 信博, 赵秋利, 王楠楠, 等. 消化系统癌症高危人群预防主动行为测评量表的编制与信效度评价[J].护理学报, 2021, 28(5):6-11. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.05.006.
[30] 王琦, 李领侠, 和巾杰, 等. 医护人员低血糖症知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9):9-13. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.09.009.
[1] 李慧, 潘玲, 李博, 刘晓辉. 患者安全胜任力自评量表的汉化及其在实习护生中的信效度评价[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(9): 47-51.
[2] 徐立敏, 钱志刚. 临床带教教师隐性知识共享量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(15): 24-27.
[3] 叶孝灵, 周春兰, 黄丛萍, 刘志红, 吴明秀, 邓水娟, 刘瑜, 杨丽潇, 王润. 脑卒中后失能综合评估量表的汉化与信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(11): 65-69.
[4] 张正敏, 左倩倩, 冯现刚, 梁素娟, 魏红云, 高钰琳. ICU护士职业死亡回避量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(1): 53-57.
[5] 王琦, 李领侠, 和巾杰, 郑华东, 米晓芬, 胡艳粉. 医护人员低血糖症知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9): 9-13.
[6] 郑丹丹, 任静, 李艳, 徐倩. 母亲感知育儿自我效能量表的汉化及其在早产儿母亲中的信效度研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9): 54-57.
[7] 刘瑜, 周春兰, 周君桂, 邓水娟, 何任红. 神经源性膀胱患者自我管理量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 64-68.
[8] 信博, 赵秋利, 王楠楠, 马得欣, 邢慧, 吴燕妮, 于洋. 消化系统癌症高危人群预防主动行为测评量表的编制与信效度评价[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(5): 6-11.
[9] 侯艳, 张云, 高蓉, 刘宝吉, 赵卿. 恶性肿瘤患者疼痛认知量表的汉化和信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 62-66.
[10] 夏杰, 段霞, 张佳男, 于婵, 王可可. 高危孕产妇病情预警评估表的构建及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 67-72.
[11] 张珊珊, 李惠萍, 宋江艳, 周梦珂, 高杰, 李嘉欣. 乳腺癌患者家庭韧性评估量表的汉化及信效度研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(24): 1-5.
[12] 李艳清, 张晓梅, 徐秀群. Skidmore焦虑病耻感量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(24): 17-21.
[13] 徐凌霞, 李爱仙. 自我调节疲劳量表用于腹膜透析患者的信度效度分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(20): 11-15.
[14] 周晓娟, 马礼坤, 张理想, 詹玲, 赵梅. 12条目药物依从性评估量表在高血压患者中的信度效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(18): 46-49.
[15] 唐鹤, 乔宇, 朱佳美, 张敏. 中文版老年人睡眠类药物使用情况调查问卷的跨文化调适[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(17): 11-14.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
[1] 张冬梅, 张林, 黄安乐, 周志庆, 刘欢. 抗击新型冠状病毒肺炎医护人员创伤后应激障碍的评估和干预进展[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(14): 26 -30 .
[2] 郑俊俊, 于卫华, 闫亭. 医养结合型养老机构的老年人久坐行为及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(15): 1 -6 .
[3] 赖先婷, 易子涵, 李茜, 张杰兰, 徐铁飞, 佘程宏, 鞠梅. 老化期望及自我效能在家庭功能与孤独间的中介调节效应分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(15): 7 -13 .
[4] 石海宁, 陈玲, 周丽静, 王黎. 乳腺癌术后患者快速康复护理敏感质量指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(15): 14 -18 .
[5] 邵李姣, 王俊霞, 吴田瑞, 赵煜华, 葛淑怡, 张瑞星. 肠造口患者社会疏离现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(15): 19 -23 .
[6] 徐立敏, 钱志刚. 临床带教教师隐性知识共享量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(15): 24 -27 .
[7] 靳玉萍, 庄红霞, 陈霞, 范小宁, 马雯, 危志娟. 神经重症专科护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(15): 28 -32 .
[8] 陈雯雯, 刘霞, 黄冬兰, 周春燕, 陈亮. 消毒供应中心腔镜器械信息化可拆卸图谱库的制作与应用[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(15): 33 -35 .
[9] 吴秀梅, 徐宁君, 李晓红, 周瑾. “组团式”紧密型帮扶提升基层中医院护士中医护理服务能力的实践[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(15): 36 -38 .
[10] 刘晓丽, 贾平, 温贤秀, 黄霞红, 吴际军. 我国ICU护士隐性缺勤现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(16): 1 -5 .