以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (24): 17-21.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.24.017

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

Skidmore焦虑病耻感量表的汉化及信效度检验

李艳清1, 张晓梅2, 徐秀群2   

  1. 1.南通大学医学院护理学院,江苏 南通 226000;
    2.南通大学附属医院,江苏 南通 226000
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-26 出版日期:2021-12-25 发布日期:2022-01-11
  • 通讯作者: 徐秀群（1966-）,女,江苏通州人,本科学历,主任护师,护理部副主任。E-mail：tyxiuqun@126.com
  • 作者简介:李艳清（1998-）,女,江苏徐州人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    南通市社会民生科技计划-面上项目（MS12020011）

Translation of the Skidmore Anxiety Stigma Scale and Its Reliability and Validity

LI Yan-qing1, ZHANG Xiao-mei2, XU Xiu-qun2   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Nantong University Medical School, Nantong 226000, China;
    2. Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong 226000, China
  • Received:2021-08-26 Online:2021-12-25 Published:2022-01-11

PDF (PC)

149

赞

摘要： 目的 汉化Skidmore焦虑病耻感量表,并检验其信度和效度。方法 遵循Brislin翻译指南对英文版量表进行汉化,采用德尔菲专家函询法进行文化调适,形成中文版Skidmore焦虑病耻感量表。于南通大学附属医院健康管理中心随机招募自评为焦虑症的405例参与者进行问卷调查,运用SPSS 26.0和AMOS 26.0对数据进行统计分析,检验中文版Skidmore焦虑病耻感量表的信度和效度。结果 中文版Skidmore焦虑病耻感量表共7个条目,总内容效度指数为0.902,各条目的内容效度指数为0.833~1.000;探索性因子分析提取2个公因子,累积方差贡献率为54.754%;校标关联效度显示中文版Skidmore焦虑病耻感量表得分与贬低-歧视感知量表、寻求专业心理帮助态度量表得分呈中度相关,相关系数分别为0.425,-0.460;量表的Cronbach α 系数为0.719,重测信度为0.855。验证性因子分析显示模型结构拟合良好。结论 中文版Skidmore焦虑病耻感量表具有良好的信效度,可作为评估我国焦虑症患者病耻感情况的调查工具。

关键词: 焦虑, 病耻感, 汉化, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To translate The Skidmore Anxiety Stigma Scale (SASS) and test its reliability and validity. Methods The scale was translated withBrislin’s classic model for translation, and the Delphi method was used for cultural adjustment. A total of 405 participants with self-reported anxiety were randomly recruited from the Health Management Center of Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University to conduct a questionnaire survey. SPSS 26.0 and AMOS 26.0 were used for statistical analysis of the data to test the reliability and validity of the translated scale. Results There were 7 items in the Chinese version of SASS. The content validity index(S-CVI) was 0.902, and the content validity index of each item(I-CVI) 0.833~1.000. Two common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 54.754%. The criterion validity showed that the scores of The Chinese Version of Skidmore Anxiety stigma Scale were moderately correlated with the scores of the Perceived Devaluation-Discrimination Scale and the Attitudes Towards Seeking Professional Psychological Help, with the correlation coefficients of 0.425 and -0.460 respectively. The Cronbach α coefficient of the scale was 0.719 and the retest reliability 0.855. Confirmatory factor analysis shows that the model fitted well. Conclusion The Chinese version of Skidmore Anxiety Stigma Scale has good reliability and validity, and it can be used as an investigation tool to evaluate the stigma of patients with anxiety in China.

Key words: anxiety, stigma, translation, reliability, validity

中图分类号: 

  • R471
[1] 秦知航,陈莹,彭玲. 抑郁症患者病耻感与自我和谐、正念水平及应对方式的关系研究[J].护理管理杂志, 2021,21(6):392-396. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-315x.2021.06.003.
[2] 汤明文,张燕红,刘寿娟.425例住院缓解期精神分裂症患者病耻感现状及影响因素分析[J].护理学报,2019,26(14):43-47.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.14.043.
[3] Schofield CA, Ponzini GT.The Skidmore Anxiety Stigma Scale (SASS): A Covert and Brief Self-report Measure[J]. J Anxiety Disord,2020,74:102259.DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102259.
[4] Vannucci A, Flannery KM, Ohannessian CM.Social Media Use and Anxiety in Emerging Adults[J]. J Affect Disord,2017,207:163-166. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.040.
[5] 陈佳伟,岑慧红,林建葵,等.精神分裂症患者孤独感与病耻感的调查分析[J].护理学报,2017, 24(1):14-17. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2017.01.014.
[6] 孔雪燕,郝志红.寻求专业性心理帮助态度问卷简版的修订[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2018,27(3):281-284. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.2018.03.019.
[7] Brislin RW.Back-translation for Cross-cultural Research[J]. J Cross Cult Psychol, 1970,1(3):185-216.DOI:10.1177/135910457000100301.
[8] 孔海燕,章新琼,张洪辉,等.2型糖尿病患者心脏病知识问卷的汉化及信效度研究[J].护理学报,2021, 28(15):1-4.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.15.001.
[9] Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al.Guidelines for the Process of Cross-cultural Adaptation of Self-report Measures[J]. Spine,2000,25(24):3186-3191.DOI:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
[10] 李月仪,陈伟菊.德尔菲法在护理管理学中的应用现状[J].护理研究,2018, 32(21):3339-3341.DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2018.21.006.
[11] 朱红兵. 问卷调查及统计分析方法:基于SPSS[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2019.5.
[12] Almanasreh E, Moles R, Chen TF.Evaluation of Methods Used for Estimating Content Validity[J]. Res Social Adm Pharm ,2019,15(2):214-221. DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066.
[13] 胡鹏,路红,马子程. 验证性因子分析中允许误差相关的可行性与条件性[J]. 统计与决策, 2018, 34(19):37-41. DOI:10.13546/j.Cnki.Tjyjc.2018.19.00.
[14] 胡雁,王志稳. 护理研究[M]. 5 版. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2017.
[15] Schnyder N, Panczak R, Groth N, et al.Association Between Mental Health-related Stigma and Active Help- seeking: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. Br J Psychiatry,2017,210(4):261-268.DOI:10.1192/bjp.bp.116.189464.
[1] 王琦, 李领侠, 和巾杰, 郑华东, 米晓芬, 胡艳粉. 医护人员低血糖症知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9): 9-13.
[2] 郑丹丹, 任静, 李艳, 徐倩. 母亲感知育儿自我效能量表的汉化及其在早产儿母亲中的信效度研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9): 54-57.
[3] 刘瑜, 周春兰, 周君桂, 邓水娟, 何任红. 神经源性膀胱患者自我管理量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 64-68.
[4] 李爱军, 姚淳, 邝春燕, 谭行华, 林路平. 耳穴压豆联合八段锦对新型冠状病毒肺炎康复期患者焦虑抑郁的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(6): 48-52.
[5] 周静, 毛嘉钰, 丁倍, 郑惠, 王君婧. 多维状态无聊在本科护生社交网络中的社会比较与错失焦虑间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(6): 43-47.
[6] 信博, 赵秋利, 王楠楠, 马得欣, 邢慧, 吴燕妮, 于洋. 消化系统癌症高危人群预防主动行为测评量表的编制与信效度评价[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(5): 6-11.
[7] 侯艳, 张云, 高蓉, 刘宝吉, 赵卿. 恶性肿瘤患者疼痛认知量表的汉化和信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 62-66.
[8] 徐思英, 黄莹, 刘丽华, 胡雅. 基于互联网认知行为疗法对产妇负性情绪干预效果的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 36-42.
[9] 夏杰, 段霞, 张佳男, 于婵, 王可可. 高危孕产妇病情预警评估表的构建及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 67-72.
[10] 张珊珊, 李惠萍, 宋江艳, 周梦珂, 高杰, 李嘉欣. 乳腺癌患者家庭韧性评估量表的汉化及信效度研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(24): 1-5.
[11] 陈凌, 申铁梅, 赖敏华, 郭金花, 廖瑶姬, 黄晶, 李惠平. 住院冠心病患者心理护理专家共识[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(22): 45-51.
[12] 徐凌霞, 李爱仙. 自我调节疲劳量表用于腹膜透析患者的信度效度分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(20): 11-15.
[13] 何毅, 陶晶晶. 正念认知疗法对喉癌术后患者癌因性疲乏及情绪感受的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(2): 69-72.
[14] 周晓娟, 马礼坤, 张理想, 詹玲, 赵梅. 12条目药物依从性评估量表在高血压患者中的信度效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(18): 46-49.
[15] 唐鹤, 乔宇, 朱佳美, 张敏. 中文版老年人睡眠类药物使用情况调查问卷的跨文化调适[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(17): 11-14.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!