临床带教教师隐性知识共享量表的编制及信效度检验

doi:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.15.024

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的编制适用于临床教学领域的隐性知识共享量表并检验其信效度。方法查阅相关文献以SECI模型为理论框架,辅以质性访谈汇总主题形成量表条目池,经过专家函询和预调查形成临床带教教师隐性知识共享的测试量表。于2021年11月—2022年2月采用便利抽样法,选取安徽省三级甲等综合性医院的325名临床带教教师进行问卷调查并检验量表的信效度。结果结构效度检验中探索性因子分析共提取2个公因子,各因子载荷均>0.500,累计方差贡献率为61.428%;验证性因子分析中各模型拟合指标良好;内容效度检验中2次专家函询中的平均内容效度指数分别为0.930、0.986。信度检验中量表的 Cronbach α 系数为0.761,折半信度系数为 0.775,重测信度系数为0.996。结论临床带教教师隐性知识共享量表信效度较好,分为2个维度和8个条目,可作为临床带教教师评估隐性知识共享水平的测评工具。

关键词: 临床带教教师, 隐性知识共享, 量表编制, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To construct a tacit knowledge sharing scale for clinical teaching and test its reliability and validity. Methods With the SECI model as the theoretical framework, combined with literature review and semi-structured interviews, the initial item pool was formed, and the test scale of tacit knowledge sharing of clinical teachers was formed after expert consultation and pre-investigation. Convenience sampling was used to conduct a questionnaire survey among 325 clinical teachers in tertiary grade-A general hospitals in Anhui Province from November 2021 to February 2022, and the reliability and validity were tested. Results In validity test, exploratory factor analysis extracted two common factors with factor load greater than 0.500, and cumulative variance contribution rate was 61.428%; in confirmatory factor analysis, the fitting indexes of each model were good. The average content validity index of the two-round expert consultation in the content validity test was 0.930 and 0.986, respectively. Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.761; split-half reliability coefficient 0.775, and the test-retest reliability coefficient 0.996. Conclusion The constructed clinical teachers' tacit knowledge sharing scale consists of two dimensions and eight items. The scale has good reliability and validity and can be used as a tool to evaluate tacit knowledge sharing in clinical teachers.

Key words: clinical teacher, tacit knowledge sharing, scale construction, reliability, validity

中图分类号:

徐立敏, 钱志刚. 临床带教教师隐性知识共享量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(15): 24-27.

XU Li-min, Qian Zhi-gang. Construction of Clinical Teachers' Tacit Knowledge Sharing Scale and Its Reliability and Validity[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2022, 29(15): 24-27.

参考文献

[1] Yoo KH, Zhang YA, Yun EK. Registered Nurses (RNs)' Knowledge Sharing and Decision-making: The Mediating Role of Organizational Trust[J].Int Nurs Rev, 2019, 66(2):234-241.DOI: 10.1111/inr.12488.
[2] Lunden A, Teräs M, Kvist T,et al.A Systematic Review of Factors Influencing Knowledge Management and the Nurse Leaders' Role[J].J Nurs Manag, 2017,25(6):407-420.DOI: 10.1111/jonm.12478.
[3] Wong CSY, Chan HYL, Aboo G, et al.Associations of Preceptors' Training Needs with Clinical Teaching Experience and Training Received[J].Contin Educ Nurs, 2022, 53(4):165-170.DOI:10.3928/00220124-20220311-06.
[4] Rodrigues NG, Han CQY, Devi KM, et al.Perspectives of Nurse Preceptors on a Web-based Clinical Pedagogy Program and Clinical Teaching: A Descriptive Qualitative Study[J].Nurs Health Sci, 2022, 24(1):214-223.DOI:10.1111/nhs.12916.
[5] Van Den Heuvel SCGH, Goossens PJJ, Terlouw C,et al.Self-Management Education for Bipolar Disorders: A Hermeneutic-phenomenological Study on the Tacit Knowledge of Mental Health Nurses[J].Issues Ment Health Nurs, 2019,40(11):942-950.DOI:10.1080/01612840.2019.1636166.
[6] 郑雯,丑安,张礼宾,等.高职护生隐性知识能力评价体系的构建研究[J].护理学报,2018,25(20):31-36.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.20.031.
[7] 李晓霞,周春兰,胡明钰,等.基于在线沟通的护理硕士研究生对临床带教需求的质性研究[J].护理学报,2019,26(11):24-27.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.11.024.
[8] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务-SPSS 操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2010:181-244.
[9] 何红艳,周体,曾登芬,等.临床护理教师胜任力评价量表的研制及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2020,27(24):11-14.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.24.011.
[10] 刘瑜,周春兰,周君桂,等.神经源性膀胱患者自我管理量表的编制及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2021,28(07):64-68.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.07.064.
[11] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型-AMOS 的操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2010:37-62.
[12] Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Wood TJ, et al.The Use of the Delphi and Other Consensus Group Methods in Medical Education Research: A Review[J].Acad Med, 2017, 92(10):1491-1498.DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000001812.
[13] 唐鹤,乔宇,朱佳美,等.中文版老年人睡眠类药物使用情况调查问卷的跨文化调适[J].护理学报,2021,28(17):11-14.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.17.011.
[14] 李玉,刘俐惠,石增霞,等.中文版肿瘤信息满意度量表在头颈肿瘤患者中的信效度分析[J].护理学报, 2019,26(9):10-15.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.09.010.
[15] 鄢建军,杨建国,江燕,等.临床护理人员创新能力评价量表的构建及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志, 2018, 53(10):1213-1217.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2018.10.011.

相关文章 15

[1]	李慧, 潘玲, 李博, 刘晓辉. 患者安全胜任力自评量表的汉化及其在实习护生中的信效度评价[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(9): 47-51.
[2]	杨丽潇, 周春兰, 屠燕, 谢翠华, 吴艳妮, 叶孝灵, 王润. 老年慢性病患者健康赋能需求评估量表的研制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 67-71.
[3]	刘凯莉, 罗艳艳, 姚桂英, 朱智玲, 郭华, 杜诣深, 秦立伟, 吴慧敏, 李佳波. 晚期癌症患者安宁疗护态度量表的汉化及信效度分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(16): 11-16.
[4]	叶孝灵, 周春兰, 黄丛萍, 刘志红, 吴明秀, 邓水娟, 刘瑜, 杨丽潇, 王润. 脑卒中后失能综合评估量表的汉化与信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(11): 65-69.
[5]	张正敏, 左倩倩, 冯现刚, 梁素娟, 魏红云, 高钰琳. ICU护士职业死亡回避量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(1): 53-57.
[6]	王琦, 李领侠, 和巾杰, 郑华东, 米晓芬, 胡艳粉. 医护人员低血糖症知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9): 9-13.
[7]	郑丹丹, 任静, 李艳, 徐倩. 母亲感知育儿自我效能量表的汉化及其在早产儿母亲中的信效度研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9): 54-57.
[8]	刘瑜, 周春兰, 周君桂, 邓水娟, 何任红. 神经源性膀胱患者自我管理量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 64-68.
[9]	信博, 赵秋利, 王楠楠, 马得欣, 邢慧, 吴燕妮, 于洋. 消化系统癌症高危人群预防主动行为测评量表的编制与信效度评价[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(5): 6-11.
[10]	侯艳, 张云, 高蓉, 刘宝吉, 赵卿. 恶性肿瘤患者疼痛认知量表的汉化和信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 62-66.
[11]	夏杰, 段霞, 张佳男, 于婵, 王可可. 高危孕产妇病情预警评估表的构建及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 67-72.
[12]	张珊珊, 李惠萍, 宋江艳, 周梦珂, 高杰, 李嘉欣. 乳腺癌患者家庭韧性评估量表的汉化及信效度研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(24): 1-5.
[13]	李艳清, 张晓梅, 徐秀群. Skidmore焦虑病耻感量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(24): 17-21.
[14]	徐凌霞, 李爱仙. 自我调节疲劳量表用于腹膜透析患者的信度效度分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(20): 11-15.
[15]	周晓娟, 马礼坤, 张理想, 詹玲, 赵梅. 12条目药物依从性评估量表在高血压患者中的信度效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(18): 46-49.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared