以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (18): 6-10.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.18.006

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

膝关节骨性关节炎患者日常生活困难评估量表的汉化及信效度检验

侯爱琳1, 宁宁1,2, 陈佳丽1,2, 李佩芳2, 张林2, 谢艳1, 朱红彦2, 屈俊宏2   

  1. 1.四川大学华西护理学院,四川 成都 610041;
    2.四川大学华西医院 骨科,四川 成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-14 出版日期:2023-09-25 发布日期:2023-10-11
  • 通讯作者: 宁宁（1964-）,女,四川遂宁人,本科学历,主任护师,硕士研究生导师,护理学科主任。E-mail：gkningning@126.com
  • 作者简介:侯爱琳（1996-）,女,陕西汉中人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,护师。
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科学技术厅重点研发项目（2021YFS0068）

Translation of Difficulties in Daily Life of Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee Scale and its reliability and validity

HOU Ai-lin1, NING Ning1,2, CHEN Jia-li1,2, LI Pei-fang2, ZHANG Lin2, XIE Yan1, ZHU Hong-yan2, QU Jun-hong2   

  1. 1. West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041, China;
    2. Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2023-03-14 Online:2023-09-25 Published:2023-10-11

PDF (PC)

356

赞

摘要： 目的 汉化膝关节骨性关节炎患者日常生活困难评估量表并检验信效度。方法 依据Brislin翻译方法对量表进行翻译、回译、跨文化调适;采用便利抽样法对2022年4—12月成都市某三级甲等医院骨科的 450例膝关节骨性关节炎患者进行调查,运用SPSS 25.0 和AMOS 24.0完成量表的项目分析、信效度检验。结果 中文版膝关节骨性关节炎患者日常生活困难评估量表共包含3个维度14个条目,条目的内容效度指数为0.818~1.000,量表的内容效度指数为 0.909,探索性因子分析提取3个公因子,累计方差贡献率为 60.019%;验证性因子分析结果显示,模型拟合可接受,具有较好的结构效度。中文版量表Cronbach α系数为0.891,折半信度为0.861,2周重测信度为0.764,各维度Cronbach α系数为0.779~0.818。结论 中文版膝关节骨性关节炎患者日常生活困难评估量表具备良好的信效度,可作为我国膝关节骨性关节炎患者日常生活困难的有效评估工具。

关键词: 膝关节, 骨性关节炎, 日常生活困难评估量表, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To translate Difficulties in the Daily Life of Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee Scale (DDLKOS) into Chinese and to test its reliability and validity. Methods The scale was translated, back-translated, and cross-culturally adapted according to Brislin translation model. A total of 450 patients with knee osteoarthritis in a tertiary grade-A hospital in Chengdu were selected using convenience sampling from April to December 2022 to analyze the reliability and validity of the scale, and the item analysis and reliability and validity test were completed by using SPSS 25.0 and AMOS 24.0. Results The Chinese version of DDLKOS consisted of 14 items in 3 dimensions. Content validity index at the item level was 0.818~1.000, and that at the scale level 0.909. Exploratory factor analysis extracted 3 common factors with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 60.019%. Validation factor analysis showed that model fitting was good and had good structural validity. Cronbach a coefficient of the scale was 0.891, with a half Cronbach α of 0.861 and a 2-week retest reliability of 0.764. Cronbach α coefficient of each dimension ranged from 0.779 to 0.818. Conclusion The Chinese version of DDLKOS has good reliability and validity, and can be used for the assessment of difficulties in the daily life of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee in China.

Key words: knee, osteoarthritis, Difficulties in the Daily Life of Patients with Osteoarthritis of the Knee Scale, reliability, validity

中图分类号: 

  • R473.6
[1] 李慕聪,吴婵媛,冷晓梅.小症状,大负担:骨关节炎流行病学概述[J]. 中华临床免疫和变态反应杂志,2022,16(3):331. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8705.2022.03.024.
[2] Turner MN, Hernandez DO, Cade W, et al.The role of resistance training dosing on pain and physical function in individuals with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review[J]. Sports Health, 2020, 12(2):200-206.DOI:10.1177/1941738119887183.
[3] Van Doormaal MCM, Meerhoff GA, Vliet Vlieland TPM, et al.A clinical practice guideline for physical therapy in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis[J]. Musculoskeletal Care, 2020, 18(4):575-595. DOI: 10.1002/msc.1492.
[4] Xie F, Li SC, Goeree R, et al.Validation of Chinese Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in patients scheduled for total knee replacement[J]. Qual Life Res.2008,17(4):595-601.DOI:10.1007/s11136-008-9340-7.
[5] 徐守宇,姚新苗,吴燕,等. 汉化版日本膝关节骨关节炎功能评估量表的信度研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志,2014,29(8):723-725. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2014.08.006.
[6] Zhao R, Ji Y, Li JJ, et al.Pain empathy and its association with the clinical pain in knee osteoarthritis patients[J]. J Pain Res. 2022, 15:4017-4027. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S379305.[7] Vitaloni M, Botto-van Bemden A, Sciortino Contreras RM, et al. Global management of patients with knee osteoarthritis begins with quality of life assessment: a systematic review[J]. BMC musculoskeletal disord, 2019,20(1):1-12.DOI10.1186/s12891-019-2895-3.
[8] Tanimura C, Morimoto M, Hiramatsu K, et al.Difficulties in the daily life of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: scale development and descriptive study[J]. J Clin Nurs.2011,20(5-6):743-753. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03536.x.
[9] Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al.Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures[J]. Spine,2000,25(24):3186-3191.DOI:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014.
[10] 叶孝灵,周春兰,黄丛萍,等.脑卒中后失能综合评估量表的汉化与信效度检验[J].护理学报,2022,29(11):65-69. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.11.065.
[11] 王文娜,张振香,张杜杜,等. 照顾者对脑卒中患者自我护理贡献量表的编制及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志,2023,58(1):39-45. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2023.01.005.
[12] Ali MU, Harkness K, Vellone E, et al.The Caregiver Contribution to Heart Failure Self-care Instrument: further psychometric testing in a European sample[J]. J Cardiovasc Nurs,2022, 37(6):E187-E196.DOI:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000860.
[13] 罗伯特. F. 德威利斯. 量表编制:理论与应用[M]. 席仲恩, 杜珏,译. 3版. 重庆:重庆大学出版社,2016:61-167.
[14] 刘凯莉,罗艳艳,姚桂英,等. 晚期癌症患者安宁疗护态度量表的汉化及信效度分析[J]. 护理学报,2022,29(16):11-16. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.16.011.
[15] Alavi M, Visentin DC, Thapa DK, et al.Exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis in clinical studies: which one should you use[J]. J Adv Nurs. 2020, 76(8):1886-1889.DOI: 10.1111/jan.14377.
[16] Shi D, DiStefano C, Maydeu-Olivares A, et al. Evaluating SEM Model fit with small degrees of freedom[J].Multivariate Behav Res. 2022, 57(2-3):179-207. DOI:10.1080/00273171.2020.1868965.
[17] 邱皓政,林碧芳. 结构方程模型的原理与应用[M]. 北京:中国轻工业出版社, 2019:91-99.
[18] 钟海燕,殷锋. IBM SPSS 统计分析与应用[M]. 北京:中国经济出版社, 2018:205-217.
[19] Izquierdo I, Olea J, Abad FJ.Exploratory factor analysis in validation studies:uses and recommendations[J]. Psicothema, 2014,26(3):395-400.DOI:10.7334/psicothema2013.349.
[20] Iheme L, Hirdes JP, Geffen L, et al.Psychometric properties, feasibility, and acceptability of the self-reported interRAI check-up assessment[J].J Am Med Dir Assoc,2022,23(1):117-121. DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2021.06.008.
[21] 朱清,彭兰雅,彭一,等. 医务人员医患沟通能力及防御性医疗行为影响因素的结构方程模型研究[J]. 中国卫生质量管理,2023,30(1):56-61. DOI:10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2023.30.1.13.
[22] 查慧贤,严红云,刘扣英,等. 公众健康积极指数量表汉化及在慢性病患者中的信效度研究[J]. 护理学杂志,2023,38(2):104-107.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2023.02.104.
[23] Pereira D, Severo M, Ramos E, et al.Potential role of age, sex, body mass index and pain to identify patients with knee osteoarthritis[J]. Int J Rheum Dis, 2017, 20(2):190-198. DOI:10.1111/1756-185X.12611.
[24] Deshpande BR, Katz JN, Solomon DH, et al.Number of persons with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in the US: impact of race and ethnicity, age, sex, and obesity[J]. Arthritis Care Res, 2016, 68(12):1743-1750. DOI:10.1002/acr.22897.
[25] 张琬婷,王红. 中国45岁及以上年龄城乡社区居民的听力残疾患病率调查[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2021,29(3):243-247. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2021.03.002.
[26] 刘艳君. 社区50岁以上人群眼健康筛查的结果分析[J]. 中国卫生标准管理,2020, 11(22):17-20. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2020.22.007.
[27] 刘晴,黄哲宙,郭雁飞,等. 中国50岁及以上人群心脑血管疾病和认知功能的关联[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志,2021,25(3):295-299. DOI:10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2021.03.009.
[1] 候莹鸽, 李好正, 侯云霞, 汪子寒, 李静, 王松梅, 赵亚杰, 阎玲. 食管癌术后患者胃食管反流自我管理测评量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 12-17.
[2] 马珠月, 姚珊珊, 史妍妍, 陆宁宁, 邾萍, 程芳. 女性乳腺癌患者淋巴水肿风险感知评估问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 1-5.
[3] 董世攀, 梁小英, 黄兰怡, 梁善英, 梁锦波, 代炜, 赵玉玲, 黄沂. 功能性腹胀患者健康促进行为量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 11-15.
[4] 苗康康, 陈勤. 儿童环境健康知识和技能问卷的汉化及信效度分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(2): 17-22.
[5] 沈傲梅, 朱飞, 张丽媛, 卞静如, 路潜, 强万敏, 符鑫, 张紫娟, 张力川. 修订版简版淋巴水肿疾病感知问卷在乳腺癌手术患者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(18): 54-59.
[6] 李娜, 黄懿炘, 刘美兰, 邓银辉, 邹小芳. 老年人健康促进行为量表的汉化及信效度评价[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 5-10.
[7] 苏闪闪, 董又鸣, 郑蔚, 王丹丹, 刘梦丽, 刘贺, 瞿小凤, 张苇. 癌症患者社会疏离测评问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 51-56.
[8] 蔡倩, 罗雯, 孙欣鑫, 陈荣, 宋慧子, 蔡业鹏, 张漪然, 廖月霞. 进食自我调节问卷的汉化及其在学龄前儿童中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(15): 11-15.
[9] 花芸, 王雯沁, 刘志梅, 冯国和, 杜沫晗. 癌症患者PICC置管支持性照护需求量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(15): 23-28.
[10] 蒋新艳, 来伟, 章晓玲, 蒋玉婷, 邓飞娜. 手术室环境对膝关节镜检查术患者等待期应激反应的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(14): 65-69.
[11] 周贵玲, 徐蓉, 边旭娜, 郑维. 中青年2型糖尿病患者健康素养量表的研制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(14): 73-78.
[12] 孙梦晨, 冯芳茗, 何佳倩, 范思雨, 杨颖, 季佳妮. 癌症患者自杀风险评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(13): 13-17.
[13] 牟静静, 任吉, 张彬彬, 门肖霞, 朱亚飞, 王亚男, 张鑫, 胡海燕, 赵晓甦. 直肠癌保肛术后患者盆底康复训练知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(13): 65-68.
[14] 张佳惠, 庞书勤, 洪雪珮, 郑智慧, 李绵利, 黄钰峰, 王炜骏. 老年前期人群退休规划过程量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(10): 1-6.
[15] 张慧鑫, 蔡卫新, 邢娅娜, 王翠雪, 尹志科, 张俊丽, 典慧娟, 林笑女. 护士心理韧性相关执业环境因素评估量表的构建及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(1): 53-59.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!