以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (17): 1-6.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.17.001

• 研究生园地 •    下一篇

无症状高尿酸血症患者尿酸管理保护动机问卷的编制及信效度检验

陈赟, 伍跃婷, 叶美霞, 刘锐, 钟印芹, 程萌, 魏珍娜   

  1. 广州中医药大学深圳医院（福田）内分泌科,广东 深圳 518034
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-04 出版日期:2022-09-10 发布日期:2022-10-10
  • 通讯作者: 钟印芹（1969-）,女,吉林长春人,本科,主任护师,硕士研究生导师,副院长。E-mail：641296484@qq.com.
  • 作者简介:陈赟（1986-）,女,广东汕头人,硕士,副主任护师,护士长。
  • 基金资助:
    广东省中医药局科研项目（20211338）; 深圳市福田区卫生科研公益性项目（FTWS2019043）

Development of Questionnaire of Protective Motivation for Uric Acid Management in Patients with Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia and Its Reliability and Validity

CHEN Yun, WU Yue-ting, YE Mei-xia, LIU Rui, ZHONG Yin-qin, CHENG Meng, WEI Zhen-na   

  1. Dept. of Endocrinology,Shenzhen Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen 518034, China
  • Received:2022-07-04 Online:2022-09-10 Published:2022-10-10

PDF (PC)

219

赞

摘要： 目的 编制无症状高尿酸血症患者尿酸管理保护动机问卷,并检验信效度。方法 以保护动机理论为指导,通过文献分析、半结构式访谈、德尔菲专家函询、预调查编制问卷初稿。通过咨询16名专家及调查318例无症状高尿酸血症患者对问卷的信度、效度进行检验。结果 最终形成的无症状高尿酸血症患者尿酸管理保护动机问卷包括7个维度,共34个条目,问卷总体内容效度指数（S-CVI）为0.832,条目水平的内容效度指数（I-CVI）为0.814~1;总Cronbach α系数为0.833,各维度的Cronbach α系数为0.782~0.845;总的折半信度为0.819,各维度折半信度为0.729~0.825;组合信度系数为0.793~0.865。探索性因子分析提取7个公因子,共同解释变异量为72.227%;验证性因子分析显示χ2/df=1.503、RMSEA=0.049、RMR=0.026、CFI=0.919、GFI=0.862、AGFI=0.875、IFI=0.921、TLI=0.910,模型拟合度良好。结论 无症状高尿酸血症患者尿酸管理保护动机问卷信度、效度检验结果良好,条目内容易于患者理解与接受,可作为临床无症状高尿酸血症患者尿酸管理认知及行为的评价工具。

关键词: 无症状, 高尿酸血症, 尿酸管理, 保护动机理论, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To develop a questionnaire of protective motivation for uric acid management in patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia and to test the reliability and validity. Methods Guided by the theory of protective motivation, the preliminary questionnaire was prepared by literature analysis, semi-structured interview, Delphi expert consultation and pre-survey. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire were tested by consulting 16 experts and investigating 318 patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia. Results The final questionnaire of protective motivation for uric acid management in patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia consisted of 7 dimensions, with 34 items in total. The overall content validity index (S-CVI) of the questionnaire was 0.832, and the item-level content validity index (I-CVI) 0.814~1. The total Cronbach α coefficient was 0.833, and the Cronbach α coefficient of each dimension ranged from 0.782 to 0.845. The total split-half reliability was 0.819, and the split-half reliability of each dimension ranged from 0.729 to 0.825. The combined reliability coefficients ranged from 0.793 to 0.865. Seven common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, which explained 72.227% of the variation. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that χ2/df=1.503, RMSEA=0.049, RMR=0.026, CFI=0.919, GFI=0.862, AGFI=0.875, IFI=0.921, TLI=0.910, and the model fit was good. Conclusion The questionnaire has good reliability and validity and it is easy for the patients to understand. It can be used as a tool to evaluate the cognition and behavior of uric acid management in patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia.

Key words: asymptomatic, hyperuricemia, uric acid management, protection motivation theory, reliability, validity

中图分类号: 

  • R471
[1] Johnson RJ, Bakris GL, Borghi C, et al.Hyperuricemia, Acute and Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension, and Cardiovascular Disease:Report of a Scientific Workshop Organized by the National Kidney Foundation[J]. Am J Kidney Dis,2018,71(6):851-865. DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd. 2017.12.009.
[2] 周智超,王凌霄.无症状高尿酸血症研究进展[J].中国医师进修杂志,2022,45(7):657-661.
[3] 袁萍. 自我管理模式在高尿酸血症患者中的应用价值[J].中国继续医学教育,2020,12(28):108-111.
[4] Yao X, Zhang L, Du J, et al.Effect of Information-motivation-behavioral Model Based on Protection Motivation Theory on the Psychological Resilience and Quality of Life of Patients with Type 2 DM[J]. Psychiatr Q, 2021,92(1):49-62. DOI:10.1007/s11126-020- 09783-w.
[5] 邓丽萍,谢小华,王亚萍,等.脑卒中高危人群保护动机问卷的编制及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2020,27(8):1-5.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.08.001.
[6] 黄娜,周英凤,李丽,等.妊娠期糖尿病孕妇血糖管理保护动机问卷的编制及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志,2021,56(4):561-566. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.04.014.
[7] Valsaraj R, Singh AK, Gangopadhyay KK,et al.Management of Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia: Integrated Diabetes & Endocrine Academy (Idea) Consensus Statement[J]. Diabetes Metab Syndr, 2020,14(2):93-100. DOI:10.1016/j.dsx.2020.01.007.
[8] 封番番,张蓓,周连锁,等. 无症状高尿酸血症的诊治和管理[J].江苏医药,2021,47(11):1182-1185. DOI:10.19460/j.cnki.0253-3685.2021.11.026.
[9] Chalès G.How Should We Manage Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia?[J]. Joint Bone Spine, 2019,86(4):437-443. DOI:10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.10.004.
[10] 中华医学会内分泌学分会.中国高尿酸血症与痛风诊疗指南(2019)[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2020,36(1):1-13.
[11] Valsaraj R, Singh AK, Gangopadhyay KK,et al.Management of Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia: Integrated Diabetes & Endocrine Academy (IDEA) Consensus Statement[J]. Diabetes Metab Syndr, 2020,14(2):93-100. DOI:10.1016/j.dsx.2020.01.007.
[12] 郑卫军,何凡.现况调查的样本量计算方法[J].预防医学,2020,32(6):647-648. DOI:10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2020.06.028.
[13] Hou S, Li B, Luo Y, et al.Creation and Location-specific Revision of a Core Nursing Outcomes Evaluation System Based on Nursing Outcomes Classification for Stroke Inpatients in China[J]. Int J Nurs Knowl,2019,30(3):154-161. DOI:10.1111/2047-3095.122 22.
[14] 李峥,刘宇.护理学研究方法[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:251.
[15] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010:158-298.
[16] Hickman RL, Pignatiello GA, Tahir S.Evaluation of the Decisional Fatigue Scale Among Surrogate Decision Makers of the Critically III[J]. West J Nurs Res, 2018, 40(2):191-208. DOI:10.1177/0193945917723828.
[17] Arbaranelli C, Leec S, Vellone E, et al.The problem with Cronbach’s Alpha: Comment on Sijtsma Andvail Derark(2015)[J]. Nurs Res, 2015,64(2):140. DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000 000079.
[1] 李慧, 潘玲, 李博, 刘晓辉. 患者安全胜任力自评量表的汉化及其在实习护生中的信效度评价[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(9): 47-51.
[2] 刘凯莉, 罗艳艳, 姚桂英, 朱智玲, 郭华, 杜诣深, 秦立伟, 吴慧敏, 李佳波. 晚期癌症患者安宁疗护态度量表的汉化及信效度分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(16): 11-16.
[3] 徐立敏, 钱志刚. 临床带教教师隐性知识共享量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(15): 24-27.
[4] 叶孝灵, 周春兰, 黄丛萍, 刘志红, 吴明秀, 邓水娟, 刘瑜, 杨丽潇, 王润. 脑卒中后失能综合评估量表的汉化与信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(11): 65-69.
[5] 张正敏, 左倩倩, 冯现刚, 梁素娟, 魏红云, 高钰琳. ICU护士职业死亡回避量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(1): 53-57.
[6] 王琦, 李领侠, 和巾杰, 郑华东, 米晓芬, 胡艳粉. 医护人员低血糖症知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9): 9-13.
[7] 郑丹丹, 任静, 李艳, 徐倩. 母亲感知育儿自我效能量表的汉化及其在早产儿母亲中的信效度研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9): 54-57.
[8] 刘瑜, 周春兰, 周君桂, 邓水娟, 何任红. 神经源性膀胱患者自我管理量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 64-68.
[9] 信博, 赵秋利, 王楠楠, 马得欣, 邢慧, 吴燕妮, 于洋. 消化系统癌症高危人群预防主动行为测评量表的编制与信效度评价[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(5): 6-11.
[10] 夏杰, 段霞, 张佳男, 于婵, 王可可. 高危孕产妇病情预警评估表的构建及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 67-72.
[11] 侯艳, 张云, 高蓉, 刘宝吉, 赵卿. 恶性肿瘤患者疼痛认知量表的汉化和信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 62-66.
[12] 李艳清, 张晓梅, 徐秀群. Skidmore焦虑病耻感量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(24): 17-21.
[13] 张珊珊, 李惠萍, 宋江艳, 周梦珂, 高杰, 李嘉欣. 乳腺癌患者家庭韧性评估量表的汉化及信效度研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(24): 1-5.
[14] 徐凌霞, 李爱仙. 自我调节疲劳量表用于腹膜透析患者的信度效度分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(20): 11-15.
[15] 周晓娟, 马礼坤, 张理想, 詹玲, 赵梅. 12条目药物依从性评估量表在高血压患者中的信度效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(18): 46-49.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!