以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 40-45.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.03.040

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

体外循环心脏手术中体温管理循证实践

周毅峰a, 杨继平a, 彭瑶丽a, 袁浩b, 石泽亚c   

  1. 湖南省人民医院(湖南师范大学附属第一医院) a.手术一部; b.检验科; c.院办,湖南 长沙 410005
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-10 发布日期:2022-03-04
  • 通讯作者: 杨继平(1990-),女,湖南长沙人,硕士,主管护师。 E-mail:1293488432@qq.com
  • 作者简介:周毅峰(1981-),女,湖南长沙人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,副主任护师,护士长。
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省自然科学基金项目(2019JJ80009)

Evidence-based Body Temperature Management in Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery

ZHOU Yi-fenga, YANG Ji-pinga, PENG Yao-lia, YUAN Haob, SHI Ze-yac   

  1. a. Operating Room I; b. Laboratory Medicine; c. Headquarter Office, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410005, China
  • Received:2021-08-10 Published:2022-03-04

摘要: 目的 通过应用前期研究制定的体外循环心脏手术中体温管理证据,以规范术中体温管理操作行为保障患者安全。方法 采用JBI循证实践证据应用程序,按照基线审查、临床实践变革、证据应用后质量审查3个阶段实施循证实践。根据前期研究获得的证据制订临床审查指标进行基线审查,分析障碍因素,制订行动策略将证据在临床应用,然后实施证据应用后审查。结果 证据应用前后,术中鼻咽温、氧合器动脉出口温度、氧合器静脉入口温度比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术中膀胱温比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);不同时间点的鼻咽温、氧合器动脉出口温度、氧合器静脉入口温度比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),膀胱温比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);不同时间点的鼻咽温、膀胱温、氧合器动脉出口温度、氧合器静脉入口温度与证据应用前后交互无统计学意义(P>0.05)。证据应用后低体温、寒颤、躁动发生率分别为16.7%、6.7%、13.3%,对比基线审查时分别为36.7%、26.7%、40.0%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。培训前后心脏专科小组护士及体外循环师相关知识考核成绩分别为(76.25±9.62)分,(91.25±6.35)分,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。基线审查时手术室护士对审查指标1、2、3的执行率分别为63%、27%、100%,其余审查指标执行率均在20%以下,证据应用后,审查指标2、4-15的执行率均有明显提高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 基于证据的体温管理策略在体外循环心脏手术中应用,可规范临床操作行为,提高护士术中体温管理的科学性与执行依从性,有效保护术中心肌、大脑细胞及神经组织,降低相关并发症,确保体外循环手术患者术中安全。

关键词: 心脏外科手术, 体外循环技术, 低温治疗, 体温管理, 循证实践

Abstract: Objective To To formulate body temperature management plan in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery based on evidence-based practice and to standardize clinical practice and promote continuous quality improvement of body temperature management. Methods With the JBI model of evidence-based healthcare (baseline data review, clinical reform and evidence audit), according to the evidence obtained in the preliminary research, corresponding clinical review indicators and review methods were developed, obstacles were reviewed and analyzed, then the strategies were formulated and the evidence was audited after the application. Results There was no significant difference in the intraoperative nasopharyngeal temperature, oxygenator artery outlet temperature and oxygenator venous inlet temperature before and after the application of the evidence (P>0.05), and the difference in intraoperative bladder temperature was statistically significant (P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences in nasopharyngeal temperature, oxygenator arterial outlet temperature and oxygenator venous inlet temperature at different time points (P<0.05), and the difference in bladder temperature was not statistically significant (P>0.05); at different time points the nasopharyngeal temperature, bladder temperature, oxygenator artery outlet temperature and the oxygenator vein inlet temperature were not statistically significant (P>0.05) before and after the application of the evidence .The incidences of hypothermia, chills, and restlessness after the application of the best evidence were 16.7%, 6.7%, and 13.3% respectively. The difference before the application of the evidence was statistically significant (P<0.001). After the evidence was applied, the intraoperative nasopharyngeal temperature and bladder temperature, oxygenator artery outlet and venous inlet temperature were uniformly lower, and the cooling and rewarming rates were both <0.5℃/min. Before and after the training, the score of intraoperative temperature management related knowledge of the nurses in cardiology specialist team and cardiopulmonary bypass specialists was 76.25±9.62 and 91.25±6.35 respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). Before the application of the best evidence, the operating room nurses' implementation rate of the review indicators 1, 2 and 3 was 63%, 27%, and 100%, respectively. The implementation rate of the remaining review indicators was all below 20%. After the best evidence was applied, the implementation rate of 2, 4-15 had been significantly improved, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Evidence-based temperature management strategies in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery are beneficial for standardizing clinical practice, improving the compliance of nurses in intraoperative temperature management for effective protection of intraoperative myocardium, brain cells and nerve tissue, and reducing related complications to ensure the safety of patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

Key words: cardiac surgery, extracorporeal circulation, therapeutic hypothermia, temperature management, evidence-based practice

中图分类号: 

  • R472.3
[1] 冯旭林,陈晓霞,韩盖宇,等.113例冠状动脉血管病变患者行胸腔镜辅助冠状动脉旁路移植术的护理[J].护理学报,2020,27(24):60-62.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.24.060.
[2] 张娜,刘金东.体外循环心脏手术脑损伤及脑保护的研究进展[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2020,40(1):120-124.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1403.2010.02.018.
[3] Engelman R, Baker RA, Likosky DS, et al.The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists,and the American Society of Extra Corporeal Technology:Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Bypass—temperature Management during Cardiopulmonary Bypass[J]. J Extra Corpor Technol,2015,47(3):145-154. DOI:doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.126.
[4] 周毅峰,杨继平,袁浩,等.肝癌加速康复外科术中保温技术的循证实践[J].护理学杂志,2019, 34(10):12-16.DOI:10.3870,/j.issn.1001—41j2.2019.10.012.
[5] Dicenso A, Bayley L, Haynes RB.Accessing Pre-appralsed evidenee:Fine-tuning the 5S Model into a 6S Model[J].Evid Based Nuts,2009,12(4):99-101.DOI:10.1136/ebn.12.4.99-b.
[6] 周毅峰,杨继平,袁浩,等.体外循环心脏手术中体温管理证据汇总[J].护理学报, 2021, 28(5):26-31.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.05.026.
[7] Gupta P, Harky A, Jahangeer S, et al.Varying Evidence on Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest in Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Surgery[J]. Tex Heart Inst J, 2018, 45(2):70-75.DOI:org/10.14503/THIJ-17-6364.
[8] Reed H, Berg KB, Janelle GM.Aortic Surgery and Deep-hypothermic Circulatory Arrest: Anesthetic Update[J].Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth,2014,18(2):137-145.DOI:10.1177/1089253214525278.
[9] 陈彧,刘锋,江朝光,等.深低温体外循环温度管理[J].中国体外循环杂志,2006, 4(3):156-159.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1403.2006.03.009.
[10] 张挺杰,杭燕南.体外循环心脏手术后患者精神障碍的发生机制[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(6):133-135.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2006.06.059.
[1] 林俏, 刘梅娟, 张广清, 赵芯梅, 夏燕飞, 施燕, 曾依婷, 赖女珍, 周丽华, 李秀梅. 成人炎症性肠病患者饮食与营养方案的循证实践[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(4): 27-33.
[2] 吴晓珩, 杨元立, 胡馨予, 王翠萍, 张萦, 王艳春, 陶艳玲. 住院患者输血全流程管理的循证实践[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(8): 33-38.
[3] 管艳, 卢山, 叶家欣, 王哲芸. 心脏术后压力性损伤规范化实践方案的构建与应用[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 15-20.
[4] 周毅峰, 杨继平, 袁浩, 吴娟. 体外循环心脏手术中体温管理证据汇总[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(5): 26-31.
[5] 王晓艳, 李牧玲, 谢亭平, 庄卓洵, 何水秀, 郑晓霞, 祝静雯, 陆云涛, 周宏珍. 神经外科患者腰椎穿刺术后最佳卧床时间的循证实践[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 31-35.
[6] 郭汉画, 陈名桂, 孔丽丽, 张晓璇. 重症患者动脉测压导管最佳更换策略的循证实践[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(2): 37-41.
[7] 王瑞娜, 赖晓帆, 黄斌英, 李焱, 张瑞. 预防住院患者经鼻管喂养非计划拔管的循证护理实践[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(19): 44-47.
[8] 袁琳, 邱正庆, 李融融, 孙静, 李杨. 基于最佳实践证据Ⅰ型糖原累积症患儿饮食管理方案的制定[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(16): 52-57.
[9] 乔秋阁, 潘杰, 刘燕, 袁雅冬, 李玉琢, 安贺娟, 冯忠军, 杨兴肖, 李金库, 郑荣坤, 游道锋, 张秀玲, 郑晶晶, 闫丽, 史蕾, 许志娟, 马薇, 袁松. 基于循证实践指南的新型冠状病毒肺炎患者隔离病区环境表面清洁与消毒流程的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(16): 9-15.
[10] 邓博, 刘宁, 杨琳. 临床实践项目持续性评估工具的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(13): 40-45.
[11] 吕永利, 王焕焕, 李沙沙, 万丞, 吴佩. 腹腔镜下宫颈癌根治术后尿潴留预防和管理的循证护理实践[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(13): 29-33.
[12] 马丹莹, 李莉, 王玮, 黄海东, 邓敏君. 主动脉弓置换术后患者ICU获得性衰弱现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(12): 38-42.
[13] 陈丽玲, 周春兰, 吴艳妮, 赵慧慧. 临床护士循证实践培训体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(11): 7-11.
[14] 张煜, 张春艳, 金玉, 王淑芹, 董亮, 万娜, 贾燕瑞, 高凤莉. 内科危重症患者深静脉血栓预防审查指标的制定及障碍因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(4): 37-41.
[15] 曹春菊, 张兰芳, 王彩芳, 罗丹华, 徐秀平, 庄聪琼, 黄梅英, 黄炜铃, 李文英. 轻、中重症急性胰腺炎患者早期经口进食的循证实践[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(24): 24-30.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
[1] 李婧雯, 梅紧紧, 王艺莹, 郭健, 任彬彬, 冯晓东, 李瑞青. 不同针刺方法治疗脑卒中后患者肢体痉挛总有效率的贝叶斯网状Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 1 -6 .
[2] 周黎雪, 姜云霞, 周云平, 冯鸿雁, 孙雪霞, 于鹏丽. 自我效能在类风湿关节炎患者社会支持和经验性回避之间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 7 -11 .
[3] 焦子珊, 张新月, 沙凯辉. 决策树C5.0与Logistic回归对产后压力性尿失禁预测性能的比较[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 12 -18 .
[4] 张立力, 赵阳, 刘欢, 罗晨玲. 国家级一流护理学本科专业建设的实践与成效[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 19 -23 .
[5] 张娜, 陈海勤, 邵磊, 朱月莉, 沈银萍. 精神科低年资护士培训应用防暴技能微视频的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 24 -28 .
[6] 刘国庆, 韩婧怡, 宋文静, 王莹. 虚拟现实在护理领域应用研究关键词的可视化分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 29 -34 .
[7] 鹿笑寒, 宋洁, 王晋芳, 刘霖, 陈海雯, 姜倩倩. 置信职业行为在护理教育中的研究现状[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 35 -39 .
[8] 向御婷, 褚婕, 严敏, 乐曲, 余嘉欣. 孕产妇孕产期静脉血栓栓塞风险评估的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 46 -51 .
[9] 张营, 孟英涛, 尚美美, 杨德艳, 朱玉方, 王倩. 癌症相关认知功能障碍评估和管理的证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 52 -56 .
[10] 胡惠菊, 郭雪琪, 唐启群, 成杰, 李慧源, 李田田. 衰老认知在养老机构老年人领悟社会支持与内在力量间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 57 -61 .