护士情域能力评价量表的编制及信度效度检验

doi:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.15.046

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的编制护士情域能力评价量表,检验其信度、效度,为评价护士情域能力提供有效工具。方法以情感领域分类学为指导,结合文献查阅、小组讨论和2轮专家咨询形成初始评价量表。采用便利抽样法对镇江市3所三级甲等医院360名护士进行问卷调查,检验问卷信度、效度,形成正式量表。结果共删除18个条目,保留25个条目：专业价值内化能力（7个条目）、专业价值评价能力（6个条目）、专业内涵领悟能力（7个条目）、专业信念感知能力（5个条目）。经探索性因子分析提取出4个公因子,累积方差贡献率为68.117%,验证性因子分析显示模型适配度良好。量表内容效度指数为0.928,各条目的内容效度指数为0.800~1.000;量表总Cronbach α系数为0.959,折半信度为0.897。结论护士情域能力评价量表具有较好的信度及效度,可用于评价护士情域能力。

关键词: 护士, 情域能力评价量表, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To development nurse affective domain ability scale, and to test its reliability and validity, and to provide an effective tool for assessing nurses&' affective domain ability. Methods Guided by the five-level structure mode of affective domain ability, initial evaluation scale was formed after literature review, group discussion and two rounds of expert consultation. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 360 nurses in 3 tertiary grade A hospitals in Zhenjiang by convenience sampling to test the reliability and validity of the questionnaire then a formal scale was developed. Results Totally 18 items were deleted in the initial version of the scale and the questionnaire was composed of 4 dimensions with 25 items: professional value internalization (7 items), professional evaluation capacity (6 items), connotation of professional ability (7 items), professional belief perception (5 items). Four factors were extracted and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 68.117% and confirmatory factor analysis revealed good fit of the model. The content validity was 0.928; the item content validity index ranged from 0.800 to 1.000 respectively and the Cronbach&'s alpha coefficient and split-half coefficient was 0.959 and 0.897 respectively. Conclusion With good reliablity and validity, the scale is a practical tool that can be used to evaluate the affective ability of nurses.

Key words: nurses, Affective Domain Ability Scale, reliability, validity

中图分类号:

吉加梅, 罗彩凤, 徐剑鸥. 护士情域能力评价量表的编制及信度效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(15): 46-50.

JI Jia-mei, LUO Cai-feng, XU Jian-ou. Development of Nurse Affective Domain Ability Scale and Its Reliability and Validity[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2019, 26(15): 46-50.

参考文献

[1] Muzyk A J, Lentz K, Green C, et al.Emphasizing Bloom&'s Affective Domain to Reduce Pharmacy Students&' Stigmatizing Attitudes[J].Am J Pharm Educ,2017,81(2):1-7.DOI:10.5688/ajpe81235.
[2] 徐剑鸥,罗彩凤,唐文玲,等. 医学生情域能力培养路径探讨[J].中国继续医学教育,2018,10(17):34-36.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2018.17.015.
[3] 吉加梅,罗彩凤,徐剑鸥,等.基于情感教育目标护理情域能力的研究进展[J].现代临护理,2018,17(11):73-76.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8283.2018.11.016.
[4] Pham J.A Student&'s Perspective on Assessment and the Affective Domain[J]. Am J Pharm Educ,2015,79(8):1-2.DOI:10.5688/ajpe798125.
[5] Miller C.Improving and Enhancing Performance in the Affective Domain of Nursing Students:Insights from the Literature for Clinical Educators[J].Contemp Nurse, 2010, 35(1):2-17.DOI:10.5172/conu.2010.35.1.002.
[6] Muzyk A J, Lentz K, Green C, et al.Emphasizing Bloom&'s Affective Domain to Reduce Pharmacy Students&' Stigmatizing Attitudes[J].Am J Pharm Educ,2017,81(2):1-7.DOI:10.5688/ajpe81235.
[7] Dunbar H,Carter B.A Sense of Belonging: The Importance of Fostering Student Nurses&' Affective Bonds[J].J Child Health Care,2017,21(4):367-369.DOI:10.1177/1367493517739977.
[8] Ward T D.Do You Hear What I Hear? The Impact of a Hearing Voices Simulation on Affective Domain Attributes in Nursing Students[J].Nurs Educ Perspect,2015,36(5):329-331.DOI:10.5480/14-1448.
[9] Russell-Kathleen K.Lessons Learned From a Theory of Planned Behavior-derived Study on Educational Interventions Inspired by the Affective Domain[J]. J Contin Educ Nurs, 2017, 48(12):543-551.DOI:10.3928/00220124-20171115-05.
[10] Karami A, Farokhzadian J, Foroughameri G.Nurses&' Professional Competency and Organizational Commitment: Is it Important for Human Resource Management?[J].PloS One,2017,12(11):1-15.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0187863.eCollection 2017.
[11] Isabell C, Banfield B, Lis G.Teaching to the Affective Domian:A End-of-life Simulation[J]. West J Nurs Res,2017,39(10):1371.DOI:10.1177/0193945917715261g.
[12] Yanofsky S D, Nyquist J G.Using the Affective Domain to Enhance Teaching of the ACGME Competencies in Anesthesiology Training[J].J Educ Perioper Med,2014,12(1):1-10.
[13] 罗丹. 炎症性肠病心理韧性量表的编制及信效度检验[D].南京:南京医科大学,2018.
[14] 潘靖菁,高钰琳,王惠珍,等.本科护生临床带教老师核心能力体系构建研究[J].护理学报, 2018,25(9):1-7.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.09.001.
[15] 刘于皛. 护士人文关怀测评工具的构建研究[D].上海:第二军医大学,2011.
[16] 李晓萍,沈翠珍.德尔菲法在护理研究中的应用现状[J].中华现代护理杂志,2012,18(22):2605-2607.DOI:10.3760/j.issn1674-2907.2012.22.001.
[17] 程晓娇,魏敏,陈芳.中文版决策冲突量表应用于面部整形美容咨询者的信效度研究[J].护理学报,2018,25(14):49-52.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.14.049.
[18] 王晓彤,卢天舒,李雪华,等.ICU护理人文关怀氛围评价量表的研制及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志, 2018,53(11):1367-1371.DOI:10.3761/j.issn0254-1769.2018.11.018.
[19] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010.
[20] 王洁,郭燕.急性白血病患儿照顾者照护知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2019,26(6):1-5.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.06.001.
[21] 杨丽峰,杨洋,张春梅,等.老年人衰弱评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志,2017,52(1):49-53.DOI:10.3761/j.issn0254-1769.2017.01.010.
[22] Thompson B.Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications[M].Washington DC:American Psychological Assocation,2004.
[23] 侯明香,卢桂芝,王静波,等.护生安全注射知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2017,24(22):7-11.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2017.22.007.
[24] 鄢建军,杨建国,江燕,等.临床护理人员创新能力评价量表的构建及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志, 2018,53(10):1213-1217.DOI:10.3761/j.issn0254-1769.2018.10.011.
[25] 史静琤,莫显昆,孙振球.量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2011,37(2):152-155.DOI:10.3969/j.issn1672-7347.2012.02.007.
[26] 程玲灵,孙玉倩.癌症患者自我管理测评量表的编制及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志,2017,52(9):1082-1087.DOI:10.3761/j.issn0254-1769.2017.09.014.
[27] 徐涓萍,郑洁,周春华.中文版4条目NASA任务负荷量表在ICU护士中的应用与信效度评价[J].护理学报,2018,25(22):55-58.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.22.055.

相关文章 15

[1]	严晓晶, 陈璐, 陈雁. 社区专科护士培训现状及研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 14-17.
[2]	潘国翠, 李梅. 决策疲劳量表的汉化及其应用于ICU患者家属的信度效度评价[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 38-41.
[3]	田凡立, 李惠玲, 杜美兰, 蒋芳琴, 张新梅, 殷雪群. 新型冠状病毒肺炎下援鄂男护士情绪体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 46-49.
[4]	陈娟慧, 陈燕萍, 蒙昱妃, 林绍英, 陶艳玲. 社区护士对老年人家庭访视的知信行评价指标体系构建[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 73-78.
[5]	刘伟权, 熊杰, 肖琦, 江燕, 刘俊雅. PBL结合医学模拟教学法在培养ICU专科护士临床能力中应用[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(4): 10-13.
[6]	杜丽, 毛红波. 1 423名临床护士薪酬公平感水平现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(4): 43-48.
[7]	邓慧芳, 张莉, 颜文贞, 邓伟英, 何少丽, 李素霞, 陈秀云, 陈丽富, 庞志明, 方艳红, 邹舒倩. 282名肿瘤科护士临终关怀态度调查分析[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(4): 49-52.
[8]	吴凡, 绳宇, 张玉筠, 朱玲玲, 李秀华. 灾害响应过程中护士救援体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(3): 28-33.
[9]	米元元, 董江, 刘欢. 护士职业倦怠真实体验的质性Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(3): 34-39.
[10]	王玉梅, 张岚, 乐琼, 吴丽芬, 熊莉娟, 杨雪娇, 张学辉. 中文版早产儿非营养性吸吮功能评估量表的信效度分析[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(3): 62-65.
[11]	王妍, 刘峰, 田敏, 张楠. 心内科护理安全管理评价量表的编制及信度效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(15): 5-8.
[12]	刘于, 于明峰, 张文艳. 基于ADDIE模型的在职护士岗位培训的应用与效果研究[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(15): 18-21.
[13]	章琼, 朱芳, 沈元春. 103名院前急救科护士创伤后应激反应筛查现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(15): 60-64.
[14]	刘园园, 石福艳, 崔娟, 牛杰, 尹崇高. 新入职规范化培训护士工作环境感知现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(14): 1-4.
[15]	刘芳, 万青, 石立雅, 史静姝, 罗丽波, 王培红, 夏文芳. 糖尿病专科护士主导多学科团队在妊娠期糖尿病患者的管理实践[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(14): 14-18.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared