以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (11): 26-32.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.11.026

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

ICU患者谵妄非药物管理相关指南的系统评价

张爱琴1, 陈俊杉2, 余金甜2   

  1. 1.中国人民解放军东部战区总医院 临床护理重点专科,江苏 南京 210002;
    2.南京大学医学院附属金陵医院 重症医学科,江苏 南京 210002
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-21 出版日期:2020-06-10 发布日期:2020-07-07
  • 作者简介:张爱琴（1966-）,女,江苏如皋人,本科学历,主任护师,E-mail:aq09z@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    2016国家临床护理重点专科项目（2016ZDZK001）

Guidelines on Non-pharmacological Management of Delirium in ICU Patients：A Systematic Review

ZHANG Ai-qin1, CHEN Jun-shan2, YU Jin-tian2   

  1. 1. Dept. of Professional Training of Clinical Nursing, General Hospital of Eastern Theatre Command, Nanjing 210002, China;
    2. Dept. of Intensive Care Unit, Jinling Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, China
  • Received:2019-11-21 Online:2020-06-10 Published:2020-07-07

PDF (PC)

251

赞

摘要： 目的 系统评价ICU患者谵妄非药物管理相关指南。方法 计算机检索国内外指南网、相关学会网站和数据库,搜集ICU患者谵妄非药物管理相关指南,检索时限均为建库至2019年9月30日。由2名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料后,采用指南研究与评价工具AGREE II对纳入的指南进行质量评价,汇总各指南的推荐意见并比较其异同。结果 最终纳入10部指南,9部来源于国外,10部指南AGREE II 各领域的平均得分为：范围和目的83%、参与人员55%、严谨性61%、清晰性82%、应用性65%和独立性38%,4部指南总体质量评价为A级,6部指南总体质量评价为B级。推荐意见涉及危险因素辨识和风险预测;评估与诊断;非药物预防;非药物治疗及(会)转诊与随访5个方面。结论 纳入的指南质量处于中等至较高水平,但在指南的参与人员、严谨性、应用性和独立性领域仍有待完善。目前,我国ICU患者谵妄非药物管理指南的开发尚处于起步阶段,应尽快制定适用于我国ICU患者的谵妄非药物管理指南。

关键词: ICU, 谵妄, 非药物管理, 指南, 系统评价

Abstract: Objective To systematically review the guidelines on non-pharmacological management of delirium in ICU patients. Methods The guideline networks, association websites and databases were electronically searched to collect guidelines on non-pharmacological management of delirium in ICU patients from the inception to 30 September 2019. Two reviewers worked independently to screen literature, extract data, and evaluate the included guidelines according to the standard quality appraisal tool AGREE II, and then summarized and compared the recommendations related to non-pharmacological management of delirium in ICU patients. Results Ten guidelines were included and nine of them were foreign ones. The average score of each AGREE II domain was 83% for scope and purpose, 55% for stakeholder involvement, 61% for rigor of development, 82% for clarity of presentation, 65% for applicability, and 38% for editorial independence. Four guidelines rated as Grade A and the remaining six as Grade B. Five aspects were involved in recommendations, including identification of risk factors and risk prediction; assessment and diagnosis; non-pharmacological prevention; non-pharmacological treatment and (Consultation) Referral and follow-up. Conclusion The overall quality of included guidelines is in a moderate to high level. More efforts are needed to improve the stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, applicability and independence domain of guidelines. At present, the development of guidelines on non-pharmacological management of delirium in ICU patients in China is still at initial stage. It is suggested to formulate localized guidelines that are suitable for China as soon as possible.

Key words: ICU, delirium, non-pharmacological management, guideline, systematic review

中图分类号: 

  • R473
[1] American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders[M].4th Edition.Washington, D.C: American Psychiatric Association, 2000:124-127.
[2] Brummel NE, Girard TD.Preventing Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit[J].Crit Care Clin,2013,29(1):51-65. DOI:10.1016/j.ccc.2012.10.007.
[3] Cavallazzi R, Saad M, Marik PE.Delirium in the ICU: An Overview[J]. Ann Intensive Care,2012,2(1):49.DOI:10.1186/2110-5820-2-49.
[4] Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, et al.Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adult Patients in the Intensive Care Unit[J]. Crit Care Med, 2013, 41(1):263-306. DOI:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72.
[5] AGREE Enterprise. AGREE II Instrument[EB/OL]. (2017-12-15)[2018-11-10]. https://www.agreetrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/AGREE-II-Users-Manual-and-23-item-Instrument-2009-Update-2017.pdf.
[6] 胡雁,郝玉芳.循证护理学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2018:157-174.
[7] 武杰,王轶,王志稳.痴呆老人精神行为问题非药物管理指南的系统评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2016,16(11):1338-1344. DOI:10.7507/1672-2531.20160202.
[8] 余红梅,罗艳虹,萨建,等. 组内相关系数及其软件实现[J].中国卫生统计,2011, 28(5):497-500.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3674.2011.05.006.
[9] American Psychiatric Association.Practice Guideline for the Treatment of Patients with Delirium[J]. Am [J] Psychiatry.1999,156(5):1-20.
[10] United Kingdom Clinical Pharmacy Association. Detection, Prevention and Treatment of Delirium in Critically Ill Patients[EB/OL].[2006-06-25]. http://icmwk.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/ukcpa_delirium_2006.pdf.
[11] Michaud L, Büla C, Berney A, et al.Delirium:Guidelines for General Hospitals[J]. J Psychosom Res, 2007, 62(3):371-383.DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.10.004
[12] Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust. Clinical Guideline: The Prevention,Recognition and Management of Delirium in Adult In-Patients[EB/OL].[2011-05-25].https://www.guysandstthomas.nhs.uk/resources/our-services/acute-medicine-gi-surgery/elderly-care/delirium-adult-inpatients.pdf.
[13] Celis-Rodríguez E, Birchenall C, de la Cal MÁ, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Evidence-based Management of Sedoanalgesia in Critically Ill Adult Patients[J]. Med Intensiva, 2013,37(8):519-574.DOI:10.1016/j.medin.2013.04.001.
[14] Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften. Evidence and Consensus Based Guideline for the Management of Delirium, Analgesia, and Sedation in Intensive Care Medicine[EB/OL].[2015-08-31].https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/001-012.html.
[15] 中华医学会重症医学分会.中国成人ICU镇痛和镇静治疗指南[J].中华重症医学电子杂志(网络版),2018,4(2):90-113.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.06.001.
[16] Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gelinas C, et al.Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU[J]. Crit Care Med, 2018, 46(9):e825-e873.DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299.
[17] Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Risk Reduction and Management of Delirium[EB/OL].[2019-03-01]. https://www.sign.ac.uk/sign-157-delirium.html.
[18] National Clinical Guideline Centre. Delirium: Diagnosis, Prevention and Management[EB/OL].[2019-03-01].http://www.nice.org.uk/CG103.
[19] Bush SH, Marchington KL, Agar M, et al.Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Delirium:A Systematic Appraisal[J]. BMJ Open.2017,7(3):e013809. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013809.
[20] 王明辉,张菁,曾宪涛,等.临床实践指南制订方法-患者的价值观和意愿[J].中国循证心血管医学杂志, 2018,10(10):1153-1156.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4055.2018.10.01.
[21] Zhan SY, Yin DX, Tang JL.Clinical Guidelines in China: Tackling Conflict of Interests and Engaging Patients[EB/OL].[2018-11-06].https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2018/11/06/clinical-guidelines-in-china-tackling-conflict-of-interests-and-engaging-patients.
[22] 谢胜,李建锋,李娟,等.难治性胃食管反流病临床指南的系统评价[J].中国全科医学,2019,22(8):901-908.DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.00.397.
[23] 陈俊杉,余金甜,赵思雨,等.ICU患者谵妄风险预测模型研究进展[J].护理学报,2019,26(5):15-19.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.05.015.
[24] 丁泓帆,杨楠,邓围,等. WHO指南制定的基本原则和方法[J].中国循证医学杂志,2016,16(4):471-477.DOI:10.7507/1672-2531.20160072.
[1] 徐慧娜, 桂意华. ICU护士血液净化技术培训应用PBL教学法结合能力进阶模式的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 1-5.
[2] 练巧兰, 欧阳红莲. 成人ICU患者探视管理研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 21-25.
[3] 叶冬婷, 张沁莲, 景霜, 郭佳, 邢雁芬. 家属对ICU患者转出体验的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 33-39.
[4] 吴静, 姚惠萍, 何巧, 蒋美娜, 郎毅平, 刘仁洋. 成人重症患者血糖管理相关临床实践指南的质量评价[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 52-56.
[5] 刘伟权, 熊杰, 肖琦, 江燕, 刘俊雅. PBL结合医学模拟教学法在培养ICU专科护士临床能力中应用[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(4): 10-13.
[6] 郑燕梅, 黄德斌, 张桂宁. 早期活动预防机械通气患者呼吸机相关性肺炎的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(4): 62-65.
[7] 米元元, 董江, 刘欢. 护士职业倦怠真实体验的质性Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(3): 34-39.
[8] 胡凯, 王静, 王明霞, 徐飞亚, 汪佳盈. 27例重症急性胰腺炎患者预防ICU获得性衰弱的护理[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(3): 59-61.
[9] 苏涛,江智霞,吴琼,黄迪,代永娅. ICU日记临床应用效果研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(9): 35-38.
[10] 马洁葵,李绮慈. 危重症患者并发ICU获得性衰竭现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(6): 45-50.
[11] 赵小利,郭利涛,刘革婷,雷小红,刘昱. 自制床头抬高标识杆提高ICU护士抬高床头依从性效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(6): 73-74.
[12] 梅彬彬,殷庆梅,王雯婷,崔飞飞,沈梅芬. 不同吸痰深度对建立人工气道的成年患者吸痰效果系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(5): 36-42.
[13] 李真, 曹晶, 李佳倩, 吴欣娟. 卒中后谵妄危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(22): 38-43.
[14] 徐涓萍, 郑洁, 周春华. 中文版4条目NASA任务负荷量表在ICU护士中的应用与信效度评价[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(22): 55-58.
[15] 赵诗雨, 柯卉, 李梦圆, 熊璨, 喻姣花. 肠内营养补充剂防治压疮效果的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(20): 24-30.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
[1] 李莉,郑艳. 注册护士临床沟通能力现状及影响因素的多中心调查[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(1): 1 -4 .
[2] 周晓楠,吕蓉,赵炳云,李峥,康晓凤. 基于专家访谈的心力衰竭患者缓和医疗照护服务内容要素的本土化探讨[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(1): 5 -9 .
[3] 衣艳凤,袁越,宋红霞,季红,田敏,刘峰,张丽. 心力衰竭患者症状群与生活质量的相关性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(1): 10 -13 .
[4] 董艳,查定军,柏亚玲,陈阿娟,张小妮,葛艳侠. 以岗位胜任力为核心的耳鼻喉科护士规范化培训实践[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(1): 14 -17 .
[5] 汪会平. 以胜任力为导向的分级管理在妇产科的实践[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(1): 18 -22 .
[6] 张继芝,张伟,代怀静,徐玉芝,彭玉兰,宋瑞芳. 医疗失效模式与效应分析在患者转床风险管理中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(1): 22 -25 .
[7] 洪燕,蒋艳. 失能老人居家照护的支持性策略应用研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(1): 26 -29 .
[8] 李媛, 张瑞, 卢艳艳, 宁佩, 李雪, 孟庆慧. 师生不同视角下危重症护理硕士专业学位研究生学习方法研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 1 -5 .
[9] 赵迪, 赵梦璐, 王娜, 付明晶, 梁凤, 张伟, 王爱敏. 青岛市592名社区老年人社会隔离现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 6 -10 .
[10] 高莹, 吴玉娥, 张建荣, 崔鑫浩, 陈淑玲, 叶丽芳, 杜秀珍. 基于循证构建轻症急性胰腺炎患者早期经口进食时机评估及管理方案[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 11 -15 .