Abstract：In this paper, the formation process model of commitment integrated with basic psychological needs satisfaction is used to analyze the influence of Chinese and western cultural background on sensitivity of formation paths of organizational commitment. Based on the comparison of volition, responsibility, and dedication in philosophy and ethics, this study proposes that the sensitive formation paths of organizational commitment are from “salience, control” and “autonomy need and competence need satisfaction” to “organizational commitment in western cultural background”, and from “affect, trust” and “relatedness need satisfaction” to “organizational commitment” in Chinese cultural background.
张旭,樊耘,颜静. 文化背景与组织承诺的关系：
内涵一致性与形成路径敏感性的差异化[J]. J4, 2013, 10(8): 1144-.
ZHANG Xu,FAN Yun,YAN Jing. The Relationship between Cultural Background and Organizational Commitment: Consistency
Meaning and Different Sensitivity of Formation Paths. J4, 2013, 10(8): 1144-.
2013, Vol. 10 
