以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 12-16.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.01.012

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于Pender健康促进模式食管癌术后患者饮食管理方案的构建

高若男1, 王翠玲2, 李亭雨3, 田美雨1, 张楠1, 郑锐1   

  1. 1.山西医科大学 护理学院,山西 太原 030000;
    2.山西医科大学附属肿瘤医院 门诊部,山西 太原 030000;
    3.太原市精神病医院 护理部,山西 太原 030000
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-24 出版日期:2024-01-10 发布日期:2024-02-19
  • 通讯作者: 王翠玲(1966-),女,山西大同人,硕士研究生,主任护师,门诊部主任。E-mail:ty.wangcuiling@163.com
  • 作者简介:高若男(1999-),女,山西吕梁人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。

Construction of a dietary management program for postoperative oesophageal cancer patients based on Pender's health promotion model

GAO Ruo-nan1, WANG Cui-ling2, LI Ting-yu3, TIAN Mei-yu1, ZHANG Nan1, ZHENG Rui1   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030000, China;
    2. Dept. of Outpatient, Cancer Hospital affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030000, China;
    3. Dept. of Nursing Administration, Taiyuan Psychiatric Hospital, Taiyuan 030000,China
  • Received:2023-08-24 Online:2024-01-10 Published:2024-02-19

摘要: 目的 构建食管癌术后患者的饮食管理方案,为食管癌术后患者开展饮食管理提供参考。方法 以Pender健康促进模式为理论指导,通过文献回顾、半结构式访谈,初步拟定食管癌术后患者的饮食管理方案框架,选取来自三级甲等医院的22名肿瘤护理、临床护理、护理管理专家进行2轮德尔菲专家函询,最终确定食管癌术后患者的饮食管理方案。结果 2轮函询专家问卷有效回收率为100%,专家权威系数为0.90,各条目肯德尔和谐系数分别为0.223、0.274、0.210(P<0.01);最终形成食管癌术后患者饮食管理方案包括:5个一级条目、18个二级条目、62个三级条目。结论 本研究构建的食管癌术后患者饮食管理方案具有一定的科学性与可靠性,可为食管癌患者的术后饮食护理提供参考。

关键词: 食管癌, 手术后, 健康促进模式, 饮食管理, 德尔菲法, 方案构建

Abstract: Objective To construct a postoperative dietary management program for patients with oesophageal cancer, and to provide reference for their dietary management. Methods Guided by the Pender's health promotion model, the framework of a postoperative dietary management plan for patients with oesophageal cancer was initially formulated through literature review and semi-structured interviews. Twenty-two experts of oncology nursing, clinical nursing, and nursing management from tertiary grade-A hospitals were selected to conduct 2 rounds of Delphi expert correspondence to determine the postoperative dietary management plan for patients with oesophageal cancer. Results The effective recovery rate of the 2-round correspondence expert questionnaire was 100%; the expert authority coefficient 0.90, and the Kendall's harmony coefficient of each entry was 0.223, 0.274, and 0.210, respectively (P<0.01). The final postoperative dietary management plan for patients with oesophageal cancer consisted of 5 first-level, 18 second-level, and 62 third-level entries. Conclusion The postoperative dietary management plan for patients with oesophageal cancer constructed in this study is scientific and reliable, and can provide reference for postoperative dietary care for patients with oesophageal cancer.

Key words: esophageal cancer, postoperative, health promotion model, diet management, Delphi method, program construction

中图分类号: 

  • R473.73
[1] Chen T, Jiang W, He G.Effect of family enteral nutrition on nutritional status in elderly patients with esophageal carcinoma after minimally invasive radical surgery: a randomized trial[J]. Ann Palliat Med, 2021,10(6):6760-6767.DOI:10.21037/apm-21-1219.
[2] 范晓丽, 杨光明, 朱雪. 精细化饮食管理对食管癌切除术患者营养状况及生活质量的影响[J]. 癌症进展, 2021,19(18):1930-1932.DOI:10.11877/j.issn.1672-1535.2021.19.18.25.
[3] 蚁洁煖, 阮春燕, 孙洁群, 等. 基于奥马哈系统的精细化饮食干预应用于食管癌术后患者的效果分析[J].中国社区医师, 2021, 37(25):37-38.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-614x.2021.25.018.
[4] Shahabi N, Hosseini Z, Aghamolaei T, et al.Application of Pender's health promotion model for type 2 diabetes treatment adherence: protocol for a mixed methods study in southern Iran[J]. Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine,2022, 23(1):1056.DOI:10.1186/s13063-022-07027-9.
[5] Bijani M, Niknam M, Karimi S, et al.The effect of peer education based on Pender's health promotion model on quality of life, stress management and self-efficacy of patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled clinical trial[J]. BMC Neurol, 2022, 22(1):144.DOI:10.1186/s12883-022-02671-9.
[6] 刘蔚, 李育玲, 韩清华, 等. 基于社会学习理论实习护生同伴支持教育方案的构建[J]. 护理学报,2023,30(3):16-19.DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.03.016.
[7] Chen HH, Hsieh PL.Applying the Pender's health promotion model to identify the factors related to older adults'participation in community-based health promotion activities[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(19):9985.DOI:10.3390/ijerph18199985.
[8] Moshki M, Mohammadipour F, Gholami M, et al.The evaluation of an educational intervention based on Pender's health promotion model for patients with myocardial infarction[J]. Int J Health Promot Educ, 2022, 60(1):25-37.DOI:org/10.1080/14635240.2020.1816487.
[9] Faroughi F, Shahriari M, Keshvari M, et al.The effect of an educational intervention based on Pender's health promotion model on treatment adherence in the patients with coronary artery disease[J].Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res, 2021,26(3):216-222.DOI:10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_53_20.
[10] Ren Y, Li M.Intervention Effect of Pender's model on mental health of patients with diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis[J]. Can J Diabetes, 2023,47(1):94-101.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2022.05.001.
[11] Vakilian P, Mahmoudi M, Oskouie F, et al.Investigating the effect of educational intervention based on the Pender's health promotion model on lifestyle and self-efficacy of the patients with diabetic foot ulcer: a clinical trial[J]. J Educ Health Promot,2021,10:466.DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1301_20.
[12] Masoudi R, Lotfizade M, Gheysarieha MR, et al.Evaluating the effect of Pender's health promotion model on self-efficacy and treatment adherence behaviors among patients undergoing hemodialysis[J]. J Educ Health Promot, 2020,9:197.DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_747_19.
[13] Habibzadeh H, Shariati A, Mohammadi F, et al.The effect of educational intervention based on Pender's health promotion model on quality of life and health promotion in patients with heart failure: an experimental study[J]. BMC Cardiovasc Disord, 2021, 21(1):478.DOI:10.1186/s12872-021-02294-x.
[14] Haghi R, Ashouri A, Karimy M, et al.The role of correlated factors based on Pender health promotion model in brushing behavior in the 13-16 years old students of Guilan, Iran[J]. Ital J Pediatr, 2021, 47(1):111.DOI:10.1186/s13052-021-01063-y.
[15] Rodrigues A, Freitas W, Polaro S, et al. Nursing process for elderly women susceptible to falls from the perspective of the Pender's model[J]. Rev Bras Enferm, 2022,75Suppl 4(Suppl 4):e20210913.DOI:10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0913.
[16] Jalili B F,Estebsari F, Rohani C, et al.Predictors of health-promoting lifestyle in pregnant women based on Pender's health promotion model[J]. Int J Womens Health, 2020,12:71-77.DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S235169.
[1] 陈彤, 秘玉清, 陈倩, 薛梓晨, 黄静雯, 罗盛, 李伟. 老年社区慢性病护理服务能力评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 1-4.
[2] 曹志琴, 张文瑾, 杜海亮, 傅瑶, 陈兴凤. 性医学领域护理专业学位研究生培养指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 1-6.
[3] 候莹鸽, 李好正, 侯云霞, 汪子寒, 李静, 王松梅, 赵亚杰, 阎玲. 食管癌术后患者胃食管反流自我管理测评量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 12-17.
[4] 许燕鸿, 魏清风, 夏叶, 钟燕. 基于筛查平台的结直肠息肉镜下切除后患者医院-社区联动管理指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 33-37.
[5] 任攀, 陈小菊, 曾兢, 廖明姝, 荣欢, 钟红月, 李莉. 长期照护保险制度视域下成都市失智老人社会支持类居家上门照护服务标准构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 11-15.
[6] 李佳, 梁嘉仪, 冯如芝, 高钰琳. 公共卫生护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 16-22.
[7] 刘蔚, 李育玲, 韩清华, 蔺彦丽. 基于社会学习理论实习护生同伴支持教育方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 16-19.
[8] 田恬, 李转珍, 都芳芳, 朱永燕, 李伟丽, 万菲菲. 基于转型冲击理论构建新护士护理安全培训内容体系[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 35-39.
[9] 韩瑞娟, 张俊娟, 李瑞玲, 张士变, 潘卫宇. 全膝关节置换术患者结果期望管理方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24): 7-11.
[10] 储爱琴, 葛文杰, 葛文静, 朱心怡, 高莉莉. 基于建构主义学习理论构建护理本科实习生叙事护理培训方案指标体系[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24): 61-65.
[11] 陈青青, 孔玲, 蒋珊, 朱求丽, 王燕, 苏明霞, 高丽芳, 陈晶梅. 新入职护士置信职业行为指标的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 18-22.
[12] 刘鸿飞, 王芳, 李晖凤, 陈晓荷, 田莉, 黎蔚华. 胸痛中心护理单元建设与管理标准的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 23-28.
[13] 秦科文, 王萍, 曹汉忠, 周晓梅. 麻醉护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(22): 20-24.
[14] 冯小莹, 吴培香, 孙雪琪, 苑潇敏, 陈兰波. 冠心病经皮冠状动脉介入术后患者中西医结合康复护理质量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(19): 1-6.
[15] 周巧, 吴俊琪, 张翠娥, 游君, 许湘华. 老年脑卒中幸存者团体接纳承诺疗法干预方案构建与应用[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(19): 7-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
[1] 张兰萍, 吕森森, 何文俊, 陈江芸, 蔡毅媛, 李春萍, 刘思源, 钟冬梅, 李嘉琪, 谢昀筠, 黄婉晴, 陈晓珊, 徐东. 实施性研究综合框架(CFIR)更新版的解析和应用[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(11): 47 -52 .
[2] 陈坚, 王园, 崔艳丽, 罗彦嗣, 廖琳, 颜明玉, 张晓梅. 缺血性脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者经口摄食功能发展轨迹及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24): 1 -6 .
[3] 韩瑞娟, 张俊娟, 李瑞玲, 张士变, 潘卫宇. 全膝关节置换术患者结果期望管理方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24): 7 -11 .
[4] 张增梅, 王宇, 赵海运, 张莹, 金子, 聂云飞. 抛锚式教学联合Gibbs反思循环在手术室专科护士培训中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24): 12 -15 .
[5] 朱芬芬, 汪婷, 秦慷. 基于专家示范的高仿真模拟教学对高职院校护生临床判断能力的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24): 16 -19 .
[6] 崔甜恬, 童宇平. 七步紧急护理评估框架的护理应用研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24): 20 -23 .
[7] 张凤玲, 卢吉, 侯胜超. 国内肿瘤患者个案管理应用进展及展望[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24): 24 -26 .
[8] 周帅, 江锦芳, 崔虹, 别逢桂, 周培明, 孙强, 谭叶. 非眼部手术全麻患者术中角膜损伤预防及管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24): 27 -32 .
[9] 柯稳, 高兴莲, 余文静, 方敏, 王曾妍. 基于三维质量结构模型构建围手术期低体温预防护理质量指标体系[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(1): 1 -6 .
[10] 钱丽娟, 方熙茹, 罗桢妮, 蔡淑慧. 我国实施护士处方权的环境SWOT分析与建议[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(1): 7 -11 .