基于专家示范的高仿真模拟教学对高职院校护生临床判断能力的影响

doi:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.24.016

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨分析基于专家示范的高仿真模拟教学对高职院校护生临床判断能力的影响。方法随机将护理三年制2个班的87名护生分为试验组与对照组,试验组43名,对照组44名。试验组采用基于专家示范的高仿真模拟教学方法,对照组采用常规高仿真模拟教学方法。采用美国护理联盟研发的模拟教学满意度、模拟教学自我效能感量表和拉萨特临床判断能力量表,从柯氏评估模型多层次评价基于专家示范的高仿真模拟教学在护理教育中的应用。结果试验组模拟教学满意度和自我效能感得分均略高于对照组,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。教师评价中试验组学生Lasater临床判断能力量表中评估观察、分析决断、实施决策3个维度和总分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。而2组学生自我评价中临床判断量表得分比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论基于专家示范的高仿真模拟教学,符合学生效仿榜样的潜意识需求,有效提升提高学生的临床评估、推理和决策能力。建议进一步护教协同,开发丰富的专家示范联合有声思维的信息化资源,帮助学生洞察专家在解决各种临床问题时的推理策略和思维过程。

关键词: 护理教育, 教学方法, 计算机模拟, 专家示范

Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of expert demonstration-based high-fidelity simulation on clinical judgment of nursing students in higher vocational college. Methods A total of 87 3-year program nursing students were randomly divided into experimental group with expert demonstration-based high-fidelity simulation (n=43) and control group receiving conventional high-fidelity simulation (n=44). Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Simulation Learning developed by the National League for Nursing and the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR) were used to evaluate the effect. Results Satisfaction and self-confidence score in experimental group was slightly higher, showing no statistical significance (P>0.05). In expert rating, the total score of LCJR and the score of assessment and observation, analysis and decision-making and implementation in experimental group were higher (P<0.05), but in student self-assessment, the score of LCJR indicated no statistical significance (P>0.05). Conclusion Expert demonstration-based high-fidelity simulation, catering to students' subconscious need for role modeling, effectively enhances students' clinical assessment, reasoning, and decision-making abilities. It is recommended to further promote collaborative nursing education and develop rich expert-demonstration combined with audio-enhanced thinking information resources to assist students in understanding the reasoning strategies and thought processes experts employ when solving various clinical problems.

Key words: nursing education, teaching methods, computer simulation, expert demonstration

中图分类号:

朱芬芬, 汪婷, 秦慷. 基于专家示范的高仿真模拟教学对高职院校护生临床判断能力的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24): 16-19.

ZHU Fen-fen, WANG Ting, QIN Kang. Effect of expert demonstration-based high-fidelity simulation on clinical judgment of nursing students in higher vocational college[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(24): 16-19.

参考文献

[1] Dodson TM .Use of expert modeling videos in undergraduate nursing education: a systematic review[J]. J Nurs Educ, 2023, 62(2):89-96.DOI:10.3928/01484834-20221213-04.
[2] Coram C.Expert role modeling effect on novice nursing students' clinical judgment[J]. Clin Simul Nurs, 2016, 12(9):385-391. DOI:10.1016/j.ecns.2016.04.009.
[3] 朱芬芬, 闻彩芬, 张慧. 高仿真教学远期效果及影响因素的质性研究[J]. 护理研究, 2020, 34(15):2740-2742. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2020.15.027.
[4] 王璟,王自盼,岳树锦,等.我国高仿真情景模拟护理课程教学设计存在的问题及对策[J].护理学报, 2018, 25(22):5.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.22.011.
[5] Jeffries, PR.Using simulations in nursing education: from conceptualization to evaluation[M]. NY: National League for Nursing, 2007:1.
[6] Lasater K.Clinical judgment development: using simulation to create an assessment rubric[J]. J Nurs Educ, 2007, 46(11):496-503. DOI:10.3928/01484834-20071101-04.
[7] 帕梅拉杰弗里斯. 护理模拟教育-从概念到评价[M]. 尚少梅,金晓燕,主译. 北京:北京大学医学出版社, 2021:77-91.
[8] Jessee MA, Nielsen A, Monagle J, et al.A national report on Clinical Judgment Model use in prelicensure nursing curricula[J]. Nurs Educ Perspect, 2023, 44(1):4-10. DOI:10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001062.
[9] Yang F, Wang Y, Yang C, et al.Improving clinical judgment by simulation: a randomized trial and validation of the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric in Chinese[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2019,19(1):20. DOI:10.1186/s12909-019-1454-9.
[10] Thomas CM, Kellgren M.Benner's Novice to Expert Model: an application for simulation facilitators[J]. Nurs Sci Q, 2017,30(3):227-234. DOI:10.1177/0894318417708410.
[11] 刘蔚,李育玲,韩清华,等.基于社会学习理论实习护生同伴支持教育方案的构建[J].护理学报, 2023, 30(3):16-19.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.03.016
[12] Lasater K, Johnson EA, Ravert P, et al.Role modeling clinical judgment for an unfolding older adult simulation[J]. J Nurs Educ, 2014, 53(5):257-264. DOI:10.3928/01484834-20140414-01.
[13] Johnson EA, Lasater K, Hodson-Carlton K, et al.Geriatrics in simulation: role modeling and clinical judgment effect[J]. Nurs Educ Perspect, 2012, 33(3):176-180. DOI:10.5480/1536-5026-33.3.176.
[14] 张力川,王玉洁,庞冬,等.全国1865名临床护理教师核心胜任力及教学培训需求现况调查[J].护理学报, 2023, 30(4):61-65. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.04.061.
[15] Abdulmohdi N, Mcvicar A.Investigating the clinical decision-making of nursing students using high-fidelity simulation, observation and think aloud: a mixed methods research study[J]. J Adv Nurs,2023,79(2):811-824. DOI:10.1111/jan.15507.

相关文章 15

[1]	赵凌云, 陈思羽, 谢颖, 卢美秀, 黄梅芳, 戴小红. 脐带脱垂虚拟仿真实验教学项目的研发与应用[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 29-32.
[2]	刘蔚, 李育玲, 韩清华, 蔺彦丽. 基于社会学习理论实习护生同伴支持教育方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 16-19.
[3]	蒲艾琳, 罗羽. 护理硕士研究生科研能力训练教学现状与启示[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 35-39.
[4]	梁小燕, 蒋维连, 李春健, 欧艳芳, 刘佳萍. 临床护士实施课程思政教学促进及障碍因素的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(2): 27-30.
[5]	黄茜莹, 张立力. 粤港澳大湾区护理本科人才合作培养的SWOT分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(16): 33-36.
[6]	黄伊, 李超凤, 陈丹, 孔祥麟, 范瑛瑛. 234名本科实习护生遭受护理教育欺凌现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(14): 1-6.
[7]	李冬秀, 洪霞, 陈婷玉, 向月, 方凤贞. 基于深度学习理论的“传染病护理学”课程思政教学实践[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(14): 24-27.
[8]	黄宇星, 刘宁, 黄婷. 基于核心能力构建适宜中低资源地区护理本科循证实践教学指标体系[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(13): 24-28.
[9]	鹿笑寒, 宋洁, 王晋芳, 刘霖, 陈海雯, 姜倩倩. 置信职业行为在护理教育中的研究现状[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 35-39.
[10]	陈绍传, 王鑫, 孙蓉, 廖书娟, 高熙, 白丽君. 院校结合模式在高职助产专业人才培养中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(9): 10-13.
[11]	邱楚瑾, 张凤英, 冯先琼. 多视角录播系统在本科护生口腔护理操作教学中的运用[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(7): 15-19.
[12]	唐诗, 陈丹, 鲍祎敏, 胡素文, 王敏, 叶湘漓. 基于创客模式本科护生创新能力培养的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(17): 6-9.
[13]	宗胜蓝, 陈佳慧. 中美老年护理学教材的比较研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(13): 15-17.
[14]	黄迪, 王雨, 代永娅, 王颖, 江智霞. 护理学创客教育2.0双螺旋教育模型的构建及应用[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(19): 11-15.
[15]	卢桢妤,庞书勤,蔡憐环,王宝莲,陈芳,周建,吴怡龙. 310名本科护生班级心理氛围的现状调查[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(8): 31-34.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared