以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (7): 44-49.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.07.044

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

决策辅助工具在炎症性肠病患者中应用的范围综述

朱展慧1, 林征1,2, 周美景1, 王咪1, 孙彩云1, 顾珺怡1   

  1. 1.南京医科大学 护理学院,江苏 南京 211166;
    2.南京医科大学第一附属医院（江苏省人民医院）护理部,江苏 南京 210029
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-28 出版日期:2022-04-10 发布日期:2022-05-10
  • 通讯作者: 林征（1967-）,女,上海人,硕士研究生学历,教授,主任护师,硕士研究生导师。E-mail: linzheng100@163.com
  • 作者简介:朱展慧（1997-）,女,江苏徐州人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    四川省基层卫生事业发展研究中心2019年立项项目（SWFZ19-Q-12）; 泸州市人民政府-西南医科大联合项目（2018LZXNYD-SK15）

Scoping Review of Patient Decision Aids in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

ZHU Zhan-hui1, LIN Zheng1, 2, ZHOU Mei-jing1, WANG Mi1, SUN Cai-yun1, GU Jun-yi1   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China;
    2. Dept. of Nursing Administration,Jiangsu Province Hospital,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2021-09-28 Online:2022-04-10 Published:2022-05-10

PDF (PC)

218

赞

摘要： 目的 对炎症性肠病患者决策辅助工具的特征、功能及应用效果进行范围综述,为今后国内开展相关研究提供参考和借鉴。方法 系统检索中国生物医学文献库、中国知网、万方和维普数据库、PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science核心合集、Cochrane Library、CINAHL数据库中的相关研究,检索时限为建库至2021年7月,应用范围综述方法框架对文献进行分析。结果 共纳入11个决策辅助工具,主要类型包括基于网络的决策辅助工具和纸质版决策辅助手册,通过收集患者偏好信息,提供疾病相关知识辅助医患共同决策;应用的效果评价包括医生与患者的接受度与满意度、工具的可行性和有效性等指标。结论 炎症性肠病患者决策辅助工具应用效果良好,建议医护人员在了解和评估国外决策辅助工具的基础上,研制和发展标准有效的工具提高炎症性肠病患者决策质量,推广其临床应用。

关键词: 决策辅助工具, 炎症性肠病, 范围综述

Abstract: Objective To summarize the characteristics, functions and application effects of patient decision aids in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, and to provide reference for relative studies in China.Methods The relevant studies were systematically screened in SinoMed, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP databases, PubMed, EMBASE, Core collections of Web of Science, Cochrane Library and CINAHL. The retrieval period was from the inception to July 2021.The scope review was applied to analyze the literature. Results Eleven patient decision aids were included, which were mainly web-based decision aids and paper-based decision aids. By collecting patient preference information and providing disease-related knowledge, doctors and patients could make joint decisions. The assessment of application value was conducted in terms of the acceptability and satisfaction of doctors and patients and the feasibility and effectiveness of the tool. Conclusion The application effect of patient decision aids for patients with inflammatory bowel disease is favorable. It is suggested that researchers should develop standard and effective tools to improve the decision quality of patients with inflammatory bowel disease and promote its clinical application after the assessment of foreign patient decision aids.

Key words: patient decision aid, inflammatory bowel disease, scoping review

中图分类号: 

  • R473.5
[1] 吴开春,梁洁,冉志华,等.炎症性肠病诊断与治疗的共识意见(2018年·北京)[J].中国实用内科杂志,2018,38(9):796-813. DOI:10.19538/j.nk2018090106.
[2] 朱良如,沈骏.炎症性肠病医患共同决策——一个循序渐进的过程[J].中华炎性肠病杂志,2019,3(3):261-263. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn2096-367X.2019.03.018.
[3] 刘巧梅,余强,乐梅先.炎症性肠病患者参与临床决策的期望与能力对其参与临床决策满意度的影响[J].上海护理,2021,21(1):19-22. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-8399.2021.01.005.
[4] Mahlich J, Matsuoka K, Sruamsiri R.Shared Decision Making and Treatment Satisfaction in Japanese Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease[J]. Dig Dis, 2017,35(5):454-462. DOI:10.1159/000471795.
[5] Barry MJ.Resolving the Decision Aid Paradox[J]. JAMA Intern Med, 2015,175(5):799-800. DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.72.
[6] 刘元. 克罗恩病患者共同决策辅助方案的构建及应用研究[D].湖州:湖州师范学院,2020. DOI:10.27946/d.cnki.ghzsf.2020.000018.
[7] Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin. An Introduction to Patient Decision Aids[J]. BMJ, 2013,347:f4147. DOI:10.1136/bmj.f4147.
[8] Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, et al. Decision Aids for People Facing Health Treatment or Screening Decisions[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017,4(4):CD001431. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
[9] 冯小萌,邹郁松.糖尿病患者对医患共同决策辅助工具态度的研究[J].医学与哲学,2021,42(10):62-66. DOI:10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2021.10.14.
[10] 于琳,杨淑,郭萍萍,等.决策辅助工具在乳腺癌筛查中的应用现状与展望[J].中国护理管理,2020,20(10):1591-1595. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.10.033.
[11] Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O'Brien KK, et al. Scoping Reviews: Time for clarity in Definition, Methods, and Reporting[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2014,67(12):1291-1294. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013.
[12] Arksey H, O'Malley L.Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework[J]. Int J Soc Res Methodol, 2005,8(1):19-32. DOI:10.1080/1364557032000119616.
[13] Almario CV, Keller MS, Chen M, et al.Optimizing Selection of Biologics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Development of an Online Patient Decision Aid Using Conjoint Analysis[J]. Am J Gastroenterol, 2018,113(1):58-71. DOI:10.1038/ajg.2017.470.
[14] Cohan JN, Ozanne EM, Sewell JL, et al.A Novel Decision Aid for Surgical Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Results of a Pilot Study[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2016,59(6):520-528. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000572.
[15] Dalal RS, Osterman MT, Buchner AM, et al.A User-Friendly Prediction Tool to Identify Colectomy Risk in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis[J]. Inflamm Bowel Dis, 2019,25(9):1550-1558. DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izz014.
[16] Siegel CA, Horton H, Siegel LS, et al.A Validated Web-based Tool to Display Individualised Crohn's Disease Predicted Outcomes Based on Clinical, Serologic and Genetic Variables[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2016,43(2):262-271. DOI: 10.1111/apt.13460.
[17] Jackson B, Begun J, Gray K, et al.Clinical Decision Support Improves Quality of Care in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis[J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2019, 49(8):1040-1051. DOI: 10.1111/apt.15209.
[18] Bennett AL, Buckton S, Lawrance I, et al.Ulcerative Colitis Outpatient Management: Development and Evaluation of Tools to Support Primary Care Practitioners[J]. Intern Med J, 2015,45(12):1254-1266. DOI: 10.1111/imj.12872.
[19] Kim AH, Girgis A, De Cruz P, et al.Development and Feasibility of a Web-based Decision Aid for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Qualitative Pilot Study[J].J Med Internet Res, 2021,23(2):e15946. DOI:10.2196/15946.
[20] Kennedy AP, Nelson E, Reeves D, et al.A Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess the Effectiveness and Cost of a Patient Orientated Self Management Approach to Chronic Inflammatory Bowel Disease[J]. Gut, 2004,53(11):1639-1645. DOI: 10.1136/gut.2003.034256.
[21] Hoyo JD, Nos P, Faubel R, et al.Adaptation of TECCU App Based on Patients' Perceptions for the Telemonitoring of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Qualitative Study Using Focus Groups[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020,17(6):1871. DOI:10.3390/ijerph17061871.
[22] Cha JM, Park DI, Park SH, et al.Physicians Should Provide Shared Decision-making for Anti-TNF Therapy to Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients[J].J Korean Med Sci, 2017,32(1):85-94. DOI:10.3346/jkms.2017.32.1.85.
[23] Holmes-Rovner M.International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS): Beyond Decision Aids to Usual Design of Patient Education Materials[J]. Health Expect, 2007,10(2):103-107. DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00445.x.
[24] 蒙艺,陈玲,邹丽琴.医疗决策模式中权力权利与文化的变迁及启示[J].护理学报,2021,28(16):74-78. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.16.074.
[25] Siegel CA, Lofland JH, Naim A, et al.Gastroenterologists' Views of Shared Decision Making for Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2015,60(9):2636-2645. DOI:10.1007/s10620-015-3675-z.
[26] 詹昱新,喻姣花,刘云访,等.护理人员对护患共享决策实践认知的质性研究[J].护理学杂志,2021,36(1):56-59. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2021.01.056.
[27] Wyatt KD, Branda ME, Anderson RT, et al.Peering into the Black Box: A Meta-analysis of How Clinicians Use Decision Aids during Clinical Encounters[J]. Implement Sci, 2014,9:26. DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-9-26.
[28] Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, et al.Not All Patients Want to Participate in Decision Making. A National Study of Public Preferences[J]. J Gen Intern Med, 2005,20(6):531-535. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.04101.x.
[29] 牟玮,陆翠,王云云,等.患者决策辅助工具国际标准4.0版的引进与评估[J]. 医学与哲学,2019,40(18):11-17. DOI:10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2019.18.03.
[30] 高亚男,张志茹.决策辅助在乳腺癌患者中的应用现状[J].护理学报,2017,24(1):38-41.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2017.01.038.
[1] 邹自玉, 唐红梅, 吴丽, 陈荣凤, 梅花. 乳腺癌相关健康教育材料可读性评估的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(9): 42-46.
[2] 阮安然, 胡浩冉, 任亚豪, 杨雪婷, 程康耀, 滕文哲. 2010-2020年炎症性肠病心理领域研究热点的可视化分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(6): 26-31.
[3] 孙彩云, 林征, 周美景, 顾子君, 王咪, 顾珺怡, 朱展慧. 炎症性肠病患者疾病获益感现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(6): 1-6.
[4] 张萍, 徒文静, 韩娟. 对成人初显期炎症性肠病患者基于LEARNS模式健康教育的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(4): 74-76.
[5] 林俏, 刘梅娟, 张广清, 赵芯梅, 夏燕飞, 施燕, 曾依婷, 赖女珍, 周丽华, 李秀梅. 成人炎症性肠病患者饮食与营养方案的循证实践[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(4): 27-33.
[6] 顾子君, 林征, 周美景, 顾芳臣, 罗丹. 炎症性肠病患者饮食管理软件应用评价[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(3): 34-38.
[7] 牛雨田, 柏晓玲, 楼婷, 韦清, 李慧. 心理痛苦筛查工具的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(20): 44-48.
[8] 王怡欣, 傅荣, 牛倩霞, 厉姝岑. 信息通信技术干预单纯性肥胖症成人患者的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(14): 35-41.
[9] 史润泽, 郝云霞, 范秀云, 张淑艳, 李峥, 康晓凤. 基于Ottawa决策支持框架的植入型心律转复除颤器患者决策辅助工具编制[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(5): 35-40.
[10] 王谊, 陈亚梅. 炎症性肠病患者自我效能现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(2): 55-60.
[11] 杨洁凤, 王倩, 陈湘玉, 杨华. 基于流程再造理论炎症性肠病患者日间生物制剂治疗服务模式的构建及应用[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(19): 7-10.
[12] 李宾宾, 关玉霞, 丰荣, 王新鹏, 赵琳, 刘婧, 卞培丽. 音乐疗法对炎症性肠病患者疲乏焦虑及抑郁影响的研究[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(18): 65-67.
[13] 陈婷婷,周云仙. 272例炎症性肠病患者乳制品摄入认知与需求的调查分析[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(4): 49-53.
[14] 陈婷婷,周云仙,陈焰. 炎症性肠病患者乳制品摄入认知态度和行为的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(5): 1-5.
[15] 王雪璐,胡嘉乐,Nicole Damico,阮洪. 围术期患者麻醉满意度问卷概述及应用进展[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(14): 26-30.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
[1] 马瑞英,李亚洁. 美国疾病诊断相关组法护理支付方式对我国护理收费的启示[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 23 -25 .
[2] 周玥,张淼,赵江,李成. 胃肠道肿瘤患者生命质量影响因素研究现状及思考[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 26 -28 .
[3] 曾友燕,徐燕,储静,顾申. 护理专业课程实行主讲教师负责制的教学实践与效果分析[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 29 -31 .
[4] 谢红燕,杨淑玲. 新型固定沙袋的制作[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 31 .
[5] 宁宁,陈佳丽,朱红,马莉. 项目管理理论在医院护理创新管理中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 32 -35 .
[6] 蔡德芳,董云春,李长琼,周媛. 基于护士分管病人的护理绩效考核[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 36 -39 .
[7] 汪洋,宋艳玲. 消毒供应中心区域一体式管理控制医院感染的实践[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 39 -41 .
[8] 马逊,朱亚梅,吕小林,张静,王蓉花,王玲. 不同血液透析预冲方法对透析器凝血的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 42 -44 .
[9] 杨江兰,汤晓丽. 17例新生儿腹裂应用免缝腹裂袋治疗的护理[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 48 -50 .
[10] 马婕,魏建华,白茹,雍琪. 1例重度卢德维氏咽峡炎患者的护理[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 51 -52 .