以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (14): 6-12.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.14.006

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

2 888名老年人抑郁症状发展轨迹及影响因素研究

吴双赢, 谢子恒, 庄严   

  1. 南方医科大学 公共卫生学院生物统计学系,广东 广州 510515
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-22 出版日期:2024-07-25 发布日期:2024-08-05
  • 通讯作者: 庄严(1982-),女,广东广州人,博士,副教授。E-mail: zhuangy179@126.com
  • 作者简介:吴双赢(1999-),女,广东广州人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(81773544)

Development trajectory and influencing factors of depressive symptoms in 2,888 elderly individuals

WU Shuang-ying, XIE Zi-heng, ZHUANG Yan   

  1. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2024-02-22 Online:2024-07-25 Published:2024-08-05

摘要: 目的 对我国老年人抑郁症状变化趋势进行建模,并纳入新冠肺炎疫情相关变量,多维度研究其影响因素,为老年人抑郁的防治提供思路。方法 基于2013—2020年中国健康与养老追踪调查数据库,采用组基轨迹模型拟合老年人抑郁症状发展趋势,将模型确定后的轨迹分类作为因变量,采用无序多分类Logistic回归分析影响因素。结果 拟合得到老年人抑郁症状发展轨迹为4条,即抑郁低风险组、抑郁中风险组、抑郁高风险组、抑郁组,分别占比11.77%、38.43%、37.92%、11.88%。无序多分类Logistic回归分析显示:(1)与男性、有配偶、教育程度大专以下、居住城镇、无躯体疼痛、ADL无受损、IADL无受损相比,农村(OR=1.64,95%CI:1.22~2.21)、有躯体疼痛(OR=1.84,95%CI:1.42~2.39)、IADL有受损(OR=2.01,95%CI:1.44~2.79)及疫情对老年人精神影响(OR=1.19,95%CI:1.09~1.31)是老年人抑郁中风险的影响因素;(2)受教育程度大专及以上(OR=0.55,95%CI:0.35~0.86)、城乡或镇乡结合区(OR=1.79,95%CI:1.07~3.00)、农村(OR=2.15,95%CI:1.55~2.98)、有躯体疼痛(OR=3.97,95%CI:2.97~5.31)、ADL有受损(OR=2.62,95%CI:1.78~3.84)、IADL有受损(OR=3.07,95%CI:2.19~4.29)、疫情对老年人精神影响(OR=1.36,95%CI:1.24~1.49)是老年人抑郁高风险的影响因素;(3)女性(OR=2.07,95%CI:1.43~3.01)、有配偶(OR=1.80,95%CI:1.19~2.72)、城乡或镇乡结合区(OR=2.26,95%CI:1.11~4.57、农村(OR=2.96,95%CI:1.85~4.75)、有躯体疼痛(OR=9.67,95%CI:5.37~17.43)、ADL有受损(OR=4.63,95%CI:2.96~7.23)、IADL有受损(OR=8.03,95%CI:5.20~12.40)、疫情对老年人精神影响(OR=1.46,95%CI:1.32~1.62)是老年人抑郁的影响因素。结论 受新冠肺炎疫情影响,老年人抑郁发展轨迹占比特征发生变化,抑郁高风险及抑郁的占比增加。同时,性别、婚姻状况、受教育程度、居住类型、近2年躯体疼痛史、ADL、IADL、疫情对老年人精神影响为抑郁发展轨迹的影响因素。

关键词: 老年人, 抑郁, 发展轨迹, 新冠肺炎疫情, 老年护理

Abstract: Objective To model the trend of depressive symptoms in the elderly population in China and explore the multidimensional influencing factors, including variables related to the COVID-19 pandemic, to provide insights for the prevention and treatment of depression in the elderly. Methods Based on The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study database (2013-2020), group-based trajectory modeling was used to fit the development trajectory of depressive symptoms in the elderly. The trajectory classification determined by the model was used as the dependent variable, and unordered multinomial logistic regression was conducted to analyze the influencing factors. Results Four trajectories of depressive symptom development were identified: the low-risk group, the moderate-risk group, the high-risk group, and the depressive group, accounting for 11.77%, 38.43%, 37.92%, and 11.88% of the sample, respectively. Unordered multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that (1) compared to males, those having a spouse, or with an educational background of college degree or below, living in urban areas, without physical pain, without impaired activities of daily living (ADL), and without impaired instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), individuals living in rural areas (OR=1.64, 95%CI: 1.22~2.21), experiencing physical pain (OR=1.84, 95%CI: 1.42~2.39), having IADL (OR=2.01, 95%CI: 1.44~2.79), and being affected by the pandemic (OR=1.19, 95%CI: 1.09~1.31) were associated with a moderate risk of depression in the elderly; (2) having an education background of college degree or above (OR=0.55, 95%CI: 0.35~0.86), living in urban or semi-urban areas (OR=1.79, 95%CI: 1.07~3.00), living in rural areas (OR=2.15, 95%CI: 1.55~2.98), experiencing physical pain (OR=3.97, 95%CI: 2.97~5.31), having impaired ADL (OR=2.62, 95%CI: 1.78~3.84), having impaired IADL (OR=3.07, 95%CI: 2.19~4.29), and being affected by the pandemic (OR=1.36, 95%CI: 1.24~1.49) were factors associated with a high risk of depression in the elderly; (3) being female (OR=2.07, 95%CI: 1.43~3.01), having a spouse (OR=1.80, 95%CI: 1.19~2.72), living in urban or semi-urban areas (OR=2.26, 95%CI: 1.11~4.57), living in rural areas (OR=2.96, 95%CI: 1.85~4.75), experiencing physical pain(OR=9.67, 95%CI: 5.37~17.43), having impaired ADL (OR=4.63, 95%CI: 2.96~7.23), having impaired IADL (OR=8.03, 95%CI: 5.20~12.40), and being affected by the pandemic (OR=1.46, 95%CI:1.32~1.62) were factors associated with depression in the elderly. Conclusion The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the proportion of different trajectories of depressive symptoms in the elderly, with an increase in the proportion of high-risk and depressive trajectories. Sex, marital status, education background, living arrangement, recent history (last 2 years) of physical pain, ADL, IADL, and the pandemic's impact on the mental health of the elderly are identified as influencing factors for the trajectory of depressive symptoms.

Key words: elderly individual, depression, development trajectory, COVID-19 pandemic, geriatric care

中图分类号: 

  • R395.4
[1] 閤承治. 后疫情时代老年高血压患者焦虑抑郁状态与睡眠质量相关情况分析[D].武汉:江汉大学,2023.DOI:10.27800/d.cnki.gjhdx.2023.000443.
[2] Yaohui Z, Yisong H, Smith JP,et al.Cohort profile: the China health and retire-ment longitudinal study (CHARLS)[J].Int J Epidemiol,2014,43(1):61-68.DOI:10.1093/ije/dys203.
[3] Zhao YH, Strauss J, Yang GH, et al.China health and retirement longitudinal study:2011-2012 national baseline users' guide[S]. Beijing: National School of Development, Peking University, 2013.
[4] Thierno MO.Statistical power of latent growth curve models to detect quadratic growth[J]. Behav Res Methods,2014,46(2):357-371.DOI:10.3758/s13428-013-0395-1.
[5] Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB,et al.Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D(center for epidemiologic studies depression scale)[J].Am J Prevent Med,1994,10(2):77-84.DOI:10.1002/ajim.4700250315.
[6] Beatriz B, Pedro M Sánchez-Jurado,Marta Martínez-Reig,et al.Frailty,Poly-pharmacy,and health outcomes in older adults: the frailty and dependence in albacete study[J]. J Am Med Direct Assoc, 2017, 19(1):46-52.DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2017.07.008.
[7] Xiang X, An R, Heinemann A.Depression and unmet needs for assistance with daily activities among community-dwelling older adults[J]. Gerontol, 2018,58(3):428-437.DOI:10.1093/geront/gnw262.
[8] 中国健康与养老追踪调查.用户手册[EB/OL].[2024-05-20].https://charls.charlsdata.com/Public/ashelf/public/uploads/document/2020-charls-wave5/application/CHARLS_2020_User_Guide_Chinese.pdf.
[9] 胡晓茜,高奇隆,赵灿,等.中国高龄老人失能发展轨迹及死亡轨迹[J].人口研究, 2019(5):11.
[10] 胡依,闵淑慧,郭芮绮,等.基于组基轨迹建模的中国老年人抑郁症状发展轨迹研究[J].现代预防医学, 2022(4):695-699.
[11] 黄立群,李华,陈焕琴,等.我国老年人抑郁情绪的异质性轨迹——基于CHARLS数据[J].浙江医学教育,2019,18(4):38-40.
[12] 黄立群,陈凌玉,高小芬,等.我国老年人抑郁轨迹及其预测因素[J].护理研究,2023, 37(14):2525-2528.DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2023.14.008.
[13] 范榕,李昱.新冠肺炎疫情背景下社区老年人健康素养水平调查[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2021,21(52):271-272.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3141. 2021.52.106.
[14] 吴蓓. COVID-19疫情背景下老年人的社会隔离与孤独—全球新挑战[J]. 医学新知,2021,31(1):2-4. DOI:10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.2021.01.01.
[15] 王越,陈晴,刘鲁蓉.中国老年人抑郁检出率及影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023,26(34):4329-4335.DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2023.0269.
[16] 刘梦焦,霍玉霞,王敬华,等.天津市滨海新区老年女性焦虑抑郁的患病情况及影响因素分析[J].中国妇幼保健, 2022(7):37.DOI:10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2022.07. 037.
[17] 郭丽阳,刘妮,陈策,等.中国社区中老年人群抑郁症状与冠心病风险的相关性研究:基于CHARLS数据库的实证分析[J].西安交通大学学报:医学版, 2023,44(1): 5.DOI:10.7652/jdyxb202301011.
[18] 任燕,陈善萍,杨永学.新冠肺炎流行期间居家老人抑郁现状及影响因素分析[J].现代临床医学, 2020,46(6):449-452.DOI:10. 11851 /j. issn. 1673-1557. 2020. 06. 018.
[1] 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12-16.
[2] 王薇, 周演铃, 薛文萍, 张淋淋, 林书球. 老年髋部骨折患者衰弱评估工具的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(4): 42-47.
[3] 袁佳琳, 杨玲玲, 刘晓慧, 甘茹, 杜瑄, 高海花, 杨小萍, 王慧娟. 308名脑卒中患者主要照顾者抑郁现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 27-31.
[4] . 老年人社会参与能力的潜在剖面分析及其对衰弱的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(12): 1-6.
[5] . 老年人咀嚼功能临床研究现状[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(12): 21-25.
[6] 邬馨益, 徐林燕, 陈卓琦, 朱徐乐, 赵磊. 老年人运动认知功能减退综合征风险预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(10): 73-78.
[7] 詹娜妮, 王雅琪, 唐丽, 卜凡, 吕启圆. 5 280名老年人主观记忆障碍现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(1): 22-26.
[8] 周祎敏, 姚宇哲, 叶旭春. 社区老年人对照护机器人感知与期望的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(9): 43-48.
[9] 孙小卫, 王燕, 闵春燕, 段菲, 肖江琴. 322例老年COPD患者生活空间现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(8): 1-6.
[10] 任影, 于卫华, 张利, 郑俊俊, 邓曼, 杨侠, 张雨溪. 社区老年人生活空间水平现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 11-15.
[11] 李梦帆, 张侠, 李晓媛. 抑郁在妊娠晚期孕妇身体不满与母胎依恋间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(6): 68-71.
[12] 贺丽春. 失智症老年人蒙台梭利型非药物干预研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 38-41.
[13] 郑思琪, 陈璐, 马晴, 王钰涵, 成杰, 王云龙. 双耳节拍音乐疗法对脑卒中偏瘫患者焦虑抑郁及疲劳的效果研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 72-78.
[14] 崔甜恬, 童宇平. 七步紧急护理评估框架的护理应用研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24): 20-23.
[15] 任影, 于卫华, 张利. 医养结合型养老机构老年人可逆性认知衰弱现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 6-11.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
[1] 高丹姗, 王昕, 张兆英. 护士攻读全日制硕士研究生学业压力的心理过程的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(13): 1 -6 .
[2] 张一帆, 徐晓霞, 王子佼, 刘腊梅, 李珍英, 毛真雪. 肿瘤科护士道德勇气的潜在类别及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(13): 7 -11 .
[3] 尹晓辉, 王葳, 许亚红. 206名婴儿父亲参与教养的现状及影响因素[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(13): 12 -17 .
[4] 杨蓓, 叶红芳, 相卢伟, 路诗雨. 中老年2型糖尿病患者轻度认知障碍风险预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(13): 18 -23 .
[5] 吴元虹, 王晓辉, 王宇宇, 高歌, 王哲, 吴善玉. 基于主客体互倚模型的老年糖尿病患者胰岛素用药依从性影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(13): 24 -29 .
[6] 詹述琴, 郑智慧, 黄宝英, 许嘉显, 詹珊珊. 认知信任量表的汉化及在医务人员中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(13): 30 -34 .
[7] 代荣琴, 刘玉枝, 陈洋, 张金彪, 郭振彬, 李卫, 郭东辉, 高峰, 卢越. 医院内静脉血栓栓塞症防治质量评价与管理指南(2022版)中血栓指标的解读及防治建议[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(13): 35 -39 .
[8] 朱琳怡, 熊飞, 黄玲颖, 张惠娜, 张思淼, 糜菁熠. 基于德尔菲法构建肘关节连续被动活动护理质量评价指标[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(13): 40 -44 .
[9] 吴舒, 张培培, 占正寅, 宁艳婷, 夏娟, 陈敬芳, 罗芳洲. 肝癌靶向药物相关手足皮肤反应的护理研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(13): 45 -49 .
[10] 孟艳亭, 顾惠凤, 金鑫, 聂敏. 孕期丧失胎儿家庭丧亲管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(13): 50 -55 .