以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (13): 17-20.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.13.017

• 护理教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

皮肤损伤多中心研究前混合模式和视频播放模式培训参研护士的效果比较

蒋琪霞1, 陈倩竹2, 赵静3, 陈德凤4, 封海霞5, 潘晓虹6, 洪艳燕7, 俞萍8, 黄仕明9, 王春立10, 马芳11, 徐芳芳12, 于秀娟13   

  1. 1.中国人民解放军东部战区总医院 烧伤整形科,江苏 南京 210002;
    2.重庆医科大学附属第一医院 骨科,重庆 400016;
    3.江苏省人民医院 门诊治疗室,江苏 南京 210009;
    4.广西壮族自治区人民医院 胃肠疝肠瘘外科,广西 南宁 530021;
    5.东南大学附属中大医院护理部,江苏 南京 210009;
    6.荆州市中心医院,湖北 荆州 434000;
    7.南京市中医院,江苏 南京 210000;
    8.无锡市第二人民医院 重症医学科,江苏 无锡 214002;
    9.遵义医科大学附属医院 护理部,贵州 遵义 630005;
    10.南方医科大学深圳医院伤口中造口护理专科,广东 深圳 518000;
    11.中国医科大学附属第四医院 造口伤口护理门诊,辽宁 沈阳 110032;
    12.合肥市第一人民医院 伤口造口门诊,安徽 合肥 230061;
    13.连云港市第二人民医院 伤口造口门诊,江苏 连云港 222000
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-22 出版日期:2022-07-10 发布日期:2022-08-02
  • 作者简介:蒋琪霞（1963-）,女,硕士,主任护师,硕士研究生导师。E-mail：jiangqixia1963@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    上海王正国创伤医学发展基金会课题（WZGF20200101）; 军队保健专项课题（21BJZ38）

Effects of Two Training Methods in Nurses Before Participating in Multicenter Study of Skin Injury in the Elderly

JIANG Qi-xia1, CHEN Qian-zhu2, ZHAO Jing3, CHEN De-feng4, FENG Hai-xia5, PAN Xiao-hong6, HONG Yan-yan7, YU Ping8, HUANG Shi-ming9, WANG Chun-li10, MA Fang11, XU Fang-fang12, YU Xiu-juan13   

  1. 1. Dept. of Burn and Plastic Surgery, General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command, Nanjing 210002, China;
    2. Dept. of Orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China;
    3. Outpatient Treatment Room, Jiangsu Provincial People’s Hospital, Nanjing 210009, China;
    4. Dept. of Gastro-intestinal Fistula Hernia Surgery, People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530021, China;
    5. Dept. of Nursing Administration, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast Hospital, Nanjing 210009, China;
    6. Jingzhou Central Hospital, Jingzhou 434000, China;
    7. Nanjing Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210000, China;
    8. Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine, the Second People’s Hospital of Wuxi, Wuxi 214002, China;
    9. Dept. Nursing Administration, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical Univeristy, Zunyi 630005, China;
    10. Specialist Care Center of Ostomy, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical University, Shenzhen 518000, China;
    11. Specialist Care Clinic of Ostomy, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110032, China;
    12. Wound and Ostomy Clinic, the First People’s Hospital of Hefei, Hefei 230061, China;
    13. Wound and Ostomy Clinic, the Second People’s Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang 222000, China
  • Received:2021-12-22 Online:2022-07-10 Published:2022-08-02

PDF (PC)

97

赞

摘要： 目的 探讨多中心研究前混合模式和视频播放模式培训不同地区参与研究的三级甲等医院护士掌握老年人四类皮肤损伤知识的效果,为选择适宜方法培训参研人员提供依据。方法 招募入选19个省、自治区和直辖市的34所医院为多中心研究单位,各医院按照调研工作量和纳排标准纳入参研护士,共计766名自愿选择了A和B培训方法,A组523名接受在线培训结合培训视频播放混合模式培训,B组243名接受培训视频播放模式培训。培训内容一致,包含4种皮肤损伤定义、分类标准和检查方法等内容。项目组根据培训内容设计包含20张老年人四类皮肤损伤照片为题干的60个问题试卷,于培训1周后,通过微信将在线考试卷链接推送至参训护士。2组参训护士通过手机独立答题,并在1 h内在线提交。满分为100分,统计2组参训率和参考率及平均得分。结果 A、B 2组护士参训率和参考率均为100%,2组总平均得分相近,四类皮肤损伤的平均得分差异也无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。结论 2种培训方法均有满意的参训率和参考率,培训效果相近,适用于多中心研究前不同地区医院参研护士的在职培训。

关键词: 在职培训, 伤口和损伤, 老年人, 护士

Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of two training methods on four types of skin injuries in the elderly for nurses from tertiary grade A hospitals in different regions before participating in multicenter study, and to provide reference for selecting appropriate training methods. Methods Thirty-four tertiary grade A hospitals in 19 provinces, or autonomous regions or municipalities were recruited as multicenter study units. A total of 766 nurses as participants were included and divided into group A and B. Nurses (n=523) in group A received online training combined with video training, and those (n=243) in group B the video training. The training content was the same in the two groups, including four types of skin injuries, stages (category), judgment basis and examination methods. A test paper of 60 questions including 20 photos of four types skin injuries in the elderly were used for evaluating the training effect through Wechat one week after the training, and nurses were required to submit the paper online within 1 hour. The rate of participating in the training and the test, and the average score was observed. Results All the nurses completed the training and online examination. The total average score and the average score of four types of skin injuries in the elderly in the two groups showed no statistical significance (all P>0.05). Conclusion The two training methods have similar effects and are appropriate for in-service training for nurses from hospitals in different regions before the multicenter study.

Key words: in-service training, wounds and injuries, the elderly, nurse

中图分类号: 

  • R473.6
[1] 杨章玲,付沫,蒋琪霞,等.参与压疮调研的临床护士岗位综合培训方法与效果分析[J]. 中华现代护理杂志,2016,22(27):3865-3868.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2016.27.001.
[2] 颜萍,封海霞,谭靓靓,等. 多中心压疮研究调研人员培训效果分析[J].中华现代护理杂志,2016,22(26):3825-3828.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2016.26.034.
[3] 蒋琪霞,刘云,祁静,等.12所综合性医院护士识别压疮分期准确率的情况分析[J].护理研究,2014,28(3B):914-916. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2014.08008.
[4] European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention,d Treatment of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries: Clinical Practice Guideline. The International Guideline. 3rd Edition.EPUAP/NPIAP/PPPIA[EB/OL](2019-11-16]. http://www.internationalguideline. com/
[5] Van den BK, Verhaeghe S, Van HA, et al. The Ghent Global IAD Monitoring Tool (GLOBIAD-M) to Monitor the Healing of Incontinence-associated Dermatitis (IAD): Design and Reliability Study[J]. Int Wound J, 2018,15(4):555-564.
[6] Van Tiggelen H, LeBlanc K, Campbell K, et al. Standardising the Classification of Skin Tears: Validity and Reliability Testing of the International Skin Tear Advisory Panel (ISTAP) Classification System in 44 Countries[J]. Br J Dermatol, 2020,183(1):146-154.DOI:10.1111/bjd.18604.
[7] Lechner A, Lahmann N, Lichterfeld-Kottner A,et al.Dry Skin and the Use of Leave-On Products in Nursing Care:A Prevalence Study in Nursing Homes and Hospitals[J].Nursing Open, 2019,6(1):189-196.DOI:10.1002/nop2.204.
[8] Hu L, Sae-Sia W, Kitrungrote L.Intensive Care Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Pressure Injury Prevention in China: A Cross-sectional Study[J]. Risk Manag Healthc Policy, 2021, 14(10):4257-4267.DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S323839.
[9] Fulbrook P, Lawrence P,Miles S.Australian Nurses’ Knowledge of Pressure Injury Prevention and Management: A Cross-sectional Survey[J]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2019, 46(2):106-112.DOI:10.1097/WON.0000000000000508.
[10] Lotfi M,Mirza Aghazadeh AM, Asgarpour H, et al.Iranian Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitude and Behaviour on Skin Care, Prevention and Management of Pressure Injury: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study[J]. Nursing Open, 2019,6(8):1600-1605. DOI:10.1002/nop2.365.
[11] 蒋琪霞,韩小琴,李莹,等. 基于指南的皮肤撕裂伤预防方案实施效果的初步研究[J].中华现代护理杂志,2016,22(24):3419-3422.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2016.24.004.
[12] Bliss DZ, Gurvich OV, Mathiason MA, et al.Prevention of Incontinence Associated Skin Damage in Nursing Homes: Disparities and Predictors[J].West J Nurs Res, 2017,39(5): 643-659. DOI:10.1177/0193945916666065.
[13] 陈梦云,蔡莹莹.医联体内护士中心静脉导管维护同质化培训[J].中华护理教育,2020,17(4):333-337.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2020.04.012.
[14] 蒋琪霞,彭青,王建荣. 基于典型病例的整体护理培训方法对伤口造口失禁专科护士的培训效果分析[J].中华护理教育,2021,18(4):293-297.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.04.001.
[15] 廖园园,周毅峰,秦月兰,等.预防术中俯卧位患者面部压力性损伤的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报,2020,27(15):39-43.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.15.039.
[16] 秦鸿利,赵震,王艳芳,等. ICU患者压力性损伤预防的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报,2021, 28(10):45-51.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.10.045.
[1] 苏孟宇, 王真, 吴金凤, 李晓燕, 张玉玺. 临床护士开展哀伤辅导的现状及研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(9): 26-30.
[2] 夏青, 肖凤凤, 彭心雨, 游雅菲, 周婷格, 王冬华. 自主性感知在农村老年人死亡焦虑和自我养老能力间的中介作用[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(9): 52-57.
[3] 吕娜, 许凤琴, 刘春梅, 邵晴. 安宁疗护专科护士再认证的研究现状与启示[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(9): 31-35.
[4] 康艳楠, 魏文彤, 王瑞瑞, 张春梅, 刘彦慧. 基于马斯洛需求层次理论农村留守老年人社会支持需求评估体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(8): 1-6.
[5] 沈影, 王梅, 罗迎霞, 谢雅瑞, 毛惠娜. 基于能力-机会-动机-行为模型老年肺癌衰弱患者健康促进方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(6): 65-70.
[6] 蔡莹莹, 张俊峰, 蔡艾芳, 曾雅燕, 李玲, 黄琼珊, 刘兴玲. 以培养护士核心能力为导向的循证护理查房模式探索[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(6): 50-54.
[7] 张慧超, 王楠楠, 张玉玺. 安宁疗护护士情感劳动经历质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(6): 37-43.
[8] 左倩倩, 曾文捷, 廖敏怡, 李景秋, 罗岚, 高钰琳. 199名安宁疗护护士职业悲伤现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(4): 46-52.
[9] 王秋婷, 魏琳, 刘杨晨, 林静霞, 林丽君, 胡萍, 朱丽佳, 林美珍. 中医专科护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(4): 1-6.
[10] 李丹, 冯兰棱, 樊落, 李琳, 朱伟, 郝雅茹. 护士对患者死亡认知与体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(4): 34-39.
[11] 张娜, 陈海勤, 邵磊, 朱月莉, 沈银萍. 精神科低年资护士培训应用防暴技能微视频的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 24-28.
[12] 胡惠菊, 郭雪琪, 唐启群, 成杰, 李慧源, 李田田. 衰老认知在养老机构老年人领悟社会支持与内在力量间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 57-61.
[13] 肖凤, 宋慧娟, 任英, 李爽, 施盛莹, 赖嘉微. 临床护士自我效能感在情绪智力与关怀行为间的中介调节作用[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 62-66.
[14] 梁红梅, 常健, 周兴梅, 陈兰. 超声专科护士岗位设立及工作实践[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(2): 17-19.
[15] 杨莉, 叶红芳, 孙倩倩, 方金林. 1 386名临床护士创新行为现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(2): 57-61.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
[1] 马蕙, 杨富国, 卢晓虹, 夏婷婷, 尹春岚, 李瑶瑶. 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者自我管理行为现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(20): 1 -4 .
[2] 马景双, 孙茜, 王艳杰. 对分课堂教学模式在护理学导论教学中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(20): 5 -7 .
[3] 李华, 夏于欣, 王西. 手术室非计价耗材基于价格标识的综合管理[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(20): 8 -9 .
[4] 于洁, 季红, 王兆秀, 张彦红, 丁文秀. 护理领域共情疲劳概念分析[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(20): 10 -14 .
[5] 黎喆, 丁欣. 衰弱评估在主动脉瓣狭窄患者中的应用进展[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(20): 14 -17 .
[6] 冷志兵, 杨晓玲, 杨平, 汪晓媛, 谢建雷, 蒲亨萍. 院前与入院后气管插管对重型颅脑损伤患者 预后影响的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(20): 18 -23 .
[7] 赵诗雨, 柯卉, 李梦圆, 熊璨, 喻姣花. 肠内营养补充剂防治压疮效果的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(20): 24 -30 .
[8] 郑雯, 丑安, 张礼宾, 盛丽莎. 高职护生隐性知识能力评价体系的构建研究[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(20): 31 -36 .
[9] 杜兰玉, 胡霞, 王向弘, 刘海娜, 任磊, 朱晓秀, 段幼萍. 380例维持性血液透析患者衰弱现状及其对预后的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(20): 37 -41 .
[10] 王乾贝, 乔曼, 郑颖, 薄琳. 癫癎自我管理行为量表汉化及其信效度评价[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(20): 42 -46 .