以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (18): 1-6.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.18.001

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

天津市2 057名护生灵性照护认知现状及影响因素分析

汪张毅1a, 赵浩梅2, 王月1a, 王朝1a, 庞晓丽1b   

  1. 1.天津中医药大学 a.研究生院;b.护理学院,天津 301617;
    2.河北中医学院 护理学院,河北 石家庄 050000
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-20 出版日期:2021-09-25 发布日期:2021-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 庞晓丽（1976-）,女,天津人,博士,教授。E-mail：403033115@qq.com
  • 作者简介:汪张毅（1998-）,男,湖南湘西人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目（81603565）; 全国中医药高等教育“十四五”规划2021年度教育科研课题（DZ-20-07）; 天津市普通高等学校本科教学质量与教学改革研究计划项目（171006303D）

Status Quo of Cognition on Spiritual Care and Its Influence Factors in Nursing Students in Tianjin: A 2, 057-case Study

WANG Zhang-yi1a, ZHAO Hao-mei2, WANG Yue1a, WANG Zhao1a, PANG Xiao-li1b   

  1. 1a. Graduate School; 1b. School of Nursing, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin 301617, China;
    2. School of Nursing, Hebei University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
  • Received:2021-03-20 Online:2021-09-25 Published:2021-10-12

PDF (PC)

192

赞

摘要： 目的 调查护生灵性照护认知现状,并分析其影响因素。方法 采用便利抽样法,于2020年11月—2021年4月抽取天津市5所院校共2 057名护生作为研究对象。采用一般资料调查表、中文版灵性照护认知量表、灵性健康简化量表及杰弗逊护生共情量表对其进行调查。采用多元线性回归分析护生灵性照护认知的影响因素。结果 2 057名护生灵性照护认知总分为（171.22±25.11）分,所有条目均分为（5.04±0.74）分;多元线性回归分析结果显示民族、学历、生源地、是否需要学校开设灵性照护培训或课程、灵性健康及共情能力是护生灵性照护认知的主要影响因素（P<0.05）,共解释总变异的43.4%。结论 天津市2 057名护生灵性照护认知处于中等水平,有待进一步提升。相关院校领导应根据护生个体化特征和差异实施灵性照护教育,如健全灵性照护教育体系和课程考核标准,定期邀请临床老师或专家开展相关讲座或培训,创新理论和临床实践教学模式等,多层次地提高护生灵性照护认知水平。

关键词: 护生, 灵性照护认知, 灵性健康, 共情能力, 影响因素

Abstract: Objective To investigate the status quo of cognition on spiritual care among nursing students, and analyze its influence factors. Methods A total of 2,057 nursing students from 5 universities and colleges in Tianjin were selected by using convenience sampling method from November 2020 to April 2021. And the survey was conducted by using general information questionnaire, the Chinese Version of the Spiritual Care-giving Scale, the Spiritual Health Scale Short Form, the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy-nursing Student for questionnaire survey. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the influence factors of spiritual care cognition. Results The total score of spiritual care cognition was 171.22±25.11 and the average score for all entries was 5.04±0.74. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that nationality, education background, birth place, needs for spiritual care training or courses, spiritual health and empathy ability were main influencing factors of spiritual care cognition (P<0.05), explaining 43.4% of the total variation. Conclusion The cognition on spiritual care of 2,057 nursing students in Tianjin is at a medium level and needs to be further improved. It is suggested that spiritual care education according to the individualized characteristics and differences of nursing students is significant, such as improving the spiritual care education system and curriculum assessment standards, regularly inviting clinical teachers or experts to deliver lectures or training, and innovating the theory and clinical practice teaching mode, so as to improve the level of spiritual care cognition among nursing students in multiple ways.

Key words: nursing student, spiritual care cognition, spiritual health, empathy ability, influencing factor

中图分类号: 

  • R471
[1] Musa AS.Attitudes Toward Spiritual Care and the Provision of Spiritual Care Interventions among Jordanian Baccalaureate Nursing Students: Prevalence and Correlates[J]. Nurs Educ Perspect, 2020, 41(6):349-354. DOI:10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000637.
[2] Damiano RF, Dilalla LF, Lucchetti G, et al.Empathy in Medical Students Is Moderated by Openness to Spirituality[J]. Teach Learn Med, 2017, 29(2):188-195. DOI:10.1080/10401334.2016.1241714.
[3] Daghan S.Nursing Students'Perceptions of Spirituality and Spiritual Care: An Example of Turkey[J]. J Relig Health, 2018, 57(1):420-430. DOI:10.1007/s10943-017-0416-y.
[4] Tiew LH, Creedy DK.Development and Preliminary Validation of a Composite Spiritual Care-giving Scale[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2012, 49(6):682-690. DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.11.014.
[5] Hu Y, Tiew LH, Li F.Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Spiritual Care-giving Scale (C-SCGS) in Nursing Practice[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2019, 19(1):21. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0662-7.
[6] Hsiao YC, Chiang YC, Lee HC, et al.Psychometric Testing of the Properties of the Spiritual Health Scale Short Form[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2013, 22(21/22):2981-2990. DOI:10.1111/jocn.12410.
[7] 邱志军,刘可,姜娜. 湖南省高职护生共情现状的调查研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2011, 27(1):68-71. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2011.01.034.
[8] 李宁,田冰洁,赵丹,等. 护理人员灵性照护教育研究进展[J]. 中国护理管理, 2017, 17(2):188-192. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2017.02.011.
[9] 史岩,赵怡婷,胡艳丽,等. 肿瘤科护士灵性照护认知与灵性照顾能力的相关性研究[J]. 医学与哲学, 2020, 41(7): 55-58. DOI:10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2020.07.14.
[10] Cooper KL, Chang E, Sheehan A, et al.The Impact of Spiritual Care Education upon Preparing Undergraduate Nursing Students to Provide Spiritual Care[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2013,33(9):1057-1061.DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2012.04.005.
[11] Deluga A, Dobrowolska B, Jurek K, et al.Nurses'Spiritual Attitudes and Involvement-validation of the Polish Version of the Spiritual Attitude and Involvement List[J]. PLoS One,2020,15(9):e239068.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0239068.
[12] 岳宗德. 大学生宗教信仰状况调查分析及教育对策——基于河南省地方高校大学生的调查[J]. 学校党建与思想教育, 2017(5):50-53.
[13] Pipkins CM, Rinker MA, Curl E.Spiritual Care Perceptions of Baccalaureate Nursing Students[J]. J Holist Nurs, 2020, 38(1):131-138. DOI:10.1177/0898010119887595.
[14] Donesky D, Sprague E, Joseph D.A New Perspective on Spiritual Care: Collaborative Chaplaincy and Nursing Practice[J]. ANS Adv Nurs Sci, 2020, 43(2):147-158. DOI:10.1097/ANS.0000000000000298.
[15] 焦妙蕊,胡艳丽,张琳,等. 灵性关怀培训对护士灵性健康和灵性照护能力的影响[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2020(4): 435-441.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2020.04.003.
[16] Tuzer H, Kirca K, Ozveren H.Investigation of Nursing Students'Attitudes Towards Death and Their Perceptions of Spirituality and Spiritual Care[J]. J Relig Health, 2020, 59(4):2177-2190. DOI:10.1007/s10943-020-01004-9.
[17] Chen CS, Chan SW, Chan MF, et al.Nurses'Perceptions of Psychosocial Care and Barriers to Its Provision: A Qualitative Study[J]. J Nurs Res, 2017, 25(6):411-418. DOI:10.1097/JNR.0000000000000185.
[18] Green C.Nurses and Patients'Perspectives on Spiritual Health Assessment[J]. J Relig Health, 2021, 60(1):122-133. DOI:10.1007/s10943-020-01113-5.
[1] 何亚林, 杜娟, 周莉, 但鑫. 本科实习护生的社会支持和成就动机在其自主学习准备度与问题解决能力间的中介作用[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(8): 50-55.
[2] 田丽, 李梦媛, 肖抒情, 阎玲. 晚期癌症患者预期性悲伤的现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 11-14.
[3] 肖萍, 宋洁, 吴淑琳, 姜倩倩, 陈海雯, 刘霖. 护生接受痴呆教育干预的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 26-29.
[4] 丁翠路, 刘安诺, 朱桂月, 张萌, 马雯, 刘敏. 自我价值感在本科护生领悟社会支持与生命意义感间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(6): 38-42.
[5] 周静, 毛嘉钰, 丁倍, 郑惠, 王君婧. 多维状态无聊在本科护生社交网络中的社会比较与错失焦虑间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(6): 43-47.
[6] 欧阳雅琦, 谢鑑辉, 梅海波, 刘昆, 刘尧喜, 黄源. 364例先天性胫骨假关节患儿照顾者家庭抗逆力现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(5): 1-5.
[7] 亓伟业, 付菊芳. 本科护生学业自我效能感焦点解决思维与学业投入的关系研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(5): 70-74.
[8] 谢颖, 陈雪蕾, 戴小红. 高职护生就业心理资本训练的干预研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(3): 63-68.
[9] 李惠平, 李立华, 崔虹, 郭金花, 邵华, 关燕霞, 谢美香. 双相障碍青少年患者父母疾病家庭负担现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(18): 70-73.
[10] 易子涵, 李茜, 张海茹, 杨良琴, 陈明秋, 鞠梅. 农村独居老年人老年自我忽视的现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(18): 7-11.
[11] 伍成凯, 许军, 黄晨, 刘倩, 李文源. 广州市老年人健康适能及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(17): 6-10.
[12] 望运丹, 胡德英, 王伟仙, 刘义兰. 基于应激-易感模型住院患者自杀意念影响因素的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(16): 5-8.
[13] 刘瑾, 路娜, 张凤娃, 牛晓丹, 袁蓉敬, 李雯艳, 王叶同, 王艳红. 乳腺癌患者癌症复发恐惧影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(14): 1-7.
[14] 刘敏利, 周春兰, 龙艳娟, 肖秀英, 黄玉楼, 黄小娜, 李小贞, 龚秀群, 李苏城, 黄锦航, 彭小平, 耿丽, 梁美燕. 珠海市金湾区老年人轻度认知障碍现况调查及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(13): 74-78.
[15] 杨丽峰. 翻转课堂教学模式下本科护生学业形成性评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(12): 6-9.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
[1] 程伟鹤,史冬雷(综述),刘华平(审校). 恶性梗阻性黄疸患者胆汁回输方式及其护理现状[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(14): 24 -27 .
[2] 陈敬芳,王晓燕,李旺. 足踝部定量活动仪辅助踝泵运动对骨科患者术后疼痛及股静脉血液回流的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(4): 1 -4 .
[3] 嵇艳, 丁亚萍, 许勤. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情下护理专业精神内涵分析及其对人才培养的启示[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(19): 71 -73 .
[4] 云婷,曹孟莹,李平. 血液净化护理信息数据元标准构建研究[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(9): 11 -14 .
[5] 乐霄,赵体玉,旷婉. 术前焦虑测评量表的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(9): 26 -30 .
[6] 杜荣欣, 张晓红, 刘艳华, 张芳, 徐娟. 永久性肠造口患者延续性护理需求量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(14): 1 -4 .
[7] 刘丹娜, 詹艳, 胡德雄, 沈婧, 王劼琼, 张淇. 中文完整版灵性需求问卷在慢性心力衰竭患者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(24): 6 -10 .
[8] 高珊, 黄慧敏, 张芳, 何宗斌, 刘亚珍, 申海燕. 前列腺增生患者自我管理需求及影响因素的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(24): 52 -56 .
[9] 陈俊杉, 范杰梅, 余金甜, 张爱琴. 神经外科ICU患者谵妄风险预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 1 -8 .
[10] 彭杰, 危志华, 马婧, 杨湘薇, 宋阳. 心理韧性在护理硕士研究生情绪智力与职业认同间的中介作用[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(22): 73 -76 .