脑卒中高危人群保护动机问卷的编制及信效度检验

doi:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.08.001

护理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (8): 1-5.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.08.001

• 研究生园地 • 下一篇

脑卒中高危人群保护动机问卷的编制及信效度检验

邓丽萍¹, 谢小华², 王亚萍², 杨洁¹, 潘璐², 马家惠¹, 肖静怡³, 熊小云³

1.安徽医科大学深圳二院临床学院,广东深圳 518035;
2.深圳市第二人民医院深圳大学第一附属医院,广东深圳 518035;
3.广州医科大学护理学院,广东广州,510000

收稿日期:2019-09-19 出版日期:2020-04-25 发布日期:2020-07-14
通讯作者: 谢小华（1964-）,女,广西合浦人,硕士,主任护师,硕士研究生导师。E-mail:13560779836@163.com
作者简介:邓丽萍（1995-）,女,安徽淮南人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
基金资助:
广东省科技厅资助项目（2017A020215121）; 广东省卫生经济学会（2017-WJ02-08）; 广东省护理学会资助项目（gdhlxueh2019zl048）; 深圳市科创委资助项目（JCYJ20180228163026995）

Development of Protection Motivation Questionnaire for High Risk Population of Stroke and Its Reliability and Validity

DENG Li-ping¹, XIE Xiao-hua², WANG Ya-ping², YANG Jie¹, PAN Lu², MA Jia-hui¹, XIAO Jing-yi³, XIONG Xiao-yun³

1. Anhui Medical University, Clinical College of the Second Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518035, China;
2. The Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518035, China;
3. School of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510000,China

Received:2019-09-19 Online:2020-04-25 Published:2020-07-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的编制脑卒中高危人群保护动机问卷,并检验其信效度。方法以保护动机理论为指导,通过指南和文献回顾、德尔菲法专家咨询、预实验后形成正式施测问卷。采用方便采样法对304例脑卒中高危人群进行问卷调查,分析问卷信效度。结果脑卒中高危人群保护动机问卷包括严重性、易感性、内外部奖励、反应效能、反应代价和自我效能6个维度,42个条目。各因子的累积方差贡献率分别为64.162%、47.559%、53.396%、63.531%、50.235%、49.636%。问卷内容效度指数为0.963,各条目内容效度指数为0.857~1。问卷的Cronbach α系数为0.872,各维度的Cronbach α系数为 0.779~0.874。问卷的折半信度为0.909,问卷的重测信度为0.810,各维度重测信度分别为0.718~0.885（P<0.01）。结论脑卒中高危人群保护动机问卷具有良好的信效度,可用于解释和预测脑卒中高危人群健康行为的意图。

关键词: 脑卒中, 高危人群, 保护动机理论, 德尔菲法, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To develop a protective motivation questionnaire for stroke high-risk population（PMQ-SHR） and to test its reliability and validity. Methods Guided by the protection motivation theory, the initial questionnaire was formed through guidelines and literature review, Delphi consulting, and pre-experiment. A total of 304 stroke high-risk patients by convenient sampling method were chosen to test its reliability and validity. Results There were 6 dimensions in the developed PMQ-SHR including severity, susceptibility, internal and external reward, response efficacy, response cost and self-efficacy, and 42 items. The cumulative variance contribution rate of the factors was 64.162%, 47.559%, 53.396%, 63.531%, 50.235%, and 49.636%, respectively. The content validity index of the questionnaire was 0.963, and that of the items ranged from 0.857 to 1. The Cronbach α coefficient was 0.872 for the questionnaire, and 0.779 to 0.874 for all the dimensions. The half-fold reliability of the questionnaire was 0.909; the test-retest reliability coefficient 0.810 for the questionnaire, and 0.718~0.885 for all the dimensions (P<0.01). Conclusion With good reliability and validity, the developed PMQ-SHR can be used to explain and predict the intention of healthy behavior of high-risk population of stroke.

Key words: stroke, high risk population, protective motivation theory, Delphi Technique, reliability, validity

中图分类号:

R473

邓丽萍, 谢小华, 王亚萍, 杨洁, 潘璐, 马家惠, 肖静怡, 熊小云. 脑卒中高危人群保护动机问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(8): 1-5.

DENG Li-ping, XIE Xiao-hua, WANG Ya-ping, YANG Jie, PAN Lu, MA Jia-hui, XIAO Jing-yi, XIONG Xiao-yun. Development of Protection Motivation Questionnaire for High Risk Population of Stroke and Its Reliability and Validity[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2020, 27(8): 1-5.

参考文献

[1] 国家卫生和计划生育委员会脑卒中筛查与防治工程委员会. 卒中筛查与防治技术规范[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2014, 47(3):199-203.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2014.03.014.
[2] 《中国脑卒中防治报告2018》编写组. 我国脑卒中防治仍面临巨大挑战——《中国脑卒中防治报告2018》概要[J]. 中国循环杂志, 2019, 34(2):105-119.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2019.02.001.
[3] O'donnell MJ, Chin SL, Rangarajan S, et al.Global and Regional Effects of Potentially Modifiable Risk Factors Associated with Acute Stroke in 32 Countries (Interstroke): ACase-control Study[J]. Lancet, 2016, 388(10046):761-775.DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30506-2.
[4] Rogers RW.A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1[J]. J Psychol, 1975, 91(1):93-114.DOI:10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803.
[5] Gidlow CJ, Ellis NJ, Cowap L, et al.A Qualitative Study of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Communication in Nhs Health Check Using Different Risk Calculators: Protocol for the Risk Communication in Nhs Health Check (Rico) Study[J]. BMC Fam Pract, 2019, 20(1):11.DOI:10.1186/s12875-018-0897-0.
[6] Chambers RS, Rosenstock S, Lee A, et al.Exploring the Role of Sex and Sexual Experience in Predicting American Indian Adolescent Condom Use Intention Using Protection Motivation Theory[J]. Front Public Health, 2018, (6):318.DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2018.00318.
[7] Thrul J, Stemmler M, Buhler A, et al.Adolescents' Protection Motivation and Smoking Behaviour[J]. Health Educ Res, 2013, 28(4):683-691.DOI:10.1093/her/cyt062.
[8] Mirkarimi K, Eri M, Ghanbari MR, et al.Modifying Attitude and Intention Toward Regular Physical Activity Using Protection Motivation Theory: A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Eastern Mediterr Health J, 2017, 23(8):543-550.
[9] Chan CW, Choi KC, Wong RS, et al.Examining the Cervical Screening Behaviour of Women Aged 50 or above and Its Predicting Factors: A Population-based Survey[J].Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2016, 13(12):E1195. DOI:10.3390/ijerph13121195.
[10] 陈娟,谢继安,徐莲英,等. 保护动机干预模式对社区中老年高血压患者自我管理行为的影响[J]. 重庆医学, 2018, 47(27):3576-3579.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2018.27.025.
[11] 陈洁,吴茜,程小霁. 对妊娠期糖尿病患者基于保护动机理论的护理干预[J]. 护理学杂志,2017, 32(6):25-27.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2017.06.025.
[12] 朱晨茜,赵江丽,王春霞. 脑卒中护理咨询门诊的建立与思考[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2016, 22(7):88-90.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2016.07.046.
[13] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务-SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2010:160-244.
[14] 麦舒敏. 基于DART模型患者价值共创行为量表研制及应用[D].广州:南方医科大学, 2019.
[15] Je M, Rogers RW.Protection Motivation and Self-efficacy: A Revised Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change[J]. Health Psychology, 1983, 19(5):469-479.
[16] 钱湘云,何炜,耿桂灵,等.社区老年高血压保护动机模型建立与分析[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2015, 35(17):4970-4973.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2015.17.116.
[17] Xiao H, Peng M, Yan H, et al.An Instrument Based on Protection Motivation Theory to Predict Chinese Adolescents' Intention to Engage in Protective Behaviors Against Schistosomiasis[J]. Global Health Res and Policy, 2016, 1:15.DOI:10.1186/s41256-016-0015-6.
[18] Wang W, Jiang B, Sun H, et al.Prevalence, Incidence, and Mortality of Stroke in China: Results from a Nationwide Population-based Survey of 480 687 Adults[J]. Circulation,2017, 135(8):759-771.DOI:10.1161/circulationaha.116.025250.
[19] Chamroonsawasdi K, Chottanapund S, Tunyasitthisundhorn P, et al.Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Knowledge, Threat and Coping Appraisal, and Intention to Practice Healthy Behaviors Related to Non-Communicable Diseases in the Thai Population[J]. Behav Sci (Basel, Switzerland),2017,7(2):E20.DOI:10.3390/bs7020020.
[20] Goldstein LB, Bushnell CD, Adams RJ, et al.Guidelines for the Primary Prevention of Stroke[J]. Stroke, 2011, 42(2):517-584.DOI:10.1161/STR.0b013e3181fcb238.
[21] 杨莘. 中国脑卒中护理指导规范[M]. 国家卫生计生委脑卒中防治工程委员会, 2015:8-14.
[22] Ping W, Cao W, Tan H, et al.Health Protective Behavior Scale: Development and Psychometric Evaluation[J]. PloS one, 2018,13(1):e0190390.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0190390.
[23] 梅永霞. 脑卒中照顾者获益感概念框架及其评估工具的研究[D].郑州:郑州大学, 2018.
[24] 张凡,张静萍. 基于Delphi-AHP法多发伤患者ICU护理监测评估量表的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(22):11-15.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.22.011.
[25] 李峥,刘宇. 护理学研究方法[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2018:251.
[26] Hickman RLJ, Pignatiello GA, Tahir S.Evaluation of the Decisional Fatigue Scale Among Surrogate Decision Makers of the Critically Ill[J]. West J Nurs Res, 2018, 40(2):191-208.DOI:10.1177/0193945917723828.
[27] 王妍,刘峰,田敏,等. 心内科护理安全管理评价量表的编制及信度效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(15):5-8.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.15.005.
[28] Koh YL, Lua YH, Hong L, et al.Using a Web-based Approach to Assess Test-retest Reliability of the "Hypertension Self-care Profile" Tool in an Asian Population[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016, 95(9):e2955.DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000002955.
[29] Dikken J, Hoogerduijn JG, Kruitwagen C, et al.Content Validity and Psychometric Characteristics of the "Knowledge about Older Patients Quiz" for Nurses Using Item Response Theory[J].J Am Geriatr Soc, 2016, 64(11):2378-2383.DOI:10.1111/jgs.14476.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

脑卒中高危人群保护动机问卷的编制及信效度检验

Development of Protection Motivation Questionnaire for High Risk Population of Stroke and Its Reliability and Validity

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	马莹, 叶君荣, 黄昭君, 夏志春, 徐丹, 邓爱萍, 刘名河, 罗斯莉, 张建龙. 基于循证构建精神科护理质量敏感性指标[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(9): 27-32.
[2]	刘丽萍, 周春兰, 吴艳妮, 从维莲, 胡明钰, 李晓霞. 情绪抑制量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(8): 6-10.
[3]	孙文玉, 毕鸿雁. 视觉追踪训练对脑卒中患者步行功能与日常生活能力的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(7): 7-10.
[4]	丁寒琴, 侯彩兰, 何夏君, 黄秋玲, 王越亚. 综合医院精神科开放式病房新护士岗位胜任力考核评价指标的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(5): 9-13.
[5]	张娟, 黄蓓蓓, 余天浩, 刘夕珍, 顾静. 基于医疗失效模式与效应分析模型的急性缺血性脑卒中患者院内急救流程优化[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(4): 16-20.
[6]	潘国翠, 李梅. 决策疲劳量表的汉化及其应用于ICU患者家属的信度效度评价[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 38-41.
[7]	陈娟慧, 陈燕萍, 蒙昱妃, 林绍英, 陶艳玲. 社区护士对老年人家庭访视的知信行评价指标体系构建[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 73-78.
[8]	谢延真, 李壮苗, 张佳宇, 纪秋露, 吴宇欣. 灸法治疗脑卒中后偏瘫的文献计量学分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 16-20.
[9]	王洁, 郭燕. 急性白血病患儿照顾者照护知信行问卷的编制及信度效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(6): 1-5.
[10]	米元元, 周瑜, 黄海燕. 脑卒中后患者吞咽困难研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(6): 22-26.
[11]	汪云云, 谢小华, 潘璐, 张剑, 邓丽萍, 熊小云, 马家惠, 肖静怡. WORSEN评分预测急性缺血性脑卒中早期神经功能恶化的效能评估[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(5): 1-5.
[12]	丁春戈, 林蓓蕾, 张振香. 社区医务人员对居家脑卒中患者分级护理认知的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(4): 5-9.
[13]	王玉梅, 张岚, 乐琼, 吴丽芬, 熊莉娟, 杨雪娇, 张学辉. 中文版早产儿非营养性吸吮功能评估量表的信效度分析[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(3): 62-65.
[14]	王妍, 刘峰, 田敏, 张楠. 心内科护理安全管理评价量表的编制及信度效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(15): 5-8.
[15]	吉加梅, 罗彩凤, 徐剑鸥. 护士情域能力评价量表的编制及信度效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(15): 46-50.