以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 28-33.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.01.028

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

老年人成功老龄态度质性研究的Meta整合

于洁1, 贾锟1, 宋菲菲1, 季红2   

  1. 1.山东中医药大学 护理学院,山东 济南 250355;
    2.山东第一医科大学第一附属医院(山东省千佛山医院),山东 济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-13 出版日期:2020-01-10 发布日期:2020-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 季红(1974-),女,江苏海安人,硕士,主任护师,硕士研究生导师,E-mail: honghongji-2005@163.com。
  • 作者简介:于洁(1993-),女,山东德州人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,护士。
  • 基金资助:
    山东省中医药科技发展计划(2019-0367)

Meta Synthesis of Qualitative Studies on Successful Aging Attitudes in the Elderly

YU Jie1, JIA Kun1, SONG Fei-fei1, JI Hong2   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, China;
    2. Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, the First Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250014,China
  • Received:2019-11-13 Online:2020-01-10 Published:2020-07-20

摘要: 目的 系统评价老年人对成功老龄的态度及看法,为今后开展促进老年人成功老龄的干预提供参考依据。方法 检索中国知网、万方、维普、PubMed、CINAHL数据库,检索老年人对成功老龄态度和看法的质性研究的文献,检索时限从建库至2019年7月。采用澳大利亚Joanna Briggs循证卫生保健中心(JBI)质性研究真实性评价,采用汇集性整合方法进行整合。结果 纳入12篇文献,提炼出50个研究结果,将相关的结果归纳成14个类别,后将其综合成4个整合结果,分别为生理健康、心理健康与精神、社会幸福感、生命认知。结论 老年人对于成功老龄的态度和看法包括多个方面,政策制定者要充分认识到不同文化背景下老年人之间的差异,根据各自的文化背景,制定出相应的干预措施以促进老年人达到成功老龄。

关键词: 老年人, 成功老龄, 质性研究, Meta整合

Abstract: Objective To systematically evaluate the attitude toward and view of the successful aging in the elderly, and provide reference for future intervention to promote successful aging of the elderly. Methods We searched databases including CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed and CINAHL for literatures of qualitative research on the attitude toward and views of successful aging in the elderly from the inception of the database to July 2019. The quality of included studies was evaluated according to JBI Critical Appraisal Tool for qualitative studies. The results were synthesized with integrative methods. Results Twelve articles were included and 50 results were extracted and summarized into 14 categories then integrated into 4 themes including physical health, mental health and spirit, social well-being and life cognitive. Conclusion There are various attitudes toward and views of successful aging in the elderly. Policy makers should fully recognize the differences among the elderly from different cultural backgrounds and formulate corresponding intervention measures to promote the elderly to achieve successful aging according to their respective cultural backgrounds.

Key words: the elderly, successful aging, qualitative research, Meta synthesis

中图分类号: 

  • R473.59
[1] 中国财政科学研究院课题组. 2020:积极应对人口老龄化的挑战[N].社会科学报,2018-11-29(001).
[2] 程志强,马金秋.中国人口老龄化的演变与应对之策[J].学术交流,2018(12):101-109.
[3] 中共中央,国务院.“健康中国2030”规划纲要[Z].2016-10-25.
[4] Estebsari F, Dastoorpoor M, RahimiKhalifehkandi Z, et al.The Concept of Successful Aging: A Review Article[J]. Curr Aging Sci, 2019 Oct 23.DOI:10.2174/1874609812666191023130117.[Epub ahead of print]
[5] Zanjari N, Sharifian SM, Hosseini CM,et al.Perceptions of Successful Ageing among Iranian Elders:Insights from a Qualitative Study[J].Int J Aging Hum Dev,2016,83(4):381-401.DOI:10.1177/0091415016657559.
[6] 季红,凌吉英.成功老龄的概念分析:护理新视野[J].护理学报,2013,20(19):1-6.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2013.19.004.
[7] Troutman M, Nies MA, Mavellia H.Perceptions of Successful Aging in Black Older Adults[J]. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv,2011,49(1):28-34.DOI:10.3928/02793695-20101201-01.
[8] Cosco TD, Prina AM, Perales J, et al.Lay Perspectives of Successful Ageing:a Systematic Review and Meta-ethnography[J].BMJ Open, 2013,3(6):1-9.DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2013002710.
[9] Sarah JB.循证护理-弥合科研与实践的鸿沟[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2018:28-29.
[10] Joanna Briggs Institute.The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for use in JBI Systematic Reviews Checklist for Qualitative Research[EB/OL][2019-12-13].https://joannabriggs.org/research/critical-appraisal-tools.html.
[11] 胡雁,郝玉芳.循证护理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:78-79.
[12] 李红梅,郑秀,田朝霞,等.COPD患者家属居家照顾体验质性研究的Meta整合[J].中国护理管理,2019,19(4):524-530.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2019.04.010.
[13] Chen L, Ye M, Kahana E.A Self-reliant Umbrella: Defining Successful Aging among the Old-old (80+) in Shanghai[J].J Appl Gerontol, 2019(3):1-18.DOI:10.1177/0733464819842500.
[14] Reichstadt J, Depp CA, Palinkas LA,et al.Building Blocks of Successful Aging:A Focus Group Study of Older Adults Perceived Contributors to Successful Aging[J].J Appl Gerontol, 2007, 15(3):194-201.DOI:10.1097/JGP.0b013e318030255f.
[15] Troutman-Jordan M, Nies MA, Davis B.An Examination of Successful Aging among Southern Black and White Older Adults[J].J Gerontol Nurs,2013,39(3):42-52.DOI:10.3928/00989134-20130131-01.
[16] Lewis JP.Successful Aging Through the Eyes of Alaska Native Elders.What It Means to be an Alder in Bristol Bay,AK[J].Gerontologist,2011,51(4):540-549.DOI:10.1093/geront/gnr006.
[17] Carr K, Weir PL.A Qualitative Description of Successful Aging through Different Decades of Older Adulthood[J].Aging Ment Health,2016, 21(12):1317-1325.DOI:10.1080/13607863.2016.1226764.
[18] Mortimer MC, Ward L, Winefield H.Successful Ageing by Whose Definition? Views of Older, Spiritually Affiliated Women[J].Australas J Ageing,2009,27(4):200-204. DOI:10.1111/j.1741-6612.2008.00305.x.
[19] Carstensen G, Rosberg B, Mc Kee KJ,et al.Before Evening Falls:Perspectives of a Good Old Age and Healthy Ageing among Oldest-old Swedish Men[J]. Arch Gerontol Geriat,2019(82):35-44.DOI:10.1016/j.archger.2019.01.002.
[20] Hörder HM, Frändin K,Larsson MEH.Self-respect through Ability to Keep Fear of Frailty at a Distance:Successful Ageing from the Perspective of Community-dwelling Older People[J]. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being, 2013,8(1):20194.DOI:10.3402/qhw.v8i0.20194.
[21] Sato-Komata M, Hoshino A, Usui K,et al.Concept of Successful Ageing among the Community-dwelling Oldest Old in Japan[J]. Br J Community Nurs,2015,20(12):586-592.DOI:10.12968/bjcn.2015.20.12.586.
[22] Amin I.Perceptions of Successful Aging among Older Adults in Bangladesh: An Exploratory Study[J].J Cross Cult Gerontol,2017,32(2):191-207.DOI:10.1007/s10823-017-9319-3.
[23] 成磊,冯升,陆春梅,等.早产儿出院后父母照顾体验质性研究的系统评价和Meta整合[J].中国循证医学杂志,2015,15(9):1090-1097.
[24] Pruchno RA, Wilson-Genderson M, Cartwright F.A Two-factor Model of Successful Aging[J]. J Gerontol B Psychol,2010,65(6):671-679.DOI:10.1093/geronb/gbq051.
[25] Nguyen AL, Seal DW.Cross-Cultural Comparison of Successful Aging Definitions Between Chinese and Hmong Elders in the United States[J].J Cross Cult Gerontol,2014,29(2):153-171.DOI:10.1007/s10823-014-9231-z.
[26] 王艳艳,宋洁,张男,等.老年人死亡态度质性研究的系统评价和Meta整合[J].护理学杂志,2018,33(12):91-94.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2018.12.091.
[1] 武玉洁, 邢乃姣, 韩丽, 刘盼盼, 赵迪, 赵梦璐, 王爱敏. 社区老年人居家不出危险因素分析及风险预测模型构建[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(8): 11-15.
[2] 刘丽萍, 吴艳妮, 从维莲, 胡明钰, 李晓霞, 周春兰. 癌症患者化疗期自我护理体验质性研究的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(7): 1-6.
[3] 尹霄朦, 胡波, 王薇, 姜园园, 莘秀芳, 朱秀丽. 基于角色理论医学硕士研究生对导师角色期望的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(5): 1-5.
[4] 张新, 崔菡斐, 董凤齐, 郑瑞双. 护理学硕士学历护士临床工作体验的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(4): 25-31.
[5] 张丹妮, 朱慧, 谢传艺, 陈肖敏. 乳腺癌患者配偶照顾体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(4): 32-36.
[6] 蔡敏, 卢咏梅, 魏琳, 周海燕, 蔡美英, 彭政, 黄丽琼, 周莉, 王建明. 广州养老机构老年人开展园艺疗法娱乐方式的意愿析因[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(3): 1-4.
[7] 李文玉, 涂文怡, 郑静, 黄小芳, 刘庆华, 徐小群. 样本量对质性研究主题与现象诠释的影响研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(3): 62-65.
[8] 田凡立, 李惠玲, 杜美兰, 蒋芳琴, 张新梅, 殷雪群. 新型冠状病毒肺炎下援鄂男护士情绪体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 46-49.
[9] 赵迪, 赵梦璐, 王娜, 付明晶, 梁凤, 张伟, 王爱敏. 青岛市592名社区老年人社会隔离现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 6-10.
[10] 叶冬婷, 张沁莲, 景霜, 郭佳, 邢雁芬. 家属对ICU患者转出体验的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(11): 33-39.
[11] 周莹, 卢洪洲, 张林, 孙美艳. 门诊艾滋病男患者对个案管理体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(10): 1-4.
[12] 黄莺莺, 曹卫平, 韦嘉洁, 李妍. 妊娠期高血压疾病患者患病体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(10): 5-9.
[13] 詹昱新, 杨中善, 莫梦燕, 李素云, 喻姣花. 患者参与患者安全知信行质性研究的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(10): 36-42.
[14] 王鹏程, 孟爱凤, 智晓旭, 汤琳, 路莉静, 浦亚楼. 青少年癌症患者生活体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(10): 43-48.
[15] 任晶晶, 王艳红, 薛文俊, 张言, 王惠琳. 459例社区老年人衰弱与认知功能的相关性分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(10): 54-56.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
[1] 夏婷婷,王淑云,杨富国,马蕙,尹春岚,王广宁,范海霞,李瑶瑶. 肠造口患者造口压力及希望水平与自我管理的相关性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(18): 8 -11 .
[2] 王婧,刘芮寒,巩文花,邹宇,王宇,王芳. 自我效能在2型糖尿病患者社会支持和心理弹性的中介作用[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(18): 12 -15 .
[3] 蒋文春,温贤秀,顾凤娇. 应用德尔菲法和层次分析法构建血液透析室护理管理质量评价标准体系[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(18): 16 -21 .
[4] 刘丽萍, 吴艳妮, 从维莲, 胡明钰, 李晓霞, 周春兰. 癌症患者化疗期自我护理体验质性研究的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(7): 1 -6 .
[5] 孙文玉, 毕鸿雁. 视觉追踪训练对脑卒中患者步行功能与日常生活能力的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(7): 7 -10 .
[6] 陈芳芳, 桂意华, 周艳, 任远, 黄琦, 郑亚华. 环状软骨上喉部分切除术患者呼吸-吞咽协调训练效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(7): 11 -14 .
[7] 冉丽伟, 董渠龙, 李桂青, 张岩, 孙超颖, 刘洪青, 苏玉美, 史海霞. 发展取向的绩效考核对助产士行为的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(18): 12 -14 .
[8] 李艳红, 刘宇英, 张海英. 健康管理中心护理人力资源短缺的管理实践[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(18): 15 -17 .
[9] 高泽宇, 高晶晶, 周颖, 周文琦. 基于互联网技术的护士培训与考试平台的建立与使用[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(18): 18 -21 .
[10] 何文斌, 廖尧, 尹熙, 杨茜, 胡君娥, 严妍, 周雪果, 姚小云, 陈红宇. 心脏瓣膜置换术后患者Ⅰ期心脏康复的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(18): 32 -36 .