产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表的编制及信效度检验

doi:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.02.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的编制适合我国文化背景的产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表,检验量表信效度。方法根据知信行理论,依据文献及德尔菲专家函询编制量表初稿,调查604名产科护士以检验量表的信效度,形成正式版量表。结果产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表包括3个维度,11个因子,共51个条目;量表总体Cronbach α系数是0.959,重测信度Cronbach α系数是0.976,内容效度是0.980;探索性因子分析提取11个公因子,累积方差贡献率为87.745%,验证性因子分析显示,量表模型拟合度良好。结论产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表具有良好的信度和效度,并有一定的推广价值,可作为评估量表应用于临床实践。

关键词: 围产期, 姑息照护, 德尔菲法, 知信行, 量表, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To develop a knowledge, belief and practice (KPA) scale for perinatal palliative care of obstetric nurses suitable for domestic cultural background, and to test its reliability and validity. Methods According to the theory of KAP, the draft of the scale was developed after literature review. Expert consultation was conducted with Delphi method and 604 obstetric nurses were investigated to test the reliability and validity of the scale, and the final version of the scale was formed. Results The KPA scale of perinatal palliative care of obstetric nurses included 3 dimensions, 11 factors, and 51 items. The coefficient was 0.959, and the retest reliability 0.976, and the content validity 0.980; The exploratory factor analysis proposed 11 common factors, with the cumulative variance contribution rate of 87.745%. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the scale model had a good fit. Conclusion The KPA scale for perinatal palliative care of obstetric nurses has good reliability and validity, and can be used in clinical practice as an evaluation scale.

Key words: perinatal period, palliative care, Delphi method, knowledge,attitude,and practice, scale, reliability, validity

中图分类号:

R473.71

张国春, 李海云, 褚梁梁, 程雪, 王君芝. 产科护士围产期姑息照护知信行量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 6-11.

ZHANG Guo-chun, LI Hai-yun, CHU Liang-liang, CHENG Xue, WANG Jun-zhi. Development of Knowledge, Belief and Practice Scale for perinatal palliative care of obstetric nurses and its reliability and validity[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(2): 6-11.

参考文献

[1] Lefkowits C, Solomon C.Palliative care in obstetrics and gynecology[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2016,128(6):1403-1420. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001739.
[2] Knighting K, Kirton J, Silverio SA, et al.A network approach to neonatal palliative care education: impact on knowledge, efficacy, and clinical practice[J]. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs,2019,33(4):350-360.DOI:10.1097/JPN.0000000000000437.
[3] Ratislavova K, Buzgova R, Vejvodova J.Perinatal palliative care education: an integrative review[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2019,82:58-66. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.08.003.
[4] Wool C, Northam S.The Perinatal Palliative Care Perceptions and Barriers Scale Instrument(c): development and validation[J]. Adv Neonatal Care, 2011,11(6):397-403. DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e318233809a.
[5] Stenekes S, Penner JL, Harlos M, et al.Development and implementation of a survey to assess health-care provider's competency, attitudes, and knowledge about perinatal palliative care[J]. J Palliat Care, 2019,34(3):151-159. DOI: 10.1177/0825859718790627.
[6] Hammond J, Wool C, Parravicini E.Assessment of healthcare professionals' self-perceived competence in perinatal/neonatal palliative care after a 3-day training course[J]. Front Pediatr, 2020,8:571335. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2020.571335.
[7] Swanson JM, Chenitz C, Zalar M, et al.A critical review of human immunodeficiency virus infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related research:the knowledge, attitudes, and practice of nurses[J]. J Prof Nurs, 1990,6(6):341-355.DOI:10.1016/s8755-7223(05)80127-9.
[8] Gemechu H, Monenus E, Feyissa B.Assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP): public health and economic burden of tuberculosis in Jarso District of West Wollega Zone, Oromia, Western Ethiopia[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2022:3314725. DOI:10.1155/2022/3314725.
[9] 王琦,李领侠,和巾杰,等.医护人员低血糖症知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2021,28(9):9-13.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.09.009.
[10] 信博, 赵秋利, 王楠楠, 等. 消化系统癌症高危人群预防主动行为测评量表的编制与信效度评价[J]. 护理学报, 2021,28(5):6-11. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.05.006.
[11] 罗伯特·F·德威利斯. 量表编制[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社: 2016.0-231.
[12] 李峥,刘宇. 护理学研究方法[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018.
[13] 程雪, 许翠萍, 王君芝, 等. 基于计划行为理论无痛分娩意向自评量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2022,37(6):540-546.DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2022.06.012.
[14] 刘凯莉,罗艳艳,姚桂英,等.晚期癌症患者安宁疗护态度量表的汉化及信效度分析[J].护理学报,2022,29(16):11-16.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.16.011.
[15] 李洪成,张茂军,马广斌. SPSS数据分析实用教程[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2017.
[16] 张萌, 崔倩, 朱长才. 医护人员职业倦怠影响因素的结构方程模型分析[J]. 中华疾病控制杂志, 2022,26(7):808-814. DOI:10.16462/j.cnki.zhjbkz.2022.07.011.
[17] 俞舒舒,徐芊芊,王彦林.新筛查模式下出生缺陷发生趋势及产前诊断结果分析[J].中国计划生育学杂志,2022,30(5):1179-1182;1186.
[18] 庄思敏, 李燕, 肖光红, 等. 医疗保健人员围产期姑息照护知识、技能、态度评估工具的研究进展[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2021,27(36):5036-5040.
[19] 谢煜. 基于系统评价与Delphi法构建骨科大手术患者深静脉血栓的护理预防策略研究[D].南京:南京中医药大学,2017.

相关文章 15

[1]	邹兆华, 卿伟, 朱茂才, 张继权, 易子涵, 胡秀. 连续性肾脏替代治疗护理敏感质量指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 70-74.
[2]	高若男, 王翠玲, 李亭雨, 田美雨, 张楠, 郑锐. 基于Pender健康促进模式食管癌术后患者饮食管理方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(1): 12-16.
[3]	陈彤, 秘玉清, 陈倩, 薛梓晨, 黄静雯, 罗盛, 李伟. 老年社区慢性病护理服务能力评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 1-4.
[4]	曹志琴, 张文瑾, 杜海亮, 傅瑶, 陈兴凤. 性医学领域护理专业学位研究生培养指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 1-6.
[5]	候莹鸽, 李好正, 侯云霞, 汪子寒, 李静, 王松梅, 赵亚杰, 阎玲. 食管癌术后患者胃食管反流自我管理测评量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 12-17.
[6]	许燕鸿, 魏清风, 夏叶, 钟燕. 基于筛查平台的结直肠息肉镜下切除后患者医院-社区联动管理指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 33-37.
[7]	马珠月, 姚珊珊, 史妍妍, 陆宁宁, 邾萍, 程芳. 女性乳腺癌患者淋巴水肿风险感知评估问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 1-5.
[8]	任攀, 陈小菊, 曾兢, 廖明姝, 荣欢, 钟红月, 李莉. 长期照护保险制度视域下成都市失智老人社会支持类居家上门照护服务标准构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 11-15.
[9]	李佳, 梁嘉仪, 冯如芝, 高钰琳. 公共卫生护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 16-22.
[10]	刘莎, 陈玲, 李甜甜, 张丹莉, 蔡文智. 孕产妇盆底肌训练自我效能发展轨迹及其对产后尿失禁的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 1-5.
[11]	董世攀, 梁小英, 黄兰怡, 梁善英, 梁锦波, 代炜, 赵玉玲, 黄沂. 功能性腹胀患者健康促进行为量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 11-15.
[12]	刘蔚, 李育玲, 韩清华, 蔺彦丽. 基于社会学习理论实习护生同伴支持教育方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 16-19.
[13]	田恬, 李转珍, 都芳芳, 朱永燕, 李伟丽, 万菲菲. 基于转型冲击理论构建新护士护理安全培训内容体系[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 35-39.
[14]	韩瑞娟, 张俊娟, 李瑞玲, 张士变, 潘卫宇. 全膝关节置换术患者结果期望管理方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24): 7-11.
[15]	储爱琴, 葛文杰, 葛文静, 朱心怡, 高莉莉. 基于建构主义学习理论构建护理本科实习生叙事护理培训方案指标体系[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24): 61-65.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared