以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (21): 32-37.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.21.032

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

护理人员参与共享决策实践认知和体验质性研究的Meta整合

林杨1, 张勤娥2, 张莉莉2, 张文博1, 徐宁2   

  1. 1.滨州医学院 护理学院,山东 烟台 264003;
    2.滨州医学院烟台附院 护理部,山东 烟台 264100
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-08 出版日期:2022-11-10 发布日期:2022-12-07
  • 通讯作者: 徐宁(1971-),女,山东淄博人,本科学历,主任护师,护理部主任,副院长。E-mail:xuning0057@163.com
  • 作者简介:林杨(1997-),男,山东东营人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。

Cognition and Experience of Nurses’ Participation in Shared Decision-making Practice: A Meta-analysis

LIN Yang1, ZHANG Qin’e2, ZHANG Li-li2, ZHANG Wen-bo1, XU Ning2   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264003, China;
    2. Dept. of Nursing Administration, Yantai Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical University, Yantai 264100, China
  • Received:2022-08-08 Online:2022-11-10 Published:2022-12-07

摘要: 目的 整合护理人员参与共享决策实践认知和体验的质性研究,为护理人员参与和实施决策共享提供参考和依据。方法 检索中国生物医学数据库、中国知网、万方、PubMed、Web of Science、CINAHL、Embase、Cochrane Library数据库中有关护理人员参与共享决策实践的认知和体验的质性研究,检索时限为建库至2022年10月。使用澳大利亚JBI循证卫生保健中心质性研究质量评价工具评价,汇集性整合方法进行整合。结果 共纳入13篇文献,提取36个主题,归纳为11个类别和6个整合结果:护士混淆共享决策的概念;对实行共享决策持批判性态度;肯定和认同共享决策;在共享决策中经历负面体验;共享决策赋予了护士新的角色;护士参与共享决策需要增强自身素质和外部条件的支持。结论 护士在共享决策中扮演了重要的角色,管理者要重视护士角色培养,根据护士需求提供培训和指导,发挥护士在共享决策中的角色价值。

关键词: 护理人员, 护士, 共享决策, 质性研究, Meta整合

Abstract: Objective To integrate the studies on experience of nurses’ participation in shared decision-making (SDM) and to provide reference for clinical practice. Methods Literature retrieval of qualitative research on nurses’ participation in SDM in SinoMed, CNKI, WanFang, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane library was conducted from the inception to October, 2022. The JBI critical appraisal tool for qualitative studies was used to evaluate the quality of the included research,and the meta-aggregation to conduct the synthesis. Results Thirteen pieces of literature were included, and 36 themes were extracted and summarized into 11 categories and 6 integrated results: confused concepts; critical attitude towards SDM; identification with SDM; negative experience in SDM; new role endowed by SDM; improved quality in SDM and external support. Conclusion Nurses play an important role in SDM. Managers should pay attention to the role training of nurses, and provide training and guidance according to the needs of nurses, thus to give full play to the role value of nurses in SDM.

Key words: nursing staff, nurse, shared decisions, qualitative research, meta integration

中图分类号: 

  • R192.6
[1] Healey J M.Making Health Care Decisions: President’s Commission for the Study of Ethnical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research[J]. Social Science & Medicine, 1984,18(12):1095.DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(84)90170-9.
[2] Vermeir P, Vandijck D, Degroote S, et al.Communication in Healthcare: A Narrative Review of the Literature and Practical Recommendations[J]. Int J Clin Pract, 2015,69(11): 1257-1267.DOI:10.1111/ijcp.12686.
[3] Aushu A, Steffensen KD, Olling K, et al.Practitioners’Views on Shared Decision-making Implementation: A Qualitative Study[J]. Plos One, 2021, 16(11):e0259844.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0259844.
[4] Kahveci R, Ayhan D, Doner P, et al.Shared Decision-Making in Pediatric Intensive Care Units: A Qualitative Study with Physicians, Nurses and Parents[J]. Indian Journal Of Pediatrics, 2014, 81(12):1287-1292. DOI:10.1007/s12098-014-1431-6.
[5] Roodbeen R, Vreke A, Boland G, et al.Communication and Shared Decision-making with Patients with Limited Health Literacy; Helpful Strategies, Barriers and Suggestions for Improvement Reported by Hospital-based Palliative Care Providers[J]. Plos One, 2020,15(6):e0234926.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0234926.
[6] 詹昱新, 喻姣花, 刘云访, 等. 护理人员对护患共享决策实践认知的质性研究[J]. 护理学杂志, 2021,36(1):56-59.DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2021.01.056.
[7] 崔金锐, 肖琦, 柯键, 等. 老年终末期肾病患者共享决策体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022,57(7): 863-871.DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.07.016.
[8] Craig L, Zachary M, Kylie P.Qualitative Research Synthesis: Methodological Guidance for Systematic Reviewers Utilizing Meta-aggregation[J]. Int J Evid Based Healthc, 2015,13(3):179-87.DOI:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062.
[9] 胡雁. 如何开展质性研究的系统评价和Meta整合[J]. 上海护理,2020,20(7):1-5.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-8399.2020.07.001.
[10] 李丹, 冯兰棱, 樊落, 等. 护士对患者死亡认知与体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2022,29(4):34-39.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.04.034.
[11] 胡雁, 彭健. 我国质性研究系统评价和Meta整合论文的质量评价[J]. 中国护理管理, 2020,20(4):490-495.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.04.004.
[12] Chung FF, Wang P, Lin S, et al.Shared Clinical Decision-making Experiences in Nursing: A Qualitative Study[J]. BMC Nurs, 2021,20(1):1-9.DOI:10.1186/s12912-021-00597-0.
[13] Truglio-Londrigan M.Shared Decision-making in Home-care from the Nurse’s Perspective: Sitting at the Kitchen Table - A Qualitative Descriptive Study[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2013,22(19-20):2883-2895. DOI:10.1111/jocn.12075.
[14] Danique DW, Thode M, Jongerden IP, et al.The Role of Hospital Nurses in Shared Decision-making about Life-prolonging Treatment: A Qualitative Interview Study[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2021,77(1):296-307.DOI:10.1111/jan.14549.
[15] Stephanie AL, Daniels R, Bokhoven MA, et al.What Makes It so Difficult for Nurses to Coach Patients in Shared Decision Making? A Process Evaluation[J]. Int Nurs Stud, 2018(80): 1-11.DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.12.005.
[16] Savelberg W, Boersma LJ, Smidt M, et al.Does Lack of Deeper Understanding of Shared Decision Making Explains the Suboptimal Performance on Crucial Parts of It? An Example from Breast Cancer Care[J]. Eur J Oncol Nurs, 2019(38): 92-97.DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.12.004.
[17] Rainier C, Lacanaria MGC.Nurses’ Concepts and Experiences in Shared Decision-Making[J]. JNPARR, 2020,10(2):48-56.
[18] Wubben N, Boogaard M, Hoeven JG, et al.Shared Decision-making in the ICU from the Perspective of Physicians, Nurses and Patients: A Qualitative Interview Study[J]. BMJ Open, 2021, 11(8):e050134.DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050134.
[19] Stoye A, Zimmer JM, Girndg M, et al.The Role of Different Nephrology Experts in Informed Shared Decision-making for Renal Replacement Therapy[J]. J Ren Care,2022,48(3):177-184.DOI:10.1111/jorc.12397.
[20] Steenbergen M, Vries J,Arits R,et al.Barriers and Facilitators for Shared Decision-making in Oncology Inpatient Practice: An Explorative Study of the Healthcare Providers’ Perspective[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2022,30(5):3925-3931.DOI:10.1007/s00520-022-06820-1.
[21] Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T.Shared decision-making in the Medical Encounter: What Does It Mean? (Or It Takes At Least Two to Tango)[J]. Soc Sci Med, 1997,44(5):681-92.DOI:10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3.
[22] Marjolein HJP, Fluit CRMG, Lagro J, et al.Expert and Patient Consensus on a Dynamic Model for Shared Decision-making in Frail Older Patients[J]. Patient Educ Couns,2016,99(6):1069-77.DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2015.12.014.
[23] Gainer R, Buth K, David J, et al.A Qualitative Analysis of Shared Decision Making in Cardiac Surgery[J]. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 2013,6(3):1941-7713. DOI:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004381.
[24] 庞建美, 张青月, 王小媛, 等. 医护人员实施乳腺癌患者决策辅助障碍及促进因素的质性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021,56(10):1516-1521.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.10.012.
[1] 苏孟宇, 王真, 吴金凤, 李晓燕, 张玉玺. 临床护士开展哀伤辅导的现状及研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(9): 26-30.
[2] 吕娜, 许凤琴, 刘春梅, 邵晴. 安宁疗护专科护士再认证的研究现状与启示[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(9): 31-35.
[3] 朱金凤, 方莹莹, 王芳, 袁萍, 陈璐. 脑卒中幸存者运动依从性影响因素质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(8): 7-13.
[4] 刘慧, 郭丽蕊, 陈秋香, 刘春英, 贺娟凤, 吴小佳. 急性脑卒中患者入院时迁移应激的现象学研究[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(8): 75-78.
[5] 田云伟, 李善玲, 田文雯, 李维果, 邵琴. 护理人员接近失误事件认知的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(7): 32-35.
[6] 张慧超, 王楠楠, 张玉玺. 安宁疗护护士情感劳动经历质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(6): 37-43.
[7] 蔡莹莹, 张俊峰, 蔡艾芳, 曾雅燕, 李玲, 黄琼珊, 刘兴玲. 以培养护士核心能力为导向的循证护理查房模式探索[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(6): 50-54.
[8] 钱湛, 杨晓婷, 耿可, 林觐民. 失独父母生活体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(5): 57-63.
[9] 付艳芬, 王春青, 胡雁. 证据临床转化中障碍因素和促进因素的内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(5): 64-68.
[10] 左倩倩, 曾文捷, 廖敏怡, 李景秋, 罗岚, 高钰琳. 199名安宁疗护护士职业悲伤现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(4): 46-52.
[11] 王秋婷, 魏琳, 刘杨晨, 林静霞, 林丽君, 胡萍, 朱丽佳, 林美珍. 中医专科护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(4): 1-6.
[12] 李丹, 冯兰棱, 樊落, 李琳, 朱伟, 郝雅茹. 护士对患者死亡认知与体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(4): 34-39.
[13] 吕静敏, 柳家贤, 李柳锦, 宋亚兰. 肿瘤科护士对灵性照护认知及实施态度的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(4): 69-73.
[14] 肖凤, 宋慧娟, 任英, 李爽, 施盛莹, 赖嘉微. 临床护士自我效能感在情绪智力与关怀行为间的中介调节作用[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 62-66.
[15] 张娜, 陈海勤, 邵磊, 朱月莉, 沈银萍. 精神科低年资护士培训应用防暴技能微视频的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 24-28.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
[1] 刘媛媛, 刘高明, 胡进, 范洁琳, 邓诗佳. 子宫内膜癌治疗后外阴淋巴水肿患者症状体验与心理感受的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(21): 1 -5 .
[2] 邢淑君, 于玲, 陈鹤方, 孙柳, 梁嘉贵, 臧爽, 刘均娥. 肿瘤患者在新辅助免疫治疗临床试验中的角色感知及体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(21): 6 -10 .
[3] 王瑞莹, 邢伟, 法宪恩, 陈钧卓. 孕妇妊娠晚期疲乏特征的潜在类别分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(21): 11 -16 .
[4] 黄玉楼, 周春兰, 刘宁, 李小贞, 刘敏利, 何银英, 孙宏春, 黄小娜, 龚秀群, 郑萍, 肖秀英. 轻度认知障碍老年人阶梯式营养管理方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(21): 17 -22 .
[5] 郑西林, 陶子荣, 彭伶丽, 陈秀文. 护理信息平台构建的理论依据及类别应用进展[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(21): 23 -26 .
[6] 邬宇涵, 苏茜, 貟蓓, 陈恋, 潘潇, 韩琳. 心理测评系统在人才测评中应用进展及启示[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(21): 27 -31 .
[7] 陈华, 孙兴兰, 肖丹, 涂惠, 刘佳文, 徐文君, 宋玉洁, 熊晓云. 心力衰竭患者易损期容量管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(21): 38 -42 .
[8] 汤青云, 黄夏赟, 李燕云, 谢红燕, 李冰. 286例青年男男性行为HIV/AIDS患者恐惧疾病进展现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(21): 43 -48 .
[9] 陈雪红, 黄敏娟, 谭瑜, 张靖瑜, 陈韵澄. 918名高职护生职业成熟度现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(21): 49 -54 .
[10] 徐帆, 张继权, 谢绍菊, 刘洁. 积极应对在女性乳腺癌幸存者心理一致感与创伤后应激反应间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(21): 55 -60 .