以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 7-11.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.08.007

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

护士深静脉血栓形成风险知识与预防实践现状及影响因素分析

潘姝丞1a, 卞丽芳1b, 骆华芳2, 黄旭叶1c, 黄昉芳1d, 曾颖1e, 王薇1a   

  1. 1.浙江大学医学院附属第一医院 a.护理部;b.肝胆胰外科;c.结直肠外科;d.重症医学科;e.胃肠外科,浙江 杭州 310003;
    2.义乌市中心医院 骨二科,浙江 义乌 322000
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-28 发布日期:2023-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 王薇（1965-）,女,浙江杭州人,博士,博士研究生导师,主任护师。E-mail：wangw2005@zju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:潘姝丞（1995-）,女,江西南昌人,硕士,博士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目（2020KY111）

Knowledge and practice of nurses on deep vein thrombosis risk and prophylaxis: a cross-sectional survey

PAN Shu-cheng1a, BIAN Li-fang1b, LUO Hua-fang2, Huang Xu-ye1c, HUANG Fang-fang1d, ZENG Yi1e, WANG Wei1a   

  1. 1a. Dept. of Nursing Administration; 1b. Dept. of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery; 1c. Dept. of Colorectal Surgery; 1d. Dept. of Critical Care Medicine; 1e. Dept. of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310003, China;
    2. Dept. of Orthopedics, Yiwu Central Hospital, Yiwu 322000, China
  • Received:2022-09-28 Published:2023-05-12

PDF (PC)

249

赞

摘要： 目的 调查护士深静脉血栓形成风险知识与预防实践现状,并分析其影响因素。方法 采用方便抽样法,2022年5—6月抽取浙江省某3所三级医院959名临床护士作为研究对象。应用经本土化调适后的中文版深静脉血栓形成风险知识与预防实践测评问卷对其进行调查。采用多重线性回归分析护士深静脉血栓形成风险知识与预防实践的影响因素。结果 本组护士深静脉血栓形成风险知识分数为（29.75±3.10）分,准确率87.5%;预防实践分数为（69.08±7.82）分。其风险知识多重线性回归结果显示：受教育程度、N级护士、所在科室、曾接受静脉血栓栓塞症（含）或深静脉血栓形成培训种类、是否有静脉血栓栓塞症（含）或深静脉血栓形成培训需求5个变量进入回归方程（P<0.001）;其预防实践多重线性回归结果显示：所在科室、是否曾接受静脉血栓栓塞症或深静脉血栓形成相关培训、静脉血栓栓塞症或深静脉血栓形成培训种类、培训效果评价4个变量进入回归方程（P<0.001）。结论 护士深静脉血栓形成风险知识与预防实践水平总体较好,其中风险因素是深静脉血栓形成风险知识的薄弱环节。护士受教育程度、不同护士层级、不同科室、是否曾接受静脉血栓栓塞症或深静脉血栓形成相关培训、培训种类、培训效果评价是影响护士深静脉血栓形成风险知识与预防实践的因素。医院管理者应注重加强护士对深静脉血栓形成风险因素的认知水平,同时改善医院静脉血栓栓塞相关防范管理制度及培训效果,进一步提高护士深静脉血栓形成风险知识与预防实践水平。

关键词: 静脉血栓栓塞症, 深静脉血栓形成, 护士, 风险, 影响因素

Abstract: Objective To investigate the knowledge and practice of nurses on deep vein thrombosis (DVT) risk and prophylaxis. Methods Convenient sampling was used to select 959 clinical nurses from 3 tertiary hospitals in Zhejiang province from May and June 2022. Nurses were investigated by using the Chinese version of Knowledge and Practice of Nurses on DVT Risk and Prophylaxis. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the influencing factors. Results The score of nurses' knowledge on DVT risk was 29.75±3.10, with an overall accuracy rate of 87.5%. The score of nurses' practice of DVT prophylaxis was 69.08±7.82. Multiple linear regression showed that education background, classification of nursing levels, clinical departments, previous DVT-related training type, and need for further training on DVT were influencing factors of nurses' risk knowledge of DVT (P<0.001). While nurses' practice of DVT prophylaxis were influenced by clinical departments, previous DVT-related training, DVT-related training type, and training effect assessment(P<0.001). Conclusion The recruited nurses' knowledge and practice on DVT risk and prophylaxis are generally good, but they have inadequate knowledge on DVT risk factors. Education background, classification of nursing levels, clinical departments, previous DVT-related training type, and training effect assessment are influence factors. Strengthened nurses' knowledge on DVT risk factors, and improved DVT prevention system and training effect are beneficial to promote the knowledge and practice of nurses on DVT risk and prophylaxis.

Key words: venous thromboembolism, deep vein thrombosis, nurse, risk, analysis

中图分类号: 

  • R47
[1] 刘兴红, 李素云, 喻姣花, 等. 医院内静脉血栓栓塞护理质量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(21):21-25. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.21.021.
[2] 全国肺栓塞和深静脉血栓形成防治能力建设项目. 关于同意开展加强肺栓塞和医院内静脉血栓栓塞症防治能力建设项目(国卫医资源便函[2018]139 号)[EB/OL]. (2018-10-13) [2022-08-11] https://www.thrombosischina.cn/news/xq/?tid=1&id=7.
[3] Ma YF, Xu Y, Chen Y P, et al.Nurses' objective knowledge regarding venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: a national survey study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97(14):1-7. DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000010338.
[4] Al-Mugheed KA, Bayraktar N.Knowledge and practices of nurses on deep vein thrombosis risks and prophylaxis: a descriptive cross sectional study[J]. J Vasc Nurs, 2018, 36(2): 71-80. DOI:10.1016/j.jvn.2018.02.001.
[5] 褚玮. 对护士DVT知识及预防行为测评量表的汉化及应用研究[D]. 湖州:湖州师范学院, 2020.
[6] 国家卫生健康委办公厅. 国家卫生健康委办公厅关于印发2021年国家医疗质量安全改进目标的通知[EB/OL]. (2021-02-09)[2023-08-11]http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-02/22/content_5588240.htm.
[7] Oh H, Boo S, Lee J A.Clinical nurses' knowledge and practice of venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prevention in South Korea: a cross-sectional survey[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2017, 26(3-4):427-435.DOI:10.1111/jocn.13424.
[8] Yohannes S, Abebe T, Endalkachew K, et al. Nurses' knowledge, perceived practice,their associated factors regarding deep venous thrombosis(DVT) prevention in Amhara Region Comprehensive Specialized Hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia, 2021: a cross-sectional study[J]. Crit Care Res Pract, 2022(7386597):1-9. DOI:10.1155/2022/7386597.
[9] 中华医学会外科学分会. 中国普通外科围手术期血栓预防与管理指南[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2016, 54(5):321-327. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2016.05.001.
[10] 刘婷, 赵顺莹, 王灵聪, 等. 脑出血患者静脉血栓栓塞机械预防的证据总结[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(6):935-939. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.06.027.
[11] 褚玲玲, 陈萍, 冯丹, 等. 肿瘤相关静脉血栓栓塞症防治指南的质量评价及内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(16): 43-48. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.16.043.
[12] Mehta Y, Bhave A.A review of venous thromboembolism risk assessment models for different patient populations: what we know and don't![J]. Medicine, 2023, 102(2):1-8. DOI:10.1097/md.0000000000032398.
[13] Zhai Z, Kan Q, Li W, et al.VTE risk profiles and prophylaxis in medical and surgical inpatients: the identification of Chinese hospitalized patients' risk profile for venous thromboembolism (DissolVE-2)-A cross-sectional Study[J]. Chest, 2019, 155(1):114-122.DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2018.09.020.
[14] Kakkos S K, Gohel M, Baekgaard N, et al.Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery(ESVS) 2021 clinical practice guidelines on the management of venous thrombosis[J]. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2021, 61(1):9-82. DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.09.023.
[15] Pandor A, Tonkins M, Goodacre S, et al.Risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism in hospitalised adult patients: a systematic review[J]. BMJ Open, 2021, 11(7): 1-19. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045672.
[16] 任爽, 李大江, 胡果, 等. 医院规范化静脉血栓栓塞症防治与管理体系的建立[J]. 华西医学, 2017, 32(2):258-261. DOI:10.7507/1002-0179.201512097.
[17] 赵红乐, 代玲玉, 吕梦, 等. 基于信息化平台院内静脉血栓栓塞风险管理系统的构建及应用[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(24):9-12. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.24.009.
[18] Zhang Z, Lei J, Shao X, et al.Trends in Hospitalization and in-hospital mortality from VTE, 2007 to 2016, in China[J]. Chest, 2019,155(2):342-353. DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2018.10.040.
[1] 孙小卫, 王燕, 闵春燕, 段菲, 肖江琴. 322例老年COPD患者生活空间现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(8): 1-6.
[2] 周瑜, 王励飞, 米元元, 王加谋. 精神科护士遭受医院II型暴力真实体验的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(8): 58-62.
[3] 任影, 于卫华, 张利, 郑俊俊, 邓曼, 杨侠, 张雨溪. 社区老年人生活空间水平现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 11-15.
[4] 郑静, 管玉香, 张瑛, 许娟, 邹冉, 王超. 安徽省873名中医院护士长变革型领导力影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 16-19.
[5] 谢婵娟, 熊静, 谌永毅, 张京慧, 李小燕, 王泽友. 精准护理内涵及其对护士的角色要求与机遇挑战[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 44-47.
[6] 陈佳茵, 郭军, 刘宁. 护士职业暴露预防与管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 53-58.
[7] 刘灵芳, 毛红波, 孙朵朵, 吴长蓉, 程真顺, 张青. 临床护士生涯适应力在职业使命感与工作投入间的中介效应分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 59-64.
[8] 陈玉平, 彭刚艺, 张莉, 何瑾云, 郑静, 林群燕, 王灵晓, 杨艳. 临床感控专科护士胜任力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(6): 15-21.
[9] 和青森, 曹珊, 井晓磊, 刘玲霞. 心理授权在服务型领导与临床护士工作旺盛感间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(6): 47-51.
[10] 朱玥, 汪张毅, 方治平, 王竞, 闫奕杉, 张亚军, 庞晓丽. 456名临床护士工作场所灵性现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 7-11.
[11] 马珠月, 姚珊珊, 史妍妍, 陆宁宁, 邾萍, 程芳. 女性乳腺癌患者淋巴水肿风险感知评估问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 1-5.
[12] 李佳, 梁嘉仪, 冯如芝, 高钰琳. 公共卫生护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 16-22.
[13] 高芸芸, 刘芳, 刘维维. 公共卫生护士胜任力特征的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 23-28.
[14] 卫平莲, 陈孝云, 金利萍, 范孝陈, 陈培培, 刘安诺. 儿科传染病专科护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 29-32.
[15] 张玉芬, 汪晖, 胡凯利. 临床护士道德困境的潜在剖面分析及其与道德敏感性的关系研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 20-25.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
[1] 徐建平,金慧,章功年. 经脐一孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术的护理配合[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 56 -58 .
[2] 李月红. 26例食管癌患者的术后舒适护理[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(4): 77 -78 .
[3] 刘美凤,李福霞,于翠华,姜光红,吕志宏,孟祥文. 中文版慢性疼痛自我效能感量表用于老年癌痛病人的信效度研究[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(12): 11 -13 .
[4] 甘敏,李良飞. 2例Menkes 疾病患儿的护理[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(2): 52 -54 .
[5] 张立新,赵楠,楚爱洁,刘春燕,周楠,张青,傅妍. 提高手术室护士共情能力的心理护理情景式查房[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(9): 66 -68 .
[6] 邹红梅,林娜. 右室流出道重建术姑息治疗肺动脉闭锁合并室间隔缺损患儿的术后监护[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(11): 59 -61 .
[7] 林静,蔡文智,陈思思,王静新,陈文芳. 应用Delphi 法对医院暴力先兆因素调查表的论证[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(12): 6 -10 .
[8] 陈晖,谢小华. 难愈创面患者医学应对方式及其影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(12): 63 -66 .
[9] 张丽娣. 心理弹性的研究现状及启示[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(13): 17 -19 .
[10] 苑晶晶,高玉芳,魏丽丽,李海燕,谢华晓,杨学荣,梁滇超. 麦卢卡蜂蜜治疗Ⅱ～Ⅲ期压疮效果及护理材料成本-效果分析[J]. 护理学报, 2014, 21(24): 13 -16 .