以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (2): 43-47.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.02.043

• 循证护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

痔疮患者术后快速康复护理循证实践

郭素云1, 代莹2, 施兰来1, 奚润1, 颜景颖1, 叶秀娟1   

  1. 1.北京中医药大学深圳医院,广东 深圳 518172;
    2.广州市妇女儿童医疗中心,广东 广州 510623
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-18 发布日期:2020-07-21
  • 作者简介:郭素云(1977-),女,广东深圳人,硕士,副主任护师,科护士长,南方医院JBI循证护理合作中心临床循证护理师。
  • 基金资助:
    广东省中医药局面上科研项目(20180404082652)

Evidence-based Practice of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery for Patients with Hemorrhoids

GUO Su-yun1, DAI Ying2, SHI Lan-lai1, XI Run1, YAN Jing-ying1, YE Xiu-juan1   

  1. 1. Shenzhen Hospital of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen 518172, China;
    2. Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou 510623, China
  • Received:2019-10-18 Published:2020-07-21

摘要: 目的 探讨基于最佳证据的痔疮患者术后快速康复干预应用于临床实践并评价其效果。方法 采用JBI临床证据实践应用模式,检索快速康复中有关痔疮术后康复指导的相关证据,利用JBI证据推荐级别系统(2014版)进行证据质量评价,对审查指标运用FAME结构从可行性、适宜性、临床意义和有效性4个方面对审查指标进行评价。将采纳的证据转化为临床审查指标,通过查看护理记录、现场审查和问卷法的方式收集资料。比较证据应用前后痔疮术后患者治疗效果、肛门疼痛、并发症发生率。结果 证据应用后痔疮术后患者治疗效果高于证据应用前(P<0.05);证据应用后痔疮术后患者在术后1 d和5 d肛门疼痛评分低于证据应用前(P<0.05);证据应用后痔疮术后患者并发症发生率低于证据应用前(P<0.05);11项指标中,指标11证据应用前已是100%,其余10项指标证据应用后执行率高于证据应用前,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。结论 基于快速康复外科的循证护理实践可优化痔疮患者的术后管理,可提高患者治疗效果,减轻患者术后肛门疼痛,降低术后并发症的发生率,促进痔疮术后患者的快速康复。

关键词: 痔疮, 术后, 快速康复, 护理, 循证实践

Abstract: Objective To explore and assess the effect of evidence-based enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) practice on postoperative rehabilitation of patients with hemorrhoids. Methods The standard procedure supported by the JBI-PACES program was used to retrieve relevant evidence of ERAS practice for postoperative rehabilitation of patients with hemorrhoids. JBI evidence pre-classification and evidence rank system (2014 edition) was used to evaluate the quality of evidence. FAME structure was used to evaluate the evidence from the respect of feasibility,appropriateness, clinical meaningfulness and effectiveness. The included evidence was translated into clinical audit indicators, and data were collected through reviewing nursing records, on-site examination and questionnaires. Comparisons were made in the effectiveness of treatment, anal pain, and incidence of complications before and after the implementation of the evidence-based ERAS practice. Results After the application of evidence, the effectiveness of treatment was improved (P<0.05) and patients' anal pain score on the first and fifth day after surgery was lower than that before the application of evidence (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications after evidence application was lower than that before (P<0.05). Regarding the 11 indicators, the execution rate of all the indicators, except indicator 11, the execution rate of which had already been 100%, was higher after the application of evidence, indicating statistical significance(P<0.001). Conclusion Evidence-based nursing practice based on rapid rehabilitation surgery can optimize postoperative management of patients with hemorrhoids, improve therapeutic effect, reduce postoperative anal pain and the incidence of postoperative complications, and promote the rapid recovery of patients with hemorrhoids.

Key words: hemorrhoids, postoperative, rapid postoperative rehabilitation, nursing, evidence-based practice

中图分类号: 

  • R473.6
[1] Wren AA, Ross AC, D’Souza G, et al. Multidisciplinary Pain Management for Pediatric Patients with Acute and Chronic Pain: A Foundational Treatment Approach When Prescribing Opioids[J]. Children(Basel),2019,6(2):E33.DOI:10.3390/children 6020033.
[2] 肖景双. 肛肠病术后疼痛的机理及治疗[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2018,5(52):68-69.DOI:10.3877/j.issn.2095-8242.2018.52.035.
[3] 沈洪明. 自拟痔篓熏洗剂坐浴治疗肛肠病术后疼痛水肿的观察[J].中医临床研究,2018,10(5):110-111.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7860.2018.05.051.
[4] 曾树宏,申璐,高月,等. 中医综合护理缓解肛肠疾病术后疼痛的系统评价[J]. 现代医药卫生,2018,34(1):27-28. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009?5519.2018.01.009.
[5] 张俊平,周英凤,周敏,等.提高与母乳喂养相关的乳头疼痛或损伤管理的循证实践[J].中华护理杂志, 2014, 49(9):1062-1066. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2014.09.008.
[6] Davis BR, Lee-Kong SA, Migaly J, et al.The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hemorrhoids[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2018,61(3):284-292.DOI:10.1097/DCR.0000000000001030.
[7] 中华医学会外科学分会、中华医学会麻醉学分会.加速康复外科中国专家共识及路径管理指南(2018版)[J].中国实用外科指南,2018, 38(1):1-20.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9081.2018.06.002.
[8] Higuero T, Abramowitz L, Castinel A, et al.Guidelines for the Treatment of Hemorrhoids[J]. J Visc Surg, 2016, 153(3):213-218. DOI:10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.03.004.
[9] Glick DB, Holt NF, Nussmeier NA. Overview of Post-anesthetic Care Fore Adult Patients[EB/OL].(2018-10-22)[2019-05-24].https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-post-anesthetic-care-for-adult-patients?search=overview%20of%20postanesthetic%20care%20for%20adult%20patients&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~150&usage_type= default&display_rank=1.
[10] Montgomery R, McNamara SA.Multimodal Pain Management for Enhanced Recovery:Reinforcing the Shift from Traditional Pathways Through Nurse-led Interventions[J]. AORN J, 2016,104(6S):S9-S16.DOI:10.1016/j.aorn.2016.10.012.
[11] 王春青,胡雁. JBI证据分级及证据推荐级别系统(2014版)[J].护士进修杂志,2015,30(11):964-967.DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2015.11.002.
[12] The Joanna Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation Working Party. Supporting Document for the Jonna Briggs Institute levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation[EB/OL]. (2014-03-01)[2018-08-29].http://joannabriggs.org/jbi-approach.html#tabbed-nav=Levels-of-Evidence
[13] 国家中医药管理局.中医病证诊断疗效标准(2012版)[S].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2012:112-124.
[14] 邓宝贵,全小明,谭彩霞,等. 电针配合耳穴压豆治疗人工髋置换患者术后疼痛效果观察[J].护理学报,2013,20(6B):58-59. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9969.2013.12.023.
[15] 邓颖辉,马冬花,姚秋琼,等. 激光坐浴对混合痔Milligan-Morgan术后患者伤口愈合的疗效观察[J].护理学报,2014,21(12):35-36.
[16] 梁健,谈燕飞,范元,等. 混合痔术后患者局部应用清热消炎洗剂湿热敷的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2011,18(4A):69-70. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9969.2011.07.023.
[1] 王佩, 陈俊春, 张茵. 基于即刻学堂和微信整合移动学习平台对老年科护士培训的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(9): 6-9.
[2] 陈绍传, 王鑫, 孙蓉, 廖书娟, 高熙, 白丽君. 院校结合模式在高职助产专业人才培养中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(9): 10-13.
[3] 李奇, 李真, 李尊柱, 孙建华, 罗红波. 以患者和家庭为中心护理干预在成人ICU应用进展[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(9): 23-26.
[4] 马莹, 叶君荣, 黄昭君, 夏志春, 徐丹, 邓爱萍, 刘名河, 罗斯莉, 张建龙. 基于循证构建精神科护理质量敏感性指标[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(9): 27-32.
[5] 程维, 程蕾, 唐鹰, 黎红英, 谭荣欢, 申利华, 王灵晓. 老年专科护士主导的吞咽障碍患者转介模式的建立与效果评价[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(9): 48-51.
[6] 戴利, 王民心, 叶艳兰, 罗静珍, 杨云智. 新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情期间社区居家护理感染防控应用失效模式效应分析的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(9): 59-63.
[7] 米元元, 李巧云, 明耀辉, 王婷, 庞志强, 胡恩华, 聂涛, 陈卉, 黄海燕. 1例危重型新型冠状病毒肺炎合并ARDS患者的成功救护[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(9): 64-67.
[8] 刘颖, 黎丹, 黄燕波, 王倩, 贯华. 优化术前肠道准备方案对根治性膀胱全切加回肠通道术患者的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(9): 68-70.
[9] 蔡国旗, 汪晖, 张梦霞, 尹世玉, 胡凯利, 王冰花, 杨纯子. 2 291名护士工作环境感知与对护士长领导行为评价的相关性分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(8): 30-33.
[10] 刘梅娟, 周丽华, 唐美云, 谭文欣, 刘玉萍, 程凤平. 2种术后进食方案在上消化道内镜黏膜下剥离术患者的应用效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(8): 51-53.
[11] 黄媛媛, 傅巧美, 刘光香, 白雅馨, 张青. 肾移植患者基于“互联网+”延续护理的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(8): 69-72.
[12] 刘丽萍, 吴艳妮, 从维莲, 胡明钰, 李晓霞, 周春兰. 癌症患者化疗期自我护理体验质性研究的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(7): 1-6.
[13] 邱楚瑾, 张凤英, 冯先琼. 多视角录播系统在本科护生口腔护理操作教学中的运用[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(7): 15-19.
[14] 裴坤一, 郑欣, 徐柳, 李霞. 基于Servqual模型构建急性酒精中毒护理质量评价体系[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(7): 25-29.
[15] 吕云霞, 冯少娟, 李丹枫, 吴宣霖, 陈彦球, 陈柳妹, 刘洁, 黄洁莹, 刘正伟. 儿童扁桃体切除术后疼痛管理的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(7): 38-43.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
[1] 宋杰, 曲桂玉, 林云英, 侯姗姗, 吴炳义. 医养结合型养老机构老年人安全管理评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(2): 1 -5 .
[2] 马丽莉, 彭幼清, 俞海萍, 张亚娟. 跨文化照护能力培训基地准入评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(2): 6 -10 .
[3] 宋涛, 张冬红. 基于护士人文关怀能力培养的精神科叙事教育网络教学系统的开发[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(2): 11 -15 .
[4] 陈秋菊, 陈斐, 黄倩, 方方. 运用团队资源管理模式提升新型布尼亚病毒感染患者急救品质[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(2): 16 -20 .
[5] 邓妍, 胡露红. 乳腺癌双职双轨个案管理模式的应用效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(2): 21 -23 .
[6] 马素文, 孙峥, 吴杰, 尚洁, 张苗, 卢洁. 老人儿童及孕产妇磁共振检查护理配合流程的改进[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(2): 24 -26 .
[7] 余文静, 高兴莲, 肖瑶, 吴佳颖, 刘佩. 基于PDA移动技术融合手术器械质量追踪与数据清点的实践[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(2): 27 -29 .
[8] 陈萍云, 陈丽芳, 李海艳, 彭丽娟. 基于护理缺失的查房模式在ICU的应用研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(2): 30 -32 .
[9] 汪冰清, 宋永霞, 何红叶, 李京京, 刘杉杉, 洪静芳. 慢性心力衰竭患者自我护理影响因素的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(2): 33 -37 .
[10] 惠靖瑞, 熊振芳, 陈涵彬, 雷雨迟, 李敬文. 神阙穴贴敷治疗肿瘤患者化疗相关性便秘疗效的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(2): 38 -42 .