以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

Journal of Nursing ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (17): 1-6.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.17.001

    Next Articles

Development of Questionnaire of Protective Motivation for Uric Acid Management in Patients with Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia and Its Reliability and Validity

CHEN Yun, WU Yue-ting, YE Mei-xia, LIU Rui, ZHONG Yin-qin, CHENG Meng, WEI Zhen-na   

  1. Dept. of Endocrinology,Shenzhen Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen 518034, China
  • Received:2022-07-04 Online:2022-09-10 Published:2022-10-10

Abstract: Objective To develop a questionnaire of protective motivation for uric acid management in patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia and to test the reliability and validity. Methods Guided by the theory of protective motivation, the preliminary questionnaire was prepared by literature analysis, semi-structured interview, Delphi expert consultation and pre-survey. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire were tested by consulting 16 experts and investigating 318 patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia. Results The final questionnaire of protective motivation for uric acid management in patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia consisted of 7 dimensions, with 34 items in total. The overall content validity index (S-CVI) of the questionnaire was 0.832, and the item-level content validity index (I-CVI) 0.814~1. The total Cronbach α coefficient was 0.833, and the Cronbach α coefficient of each dimension ranged from 0.782 to 0.845. The total split-half reliability was 0.819, and the split-half reliability of each dimension ranged from 0.729 to 0.825. The combined reliability coefficients ranged from 0.793 to 0.865. Seven common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, which explained 72.227% of the variation. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that χ2/df=1.503, RMSEA=0.049, RMR=0.026, CFI=0.919, GFI=0.862, AGFI=0.875, IFI=0.921, TLI=0.910, and the model fit was good. Conclusion The questionnaire has good reliability and validity and it is easy for the patients to understand. It can be used as a tool to evaluate the cognition and behavior of uric acid management in patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia.

Key words: asymptomatic, hyperuricemia, uric acid management, protection motivation theory, reliability, validity

CLC Number: 

  • R471
[1] Johnson RJ, Bakris GL, Borghi C, et al.Hyperuricemia, Acute and Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension, and Cardiovascular Disease:Report of a Scientific Workshop Organized by the National Kidney Foundation[J]. Am J Kidney Dis,2018,71(6):851-865. DOI:10.1053/j.ajkd. 2017.12.009.
[2] 周智超,王凌霄.无症状高尿酸血症研究进展[J].中国医师进修杂志,2022,45(7):657-661.
[3] 袁萍. 自我管理模式在高尿酸血症患者中的应用价值[J].中国继续医学教育,2020,12(28):108-111.
[4] Yao X, Zhang L, Du J, et al.Effect of Information-motivation-behavioral Model Based on Protection Motivation Theory on the Psychological Resilience and Quality of Life of Patients with Type 2 DM[J]. Psychiatr Q, 2021,92(1):49-62. DOI:10.1007/s11126-020- 09783-w.
[5] 邓丽萍,谢小华,王亚萍,等.脑卒中高危人群保护动机问卷的编制及信效度检验[J].护理学报,2020,27(8):1-5.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.08.001.
[6] 黄娜,周英凤,李丽,等.妊娠期糖尿病孕妇血糖管理保护动机问卷的编制及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志,2021,56(4):561-566. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.04.014.
[7] Valsaraj R, Singh AK, Gangopadhyay KK,et al.Management of Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia: Integrated Diabetes & Endocrine Academy (Idea) Consensus Statement[J]. Diabetes Metab Syndr, 2020,14(2):93-100. DOI:10.1016/j.dsx.2020.01.007.
[8] 封番番,张蓓,周连锁,等. 无症状高尿酸血症的诊治和管理[J].江苏医药,2021,47(11):1182-1185. DOI:10.19460/j.cnki.0253-3685.2021.11.026.
[9] Chalès G.How Should We Manage Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia?[J]. Joint Bone Spine, 2019,86(4):437-443. DOI:10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.10.004.
[10] 中华医学会内分泌学分会.中国高尿酸血症与痛风诊疗指南(2019)[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2020,36(1):1-13.
[11] Valsaraj R, Singh AK, Gangopadhyay KK,et al.Management of Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia: Integrated Diabetes & Endocrine Academy (IDEA) Consensus Statement[J]. Diabetes Metab Syndr, 2020,14(2):93-100. DOI:10.1016/j.dsx.2020.01.007.
[12] 郑卫军,何凡.现况调查的样本量计算方法[J].预防医学,2020,32(6):647-648. DOI:10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2020.06.028.
[13] Hou S, Li B, Luo Y, et al.Creation and Location-specific Revision of a Core Nursing Outcomes Evaluation System Based on Nursing Outcomes Classification for Stroke Inpatients in China[J]. Int J Nurs Knowl,2019,30(3):154-161. DOI:10.1111/2047-3095.122 22.
[14] 李峥,刘宇.护理学研究方法[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:251.
[15] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010:158-298.
[16] Hickman RL, Pignatiello GA, Tahir S.Evaluation of the Decisional Fatigue Scale Among Surrogate Decision Makers of the Critically III[J]. West J Nurs Res, 2018, 40(2):191-208. DOI:10.1177/0193945917723828.
[17] Arbaranelli C, Leec S, Vellone E, et al.The problem with Cronbach’s Alpha: Comment on Sijtsma Andvail Derark(2015)[J]. Nurs Res, 2015,64(2):140. DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000 000079.
[1] LI Hui, PAN Ling, LI Bo, LIU Xiao-hui. Translation of Patient Safety Competency Self-rating Scale and Its Reliability and Validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2022, 29(9): 47-51.
[2] LIU Kai-li, LUO Yan-yan, YAO Gui-ying, ZHU Zhi-ling, GUO Hua, DU Yi-shen, QIN Li-wei, WU Hui-min, LI Jia-bo. Translation of Palliative Care Attitudes Scale and Its Reliability and Validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2022, 29(16): 11-16.
[3] XU Li-min, Qian Zhi-gang. Construction of Clinical Teachers' Tacit Knowledge Sharing Scale and Its Reliability and Validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2022, 29(15): 24-27.
[4] YE Xiao-ling, ZHOU Chun-lan, HUANG Cong-ping, LIU Zhi-hong, WU Ming-xiu, DENG Shui-juan, LIU Yu, YANG Li-xiao, WANG Run. Translation of Comprehensive Assessment Scale for Post-stroke Disability and Its Reliability and Validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2022, 29(11): 65-69.
[5] ZHANG Zheng-min, ZUO Qian-qian, FENG Xian-gang, LIANG Su-juan, WEI Hong-yun, GAO Yu-lin. Development of Professional Death Avoidance Scale for ICU Nurses and Its Reliability and Validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2022, 29(1): 53-57.
[6] WANG Qi, LI Ling-xia, HE Jin-jie, ZHENG Hua-dong, MI Xiao-fen, HU Yan-fen. Development and Validation of Questionnaire of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Hypoglycemia for Medical Staff [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(9): 9-13.
[7] LIU Yu, ZHOU Chun-lan, ZHOU Jun-gui, DENG Shui-juan, HE Ren-hong. Development and Validation of Self-management Scale for Neurogenic Bladder Patients [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(7): 64-68.
[8] XIA Jie, DUAN Xia, ZHANG Jia-nan, YU Chan, WANG Ke-ke. Construction of Early Warning Assessment Scale for High-risk Pregnant Women and Its Reliability and Validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(4): 67-72.
[9] LI Yan-qing, ZHANG Xiao-mei, XU Xiu-qun. Translation of the Skidmore Anxiety Stigma Scale and Its Reliability and Validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(24): 17-21.
[10] ZHANG Shan-shan, LI Hui-ping, SONG Jiang-yan, ZHOU Meng-ke, GAO Jie, LI Jia-xin. Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Family Resilience Assessment in Breast Cancer Patients [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(24): 1-5.
[11] TANG He, QIAO Yu, ZHU Jia-mei, ZHANG Min. Cross-cultural Adaptation of Chinese Version of Questionnaire of Use of Sleep Medication in Elderly [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(17): 11-14.
[12] XU Ai-hong. Effect of Protective Motivation Theory-based Nursing Intervention on Self-care Ability of Elderly Patients with Chronic Diseases [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(16): 47-51.
[13] KONG Hai-yan, ZHANG Xin-qiong, ZHANG Hong-hui, WANG Ting-ting, WANG Ai-mei. Localization of Heart Disease Fact Questionnaire and Its Reliability and Validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(15): 1-4.
[14] DING Han-qin, LI Li-hua, HE Xia-jun. Construction of Training System for Nursing Interview Ability of Psychiatric Nurses and Its Reliability and Validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(13): 6-12.
[15] LIU Yun-fang, YU Jiao-hua, LI Su-yun, KE Hui, YAN Rong, ZHAO Shi-yu. Translation of Multi-criteria Nursing Decision-making Evaluation Scale and Its Reliability and Validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(10): 52-56.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!