以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

Journal of Nursing ›› 2019, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 1-5.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.06.001

    Next Articles

Development and Test of Questionnaire of Care Knowledge-attitude-practice of Caregivers for Children with Acute Leukemia

WANG Jie1, GUO Yan2   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China;
    2. Cancer Hospital of Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450000, China
  • Received:2018-08-26 Published:2020-07-13

Abstract: Objective To develop a questionnaire of care knowledge-attitude-practice (KAP) of caregivers for children with acute leukemia and to test its reliability and validity. Methods Based on KAP theory, the questionnaire was developed by using literature review,semi-structured interviews,and 2 rounds of expert consultation. The project analysis was carried out using a sample of 360 caregivers for children with acute leukemia from the wards in 2 tertiary grade A hospitals in Zhengzhou. The validity of the questionnaire was analyzed by exploratory factor analysis and content validity. The internal consistency coefficient and bisected reliability were used to evaluate the reliability of the questionnaire. Results Totally 13 items were deleted. The questionnaire was composed of 41 items and 3 dimensions including knowledge (22 items), attitude (11 items), and behavior (8 items). The 3 dimensions included 4, 2 and 1 common factors respectively and they explained 72.141%, 70.336%, 55.798% of the variances respectively by using exploratory factor analysis. The S-CVI was 0.909, 0.922, 0.929 respectively,and I-CVI ranged from 0.857 to 1.000. The Cranach's α of the questionnaire and each dimension was 0.967, 0.953, 0.916 and 0.885 respectively. The split-half reliability of the general questionnaire and each dimension was 0.894, 0.842, 0.762, and 0.833 respectively. Conclusion The questionnaire has good reliability and validity, and it can be used to evaluate the care KAP of caregivers for children with acute leukemia.

Key words: acute leukemia, caregiver, knowledge-attitude-practice, questionnaire development, reliability, validity

CLC Number: 

  • R473.55
[1] Terracini B.Epidemiology of Childhood Cancer[J].Environmental Health, 2011, 10(Suppl 1):S1-S8.DOI:10.1186/1476-069X-10-S1-S8.
[2] Kaltenbaugh D J, Klem M L, Hu L, et al.Using Web-based Interventions to Support Caregivers of Patients with Cancer: A Systematic Review[J]. Oncol Nurs Forum, 2015, 42(2):156-64.DOI:10.1188/15.ONF.156-164.
[3] 侯明香,芦桂芝,王静波,等. 护生安全注射知信行问卷的编制及信效度评价[J].护理学报, 2017, 24(22):7-11.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2017.22.007.
[4] Hashemi F, Shokrpour N.The Impact of Education Regarding the Needs of Pediatric Leukemia Patients' Siblings on the Parents' Knowledge and Practice[J]. Health Care Manager, 2010,29(1):75-79.DOI:10.1097/HCM.0b013e3181cca479.
[5] 刘晓,俞梦盈,何桂娟.护士用老年糖尿病患者口腔保健知信行问卷的编制及信效度评价[J].护理学报, 2016,23(23):54-58. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2016.23.054.
[6] 王园园,王婧婷,俞苏燕,等.确诊初期急性淋巴细胞性白血病患儿父母需求的质性研究[J]. 解放军护理杂志,2016,33(4):6-10.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2016.04.002.
[7] 武艳,高伟,李曼,等.白血病患儿照顾者真实感受的质性研究[J].护理学报,2017,24(12):5-9.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2014.08.001.
[8] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2010.
[9] 李真. 肿瘤患儿家庭照顾者负担及影响因素研究[D].吉林:吉林大学, 2015.
[10] Markon K E, Chmielewski M, Miller C J.The Reliability and Validity of Discrete and Continuous Measures of Psychopathology: A Quantitative Review[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 2011, 137(5):856-879.DOI:10.1037/a0023678.
[11] 张莎,田晋,刘巧兰,等.流动人口SF-12生命质量量表信度、效度评价[J]. 中国公共卫生,2011, 27(2):226-227.DOI:10.11847/zgggws2011-27-02-49.
[12] 郑日昌. 心理测量与测验[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013.
[13] 郝元涛,孙希凤,方积乾,等.量表条目筛选的统计学方法研究[J].中国卫生统计,2004, 21(4):209-211.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3674.2004.04.006.
[1] DENG Li-ping, XIE Xiao-hua, WANG Ya-ping, YANG Jie, PAN Lu, MA Jia-hui, XIAO Jing-yi, XIONG Xiao-yun. Development of Protection Motivation Questionnaire for High Risk Population of Stroke and Its Reliability and Validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2020, 27(8): 1-5.
[2] LIU Li-ping, ZHOU Chun-lan, WU Yan-ni, CONG Wei-lian, HU Ming-yu, LI Xiao-xia. Translation of Emotional Inhibition Scale and Its Reliability and Validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2020, 27(8): 6-10.
[3] WANG Yan, ZHU Gui-lin. Effect of Nursing Intervention based on Behaviour Change Wheel for Patients after Enterostomy [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2020, 27(8): 54-58.
[4] YE Dong-ting, ZHANG Qin-lian, JING Shuang, GUO Jia, XING Yan-fen. Psychological Experience of Family Members of ICU Patients during ICU Transfer: A Meta-synthesis [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2020, 27(11): 33-39.
[5] WU Bin, WU Li-gui, YUAN Ling, GUO Miao-Miao, PENG Wei-Qin, XIA Hao-zhi. Qualitative Research on Care Experience of Relative Caregivers of Hospice Patients with Oncology [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2019, 26(6): 6-9.
[6] JIN Huan, YU Jiao-hua, LI xin, WANG Yu-mei, LI Yao. Design and Application of Human Reliability Database for Nursing Adverse Events [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2019, 26(3): 8-11.
[7] WANG Yu-mei, ZHANG Lan, LE Qiong, WU Li-fen, XIONG Li-juan, YANG Xue-jiao, ZHANG Xue-hui. Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Non-nutritive Sucking Scoring System in Preterm Newborns [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2019, 26(3): 62-65.
[8] WANG Yan, LIU Feng, TIAN Min, ZHANG Nan. Development of Nursing Safety Management Evaluation Scale in Department of Cardiology and Its Reliability and Validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2019, 26(15): 5-8.
[9] JI Jia-mei, LUO Cai-feng, XU Jian-ou. Development of Nurse Affective Domain Ability Scale and Its Reliability and Validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2019, 26(15): 46-50.
[10] GUO Li,HUO Shu-ping,LIU Yan,LIU De-hong. Translation of Work Addiction Scale for Nurses and Reliability and Validity Evaluation [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2018, 25(8): 27-31.
[11] CAI Jian-ping,JIANG Zi-fang. Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form in Women with Breast Cancer [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2018, 25(7): 5-8.
[12] ZENG Ji-li, WANG Xin-yu, HU Fen. Qualitative Research of Care Experience of Caregivers of Dementia Patients: A Meta Analysis [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2018, 25(23): 28-34.
[13] CHU Hui-hui ,CHEN Qin ,Huang Li-min ,Zhong Tong . Reliability and Validity of Sweeney-Clark 's Simulation Performance Rubric (Chinese version) [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2017, 24(8): 1-4.
[14] KANG Dong-qin,LIU Yu-fen,XUE Dong-qun,LIU Qi,LI Yu,CHEN Zhi-qi,YUE Shu-jin. Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of EPIC Physical Activity Questionnaire [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2017, 24(24): 1-4.
[15] HOU Ming-xiang,LU Gui-zhi,WANG Jing-bo,LI Jing,ZHANG Hui-lin. Development of KAP Questionnaire of Safety Injection in Nursing Students and Its Reliability and Validity [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2017, 24(22): 7-11.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
[1] ZHAO Di, ZHAO Meng-Lu, WANG Na, FU Ming-Jing, LIANG Feng, ZHANG Wei, WANG Ai-Min. Current Status of Social Isolation of Community-dwelling Elderly People in Qingdao and Its Influencing Factors[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2020, 27(11): 6 -10 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2020, 27(11): 11 -15 .
[3] XIE Yan-zhen, LI Zhuang-miao, ZHANG Jia-yu, JI Qiu-lu, WU Yu-xin. Bibliometric Analysis of Moxibustion for Hemiplegia after Stroke[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2020, 27(11): 16 -20 .
[4] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2020, 27(11): 21 -25 .
[5] YE Dong-ting, ZHANG Qin-lian, JING Shuang, GUO Jia, XING Yan-fen. Psychological Experience of Family Members of ICU Patients during ICU Transfer: A Meta-synthesis[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2020, 27(11): 33 -39 .
[6] GUO Xiao-yu, SHI Dong-li, ZHANG Zheng-mei, LI Na, ZHANG Pei-feng, YANG Li-juan. Best Evidence Summary for Early Removal of Urinary Catheters in Male Patients after Lumbar Spine Surgery under General Anethesia[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2020, 27(11): 46 -51 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2020, 27(11): 52 -56 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2020, 27(11): 66 -70 .
[9] LI Xi-zhen, CAO Mei-chang, DENG Ju-ying, ZENG Man-ping, OU Li-fang. Effect of Narrative Therapy on Fear of Cancer Recurrence and Level of Hope in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2020, 27(11): 71 -74 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2020, 27(11): 75 -78 .