骨折联络服务在骨质疏松性髋部骨折患者中应用的范围综述

doi:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.22.048

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的对FLS在骨质疏松性髋部骨折患者中应用的研究进行范围审查,为未来FLS的研究方向以及临床应用提供参考。方法检索自建库至2023年11月30日中国知网、万方、维普、中国生物医学文献、中华医学期刊全文数据库、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CINAHL、JBI数据库中发表的所有与主题相关的文献。对作者、发表年份、国家、研究类型、样本量、干预措施、干预时长、结局指标等进行提取与汇总分析。结果共纳入33篇文献。干预措施多以FLS团队确立、患者的识别和确认、危险因素的评估和干预、药物和非药物治疗、健康随访为框架。共提取27项结局指标,归纳为有效性结局指标、主观结局指标、安全性结局指标、医院相关结局指标4个方面。结论骨折联络服务对骨质疏松性髋部骨折患者的预后改善及再骨折预防有积极意义。未来研究应规范干预措施、结局指标及其评价内容和工具,制定适合骨质疏松性髋部骨折患者的骨折联络服务方案。

关键词: 骨折联络服务, 骨质疏松症, 髋部骨折, 范围综述

Abstract: Objective To perform a scoping review on the application of fracture liaison service (FLS) in patients with osteoporotic hip fracture and to provide reference for FLS's clinical application and future research. Methods We searched literature in CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP, CBM, Chinese Medical Journal Full Text Database, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, and JBI databases from the inception to November 30, 2023. The following information was retrieved and extracted for the analysis: author, publication year, nation, study type, sample size, intervention, length of intervention, and outcome indicator. Results Totally 33 articles were collected. The framework of the interventions was mainly established by the establishment of FLS team, patient identification and validation, risk factor evaluation and intervention, pharmaceutical and non-pharmacological treatment, and health follow-up. A total of 27 outcome indicators were extracted and categorized into 4 aspects: effectiveness outcome indicators, subjective outcome indicators, safety outcome indicators, and hospital-related outcome indicators. Conclusion In patients with osteoporotic hip fracture, FLS has a favorable impact on prognosis improvement and re-fracture prevention. In future research, an appropriate FLS program for patients with osteoporotic hip fracture should be created, and the interventions, outcome indicators, and evaluation tools should be standardized.

Key words: fracture liaison service, osteoporosis, hip fracture, scoping review

中图分类号:

R473.6

王爱, 周冰倩, 曹虹. 骨折联络服务在骨质疏松性髋部骨折患者中应用的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 48-53.

WANG Ai, ZHOU Bing-qian, CAO Hong. Application of Fracture Liaison Service in Patients with Osteoporotic Hip Fracture：a Scoping Review[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(22): 48-53.

参考文献

[1] 中华医学会骨科学分会. 骨质疏松性骨折诊疗指南(2022年版)[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2022,42(22):1473-1491. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn121113-20220704-00377.
[2] 张红霞,杨巧巧,党晨珀,等. 老年性骨质疏松患者骨折风险预测工具的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3):57-62. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.03.057.
[3] 刘春香,成传芳,赵晨,等. 骨折联络服务在老年髋部脆性骨折患者中的应用[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(9):1343-1348. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.09.012.
[4] Wallace I, Callachand F, Elliott J, et al.An evaluation of an enhanced fracture liaison service as the optimal model for secondary prevention of osteoporosis[J]. JRSM Short Rep, 2011, 2(2):8. DOI:10.1258/shorts.2010.010063.
[5] Amphansap T, Stitkitti N, Dumrongwanich P.Evaluation of Police General Hospital's Fracture Liaison Service (PGH's FLS): the first study of a Fracture Liaison Service in Thailand[J]. Osteoporos Sarcopenia, 2016, 2(4):238-243. DOI:10.1016/j.afos.2016.09.002.
[6] Cosman F, Nicpon K, Nieves JW.Results of a fracture liaison service on hip fracture patients in an open healthcare system[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2017, 29(2):331-334. DOI:10.1007/s40520-016-0545-2.
[7] Naranjo A, Fernandez-Conde S, Ojeda S, et al.Preventing future fractures: effectiveness of an orthogeriatric fracture liaison service compared to an outpatient fracture liaison service and the standard management in patients with hip fracture[J]. Arch Osteoporos, 2017, 12(1):112. DOI:10.1007/s11657-017-0373-9.
[8] Beaupre LA, Moradi F, Khong H, et al.Implementation of an in-patient hip fracture liaison services to improve initiation of osteoporosis medication use within 1-year of hip fracture: a population-based time series analysis using the RE-AIM framework[J]. Arch Osteoporos, 2020, 15(1):83. DOI:10.1007/s11657-020-00751-2.
[9] Amphansap T, Stitkitti N, Arirachakaran A.The effectiveness of Police General Hospital's fracture liaison service (PGH's FLS) implementation after 5 years: a prospective cohort study[J]. Osteoporos Sarcopenia, 2020, 6(4):199-204. DOI:10.1016/j.afos.2020.11.004.
[10] Gonzalez-Quevedo D, Bautista-Enrique D, Perez-Del-Rio V, et al.Fracture liaison service and mortality in elderly hip fracture patients: a prospective cohort study[J]. Osteoporos Int, 2020, 31(1):77-84. DOI:10.1007/s00198-019-05153-w.
[11] 胡黎婷. 老年髋部骨折中“骨折联络服务”的初步疗效分析[J]. 养生保健指南, 2020(6):48.
[12] 朱玉燕,潘杏华,赵丽君. 老年髋部脆性骨折患者实施骨折联络服务效果分析[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2020, 26(16): 100-103. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2020.16.039.
[13] Stephens JR, Caraccio D, Mabry DR, et al.Implementation of a fracture liaison service for patients with hip fracture cared for on a hospital medicine service[J].Hosp Pract (1995), 2021, 49(1):41-46. DOI:10.1080/21548331.2020.1832384.
[14] 陈勉珊,郑倍奋,黄秋娜,等. 基于FLS模式的康复护理在骨质疏松性股骨转子间骨折手术患者中的应用[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2021, 27(18):105-107. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2021.18.042.
[15] 丛珊,李思,李倩,等. 髋部脆性骨折老年患者实施骨折联络服务效果观察[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2021, 27(14):69-71. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2021.14.024.
[16] 甘玉云,刘静,徐丽,等. 基于骨折联络服务模式的老年髋部脆性骨折患者综合护理干预效果研究[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2021,38(9):67-70. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2021.09.017.
[17] 李慧,贾伟丹,王琼,等. 医联体模式下骨折联络服务在社区老年髋部骨折术后患者自我管理能力的应用[J]. 临床研究, 2021, 29(5):184-186.
[18] 向青天,王通卫,王继军,等. 骨折联络服务理念在老年骨质疏松性髋部骨折术后患者中的应用效果[J]. 临床医学研究与实践,2021, 6(7):43-46.DOI:10.19347/j.cnki.2096-1413.202107014.
[19] 张萍霞,倪艳,郑珺,等. 适度运动疗法及骨折联络服务在骨质疏松性髋部骨折中的应用效果[J]. 中国实用护理杂志,2021,37(30):2335-2339.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20201103-04404.
[20] 张绍梅,张和玲. 骨折联络服务对老年髋部脆性骨折患者衰弱程度的影响[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2021, 40(20): 3816-3819.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn221370-20200329-01077.
[21] Zinger G, Sylvetsky N,Levy Y,et al.Efficacy of orthopaedic-inspired osteoporosis management: a secondary fracture prevention program after a fracture of the hip in a prospective randomized study[J]. OTA Int, 2021, 4(2):e122. DOI: 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000122.
[22] 曾玉春,钟亮,雷梅珍,等. 骨折联络服务理论指导的信息化延续性护理对骨质疏松性髋部骨折患者依从性、相关知识水平及髋关节功能的影响[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志,2022,31(16):2317-2320. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-8849.2022.16.027.
[23] 胡毓敏,赵一琼. 骨折联络服务模式应用于老年股骨颈骨折行全髋置换病人的效果观察[J]. 全科护理, 2022, 20(11):1529-1531.DOI:10.12104/j.issn.1674-4748.2022.11.023.
[24] 李兴晶,燕东展,赵红霞. 基于骨折联络服务(FLS)模式对老年髋部脆性骨折患者康复效果的影响[J].健康大视野, 2022(21): 40-41.
[25] 秦海珍. 骨折联络服务对老年股骨颈骨折患者术后感染预防作用的评价[J]. 抗感染药学, 2022, 19(4):563-566. DOI:10.13493/j.issn.1672-7878.2022.04-029.
[26] 张爱峰. 骨折联络服务(FLS)模式在老年骨质疏松性股骨转子间骨折患者中的应用效果[J].国际护理学杂志, 2022, 41(13):2473-2476. DOI:10.13493/j.issn.1672-7878.2022.04-029.
[27] 周红艳,闫林平,李艳蕊,等. 联络员主导的老年髋部骨折患者精准随访方案的构建与应用研究[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2022,37(9):777-782.DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2022.09.003.
[28] Chen YP, Chang WC, Wen TW, et al.Multipronged programmatic strategy for preventing secondary fracture and facilitating functional recovery in older patients after hip fractures: our experience in Taipei Municipal Wanfang Hospital[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2022, 58(7):875. DOI:10.3390/medicina58070875.
[29] Gonzalez-Quevedo D, Perez-Del-Rio V, Moriel-Garceso D, et al. A 2-year follow-up of a novel Fracture Liaison Service: can we reduce the mortality in elderly hip fracture patients? A prospective cohort study[J].Osteoporos Int, 2022, 33(8):1695-1702. DOI:10.1007/s00198-022-06298-x.
[30] Ruggiero C, Baroni M, Talesa G R, et al.The interdisciplinary fracture liaison service improves health-related outcomes and survival of older adults after hip fracture surgical repair[J]. Arch Osteoporos, 2022, 17(1):135. DOI:10.1007/s11657-022-01171-0.
[31] Lai H, Fan J, Liu H, et al.Fracture liaison services combined with online home nursing care in fragility hip fracture: a comparative effectiveness pilot study[J]. Arch Osteoporos, 2023, 18(1):33.DOI:10.1007/s11657-023-01221-1.
[32] 蒋璟峰,来贺欢,陈静,等. 骨折联络服务模式预防老年髋部脆性骨折患者发生二次骨折效果观察[J]. 中国基层医药, 2023, 30(1):148-151. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn341190-20210623-00718.
[33] 孟蓓毅,许斌,冯立,等. 基于骨折联络服务的老年髋部脆性骨折患者综合干预作用分析[J].浙江创伤外科, 2023, 28(3):605-607.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-7147.2023.03.060.
[34] Wang CC, Liu HC, Lee MT, et al.Effects of Fracture Liaison Service on Outcomes of Patients with Hip Fracture in Rural Area of an Asian Country[J]. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil,2023,14:1761054289.DOI:10.1177/21514593231204783.
[35] Chotiyarnwong P, Kitcharanant N, Vanitcharoenkul E, et al.Three-year outcomes of a fracture liaison service model at a university-based tertiary care hospital in Thailand[J]. Archives of osteoporosis, 2023, 18(1):26. DOI:10.1007/s11657-023-01215-z

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared