以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8): 18-22.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.08.018

• 护理管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

问题提示清单在乳腺癌手术患者中的应用研究

华晶, 张青月, 王燕, 程畅, 张秀丽, 张爱爱   

  1. 天津医科大学肿瘤医院,国家恶性肿瘤临床医学研究中心, 天津市恶性肿瘤临床医学研究中心,乳腺癌防治教育部重点实验室,天津市肿瘤防治重点实验室,天津 300060
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-02 出版日期:2024-04-25 发布日期:2024-05-08
  • 通讯作者: 王燕(1981-),女,湖北武汉人,硕士,副主任护师,护士长。
  • 作者简介:华晶(1996-),女,天津人,本科学历,护师。
  • 基金资助:
    天津市医学重点学科(专科)建设项目(TJYXZDXK-011A)资助; 天津医科大学肿瘤医院护理专项基金(TJMUCH-H-2022-07)

Application of question prompt list in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery

HUA Jing, ZHANG Qing-yue, WANG Yan, CHENG Chang, ZHANG Xiu-li, ZHANG Ai'ai   

  1. Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University, Ministry of Education, ianjin Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin 300060, China
  • Received:2024-01-02 Online:2024-04-25 Published:2024-05-08

摘要: 目的 探究问题提示清单在乳腺癌患者围手术期的应用效果。方法 采用临床对照研究,通过便利抽样法,选取2023年8-12月在天津市某三级甲等医院乳腺外科的确诊为乳腺癌需手术85例患者作为研究对象,依据入院时间分为干预组和对照组。对照组接受常规护理,干预组在常规护理基础上给予问题提示清单。应用决策冲突量表、癌症患者未满足需求简明量表以及医疗决策参与满意度量表对2组患者进行效果比较。结果 对照组40例、干预组37例完成研究。干预组决策冲突总分为低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=2.145,P<0.05);未满足需求简明量表干预组总分为低于对照组总分,差异有统计学意义(t=2.514,P<0.05);医疗决策参与满意度干预组总分高于对照组总分,差异有统计学意义(t=2.765,P<0.05)。结论 乳腺癌手术患者使用问题提示清单可增加询问问题积极性,满足患者信息需求,降低决策冲突水平,提高医患沟通质量,提升医疗决策参与能力及医疗决策参与满意度,促进患者做出有效决策。

关键词: 问题提示清单, 乳腺癌手术, 决策冲突

Abstract: Objective To study the effect of question prompt list in breast cancer patients during perioperative period. Methods Convenience sampling was adopted to select 85 patients with breast cancer who had undergone surgery in the breast surgery department of a tertiary grade-A hospital in Tianjin from August to December 2023 as the research subjects. They were divided into intervention and control group according to the time of admission. The control group received routine care, while the intervention group was provided with a question prompt checklist in addition to routine care. The Decision Conflict Scale, The Chinese version of Short-Form Survivor Unmet Needs Survey, and Participation in Medical Decision-making Scale were used to compare the intervention effect between the two groups. Results Forty cases in the control group and thirty-seven cases in the intervention group completed the study. The total score of Decision Conflict Scale (t=2.145,P<0.05)and the Chinese version of Short-Form Survivor Unmet Needs Survey (t=2.514, P<0.05) in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant. The total score of the Participation in Medical Decision-making Scale in the intervention group was higher than that of the control group, indicating statistically significance(t=2.765,P<0.05). Conclusion The application of the question prompt list can enhance patients' enthusiasm for asking questions, improve the quality of doctor-patient communication, meet patients' information needs, reduce decision-making conflicts, improve medical decision-making participation ability, and ultimately improve patients' satisfaction with medical decision-making participation.

Key words: question prompt list, breast cancer, decision-making conflict

中图分类号: 

  • R47
[1] Heer E, Harper A, Escandor N, et al.Global burden and trends in premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer: a population-based study[J]. The Lancet Global Health, 2020,8(8):e1027-e1037. DOI:10.1016/S2214-109x(20)30215-1.
[2] 郑红颖,杨林宁,尤婷婷,等.乳腺癌患者参与共享决策阻碍及促进因素的描述性质性研究[J].中国护理管理, 2020, 20(10):5. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.10.013.
[3] 郝富杰,潘瑞丽,姜懿珊,等.癌症患者参与治疗决策的研究进展[J].沈阳医学院学报, 2023, 25(2):193-197. DOI:10.16753/j.cnki.1008-2344.2023.02.019.
[4] Brown RF, Shuk E, Leighl N, et al.Enhancing decision making about participation in cancer clinical trials: development of a question prompt list[J]. Supportive Care in Cancer,2010,19(8):1227-1238.DOI:10.1007/s00520-010-0942-6.
[5] Buizza C, Ghilardi A, Mazzardi P, et al.Effects of a question prompt sheet on the oncologist-patient relationship: a multi-centred randomised controlled trial in breast cancer[J]. J Cancer Educ, 2019,35(3):621-628. DOI:10.1007/s13187-019-01505-6.
[6] O'Connor AM. Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale[J]. Medical Decision Making, 1995,15(1):25-30. DOI:10.1177/0272989x9501500105.
[7] 李玉. 早期原发性肝癌患者治疗决策辅助方案的构建与应用研究[D].第二军医大学, 2017.
[8] Campbell HS, Hall AE, Sanson-Fisher RW, et al.Development and validation of the Short-Form Survivor Unmet Needs Survey (SF-SUNS)[J]. Supportive Care in Cancer. 2013,22(4):1071-1079. DOI:10.1007/s00520-013-2061-7.
[9] 闫婷婷,乔婷婷,郑蔚,等.中文版癌症患者未满足需求简明量表的信效度研究[J].现代预防医学, 2018, 45(2):6. DOI:cnki:sun:xdyf.0.2018-02-031.
[10] 徐小琳. 患者对医疗决策参与的满意度量表的编制及信效度考评[D]. 长沙:中南大学, 2010. DOI:10.7666/d.y1718142.
[11] 李玉,叶志霞,刘佩玉,等.癌症患者治疗决策辅助的研究进展[J].中华护理杂志, 2017, 52(1):6. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2017.01.006.
[12] Terrasson J, Rault A, Dolbeault S, et al.Question prompt lists to improve communication between cancer patients and healthcare professionals[J]. Current Opinion in Oncology, 2022, 34(4):265-269.DOI:10.1097/cco.0000000000000840.
[13] Jayasekera J, Vadaparampil S, Eggly S, et al.Question prompt list to support patient-provider communication in the use of the 21-gene recurrence test: feasibility, acceptability, and outcomes[J]. JCO oncology practice, 2020, 16(10):e1085-e1097. DOI:10.1200/JOP.19.00661.
[14] 郑粉善,曹沛莹,华兴龙,等.乳腺癌患者需求量表的编制及信效度检验[J].中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(4):469-475. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.04.013.
[15] 吴丽,陈荣凤,邹自玉,等.问题提示列表在乳腺癌患者中临床应用效果的系统评价[J].护理学报, 2022, 29(2):45-50. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.02.045.
[16] 张青月,王燕,王小媛,等.问题提示清单在肿瘤患者决策沟通中的应用进展[J].中国护理管理, 2022, 22(6):943-946. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2022.06.028.
[17] 金彩,刘翔宇,彭小伟,等.经口甲状腺切除术后患者参与医疗决策的满意度及其与医患关系的相关性分析[J].护士进修杂志, 2021, 36(5):476-479. DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2021.05.020.
[18] Sepucha KR, Belkora JK, Tripathy D, et al.Building bridges between physicians and patients: results of a pilot study examining new tools for collaborative decision making in breast cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2000,18(6):1230-1238. DOI:10.1200/jco.2000.18.6.1230.
[19] Sansoni JE, Grootemaat P, Duncan C.Question prompt lists in health consultations: a review[J]. Patient Education and Counseling, 2015,98(12):1454-1464. DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2015.05.015.
[20] 吴玲玉. 共享决策干预对冠心病患者治疗决策冲突与决策满意度的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志, 2020, 26(1):9-12. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2020.01.003.
[1] 郭红涛, 张静, 李颖, 甄艺婉. 白血病患儿父母决策冲突现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 22-26.
[2] 毛赛璐, 曾莉. ICU患者代理决策者决策冲突的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 33-37.
[3] 王丽萍, 王慧, 侯铭, 郭俊梅, 祖百法, 李萍. 222名颅内肿瘤患者家属决策冲突现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(20): 11-16.
[4] 寇玉珠, 杨朝霞, 张爱华. 自我管理行为在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者决策冲突与共同决策参与度间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(21): 52-56.
[5] 程晓姣,魏敏,陈芳. 中文版决策冲突量表应用于面部整形美容咨询者的信效度研究[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(14): 49-52.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
[1] 孙素亚, 陈亚梅, 陈伟仙, 薄瑾, 刘晓红, 黄燕, 林梦月. 认知性访谈在过渡期炎症性肠病患者过渡准备量表文化调适中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 1 -5 .
[2] 陈芮, 王梅, 唐晓霞, 朱傲雪, 毛惠娜. 基于ERG理论的免疫检查点抑制剂治疗癌症患者护理需求方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 1 -5 .
[3] 马瑞瑞, 范晓莉, 徐姝娟, 张伟, 陈婷, 谈飞飞. 护士参与终末期患者临终决策体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 6 -11 .
[4] 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12 -16 .
[5] 赵洁, 宋雅玲, 畅盼, 郭倩, 王锦华. 慢性心力衰竭患者及其照顾者心理弹性在疾病不确定感与生活质量间的主客体互倚中介模型研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 17 -21 .
[6] 郑桃花, 高翔, 康梅, 魏海霞, 柳笑, 张丽. 4R危机管理理论在结肠镜围检查期低血糖风险管理中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 22 -26 .
[7] 龙瑶, 卢春凤, 冯志仙. 临床护士对横向领导者特质感知的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 27 -31 .
[8] 白雅萍, 施婧. 共享决策在心脏瓣膜病介入治疗患者中的应用研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 32 -35 .
[9] 朱心悦, 嵇冰聪, 蓝雪芬, 季晓珍. 糖尿病患者电子健康素养研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 36 -39 .
[10] 郭俊晨, 刘超毅, 戴云云, 蒋思珊, 杨索, 谌永毅. 虚拟现实技术在生命末期患者中应用的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 40 -45 .