以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (7): 6-11.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.07.006

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

护士参与终末期患者临终决策体验的质性研究

马瑞瑞, 范晓莉, 徐姝娟, 张伟, 陈婷, 谈飞飞   

  1. 皖南医学院附属弋矶山医院 神经内科重症监护室,安徽 芜湖 241000
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-15 出版日期:2024-04-10 发布日期:2024-05-08
  • 通讯作者: 范晓莉(1975-),女,安徽芜湖人,硕士,副主任护师,硕士研究生导师。E-mail:19631243@qq.com
  • 作者简介:马瑞瑞(1995-),女,安徽芜湖人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。

Nurses' involvement in end-of-life decision-making for terminally ill patients: a qualitative study

MA Rui-rui, FAN Xiao-li, XU Shu-juan, ZHANG Wei, CHEN Ting, TAN Fei-fei   

  1. Intensive Care Unit, Dept. of Neurology, Yijishan Hospital, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241000, China
  • Received:2023-11-15 Online:2024-04-10 Published:2024-05-08

摘要: 目的 了解护士在参与终末期患者临终决策工作的感受及看法,为促进临床护士参与临终决策工作的实施提供参考依据。方法 采用目的及滚雪球抽样方法,纳入14名护士,进行半结构深度访谈,运用解释现象学分析法分析访谈资料,提炼主题。结果 护士参与终末期患者临终决策体验,可归纳为4个主题15个子主题,包括满足患者需求(信息传递、情感支持),自身的多重情感体验(职业价值、职业责任、成长与收获、悲伤、矛盾、共情疲劳),受到复杂的临床环境限制(繁忙的护理工作、承认医生权威、紧张的医护患环境、法律、伦理),实践能力和素养有待提高(经验与方法薄弱、参加教育和培训的需求强烈)。结论 护士在参与终末期患者临终决策实践中承担着信息传递和情感支持的角色和责任分工;其次,护士在参与过程中存在复杂的多重情感体验同时也受到复杂的临床环境限制,也表达出想要通过参加教育培训以及丰富实践经验来提高自己的能力和素养的需求和渴望,希望为完善我国高质量的临终关怀服务体系提供支持。

关键词: 患者, 终末期, 临终决策, 护士, 安宁疗护, 质性研究

Abstract: Objective Understanding the feelings and opinions of nurses in participating in end-of-life decision-making for terminally ill patients, providing a reference basis for promoting the implementation of clinical nurses in end-of-life decision-making work. Methods Purposive and snowball sampling methods were used to recruit 14 nurses for semi-structured in-depth interviews. The data from the interviews were analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis to extract themes. Results The experiences of nurses in their involvement in end-of-life decision-making for terminally ill patients can be categorized into 4 themes and 15 sub-themes. Four themes included meeting the needs of patients (information delivery, emotional support), nurses' multiple emotional experiences (professional value, professional responsibility, growth and gains, sadness, conflicts, empathy fatigue), encountering complex clinical environment restrictions (busy nursing work, acknowledging the authority of doctors, tense medical environment, legal and ethical considerations), and the need to improve practical abilities and qualities (weaknesses in experience and methods, strong demand for education and training). Conclusion Nurses play roles and responsibilities in information delivery and emotional support in their involvement in end-of-life decision-making for terminally ill patients. They also experience complex emotional experiences and face restrictions from the complex clinical environment. Furthermore, they express a desire to improve their abilities and qualities through education, training, and rich practical experience, hoping to provide high-quality end-of-life care services in China.

Key words: patient, terminally ill, end-of-life decision-making, nurse, palliative care, qualitative study

中图分类号: 

  • R473
[1] McMillen RE. End of life decisions:nurses perceptions, feelings and experiences[J]. Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 2008,24(4):251-259.DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2007.11.002.
[2] Kryworuchko J, Strachan PH, Nouvet E, et al.Factors influencing communication and decision-making about life-sustaining technology during serious illness: a qualitative study[J]. BMJ Open, 2016,6(5):e010451.DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010451.
[3] Huang J, Yang L, Qi H, et al.Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the End-of Life Decision-Making and Staff Stress Questionnaire[J].Int J Clin Health Psychol, 2020,20(3):271-281.DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2020.07.001.
[4] 何旭斌, 宦宗素, 杜娜, 等. 青少年非自杀性自伤主要照顾者真实体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2024,31(1):46-51.DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.01.046.
[5] Inagaki N, Seto N, Lee K, et al.The role of critical care nurses in shared decision-making for patients with severe heart failure: a qualitative study[J]. PLoS One, 2023,18(7):e0288978.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288978.
[6] Heradstveit SH, Larsen MH, Solberg MT, et al.Critical care nurses' role in the decision making process of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment: a qualitative systematic review[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2023,32(17/18):6012-6027.DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16728.
[7] Taylor I, Dihle A, Hofsø K, et al.Intensive care nurses' experiences of withdrawal of life sustaining treatments in intensive care patients: a qualitative study[J]. Intensive Crit Care Nurs,2020,56:102768.DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2019.102768.
[8] Bloomer MJ, Endacott R, Ranse K, et al.Navigating communication with families during withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in intensive care: a qualitative descriptive study in Australia and New Zealand[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2017,26(5/6):690-697.DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13585.
[9] Chang HT, Lin MH, Chen CK, et al.Nurses' experiences and factors related to their attitudes regarding discussions with patients and family members about do-not resuscitate decisions and life-sustaining treatment withdrawal: a hospital-based cross-sectional study[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020,17(2).DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17020557.
[10] Huang J, Qi H, Zhu Y, et al.Factors influencing the initiative behavior of intensive care unit nurses toward end-of-life decision making: a cross-sectional study[J]. J Palliat Med,2022,25(12):1802-1809.DOI:10.1089/jpm.2021.0640.
[11] 刘鑫,乔梦圆,王海燕,等.护士参与生命终末期患者临终决策阻碍因素的Meta整合[J]. 中国护理管理, 2023,23(6):904-909.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2023.06.020.
[12] 黎东梅, 陈锦丽, 李丽, 等. 300名慢性病患者代理决策者预立医疗照护计划参与现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023,30(2):67-72. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.02.067.
[13] 吴晓芬, 王丽洁, 王宁, 等. 老年人家属临终关怀决策的影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022,29(18):12-17. DOI: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.18.012.
[14] 庞建美, 张青月, 王小媛, 等. 医护人员实施乳腺癌患者决策辅助障碍及促进因素的质性研究[J].中华护理杂志, 2021,56(10):1516-1521.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.10.012.
[15] 李梦婷, 陈朔晖, 陈晓飞, 等. 医护人员对新生儿安宁疗护感受和经验的质性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022,57(8):908-913. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.08.002.
[16] Brooks LA, Manias E, Nicholson P.Communication and decision-making about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit[J]. Am J Crit Care, 2017,26(4):336-341.DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2017774.
[17] Sutherland N, Wiersma E, Vangel P.Barriers to staff involvement in end-of-life decision-making for long-term care residents with dementia[J]. Can J Aging, 2019,38(3):255-267. DOI: 10.1017/S0714980818000636.
[18] urkovi M, Brajkovi L, Jozepovi A, et al. End-of-life decisions in Intensive Care Units in Croatia-Pre COVID-19 perspectives and experiences from nurses and physicians[J]. J Bioeth Inq, 2021,18(4):629-643. DOI: 10.1007/s11673-021-10128-w.
[19] Baliza MF, Bousso RS, Poles K, et al.Factors influencing Intensive Care Units nurses in end-of-life decisions[J]. Rev Esc Enferm USP,2015,49(4):572-579.DOI:10.1590/S0080-623420150000400006.
[20] Heradstveit SH, Larsen MH, Solberg MT, et al.Critical care nurses' role in the decision-making process of withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment: a qualitative systematic review[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2023. DOI:10.1111/jocn.16728.
[21] Aperstein Y, Cohen L, Bendavid I, et al.Improved ICU mortality prediction based on SOFA scores and gastrointestinal parameters[J]. PLoS One, 2019,14(9):e0222599. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0222599.
[22] Yao LY, Xiang ML, Ye ZH, et al.Intervention study of compassion fatigue of oncology nurses in Balint group activities[J]. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi, 2017,35(12):910-913. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-9391.2017.12.007.
[23] Gjessing K, Steindal SA, Kvande ME.Collaboration between nurses and doctors in the decision-making process when considering ending the life-prolonging treatment of intensive care patients[J]. Nurs Open, 2023,10(1):306-315. DOI:10.1002/nop2.1305.
[1] 张小莉, 杨鑫玉, 肖宇, 刘春燕, 张璐, 伍晓琴, 黄月霖, 傅静. 晚期癌症患者代理决策者安宁疗护决策后悔研究的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 49-54.
[2] 徐晓东, 刘顺梅, 赵瑄, 丁秀娜. 显微根尖外科手术护士核心能力评价指标的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 69-73.
[3] 曹依丽, 王玲, 王灿, 陈燕华, 秦虹云. 精神分裂症住院患者家属资源取向的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 74-78.
[4] 龙瑶, 卢春凤, 冯志仙. 临床护士对横向领导者特质感知的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 27-31.
[5] 郭俊晨, 刘超毅, 戴云云, 蒋思珊, 杨索, 谌永毅. 虚拟现实技术在生命末期患者中应用的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 40-45.
[6] 张颖, 车晓艳, 万婠, 秦雪, 张恩思, 崇武, 郑淑娟. 我国性治疗护士工作范畴和核心能力的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 68-72.
[7] 姚晨晨, 陈娟, 杨雷. 老年衰弱患者基于埃德蒙顿衰弱量表评估分层抗阻运动的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 73-78.
[8] 李爱群, 李利花, 王芳, 蒋源元, 蔡益民. 慢性病资源利用在冠心病PCI术后患者自我超越与自我管理行为间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 13-17.
[9] 张露心, 焦延超, 文稀, 田利, 王婷, 田凤美, 李惠玲. 护理本科生在“慕课西行”同步课堂学习体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 30-34.
[10] 莫选菊, 吴远, 张曼, 刘章来, 申铁梅. 共患慢性失眠症住院患者实施睡眠限制疗法的证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 62-66.
[11] 王静, 李萍, 王妍, 张琴, 侯铭, 王孜凡. 2 050名三级甲等医院护士组织公民行为现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 67-72.
[12] 袁华君, 段功香, 陈路桥, 王慧清. 癌症终末期患者救护意愿量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 73-78.
[13] 胡晓涵, 占婷婷, 何望生, 乔疏桐, 李雪. 肝豆状核变性患者自我管理体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 17-21.
[14] 罗霞, 刘玉萍, 帅平, 关华, 杨华, 姚晓琴. 体检护士能力绩效考核方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 30-33.
[15] 吴觅之, 刘文生, 潘红英, 余红梅, 黄晨. 住院患者器械相关压力性损伤的数据挖掘及防范对策分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 34-38.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
[1] 孙素亚, 陈亚梅, 陈伟仙, 薄瑾, 刘晓红, 黄燕, 林梦月. 认知性访谈在过渡期炎症性肠病患者过渡准备量表文化调适中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 1 -5 .
[2] 陈芮, 王梅, 唐晓霞, 朱傲雪, 毛惠娜. 基于ERG理论的免疫检查点抑制剂治疗癌症患者护理需求方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 1 -5 .
[3] 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12 -16 .
[4] 赵洁, 宋雅玲, 畅盼, 郭倩, 王锦华. 慢性心力衰竭患者及其照顾者心理弹性在疾病不确定感与生活质量间的主客体互倚中介模型研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 17 -21 .
[5] 郑桃花, 高翔, 康梅, 魏海霞, 柳笑, 张丽. 4R危机管理理论在结肠镜围检查期低血糖风险管理中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 22 -26 .
[6] 龙瑶, 卢春凤, 冯志仙. 临床护士对横向领导者特质感知的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 27 -31 .
[7] 白雅萍, 施婧. 共享决策在心脏瓣膜病介入治疗患者中的应用研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 32 -35 .
[8] 朱心悦, 嵇冰聪, 蓝雪芬, 季晓珍. 糖尿病患者电子健康素养研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 36 -39 .
[9] 郭俊晨, 刘超毅, 戴云云, 蒋思珊, 杨索, 谌永毅. 虚拟现实技术在生命末期患者中应用的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 40 -45 .
[10] 周毅峰, 杨继平, 胡正中, 袁浩. 肝癌切除手术患者目标导向性血糖监测的证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 46 -50 .