以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (24): 1-6.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.24.001

• 研究生园地 •    下一篇

缺血性脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者经口摄食功能发展轨迹及影响因素分析

陈坚1,2, 王园1, 崔艳丽1,2, 罗彦嗣1, 廖琳1,2, 颜明玉1,2, 张晓梅1   

  1. 1.南方医科大学南方医院 神经内科,广东 广州 510515;
    2.南方医科大学 护理学院,广东 广州 510515
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-02 出版日期:2023-12-25 发布日期:2024-01-09
  • 通讯作者: 张晓梅(1980-),女,广东广州人,硕士,主任护师。E-mail: 2925611568@qq.com
  • 作者简介:陈坚(1997-),女,广西北海人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,护师。
  • 基金资助:
    广东省自然科学基金面上项目(2022A1515012184)

Development trajectory of oral intake function in patients with post-stroke dysphagia and its influencing factors

CHEN Jian1,2, WANG Yuan1, CUI Yan-li1,2, LUO Yan-si1, LIAO Lin1,2, YAN Ming-yu1,2, ZHANG Xiao-mei1   

  1. 1. Dept. of Neurosurgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;
    2. School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China
  • Received:2023-08-02 Online:2023-12-25 Published:2024-01-09

摘要: 目的 探讨脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者经口摄食功能的潜在类别,并分析其影响因素,为个性化康复护理措施提供参考。方法 便利选取广东省4所三级医院神经内科的缺血性脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者393例,采用一般资料调查表、经口摄食功能评估量表进行调查。潜类别增长分析模型识别经口摄食功能变化轨迹的潜在类别后,采用无序多分类Logistic回归分析其影响因素。结果 患者的经口摄食功能变化轨迹可分为低风险稳定组(25.6%)、高风险下降组(51.1%)、高风险稳定组(23.3%)。多分类Logistic回归分析结果显示,不同经口摄食功能类别的患者在年龄、美国国立卫生院卒中量表评分、管饲时长、院外照护机构上差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者经口摄食功能分为3种变化轨迹,存在群体异质性,应根据患者经口摄食功能的变化轨迹采取针对性的康复护理干预。

关键词: 脑卒中, 吞咽障碍, 经口摄食功能, 潜类别增长模型, 纵向研究

Abstract: Objective To explore the latent categories and influencing factors of oral intake function in patients with post-stroke dysphagia, and to provide reference for individualized rehabilitation nursing intervention. Methods Convenience sampling was used to select 393 patients with post-stroke dysphagia in four tertiary grade-A hospitals, and the patients were surveyed by using general information questionnaire and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. The latent category growth analysis model was used to identify the potential categories of oral intake function, and its influencing factors were analyzed by multinomial logistic regression. Results Three distinct trajectories were identified as “low risk of stable group”(25.6%), “high risk of stable group”(51.1%), and “high risk of decreasing group”(23.3%). Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that there were significant differences in age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, length of tube feeding, and out-of-hospital care institutions among different categories (P<0.05). Conclusion There are 3 trajectories of oral intake function in patients with post-stroke dysphagia, and there is group heterogeneity in their oral intake function. Individualized rehabilitation nursing intervention should be taken according to the trajectory of patients' oral intake function.

Key words: stroke, dysphagia, oral intake function, Latent Class Growth Model, longitudinal study

中图分类号: 

  • R473.74
[1] 苗姣娜,王元姣,何叶.口腔感觉训练在脑卒中吞咽障碍患者中的应用进展[J].护理学报,2023,30(1):37-40.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.01.037.
[2] D'Netto P, Rumbach A, Dunn K, et al. Clinical predictors of dysphagia recovery after stroke: a systematic review[J]. Dysphagia, 2023, 38(1):1-22. DOI:10.1007/s00455-022-10443-3.
[3] Galovic M, Stauber AJ, Leisi N, et al.Development and validation of a prognostic model of swallowing recovery and enteral tube feeding after ischemic stroke[J].JAMA Neurol, 2019,76(5):561-570. DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4858.
[4] 王博,袁永学,张庆苏.非经口进食吞咽障碍脑卒中患者预后的相关因素及预测模型[J].中国康复理论与实践,2022,28(4):453-460.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2022.04.012.
[5] 中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国急性缺血性脑卒中诊治指南2018[J].中华神经科杂志,2018,51(9):666-682. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2018.09.004.
[6] 万桂芳,张耀文,史静,等. 改良容积粘度测试在吞咽障碍评估中的灵敏性及特异性研究[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2019, 41(12):900-904.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2019.12.004.
[7] Lee WH, Lim MH, Seo HG, et al.Development of a novel prognostic model to predict 6-month swallowing recovery after ischemic stroke[J]. Stroke,2020,51(2):440-448. DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027439.
[8] Brott T, Adams HP Jr, Olinger CP, et al.Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale[J]. Stroke,1989,20(7):864-870. DOI:10.1161/01.str.20.7.864.
[9] 朱亚芳,张晓梅,张钦缔,等.中文版经口摄食功能评估量表在摄食-吞咽障碍脑卒中患者中的信效度检验[J].实用医学杂志,2017, 33(22):3826-3829.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2017.22.038.
[10] Carnaby-Mann G, Crary MA, Schmalfuss I, et al."Pharyngocise": randomized controlled trial of preventative exercises to maintain muscle structure and swallowing function during head-and-neck chemoradiotherapy[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys,2012,83(1):210-219. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.1954.
[11] 刘莎,陈玲,李甜甜,等.孕产妇盆底肌训练自我效能发展轨迹及其对产后尿失禁的影响[J].护理学报,2023,30(3):1-5.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.03.001.
[12] 尚彬,罗彩凤,吕妃,等.护理人员资质过剩感潜在类别分析及其与离职意愿的关系[J].护理学报,2023,30(9):18-24.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.09.018.
[13] Wang Z, Shi Y, Zhang L, et al.Nomogram for predicting swallowing recovery in patients after dysphagic stroke[J]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr,2022,46(2):433-442. DOI:10.1002/jpen.2115.
[14] Leslie P, Smithard DG.Is Dysphagia Under diagnosed or is normal swallowing more variable than we think? Reported swallowing problems in people aged 18-65 years[J]. Dysphagia, 2021, 36(5):910-918. DOI:10.1007/s00455-020-10213-z.
[15] Wang L, Qiao J, Sun F, et al.Demographic and clinical factors associated with recovery of poststroke dysphagia: a Meta-analysis[J]. Brain Behav,2023,13(6):e3033. DOI:10.1002/brb3.3033.
[16] Lin WC, Huang CY, Lee LF, et al.Initial national institute of health stroke scale to early predict the improvement of swallowing in patients with acute ischemic stroke[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2019, 28(10):104297.DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.07.013.
[17] De Stefano A, Dispenza F, Kulamarva G, et al.Predictive factors of severity and persistence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in sub-acute stroke[J].Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol,2021,278(3):741-748. DOI:10.1007/s00405-020-06429-2.
[18] Leite KKA, Sassi FC, Medeiros GC, et al.Clinical swallowing prognostic indicators in patients with acute ischemic stroke[J]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr,2019,77(7):501-508. DOI:10.1590/0004-282X20190080.
[19] Nutakki A, Chomba M, Chishimba L, et al.Predictors of in-hospital and 90-day post-discharge stroke mortality in Lusaka, Zambia[J]. J Neurol Sci,2022,437:120249. DOI:10.1016/j.jns.2022.120249.
[20] van Dijk M, Buijck BI. What is desirable care in the opinion of formal and informal caregivers in nursing-home care for patients with dementia?[J]. Nurs Open,2018,5(2):139-148. DOI:10.1002/nop2.122.
[21] Keykha A, Ramezani M, Amini S, et al.Educational challenges of family caregivers of vegetative state patients for home care preparedness: a qualitative content analysis[J]. J Educ Health Promot,2022,11:345.DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1647_21.
[1] 何叶, 王元姣, 谢珺, 苗姣娜. 心理资本在恢复期脑卒中患者领悟社会支持与患者积极度的中介效应分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 65-70.
[2] 李壮苗, 梦婷, 刘芳, 李霞, 李秀霞, 燕文娟. 艾盐包热熨手三阳经对脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢运动功能的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(6): 61-67.
[3] 郑思琪, 陈璐, 马晴, 王钰涵, 成杰, 王云龙. 双耳节拍音乐疗法对脑卒中偏瘫患者焦虑抑郁及疲劳的效果研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 72-78.
[4] 刘莎, 陈玲, 李甜甜, 张丹莉, 蔡文智. 孕产妇盆底肌训练自我效能发展轨迹及其对产后尿失禁的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 1-5.
[5] 张鹏博, 梅永霞, 张振香, 林蓓蕾, 薛利红, 刘志薇. 脑卒中患者焦虑症状潜在剖面影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 12-17.
[6] 熊尹诗, 王娜, 张颖. 基于奥马哈问题分类系统构建吞咽障碍老年患者护理问题评估体系[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 67-72.
[7] 徐倩, 穆艳. 化学刺激治疗脑卒中后吞咽障碍的研究现状[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(22): 40-43.
[8] 付爽, 刘祯, 崔玉顺. 中青年首发脑卒中患者心理一致感在领悟社会支持与创伤后应激障碍的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(20): 43-47.
[9] 周巧, 吴俊琪, 张翠娥, 游君, 许湘华. 老年脑卒中幸存者团体接纳承诺疗法干预方案构建与应用[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(19): 7-12.
[10] 龚思媛, 廖春莲, 高燕, 刘继红, 李佳, 唐荣珠. 帕金森病患者吞咽障碍筛查工具的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(18): 42-47.
[11] 王贝贝, 段思雨, 冉明, 孙瑶, 李萍. 251例缺血性脑卒中患者复发风险感知现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(15): 69-73.
[12] 张欣, 尹卫, 刘巧艳, 金华怡, 祖后娟. 妊娠期糖尿病患者血糖管理决策体验的纵向质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(12): 22-26.
[13] 张程婕, 井坤娟, 刘冬雪. 列线图与CART决策树模型对老年脑卒中患者病耻感预测效能的比较[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(11): 7-12.
[14] 涂英, 杜丹阳, 舒严, 曾涛. 缺血性脑卒中复发预防的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(11): 41-46.
[15] 苗姣娜, 王元姣, 何叶. 口腔感觉训练在脑卒中吞咽障碍患者中的应用进展[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(1): 37-40.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
[1] 付艳芬, 王春青, 胡雁. 证据临床转化中障碍因素和促进因素的内容分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(5): 64 -68 .
[2] 孙琪, 李丹钰, 宗旭倩, 袁长蓉, 罗菁, 黄青梅, 张雯, 杨瑒, 吴傅蕾. 移动医疗在癌症老年患者院外管理中的应用进展[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(22): 36 -39 .
[3] 孙菲, 刘敏, 胡珊珊, 吴蕾, 刘君, 李萍. 基于Meta分析构建早产儿母亲泌乳建立风险预测评分模型[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 1 -5 .
[4] 任影, 于卫华, 张利. 医养结合型养老机构老年人可逆性认知衰弱现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 6 -11 .
[5] 张鹏博, 梅永霞, 张振香, 林蓓蕾, 薛利红, 刘志薇. 脑卒中患者焦虑症状潜在剖面影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 12 -17 .
[6] 陈青青, 孔玲, 蒋珊, 朱求丽, 王燕, 苏明霞, 高丽芳, 陈晶梅. 新入职护士置信职业行为指标的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 18 -22 .
[7] 刘鸿飞, 王芳, 李晖凤, 陈晓荷, 田莉, 黎蔚华. 胸痛中心护理单元建设与管理标准的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 23 -28 .
[8] 佘佳晨, 张金燕, 张瑞星, 梅永霞, 李洪峰. 工作中伦理型领导问卷的汉化及在护士群体中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 29 -34 .
[9] 蒲艾琳, 罗羽. 护理硕士研究生科研能力训练教学现状与启示[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 35 -39 .
[10] 杨婷婷, 康佳敏, 邢雪燕, 胡惠惠, 涂淑敏. 国内外麻醉护士在职教育培训课程的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 40 -43 .