以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (21): 1-6.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.21.001

• 研究生园地 •    下一篇

心房颤动患者抗凝治疗体验质性研究的Meta整合

刘沈馨雨1, 孙国珍1,2, 王洁1   

  1. 1.南京医科大学 护理学院,江苏 南京 210029;
    2.南京医科大学第一附属医院 心血管内科,江苏 南京 210029
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-16 出版日期:2021-11-10 发布日期:2021-12-13
  • 通讯作者: 孙国珍（1969-）,女,江苏南通人,硕士,教授。E-mail：gzsun100@126.com
  • 作者简介:刘沈馨雨（1998-）,女,江苏苏州人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目（72074124）; 江苏高校优势学科建设工程项目“护理学”[苏政办发（2018）87号]

Experience of Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-synthesis of Qualitative Studies

LIU Shen-xinyu1, SUN Guo-zhen1,2, Wang Jie1   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China;
    2. Dept. of Vasculocardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2021-04-16 Online:2021-11-10 Published:2021-12-13

PDF (PC)

162

赞

摘要： 目的 对心房颤动患者抗凝治疗体验的质性研究进行Meta整合,为优化抗凝治疗管理提供理论基础。方法 计算机检索The Cochrane Library、PubMed、EMbase、Web of Science、OVID、CINAHL、中国知网、维普、万方和中国生物医学数据库,从建库至2020年12月检索房颤患者抗凝治疗体验相关的质性研究或包含抗凝治疗体验质性研究的混合性研究。采用“澳大利亚JBI循证卫生保健中心（2016）质性研究质量评价标准”评价纳入文献,运用Meta整合方法对结果进行整合。结果 共纳入16篇研究,提炼出26个完整的研究结果,归纳出8个新的类别,得到4个整合结果。结果1：房颤患者的固有认知、信息短板及医疗资源限制与抗凝决策缺失有着不可分割的联系;结果2：房颤患者治疗态度存在差异,主动接受治疗者积极性更高;结果3：房颤患者需要多元社会支持来对抗治疗中的困扰;结果4：房颤患者在抗凝治疗过程中承受着多重心理负担。结论 房颤患者在抗凝治疗过程中常处于决策缺失状态,其药物偏好易被忽视,治疗态度各异,同时承受着多重心理负担,亟需医院、家庭、社区等多方面的支持。

关键词: 心房颤动, 抗凝治疗, 体验, 质性研究, Meta整合

Abstract: Objective To integrate the experience of anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) by meta-synthesis and provide theoretical basis for optimizing anticoagulant therapy management. Methods We searched databases including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, OVID, CINAHL, CNKI, VIP, WANFANG and CBM to collect relevant qualitative studies and mixed studies from the inception to December 2020. The literature was evaluated by the JBI Critical Appraisal Tool for qualitative studies in Australia (2016). Meta-synthesis was used to integrate results. Results A total of 16 studies were included; 26 complete research results were extracted; 8 new categories were summarized, and 4 integrated results were obtained: 1.inherent cognition, information missing, and medical resource limitations were inseparable from the lack of decision-making about anticoagulation in patients with AF. 2.There were differences in the treatment attitude of patients with AF, and the initiative of patients receiving treatment was higher. 3. Patients with AF needed multiple social support to cope with the problems in treatment. 4. Patients with AF bore multiple psychological burdens in the process of anticoagulation therapy. Conclusion During the process of anticoagulant therapy, patients with AF often lack decision-making. Their drug preferences are easily ignored, and their treatment attitudes vary. Bearing multiple psychological burdens, they are in urgent need of support from hospitals, families, and communities.

Key words: atrial fibrillation, anticoagulant therapy, experience, qualitative research, Meta-synthesis

中图分类号: 

  • R473.54
[1] Pandya EY,Bajorek B.Factors Affecting Patients' Perception On, and Adherence to, Anticoagulant Therapy: Anticipating the Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulants[J]. Patient, 2017, 10(2):163-185. DOI:10.1007/s40271-016-0180-1.
[2] 方曙静,林征,孙国珍.心房颤动患者华法林抗凝规范治疗影响因素及对策的研究进展[J].护理学报,2010,17(11B):5-8.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2010.22.029.
[3] 胡雁. 如何开展质性研究的系统评价和Meta整合[J].上海护理,2020,20(7):1-5.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-8399.2020.07.001.
[4] 胡雁,郝玉芳.循证护理学[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2018.
[5] Bajorek BV, Ogle SJ, Duguid MJ, et al.Management of Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation: Views of Health Professionals, Older Patients and Their Carers[J]. Med J Aust, 2007, 186(4):175-180. DOI:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb00856.x.
[6] Pokorney SD, Bloom D, Granger CB, et al.Exploring Patient-provider Decision-making for Use of Anticoagulation for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: Results of the INFORM-AF Study[J]. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2019, 18(4): 280-288. DOI:10.1177/1474515118812252.
[7] Clarkesmith DE, Lip GYH, Lane DA.Patients' Experiences of Atrial Fibrillation and Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants(NOACs), and Their Educational Needs: A Qualitative Study[J]. Thromb Res, 2017, 153:19-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2017.03.002.
[8] Salmasi S, Kapanen AI, Kwan L, et al.Atrial Fibrillation Patients' Experiences and Perspectives of Anticoagulation Therapy Changes[J]. Res Social Adm Pharm,2020,16(10): 1409-1415. DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.01.004.
[9] Vaanholt MCW, Weernink MGM, Clemens VB, et al.Perceived Advantages and Disadvantages of Oral anticoagulants, and The Trade-offs Patients Make in Choosing Anticoagulant Therapy and Adhering to Their Drug Regimen[J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2018, 101(11):1982-1989. DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2018.06.019.
[10] Xuereb CB, Shaw RL, Lane DA.Patients' and Physicians' Experiences of Atrial Fibrillation Consultations and Anticoagulation Decision-making: A Multi-perspective IPA Design[J]. Psychol & Health, 2016, 31(4):436-455. DOI:10.1080/08870446.2015.1116534.
[11] Bajorek B, Saxton B, Anderson E, et al.Patients' Preferences for New Versus Old Anticoagulants:A Mixed-method Vignette-based Study[J]. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2018, 17(5):429-438. DOI:10.1177/1474515117739618.
[12] Mull HJ, Shin MH, Engle RL, et al.Veterans Perceptions of Satisfaction and Convenience with Anticoagulants for Atrial Fibrillation: Warfarin Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants[J]. Patient Preference and Adherence,2020, 14:1911-1922. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S279621.
[13] Wild D,Murray M, Donatti C.Patient Perspectives on Taking Vitamin K Antagonists: A Qualitative Study in the UK, USA and Spain[J]. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 2009, 9(5):467-474. DOI:10.1586/erp.09.48.
[14] Murphy A, Brosnan S, McCarthy S, et al. World Caféapproach: Exploring the Futurevision of Oral Anticoagulants for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) in Ireland[J]. BMJ Open,2020,10:e036493.DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036493.
[15] Caleb, Ferguso, Sally, et al. Barriers and Enablers to Adherence to Anticoagulation in Heart Failure with Atrial Fibrillation: Patient and Provider Perspectives[J]. J Clin Nurs,2017,26(23-24):4325-4334. DOI:10.1111/jocn.13759.
[16] Sarrazin MSV, Cram P, Mazur A, et al.Patient Perspectives of Dabigatran: Analysis of Online Discussion Forums[J]. Patient,2014,7(1):47-54.DOI:10.1007/s40271-013-0027-y.
[17] Hawking MKD, Robson J, Taylor SJC, et al.Adherence and the Moral Construction of the Self: A Narrative Analysis of Anticoagulant Medication[J]. Qualitative Health Research, 2020, 30(14):2316-2330.DOI:10.1177/1049732320951772.
[18] Ng VW, Siu CW, Chiu PK, et al.Understanding the Barriers to Using Oral Anticoagulants Among Long-term Aspirin Users with Atrial Fibrillation-A Qualitative Study[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2020, 20(1):1084. DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-05947-3.
[19] 谢梦珂,杨巧芳,阙静,等.心房颤动患者参与抗凝治疗决策冲突的质性研究[J].解放军护理杂志,2020,37(12):18-21. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2020.12.005.
[20] Michelle BT, Kimberly S, David W, et al.Development of a Conceptual Model of Adherence to Oral Anticoagulants to Reduce Risk of Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation[J]. J Manag Care Pharm, 2012,18(5):351-362. DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.5.351.
[21] 黄榕翀,丁怀玉,郭宏洲.医患共同决策模式在我国临床实践中的应用与改进[J].中华心血管病杂志, 2020,48(10):890-894. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200519-00409.
[1] 程爽, 熊振芳, 蔡艺, 陈涵彬, 惠靖瑞. 父母接受孤独症儿童诊断经历质性研究的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9): 35-42.
[2] 刘萍, 尤奥林, 刘姝, 李亚楠, 栾晓嵘. 我国护理硕士专业学位研究生就读期间培养体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 35-42.
[3] 李换则, 陈鸿芳, 黄丽群, 安芳芳, 徐鹏, 庄苗青, 张露语, 王嘉懿. 急诊科护士临终照护体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 43-48.
[4] 陈思羽. 老年医学科低年资护士对临终患者死亡事件体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 74-78.
[5] 李玉娟, 李君艳, 欧阳艳琼. 孕妇参与群组孕期保健体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(6): 6-12.
[6] 何怡庆, 周红, 高祖梅. 护士同情疲劳真实体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(6): 33-37.
[7] 严佳丽, 裘慧颖, 贾芸, 刘倩静, 富晶晶, 金云秋. 模拟体验并发症健康教育在中青年初发2型糖尿病患者中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(5): 75-78.
[8] 郭晓宇, 王丽媛. 参与突发急性传染病护士救治体验的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 43-49.
[9] 厉柯轩, 沈利腾, 梁艺, 项薇旭, 应钰皑, 李玲. 高血压患者应用体验式健康教育的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(3): 74-78.
[10] 宋静雨, 舒瑶雅, 王蒙蒙, 徐天梦, 岳鹏. 终末期病人配偶照护者需求的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(20): 30-38.
[11] 刘佳欣, 李丹丹, 刘备备, 张淑芳, 高晓, 杨丽娟. 医护人员对ICU日记真实体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(20): 49-54.
[12] 贾莉莉, 张国增, 越丽霞, 朱康宁, 王志霞, 王飞杰. 临时性肠造口患者还纳术后居家生活体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(2): 1-4.
[13] 王惠, 仝旭, 李玲. 慢性心力衰竭患者自我管理体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(2): 31-36.
[14] 刘庆伟, 邵美华, 赵亚玲, 尹霄朦, 姜园园, 朱秀丽. 间质性肺疾病患者健康信息获取行为的描述性质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(2): 47-51.
[15] 牛倩霞, 傅荣, 褚红, 王怡欣, 孙晶娜. 恶性血液病患者造血干细胞移植术后2年内生活体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(19): 52-58.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
[1] 叶增杰,阮小丽,曾珍,谢琼,程梦慧,彭超华,卢咏梅,邱鸿钟. 中文版10条目心理韧性量表在护生群体中的信效度分析[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(21): 9 -13 .
[2] 刘华龙,张培璐,葛学娣. 住院高龄患者主要照顾者对误吸预防的知信行调查分析[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(21): 14 -18 .
[3] 沈霖,唐金凤,王惠. 人形图在普外科护理查房中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(21): 19 -21 .
[4] 亢东琴,岳树锦. 翻转课堂应用于护理课程教学的文献计量分析[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(21): 22 -25 .
[5] 常小霞,袁丽,杨小玲. 2型糖尿病老年患者胰岛素治疗依从性现状及影响因素研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(21): 26 -29,30 .
[6] 肖淑萍,王光秀(综述),张玉芳(审校). 护士心理韧性的干预研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(21): 30 -33 .
[7] 杜慧,覃惠英,孙仲文,黄春丽. ICU恶性肿瘤患者家属疾病不确定感现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(21): 34 -37 .
[8] 王颖雯,张玉侠,沈国妹,顾莺. 综合性儿童医院专科护士岗位管理实践[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(21): 38 -41,42 .
[9] 许文馨, 唐煦萌, 曹松梅, 杨君, 谢莉玲, 肖明朝, 赵庆华. 社区居家失能老人口腔吞咽现状及其对心理健康的影响研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(20): 1 -6 .
[10] 焦子珊, 邱金花, 王娜娜, 沙凯辉. 489例产后腹直肌分离产妇患病现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(20): 7 -10 .