以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 6-12.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.06.006

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

孕妇参与群组孕期保健体验质性研究的Meta整合

李玉娟, 李君艳, 欧阳艳琼   

  1. 武汉大学健康学院 护理系,湖北 武汉 430061
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-21 出版日期:2021-03-25 发布日期:2021-04-08
  • 通讯作者: 欧阳艳琼（1973-）,女,湖北监利人, 博士,副教授。E-mail：ouyangyq@whu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李玉娟（1994-）,女,河南焦作人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。

Qualitative Studies on Pregnant Women's Experience of Group Antenatal Care: A Meta Synthesis

LI Yu-juan, LI Jun-yan, OUYANG Yan-qiong   

  1. Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430061, China
  • Received:2020-11-21 Online:2021-03-25 Published:2021-04-08

PDF (PC)

275

赞

摘要： 目的 了解孕妇参与群组孕期保健的体验及观点,以孕妇视角衡量群组孕期保健的可行性和有效性,为群组孕期保健的推广提供依据。方法 检索PubMed、Web of Science 、PsycINFO、Cochrane Library、EMbase、Scopus、CINAHL、知网、中国生物医学文献数据库、维普、万方数据库,收集孕妇参与群组孕期保健体验的质性研究,检索时限均为建库至2020年11月8日。采用澳大利亚JBI循证卫生保健中心的质性研究质量评价标准进行质量评价,并采用汇集性整合方法整合结果。结果 共纳入12项研究,提炼39个研究结果,归纳形成8个类属,综合成3个整合结果：形成社会支持网络,建立有意义的联系;为孕妇赋能;群组孕期保健模式存在的挑战。结论 群组孕期保健为我国孕期保健模式的优化提供了策略,但需要结合我国不同地区的卫生保健环境,深入探讨孕妇、群组孕期保健组织者和政策层面的系统策略,以确保群组孕期保健的实施效果。

关键词: 群组孕期保健, 孕期保健, 孕妇, 体验, 质性研究, Meta整合

Abstract: Objective To integrate authentic experience and opinions of pregnant women participating in Group Antenatal Care (GANC), and measure the feasibility and effectiveness of GANC from the perspective of pregnant women, and to provide reference for the promotion of GANC model. Methods We searched PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, EMbase, Scopus, CINAHL, CNKI, Sino-med, VIP and WanFang data for eligible studies on pregnant women participating in GANC from database inception to November 8, 2020. The quality of included studies was evaluated according to JBI Critical Appraisal Tool for qualitative studies, and meta-integration was conducted using the aggregative integration method. Results Twelve qualitative studies were included involving 39 results and 8 categories, then 3 integrated themes were extracted: establishing social supporting network and significant connections; empowering pregnant women and challenges in the promotion of GANC. Conclusion GANC provides reference for the optimization of pregnancy health care mode and the improvement of pregnancy health care quality in China. Practical health care conditions of different regions in China and systematic strategies at different levels of pregnant women, GANC organizers and policies are beneficial to the implementation effect of GANC.

Key words: group antenatal care, antenatal care, pregnant women, experience, qualitative study, Meta synthesis

中图分类号: 

  • R473.71
[1] Hunter LJ,Da Motta G, McCourt C, et al.Better Together: A Qualitative Exploration of Women's Perceptions And Experiences of Group Antenatal Care[J].Women Birth, 2019,32(4):336-345. DOI:10.1016/j.wombi.2018.09.001.
[2] Mazzoni SE, Carter EB.Group Prenatal Care[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017,216(6):552-556. DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.006.
[3] 李林蔚,张彩虹,郭洪花.群组式护理模式在围产期保健的应用进展[J].护理学报, 2019,26(23):41-44. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.23.041.
[4] WHO.WHO Recommendations on Antenatal Care for A Positive Pregnancy Experience[EB/OL].(2016-11-07)[2021-01-20].http://www.who.int/en/.
[5] 胡雁.郝玉芳.循证护理学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2018:157-172.
[6] Mcneil DA, Vekved M, Dolan SM, et al.Getting More Than They Realized They Needed: A Qualitative Study of Women's Experience of Group Prenatal Care[J].BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2012,12:17. DOI:10.1186/1471-2393-12-17.
[7] Novick G, Sadler LS, Kennedy HP, et al.Women's Experience of Group Prenatal Care[J].Qual Health Res,2010,21(1):97-116. DOI:10.1177/1049732310378655.
[8] Sultana M, Ali N, Akram R, et al.Group Prenatal Care Experiences Among Pregnant Women in a Bangladeshi Community[J].Plos One,2019,14(6):e218169. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0218169.
[9] Musabyimana A, Lundeen T, Butrick E, et al.Before and After Implementation of Group Antenatal Care in Rwanda: A Qualitative Study of Women's Experiences[J].Reprod Health,2019,16(1):90. DOI:10.1186/s12978-019-0750-5.
[10] Risisky D, Asghar SM, Chaffee M, et al.Women's Perceptions Using the CenteringPregnancy Model of Group Prenatal Care[J].J Perinat Educ, 2013,22(3):136-144. DOI:10.1891/1058-1243.22.3.136.
[11] Heberlein EC, Picklesimer AH, Billings DL, et al.Qualitative Comparison of Women's Perspectives on the Functions and Benefits of Group and Individual Prenatal Care[J].J Midwifery Womens Health, 2016,61(2):224-234. DOI:10.1111/jmwh.12379.
[12] Kweekel L, Gerrits T, Rijnders M, et al.The Role of Trust in CenteringPregnancy: Building Interpersonal Trust Relationships in Group-based Prenatal Care in the Netherlands[J].Birth, 2017,44(1):41-47. DOI:10.1111/birt.12260.
[13] Kennedy HP, Farrell T, Paden R, et al.“I Wasn't Alone”-A Study of Group Prenatal Care in the Military[J].J Midwifery Womens Health, 2009,54(3):176-183. DOI:10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.11.004.
[14] Herrman JW, Rogers S, Ehrenthal DB.Women's Perceptions of CenteringPregnancy: A Focus Group Study[J].MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs, 2012,37(1):19-26. DOI:10.1097/NMC.0b013e3182385204.
[15] 陈丹丹,李益民,周临,等.初产妇对助产士主导的家庭群组式孕期保健服务的体验[J].护理学杂志, 2018,33(12): 32-34. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2018.12.032.
[16] 周临,张晶,陈丹丹,等.以家庭为中心的群组式孕期保健模式的应用及效果研究[J].中华护理杂志, 2019,54(3): 401-405. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.03.015.
[17] Sharma J, O'Connor M, Rima Jolivet R.Group Antenatal Care Models in Low-and Middle-income Countries:A Systematic Evidence Synthesis[J].Reprod Health, 2018,15(1):38. DOI:10.1186/s12978-018-0476-9.
[18] Abraham C.Rethinking the Traditional Prenatal Care Model[J].Obstet Gynecol, 2020,135(5):1024-1026. DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003789.
[19] Pekkala J, Cross Barnet C, Kirkegaard M, et al.Key Considerations for Implementing Group Prenatal Care: Lessons from 60 Practices[J].J MidwiferyWomens Health, 2020,65(2):208-215. DOI:10.1111/jmwh.13047.
[20] 潘旋,张晶,周临,等.杭州市孕产妇孕期保健质量及影响因素分析[J].预防医学,2018,30(4):352-355. DOI:10.19485/j.cnki.issn2096-5087.2018.04.008.
[21] 袁雨,漆洪波.结合中国实践谈WHO 2016年孕期保健指南[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2017,33(6):567-571. DOI:10.19538/j.fk2017060105.
[22] 韦俭俭,赵红,李颖.美国小组产前保健模式应用及效果研究进展[J].中国护理管理, 2017,17(1):141-143. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2017.01.035.
[23] Peahl AF, Gourevitch RA, Luo EM, et al.Right-sizing Prenatal Care to Meet Patients' Needs and Improve Maternity Care Value[J].Obstet Gynecol, 2020,135(5):1027-1037. DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003820.
[24] Strickland C, Merrell S, Kirk JK.Centering Pregnancy: Meeting the Quadruple Aim in Prenatal Care[J].N C Med J, 2016, 77(6):394-397. DOI:10.18043/ncm.77.6.394.
[25] 李小梅,梁燕梅,伍丽燕.基于集中群组化的产前保健服务模式的研究[J].护理学报, 2019,26(11):37-40. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.11.037.
[26] 王义会,王惠琳,李颖.集中群组孕期保健模式的临床效果评价[J].中国妇幼保健, 2020,35(9):1603-1606. DOI:10.19829/j.zgfybj.issn.1001-4411.2020.09.011.
[27] Kania-Richmond A, Hetherington E, Mcneil D, et al.The Impact of Introducing Centering Pregnancy in a Community Health Setting:A Qualitative Study of Experiences and Perspectives of Health Center Clinical and Support Staff[J].Matern Child Health J,2017,21(6):1327-1335. DOI:10.1007/s10995-016-2236-1.
[28] Harsha Bangura A, Nirola I, Thapa P, et al.Measuring Fidelity, Feasibility, Costs: An Implementation Evaluation Of A Cluster-controlled Trial of Group Antenatal Care in Rural Nepal[J].Reprod Health, 2020, 17(1):5. DOI:10.1186/s12978-019-0840-4.
[29] Adaji SE, Jimoh A, Bawa U, et al.Women's Experience with Group Prenatal Care in a Rural Community in Northern Nigeria[J].Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2019,145(2):164-169. DOI:10.1002/ijgo.12788.
[30] Huang Y, Shallcross D, Pi L, et al.Ethnicity and Maternal and Child Health Outcomes and Service Coverage in Western China: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J].Lancet Global Health, 2018, 6(1):E39-E56. DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30445-X.
[1] 程爽, 熊振芳, 蔡艺, 陈涵彬, 惠靖瑞. 父母接受孤独症儿童诊断经历质性研究的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9): 35-42.
[2] 刘萍, 尤奥林, 刘姝, 李亚楠, 栾晓嵘. 我国护理硕士专业学位研究生就读期间培养体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 35-42.
[3] 李换则, 陈鸿芳, 黄丽群, 安芳芳, 徐鹏, 庄苗青, 张露语, 王嘉懿. 急诊科护士临终照护体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 43-48.
[4] 陈思羽. 老年医学科低年资护士对临终患者死亡事件体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 74-78.
[5] 何怡庆, 周红, 高祖梅. 护士同情疲劳真实体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(6): 33-37.
[6] 严佳丽, 裘慧颖, 贾芸, 刘倩静, 富晶晶, 金云秋. 模拟体验并发症健康教育在中青年初发2型糖尿病患者中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(5): 75-78.
[7] 郭晓宇, 王丽媛. 参与突发急性传染病护士救治体验的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 43-49.
[8] 厉柯轩, 沈利腾, 梁艺, 项薇旭, 应钰皑, 李玲. 高血压患者应用体验式健康教育的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(3): 74-78.
[9] 贾莉莉, 张国增, 越丽霞, 朱康宁, 王志霞, 王飞杰. 临时性肠造口患者还纳术后居家生活体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(2): 1-4.
[10] 刘庆伟, 邵美华, 赵亚玲, 尹霄朦, 姜园园, 朱秀丽. 间质性肺疾病患者健康信息获取行为的描述性质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(2): 47-51.
[11] 王惠, 仝旭, 李玲. 慢性心力衰竭患者自我管理体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(2): 31-36.
[12] 杨霞, 卫玉齐, 王瑞瑞, 甘燕玲. 护士经历患者自杀事件真实体验及应对质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(14): 42-46.
[13] 邓杨清, 潘岑, 王庆兰, 王迪. 乳腺癌患者运动体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(13): 34-39.
[14] 周梦珂, 李惠萍, 张珊珊, 王全兰, 陈娟娟, 王艺璇. 癌症患者癌因性疲乏真实体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(12): 27-32.
[15] 冯春玲, 李益民, 周临, 袁莉, 袁玲, 王莉, 马硕. 新生儿父母参与皮肤接触护理体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(11): 27-32.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
[1] 汪洋,宋艳玲. 消毒供应中心区域一体式管理控制医院感染的实践[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 39 -41 .
[2] 马婕,魏建华,白茹,雍琪. 1例重度卢德维氏咽峡炎患者的护理[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 51 -52 .
[3] 揭小燕. A型肉毒毒素注射治疗患者的护理[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 65 -66 .
[4] 张瑞红,董秀娟,吴超,郝丽,邵敬会,马会娜. 社区干预对农村脑卒中患者日常生活能力和生活满意度的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 67 -70 .
[5] 朱佩芳,周卫国,李冬梅,陈玲. 上海市浦东新区社区卫生服务中心住院医疗资源利用现状分析[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 70 -72 .
[6] 侯玉清,黄莉,谭舒尹,杜娟. 距骨骨折合并脱位患者的康复护理[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(2): 62 -63 .
[7] 黄玉华,刘莉. 3种方法检测宫腔刮吸器清洗效果的对比研究[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(2): 70 -72 .
[8] 董明芬,陈科,邵静,钱宁,龚银亚,陈娜,史汀,陈超. 集束干预策略预防肿瘤患者导管相关性血流感染的体会[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(2): 73 -75 .
[9] 吴丽琴,胡朝晖,陈育群. 根据踝臂指数和感觉阈值实施糖尿病足强化健康教育[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(2): 76 -78 .
[10] 黄静,区秀丽,李伟栋,罗小燕,谈燕飞,刘乐乐,韩春春,杜春花. 江门市综合与专科三级甲等医院门诊病人反应性比较[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(2): 16 -20 .