以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (23): 5-9.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.23.005

• 护理管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

对外科护士基于计划行为理论的疼痛管理行为干预效果

贺育华, 杨婕, 蒋理立   

  1. 四川大学华西医院 胃肠外科,四川 成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-10 出版日期:2020-07-09 发布日期:2020-07-09
  • 作者简介:贺育华(1991-),女,山西文水人,硕士,护师。
  • 基金资助:
    四川省卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题(18PJ247)

Effects of Pain Management Behavior Intervention Based on Theory of Planned Behavior for Surgical Nurses

HE Yu-hua, YANG Jie, JIANG Li-li   

  1. Dept. of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2018-08-10 Online:2020-07-09 Published:2020-07-09

摘要: 目的 探讨基于计划行为理论的干预方案对护士疼痛管理知识、态度以及疼痛管理行为的影响。方法 以计划行为理论为指导,设计实施针对护士疼痛管理行为的干预方案,并在某三级甲等医院外科病房进行试行。方案实施前(2018年1月上旬)及实施后(2018年4月下旬),采用《疼痛管理知识和态度调查问卷》对34名病房护士进行疼痛管理知识及态度的测评对比。此外,选取同期病房出院患者各60例,应用休斯顿疼痛情况调查表调查患者对控制或减轻疼痛方法的满意度,同时,利用电子病历系统对120例出院患者的护理病历进行疼痛护理记录书写合格率的评价对比。结果 在应用计划行为理论对护士疼痛管理行为进行干预后,病房护士疼痛管理知识和态度问卷得分较前显著提高(P<0.01);疼痛护理记录规范率显著提高(P<0.05);病员对“疼痛缓解的满意度”、对“护士疼痛处理的满意度”、“护士反应快慢的满意度”、“疼痛时受到所有照料的满意度”均显著提高(P<0.01)。结论 基于计划行为理论构建的护士疼痛管理行为干预方案,可提升护士疼痛知识和态度,并能促进其疼痛管理行为的改进,最终达到改善患者疼痛体验的目的。

关键词: 计划行为理论, 普外科, 护士, 疼痛管理

Abstract: Objective To explore the effects of pain management behavior intervention based on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) on nurses' knowledge and behavior of and attitude toward pain management behavior. Methods Thirty-four nurses in surgical wards received TPB-based pain management behavior intervention and they were investigated by the Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain questionnaire before the implementation of the scheme (early January 2018) and after the implementation (late April 2018). The qualification rate of the pain nursing records was also evaluated by the electronic medical record system. At the same time, 120 patients discharged from the hospital in the same period were investigated by the Houston Pain Outcome Instrument. Results After the implementation of pain management behavior intervention, the scores of nurses' knowledge of and attitudes toward pain management behavior were significantly higher than before(P<0.01) and qualification rate of the pain nursing records was improved significantly (P<0.05). Patients' satisfaction with pain relief, pain treatment, nurses' response speed and all the nursing service provided when suffering pain was significantly improved (P<0.01). Conclusion TPB-based pain management behavior intervention can improve nurses' pain knowledge of and attitude toward pain, improve their pain management behavior thus relieve patients' pain.

Key words: theory of planned behavior, general surgery department, nurse, pain management

中图分类号: 

  • R473.6
[1] 中华医学会麻醉学分会.成人手术后疼痛处理专家共识[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2017,33(9):911-917.
[2] Mccaffery M, Robinson E S.Your Patient Is in Pain-here's How You Respond[J]. Nursing, 2002, 32(10):36-45.
[3] 赵继军,崔静.护士在疼痛管理中的作用[J].中华护理杂志,2009,44(4):383-384.
[4] Schoenwald A V.Two Hundred Days of Nurse Practitioner Prescribing and Role Development: A Case Study Report from A Hospital-based Acute Pain Management Team[J]. Aust Health Rev, 2011, 35(4):444-447. DOI:10.1071/AH10946.
[5] 刘雪莲,李漓.临床护士疼痛管理核心能力知识水平现状分析[J].护理学报,2018,25(9):12-16.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.09.012.
[6] 童莺歌,叶志弘.浙江省4家三级医院护士疼痛管理知识和态度的调查与分析[J].护理与康复, 2010,9(9):747-749. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9875.2010.09.004.
[7] 陈晓燕,成守珍,高明榕,等.8家三级医院ICU护士疼痛管理知识和态度调查分析[J].中国护理管理,2013,13(10):87-89. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2013.010.031.
[8] 李伦兰,倪秀梅,甘玉云,等.227名骨科护理人员疼痛管理知识和态度调查分析[J]. 护理学报,2014,21(19):44-48. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2014.19.014.
[9] 易智慧. 疼痛知识培训对改善外科护士的疼痛管理知识和态度的效果[J].中国实用医药,2009,4(36):254-255. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-7555.2009.36.205.
[10] 韩玉,彭杨灵,曲波,等.计划行为理论及其在医学中的研究应用[J].实用预防医学,2015,22(6):763-765. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-3110.2015.06.043.
[11] Gaston G, Ariane B G, Martin E, et al.Healthcare Professionals' Intentions and Behaviours: A Systematic Review of Studies Based on Social Cognitive Theories[J]. Implement Sci, 2008, 3(36):1-12. DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-3-36.
[12] Welsh D, Lennie T A, Marcinek R, et al.Low-Sodium Diet Self-management Intervention in Heart Failure: Pilot Study Results[J]. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2013, 12(1):87-95. DOI:10.1177/1474515111435604.
[13] 童莺歌,叶志弘.《疼痛管理知识和态度的调查》问卷的汉化及应用测试研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志,2010,26(11): 66-68. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2010.04.056.
[14] Palos G, Rodriguez T, Disnard G, et al.Design Strategies in Pain Management Research with Hispanics[J]. Hispanic Health Care Int, 2003, 2(2):73-80.
[15] 丁燕. 外科护士对术后疼痛知识、态度和行为的认知情况调查[J]. 中医药管理杂志, 2016, 24(10):12-13. DOI:10.16690/j.cnki.1007-9203.2016.10.006.
[16] 应秋平,童苏琴,陈金娟,等.强化知识培训提高基层医院护士对患者疼痛的管理能力[J].中华护理杂志, 2011,46(4):375-377. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2011.04.023.
[17] Morris B N, Henshaw D S, Royster R L.Survey of Pain Management in Thoracoscopic Surgery[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2018,32(4):1756-1758. DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2018.02.013.
[1] 郭雅萍, 郭淑丽, 李敏, 侯海燕. 行动研究法对提高普外科护士肠造口护理能力的效果研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 6-9.
[2] 严晓晶, 陈璐, 陈雁. 社区专科护士培训现状及研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 14-17.
[3] 田凡立, 李惠玲, 杜美兰, 蒋芳琴, 张新梅, 殷雪群. 新型冠状病毒肺炎下援鄂男护士情绪体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 46-49.
[4] 陈娟慧, 陈燕萍, 蒙昱妃, 林绍英, 陶艳玲. 社区护士对老年人家庭访视的知信行评价指标体系构建[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 73-78.
[5] 刘伟权, 熊杰, 肖琦, 江燕, 刘俊雅. PBL结合医学模拟教学法在培养ICU专科护士临床能力中应用[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(4): 10-13.
[6] 杜丽, 毛红波. 1 423名临床护士薪酬公平感水平现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(4): 43-48.
[7] 邓慧芳, 张莉, 颜文贞, 邓伟英, 何少丽, 李素霞, 陈秀云, 陈丽富, 庞志明, 方艳红, 邹舒倩. 282名肿瘤科护士临终关怀态度调查分析[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(4): 49-52.
[8] 吴凡, 绳宇, 张玉筠, 朱玲玲, 李秀华. 灾害响应过程中护士救援体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(3): 28-33.
[9] 米元元, 董江, 刘欢. 护士职业倦怠真实体验的质性Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(3): 34-39.
[10] 刘于, 于明峰, 张文艳. 基于ADDIE模型的在职护士岗位培训的应用与效果研究[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(15): 18-21.
[11] 吉加梅, 罗彩凤, 徐剑鸥. 护士情域能力评价量表的编制及信度效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(15): 46-50.
[12] 章琼, 朱芳, 沈元春. 103名院前急救科护士创伤后应激反应筛查现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(15): 60-64.
[13] 刘园园, 石福艳, 崔娟, 牛杰, 尹崇高. 新入职规范化培训护士工作环境感知现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(14): 1-4.
[14] 刘芳, 万青, 石立雅, 史静姝, 罗丽波, 王培红, 夏文芳. 糖尿病专科护士主导多学科团队在妊娠期糖尿病患者的管理实践[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(14): 14-18.
[15] 何湘子, 蔡修宇, 张璇, 陈健雯, 黎燕芳. 运用项目管理提高某肿瘤医院综合科护士病情观察能力的实践[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(14): 25-29.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!