以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 20-25.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.03.020

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

临床护士道德困境的潜在剖面分析及其与道德敏感性的关系研究

张玉芬1,2, 汪晖1, 胡凯利1   

  1. 1.华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院 护理部,湖北 武汉 430030;
    2.华中科技大学同济医学院 护理学院,湖北 武汉 430030
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-06 出版日期:2023-02-10 发布日期:2023-03-14
  • 通讯作者: 汪晖（1963-）,女,湖北武汉人,本科学历,主任护师,博士生研究生导师。E-mail:tjwhhlb@126.com
  • 作者简介:张玉芬（1996-）,女,湖北应城人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。

Relationship between moral distress and moral sensitivity in clinical nurses: a latent profile analysis

ZHANG Yu-fen1,2, WANG Hui1, HU Kai-li1   

  1. 1. Dept. of Nursing Administration, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China;
    2. School of Nursing, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430030, China
  • Received:2022-09-06 Online:2023-02-10 Published:2023-03-14

PDF (PC)

246

赞

摘要： 目的 调查临床护士道德困境现况,分析临床护士道德困境的潜在剖面及其与道德敏感性的关系并探讨不同剖面的影响因素。方法 采取便利抽样法于2022年5月选取武汉市某三级甲等综合医院1 022名临床护士作为调查对象。采用一般资料调查表、护士道德敏感性量表、护士道德困境量表进行调查,以护士道德困境量表的4个外显指标进行潜在剖面分析,并用单因素分析、二分类Logistic回归分析进行统计分析。结果 1 022名临床护士的道德困境可分为“低道德困境型”（72.7%）和“高道德困境型”（27.3%）2个潜在剖面。道德困境的影响因素包括年龄、职称、道德力量与责任、道德负担感（P<0.05）。结论 临床护士道德困境水平处于轻度水平。护士道德困境可分为2个类别,护理管理者应根据不同剖面的人群特征制定针对性的干预方案,增强护士道德敏感性,降低其道德困境水平。针对“高道德困境型”护士,既要注意培养护士道德决策能力,也要充分营造良好的医院伦理氛围,合理授权,疏导其因道德困境产生的不良情绪;针对“低道德困境型”护士,要强化护士职业道德伦理再教育,提升护理道德修养,规范临床实践中的道德行为,从而改善护理质量。

关键词: 护士, 道德困境, 道德敏感性, 潜在剖面分析

Abstract: Objective To investigate the current status of clinical nurses' moral distress, to analyze the latent profile of moral distress and its relationship with moral sensitivity, and to explore the influencing factors of different profiles. Methods A total of 1,022 clinical nurses from a tertiary grade-A hospital in Wuhan were selected by convenience sampling method in May 2022, and they were investigated by using the general information questionnaire, Nurses' Moral Sensitivity Scale and Nurses' Moral Distress Scale. Four explicit indicators of nurses' moral distress scale were used for latent profile analysis, and univariate analysis and binary logistic regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. Results The moral distress of 1,022 clinical nurses could be divided into "low moral distress type" (72.7%) and "high moral distress type" (27.3%). The influencing factors of moral distress included age, professional title, moral power and responsibility, and moral burden (P<0.05). Conclusion Clinical nurses have slight moral distress, which could be divided into two latent profiles. Specific interventions should be formulated according to the characteristics of different latent profiles to enhance nurses' moral sensitivity and reduce their moral distress. The cultivation of moral decision-making ability of nurses, a good moral and ethical atmosphere, reasonable authorization, and easing emotions caused by moral distress are helpful for nurses of "high moral distress type"; for "low moral distress type" nurses, it is necessary to strengthen the professional ethics education of nurses, improve nursing moral cultivation, standardize moral behavior in clinical practice, so as to improve the quality of nursing.

Key words: nurse, moral distress, moral sensitivity, latent profile analysis

中图分类号: 

  • R47
[1] 周军, 王莎莎, 武丹丹, 等. 重症医学科护士道德困境研究进展[J]. 医学与哲学, 2020,41(16):36-40.DOI:10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2020.16.09
[2] 徐晨子, 熊莉娟. 护士道德敏感性的研究进展[J]. 护理学杂志,2021, 36(14):110-113.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2021.14.110.
[3] 岳鑫彦, 王冬华. 伦理敏感性与工作嵌入在护士感知的管理关怀与工作满意度间的链式中介效应[J].护理学报, 2021,28(19):59-66.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.19.059.
[4] 王孟成, 毕向阳. 潜变量建模与Mplus应用·进阶篇[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2018.
[5] Huang FF, Yang Q, Zhang J, et al.Cross-cultural validation of the moral sensitivity questionnaire-revised Chinese Version[J]. Nurs Ethics, 2016,23(7):784-793.DOI:10.1177/0969733015583183.
[6] 孙霞, 曹枫林, 姚静, 等. 中文版护士道德困境量表的信度和效度研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2012,28(36):52-55.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2012.36.136.
[7] Zhang WW, Wu XY, Zhan YF, et al.Moral distress and its influencing factors: a cross-sectional study in china[J]. Nurs Ethics, 2018, 25(4):470-480. DOI:10.1177/0969733016658792.
[8] Lusignani M, Giannì ML, Re LG, et al.Moral distress among nurses in medical, surgical and intensive-care units[J]. J Nurs Manag, 2017,25(6):477-485.DOI:10.1111/jonm.12431.
[9] 姚秀钰, 卢鹃鹃, 杨一瑶, 等. 北京三级甲等综合医院急诊科护士道德困境与职业倦怠相关性分析[J]. 中国护理管理, 2018, 18(11):1511-1515.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2018.11.016.
[10] 吴姣娣, 林芹, 蔡於莹, 等. 神经外科护士同情心疲乏的影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2018,25(1):65-69.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.01.065.
[11] 谭开宇,林霞.肿瘤科护士道德困境对职业倦怠的影响[J]. 护理研究,2017,31(34):4344-4348.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2017.34.009.
[12] Young PD, Rushton CH.A concept analysis of moral resilience[J]. Nurs Outlook, 2017,65(5):579-587.DOI:10.1016/j.outlook.2017.03.009.
[13] Ishihara I, Inagaki S, Osawa A, et al.Effects of an ethics education program on nurses’ moral efficacy in an acute health care facility[J]. J Nurs Manag, 2022,30(7):2207-2215.DOI:10.1111/jonm.13579.
[14] Abbasi S, Ghafari S, Shahriari M, et al.Effect of moral empowerment program on moral distress in Intensive care unit nurses[J]. Nurs Ethics, 2019,26(5):1494-1504.DOI:10.1177/0969733018766576.
[15] Browning ED, Cruz JS.Reflective debriefing: a social work intervention addressing moral distress among ICU nurses[J]. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care, 2018,14(1):44-72.DOI:10.1080/15524256.2018.1437588.
[16] Hamric AB, Epstein EG.A Health system-wide moral distress consultation service: development and evaluation[J].HEC Forum,2017,29(2):127-143.DOI:10.1007/s10730-016-9315-y.
[17] 沈志莹, 钟竹青, 丁四清, 等. 长沙市三级甲等综合医院护士道德困境现状及其影响因素分析[J].中国护理管理, 2017, 17(1):50-55.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2017.01.014.
[18] Sirilla J, Thompson K, Yamokoski T, et al.Moral distress in nurses providing direct patient care at an academic medical center[J]. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs, 2017,14(2):128-135.DOI:10.1111/wvn.12213.
[19] Arnold TC.Moral distress in emergency and critical care nurses: a metaethnography[J].Nurs Ethics,2020:1875024112.DOI:10.1177/0969733020935952.
[20] Giannetta N, Sergi R, Villa G, et al.Levels of moral distress among health care professionals working in hospital and community settings: a cross sectional study[J]. Healthcare(Basel),2021,9(12).DOI:10.3390/healthcare9121673.
[21] 罗昌春, 纪冬梅, 李海芳, 等. 北京市某三级老年医院护士道德困境现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国护理管理, 2019, 19(4):553-558.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2019.04.015.
[22] Milliken A.Nurse ethical sensitivity: an integrative review[J].Nurs Ethics,2018,25(3):278-303.DOI:10.1177/0969733016646155.
[23] Altaker KW, Howie-Esquivel J, Cataldo JK.Relationships among palliative care, Ethical Climate, Empowerment, and Moral Distress in intensive care unit nurses[J]. Am J Crit Care, 2018,27(4):295-302.DOI:10.4037/ajcc2018252.
[24] Ko HK, Chin CC, Hsu MT.Moral distress model reconstructed using grounded theory[J]. J Nurs Res, 2018,26(1):18-26.DOI:10.1097/JNR.0000000000000189.
[25] Lützén K, Blom T, Ewalds-Kvist B, et al.Moral Stress, moral climate and moral sensitivity among psychiatric professionals[J]. Nurs Ethics, 2010,17(2):213-224.DOI:10.1177/0969733009351951.
[1] 李佳, 梁嘉仪, 冯如芝, 高钰琳. 公共卫生护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 16-22.
[2] 高芸芸, 刘芳, 刘维维. 公共卫生护士胜任力特征的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 23-28.
[3] 卫平莲, 陈孝云, 金利萍, 范孝陈, 陈培培, 刘安诺. 儿科传染病专科护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 29-32.
[4] 田恬, 李转珍, 都芳芳, 朱永燕, 李伟丽, 万菲菲. 基于转型冲击理论构建新护士护理安全培训内容体系[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 35-39.
[5] 安晓, 薛雅婷, 夏雨, 王红. 126名护士长决策疲劳现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 74-78.
[6] 马俊杰, 王硕, 魏玉莲, 赵红, 冯会玲, 张立瑶. 职场精神力在低年资护士双元工作压力与主动创新行为间的中介效应分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 68-73.
[7] 梁小燕, 蒋维连, 李春健, 欧艳芳, 刘佳萍. 临床护士实施课程思政教学促进及障碍因素的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(2): 27-30.
[8] 程青云, 张艳, 田雨同, 许冰, 鹿艺馨, 李晓华, 高月, 高梦珂. 924名三级甲等医院临床护士在线学习力现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(1): 1-6.
[9] 方业香, 韩江英, 王祚传, 齐梦影, 伍姗姗, 李娟. 252名ICU护士生命意义感现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(1): 60-63.
[10] 张慧鑫, 蔡卫新, 邢娅娜, 王翠雪, 尹志科, 张俊丽, 典慧娟, 林笑女. 护士心理韧性相关执业环境因素评估量表的构建及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(1): 53-59.
[11] 方慧玲, 王健, 黄德荣, 刘子钰, 曲歌, 曹硕. 基于Web of Science国外护士主观幸福感研究热点分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(1): 7-11.
[12] 吴秀强, 杨珍, 谢志勤, 杜韫雨, 杨丽娜, 陈诗涵. 护士道德困境干预的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(1): 47-52.
[13] 弋新, 陈刚, 刘晓云, 黄婵, 叶艳, 吴霜. 积极心理学视阈下护士心盛现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(1): 67-71.
[14] 吕娜, 许凤琴, 刘春梅, 邵晴. 安宁疗护专科护士再认证的研究现状与启示[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(9): 31-35.
[15] 苏孟宇, 王真, 吴金凤, 李晓燕, 张玉玺. 临床护士开展哀伤辅导的现状及研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(9): 26-30.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
[1] 李朝阳, 杨芬, 胡婷, 赵雪扬, 吴曼. 基于百度贴吧“同妻吧”的同妻负性情绪特征及来源分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(7): 12 -16 .
[2] 何万巧, 盖薇, 周春兰, 张艺祯, 陶艳玲. 积极心理学视角下维持性血液透析患者生活质量现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(2): 12 -16 .
[3] 王冲, 梁灿, 刘俐惠. 护理夜班绩效管理系统的构建与实施[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(2): 31 -34 .
[4] 刘莎, 陈玲, 李甜甜, 张丹莉, 蔡文智. 孕产妇盆底肌训练自我效能发展轨迹及其对产后尿失禁的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 1 -5 .
[5] 高杰, 李惠萍, 宋江艳, 李嘉欣, 周梦珂, 张珊珊, 庞自云. 以应对为焦点的乳腺癌患者家庭韧性干预方案构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 6 -10 .
[6] 董世攀, 梁小英, 黄兰怡, 梁善英, 梁锦波, 代炜, 赵玉玲, 黄沂. 功能性腹胀患者健康促进行为量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 11 -15 .
[7] 刘蔚, 李育玲, 韩清华, 蔺彦丽. 基于社会学习理论实习护生同伴支持教育方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 16 -19 .
[8] 郑伟, 秦英, 江庆华. 基于Octave软件与铝箔腐蚀法对超声清洗时器械摆放位置的研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 26 -29 .
[9] 黄珊, 袁娟, 颜贵明. 基于自由联想法本科实习护生群体情绪分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 30 -34 .
[10] 田恬, 李转珍, 都芳芳, 朱永燕, 李伟丽, 万菲菲. 基于转型冲击理论构建新护士护理安全培训内容体系[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 35 -39 .