对分娩中产妇应用会阴评估量表指导会阴切开的效果观察

doi:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.12.060

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨在分娩中的产妇应用会阴评估量表指导会阴切开的应用效果。方法选取我院符合经阴道分娩条件的孕产妇400例,根据入院时间顺序依次编号,单号为观察组,双号为对照组,每组各200例。对照组采用传统会阴保护方式接产,观察组对分娩中的产妇应用会阴评估量表指导会阴切开。观察比较2组产妇在分娩时的会阴切开率会阴损伤情况和母婴结局。结果观察组产妇会阴切开率低于对照组,观察组产妇会阴损伤发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意（P<0.05）。观察组伤口愈合不良低于对照组（P<0.05）。结论应用会阴评估量表评估有助于规范限制性使用会阴切开术,能够降低自然分娩中产妇的会阴切开率,保持产妇会阴完整,降低母婴不良结局。

关键词: 会阴评估量表, 产妇, 会阴切开, 母婴结局

Abstract: Objective To explore the application of perineal assessment scale in perineotomy. Methods Four hundred puerperae were selected and divided into observation group and control group, with 200 cases in each group. In the control group, puerperae received traditional perineal care and in the observation group, perineal assessment scale was used in guiding perineotomy . Rate of perineal incision, perineal injury and maternal and neonatal outcomes in the two groups were compared. Results There were lower rate of perineal incision and perineal injury in the observation group, indicating statistical significance (P<0.05) and the healing of perineum in the observation group was better (P<0.05). Conclusion Perineal assessment scale can be used to guide perineotomy, which helps to lower the rate of perineal incision and adverse maternal and outcomes.

Key words: perineal assessment scale, puerpera, perineal incision, maternal and outcomes

中图分类号:

R473.71

刘幸, 万丽. 对分娩中产妇应用会阴评估量表指导会阴切开的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 60-64.

LIU Xing, WAN Li. Application of Perineal Assessment Scale in Perineotomy[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2020, 27(12): 60-64.

参考文献

[1] 李红雨,常青.会阴侧切与经阴道分娩结局的临床分析[J].中华妇幼临床医学杂志,2014, 10(4):477-479. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1673-5250.2014.04.016.
[2] 林丽. 会阴切开术的临床应用现状与研究进展[J].上海护理, 2016, 16(1):64-67.
[3] Demirel D, Golbasi Z.Effect of Perineal Massage on the Rate of Episiotomy and Perineal Tearing[J]. Int J Gynecol Obstet,2015,131(2):183-186. DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.048.
[4] Freeman RM, Hollands HJ, Barron LF, et al.Cutting a Mediolateral Episiotomy at the Correct Angle:Evaluation of a New Device, the Episcissors-60[J].Medical Devices, 2014(7):23-28. DOI:10.2147/MDER.S60056.
[5] 魏素花,叶晓东.初产妇行会阴保护无侧切法阴道分娩的效果分析[J].护理学报,2013,20(12B):39-41.
[6] Jiang H, Qian X, Carroli G, et al. Selective Versus Routine Use of Episiotomy for Vaginal Birth[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017(2):CD000081. DOI:10.1002/14651858.cd000081.pub3.
[7] 覃爱开,蔡文智,潘石蕾,等. 运用项目管理降低初产妇会阴侧切率的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(20):20-22. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2016.20.020.
[8] 陈彩平,陆瑞光,杨迪琼,等.自然分娩会阴切开评估表的设计和应用[J].护理与康复,2013, 12(8):792-793. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-9875.2013.08.033.
[9] 饶琳,黄群,王蕾,等. 会阴切开前综合评估对初产妇妊娠结局的影响[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2017,34(7):40-43. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2017.07.011.
[10] Hartmann K, Viswanathan M, Palmieri R, et al.Outcomes of Routine Episiotomy: A Systematic Review[J]. JAMA,2005, 293(17):2141-2148. DOI:10.1001/jama.293.17.2141.
[11] Golezar S.Ananas comosus Effect on Perineal Pain and Wound Healing after Episiotomy: A Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial[J]. Iranian Red Crescent Med J, 2016, 18(3):e21019. DOI:10.5812/ircmj.21019.
[12] Rusavy Z, Karbanova J, Kalis V.Timing of Episiotomy and Outcome of a Non-instrumental Vaginal Delivery[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2016, 95(2):190-196. DOI:10.1111/aogs.12814.
[13] 王秀梅,刘凤娥,皮桂玲,等. 会阴体长度及弹性评估在初产妇分娩中的应用[J]. 护理学杂志, 2008, 23(20):4-6. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4152.2008.20.002.
[14] 谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8 版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:183.
[15] Dimitrov A, Nikolov A, Nalbanski B, et al.The Results of the Limited Use of Episiotomy in Managing the Second Stage of Labor[J]. Akusherstvo I Ginekologiia, 1997, 36(1):3-4.
[16] 孔欣, 郭培奋.经阴道头位分娩中倡导限制会阴切开[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2012, 28(2):117-120.
[17] 陈利敏,陆瑞光,黄奕,等. 产前综合评估对自然分娩会阴切开率和母儿结局的影响[J]. 浙江医学,2013(12):1202-1204.
[18] Sulaiman AS, Ahmad S, Ismail NAM, et al.A Randomized Control Trial Evaluating the Prevalence of Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injuries in Primigravida in Routine Versus Selective Mediolateral Episiotomy[J]. Saudi Medical Journal, 2013, 34(8):819-823. DOI:10.1111/jep.12017.
[19] Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for Vaginal Birth[J]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2008,1(1):CD000081. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub2
[20] Islam A, Hanif A, Ehsan A, et al.Morbidity from Episiotomy[J]. J Pak Med Assoc, 2013, 63(6):696-701. DOI:10.1007/s00109-013-1029-x.
[21] Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, et al.Continuous Support for Women during Chidlbirth[J]. Birth, 2010, 32(1):72-72. DOI:10.1111/j.0730-7659.2005.00336.x.
[22] Landy HJ, Laughon SK, Bailit JL, et al.Characteristics Associated with Severe Perineal and Cervical Lacerations During Vaginal Delivery[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 117(3):627-635. DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820afaf2.

相关文章 15

[1]	赵彩霞,陆金美,朱春云,崔娟. 无缝隙护理干预对乳头凹陷初产妇母乳喂养的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(9): 53-56.
[2]	郑雅宁,丁颖,吴瑜玲. 基于自我效能的集中群组保健模式对产妇母乳喂养的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(5): 75-78.
[3]	贾丹丹,马丽丽,杨绪影,陈婉莹,任珂,王楠,郑常洁,王晓,和鑫鑫. 192名产妇出院准备度与出院指导质量的相关性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(3): 42-45.
[4]	邹丽, 郑雅宁, 吴瑜玲. 剖宫产术后医用皮肤接触组合母子衣的研制[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(22): 77-78.
[5]	吴尔,廖瑛华,陈少玉,周琼,鲁丽容. 母亲角色适应在初产妇社会支持和养育效能间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(13): 55-59.
[6]	王雪璐,庄薇,赵敏慧,余慧,侯燕文,吴文燕. 初产妇母乳喂养认知行为干预的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(4): 64-67.
[7]	陈丽玲,黄晓莉. 剖宫产术后再次妊娠阴道分娩产妇真实体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(4): 68-71.
[8]	孙赵娜,李云云,吴兰君,朱庆贤,吴小燕. 亲情化干预对产妇自我保健能力及新生儿照护技能的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(3): 65-67.
[9]	欧阳娜,瞿佳,刘可,高玲玲. 我国助产士门诊对初产妇分娩方式及分娩结局影响的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(2): 4-10.
[10]	孙丽媛,杜彩素,朱晓飞,孙晓理,苏敏. 产妇会阴部微波治疗可调节医用腿部支架的研制[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(2): 77-78.
[11]	冯夏芬,方意,周彬,王静蝶. 萨提亚冥想训练对宫腔纱条取出术产妇生理状况及疼痛的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(18): 62-65.
[12]	朱远,王燕君,张爱霞,徐桂华. 头位阴道分娩会阴切开影响因素Logistic回归分析[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(16): 10-13.
[13]	李晓瑞,姚琴,朱丽红. 自然分娩中会阴无保护接生技术母婴结局的病例对照研究[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(21): 5-8.
[14]	覃爱开,蔡文智,潘石蕾,杨丽霞,张嫣,周宇凤. 运用项目管理降低初产妇会阴侧切率的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2016, 23(20): 20-22.
[15]	石娟,王彩珊,勇霞,汪莉,樊彩凤,李彤,王朝红,黄建春. 针刺昆仑穴联合拉玛泽呼吸减痛法干预产妇分娩疼痛的研究[J]. 护理学报, 2016, (1): 62-64.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared