以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (21): 1-6.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.21.001

• 研究生园地 •    下一篇

原发性青光眼患者疾病体验及治疗期望的质性研究

王瑶1, 史静华2, 郭丽霞2, 柴千茹1   

  1. 1.山西医科大学 护理学院,山西 太原 030000;
    2.山西省眼科医院 护理部,山西 太原 030002
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-13 发布日期:2024-12-04
  • 通讯作者: 史静华(1967-),女,山西太原人,硕士,主任护师,护理部主任。E-mail:shijh1002@sina.com
  • 作者简介:王瑶(1998-),女,山西汾阳人,本科学历, 硕士研究生在读,护士。
  • 基金资助:
    山西老年眼健康管理策略研究(202204031401163)

Disease experience and treatment expectation in patients with primary glaucoma: a qualitative study

WANG Yao1, SHI Jing-hua2, GUO Li-xia2, CHAI Qian-ru1   

  1. 1. School of Nursing,Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030000, China;
    2. Dept. of Nursing Administration, Shanxi Eye Hospital, Taiyuan 030002, China
  • Received:2024-06-13 Published:2024-12-04

摘要: 目的 深入了解原发性青光眼患者的疾病体验及治疗期望,为制订综合性身心护理策略提供参考依据。方法 采用目的>抽样法,对2023年2—6月在山西省眼科医院住院的12例原发性青光眼患者进行半结构式访谈,使用NVivo20.0及Colaizzi七步分析法对资料进行整理分析。结果 共归纳提炼出3大主题,10个亚主题:经历多重挑战(生理体验复杂、心理体验失衡、日常生活受挫);疾病认知及应对差异(疾病自我认知不足、消极逃避、积极应对);患者对疾病的治疗期望(疾病治疗方式期望、疾病治疗结果期望、疾病恢复过程期望、对治疗消极、不切实际的期望)。结论 原发性青光眼患者承受过度身心压力,应对方式欠妥,存在多方面治疗期望。提示需重视患者疾病负担,帮助建立积极合理的治疗期望,以提升患者的幸福感和生存质量。

关键词: 原发性青光眼, 疾病体验, 治疗期望, 质性研究

Abstract: Objective To deeply understand disease experience and treatment expectation of patients with primary glaucoma, and to provide reference for formulating comprehensive psychosomatic nursing strategy. Methods Semi-structured interview was conducted in twelve patients with primary glaucoma hospitalized in Shanxi Eye Hospital from February to June 2023. The data were collated and analyzed by NVivo20.0 and Colaizzi method of data analysis. Results There were 3 themes and 10 sub-themes, which included experiencing multiple challenges (complex physical experience, unbalanced psychological experience, frustration in daily life); disease cognition and differences in coping (lack of disease self-cognition, negative avoidance, positive coping); treatment expectation (treatment method expectation, outcome expectation, recovery process expectation, negative and unrealistic expectation of the treatment). Conclusion Patients with primary glaucoma suffer from excessive physical and mental stress and have inadequate coping styles but various expectations for disease treatment. It is suggested that medical staff should pay attention to the disease burden of patients and help establish positive and reasonable treatment expectations to improve the happiness and quality of life of patients.

Key words: primary glaucoma, disease experience, treatment expectation, qualitative study

中图分类号: 

  • R473.77
[1] 杨培增,范先群. 眼科学[M]. 9版. 北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:148-149.
[2] 梁远波,江俊宏,王宁利. 中国青光眼流行病学调查研究回顾[J]. 中华眼科杂志,2019,55(8):634-640. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2019.08.018.
[3] 陈君毅,孙兴怀. 《欧洲青光眼指南(第五版)》解读[J]. 中华实验眼科杂志,2021, 39(10):906-909.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115989-20210903-00494.
[4] Kube T, Glombiewski JA, Rief W.Using different expectation mechanisms to optimize treatment of patients with medical conditions: a systematic review[J]. Psychosom Med,2018,80(6):535-543.DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000596.
[5] Chen Y, Lohfeld L, Song D, et al.Facilitators and barriers to using selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) as first-line treatment for glaucoma: physician and patient views gathered during an exploratory descriptive qualitative study[J]. Ophthalmic Epidemiol,2023, 30(1):74-81.DOI:10.1080/09286586.2022.2029500.
[6] 中华医学会眼科学分会青光眼学组,中国医师协会眼科医师分会青光眼学组. 中国青光眼指南(2020年)[J]. 中华眼科杂志,2020,56(8):573-586.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20200313-00182.
[7] 谭健烽,王永存,郑秀莹,等. 乳腺癌青年患者康复心理体验与益处发现的质性研究[J]. 护理学报,2023,30(23):73-78. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.23.073.
[8] Zhang Q, Zhou W, Song D, et al.Vision-related quality of life in patients with glaucoma: the role of illness perceptions[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2022, 20(1):78. DOI:10.1186/s12955-022-01979-x.
[9] Iyigun E, Tastan S, Ayhan H, et al.Life experiences of patients with glaucoma: a phenomenological study[J]. J Nurs Res,2017,25(5):336-343.DOI:10.1097/JNR.0000000000000172.
[10] 杨新宇,赵梅,程旭,等. 青光眼症状量表的汉化与信效度检验[J].中华现代护理杂志,2023,29(12):1594-1597. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20220916-04544.
[11] 张宇,吕启圆,黄文敏,等. 中文版17条目青光眼生活质量量表的信度与效度检验[J].现代临床护理,2021,20(2):40-45. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8283.2021.02.007.
[12] Dada T, Ramesh P, Shakrawal J.Meditation: a polypill for comprehensive management of glaucoma patients[J]. J Glaucoma,2020,29(2):133-140. DOI:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001406.
[13] 李佳,关晋英,李蓉,等. 正念减压联合团体健康教育对原发性青光眼病人负性情绪及睡眠质量的影响[J]. 护理研究,2020,34(6):1066-1069. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2020.06.032.
[14] Newman-Casey PA, Killeen O, Miller S, et al.A glaucoma-specific brief m-otivational interviewing training program for ophthalmology para-professionals: assessment of feasibility and initial patient impact[J]. Health Commun,2020,5(2):233-241.DOI:10.1080/10410236.2018.1557357.
[15] Young J, Entwistle L, DeSousa JL, et al. Evaluation of a nurse-led glaucoma assessment clinic for non-complex patients[J]. J Clin Nurs,2023,32(17-18):6743-6750. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16670.
[16] Chen X, Zhong YL, Chen Q, et al.Knowledge of glaucoma and associated factors among primary glaucoma patients in Kunming, China[J]. BMC Ophthalmol,2022,22(1):95. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-022-02322-0.
[17] 邓诗裔,徐晓叶,郑维鑫,等. 基于移动健康平台的自我管理干预在青光眼日间手术患者中的应用[J]. 中国护理管理,2022,22(12):1849-1855. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2022.12.018.
[18] Kulkarni BB, Leighton P, King AJ.Exploring patients' expectations and preferences of glaucoma surgery outcomes to facilitate healthcare delivery and inform future glaucoma research[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2019, 103(12):1850-1855. DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313401.
[19] SooHoo JR, Golas L, Marando CM, et al. Glaucoma patient treatment preferences[J]. Ophthalmology, 2016, 123(7):1621-1622. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.01.018.
[20] 赵家良. 改变青光眼作为首位不可逆致盲性眼病的现状[J]. 眼科学报,2021,36(6):389-392. DOI:10.3978/j.issn.1000-4432.2021.06.08
[21] Safitri A, Konstantakopoulou E, Hu K, et al.Treatment expectations in glaucoma: what matters most to patients?[J]. Eye (Lond),2023,37(16):3446-3454. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02532-w.
[22] Hua Y, Lu H, Dai J, et al.Self-management challenges and support needs among patients with primary glaucoma: a qualitative study[J]. BMC Nurs,2023,22(1):426. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01527-y.
[1] 冯春玲, 胡夏晴, 徐琳, 蔡鑫健, 徐琴鸿. 基于社会生态系统理论的电话指导公众实施心肺复苏行为动机及需求的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 66-71.
[2] 曹依丽, 王玲, 王灿, 陈燕华, 秦虹云. 精神分裂症住院患者家属资源取向的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 74-78.
[3] 马瑞瑞, 范晓莉, 徐姝娟, 张伟, 陈婷, 谈飞飞. 护士参与终末期患者临终决策体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 6-11.
[4] 龙瑶, 卢春凤, 冯志仙. 临床护士对横向领导者特质感知的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 27-31.
[5] 张颖, 车晓艳, 万婠, 秦雪, 张恩思, 崇武, 郑淑娟. 我国性治疗护士工作范畴和核心能力的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 68-72.
[6] 张露心, 焦延超, 文稀, 田利, 王婷, 田凤美, 李惠玲. 护理本科生在“慕课西行”同步课堂学习体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 30-34.
[7] 胡晓涵, 占婷婷, 何望生, 乔疏桐, 李雪. 肝豆状核变性患者自我管理体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 17-21.
[8] 邓悦, 胡宇帆, 王冉, 张远星, 王芳, 袁萍, 陈璐. 老年患者接受远程医疗护理体验与需求质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 50-55.
[9] 李珂, 杨振楠, 韩舒羽, 张建霞, 张梦杰, 李君. 护士经历护理中断事件真实体验的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 61-66.
[10] 商丽, 黄菲, 程利, 张桃桃, 王宏梅. 本科护生参与漫改剧学习体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 25-29.
[11] 刘仲全, 杨秀, 傅忠华. 头颈癌患者女性配偶照顾者创伤后成长体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(22): 73-78.
[12] 唐昕宇, 陈昌连, 张绍青, 曹家燕. 基于理论域框架的胃癌患者一级亲属健康行为促进与障碍因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(20): 73-78.
[13] 刘慧敏, 姜蕾. 深圳市助产士核心胜任力培训优化策略的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 40-43.
[14] 李嘉琪, 叶向红, 左俊焘, 徐瑶, 姚红林. 终末期患者营养支持决策过程质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 53-58.
[15] 谷雨芳, 顾志娥, 陈应柱, 于传山, 刘星宇, 丁坤. 基于场域理论的临床护士辞职读研决策体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(18): 1-6.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
[1] 马瑞英,李亚洁. 美国疾病诊断相关组法护理支付方式对我国护理收费的启示[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 23 -25 .
[2] 周玥,张淼,赵江,李成. 胃肠道肿瘤患者生命质量影响因素研究现状及思考[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 26 -28 .
[3] 曾友燕,徐燕,储静,顾申. 护理专业课程实行主讲教师负责制的教学实践与效果分析[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 29 -31 .
[4] 谢红燕,杨淑玲. 新型固定沙袋的制作[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 31 .
[5] 宁宁,陈佳丽,朱红,马莉. 项目管理理论在医院护理创新管理中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 32 -35 .
[6] 蔡德芳,董云春,李长琼,周媛. 基于护士分管病人的护理绩效考核[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 36 -39 .
[7] 汪洋,宋艳玲. 消毒供应中心区域一体式管理控制医院感染的实践[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 39 -41 .
[8] 马逊,朱亚梅,吕小林,张静,王蓉花,王玲. 不同血液透析预冲方法对透析器凝血的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 42 -44 .
[9] 濮益琴. 13户家庭聚集性恶性血液病患者的护理[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 45 -47 .
[10] 杨江兰,汤晓丽. 17例新生儿腹裂应用免缝腹裂袋治疗的护理[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 48 -50 .