以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (17): 63-66.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.17.063

• 临床护理※内科护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

脉动饮料联合和爽在门诊患者结肠镜检查中的应用

张春霞a, 卜梦茹b, 周瑾b   

  1. 南方医科大学中西医结合医院 a.内镜中心; b.护理部,广东 广州 510315
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-15 出版日期:2023-09-10 发布日期:2023-10-11
  • 通讯作者: 周瑾（1977-）,女,安徽巢湖人,硕士,硕士研究生导师,主任护师,护理部主任。E-mail:727120567@qq.com
  • 作者简介:张春霞（1977-）,女,安徽巢湖人,本科学历,主管护师。
  • 基金资助:
    2022年广东省卫生健康适宜技术推广项目〔粤卫办科教函（2022）14号〕

Effect of Mizone and SF-PEG in intestinal preparation for outpatients undergoing colonoscopy

ZHANG Chun-xiaa, Bu Meng-rub, ZHOU Jinb   

  1. a.Endoscopy Center; b. Dept. of Nursing Administration, Hospital of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510315, China
  • Received:2023-05-15 Online:2023-09-10 Published:2023-10-11

PDF (PC)

253

赞

摘要： 目的 探讨脉动饮料联合和爽（药名复方聚乙二醇电解质散,SF-PEG）的肠道准备方法在门诊结肠镜检查中的应用效果。方法 纳入拟行结肠镜检查的患者76例,采用随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,各38例。对照组患者在进行结肠镜检查前2个时间段,口服温开水稀释的和爽导泻剂2袋,2 h内饮完;观察组患者口服脉动饮料+温开水稀释的和爽导泻剂。比较2组患者开始服药至首次排便的时间、首次排便至末次排便的时间、不良反应发生情况、肠道清洁度。结果 2组均顺利完成结肠镜检查。观察组的开始服药至首次排便时间、首次排便至末次排便时间、不良反应发生率均明显低于对照组（P<0.05）;观察组的肠道清洁度与对照组相当,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;观察组的口感满意明显高于对照组（84% VS 51%）,观察组92%患者可以喝完导泻剂,服药依从性明显高于对照组（P<0.05）。结论 应用脉动饮料联合和爽的肠道准备方法在结肠镜检查中,具有肠道准备时间短、不良反应少、改变患者的味觉体验,提高服药依从性的优点。

关键词: 脉动饮料, 复方聚乙二醇电解质散, 和爽, 结肠镜, 肠道准备

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical effect of Mizone combined with Heshuang (polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder, SF-PEG) in intestinal preparation for outpatients undergoing colonoscopy. Methods Seventy-six patients undergoing morning colonoscopy were divided into experimental group and control group according to random number table method, with 38 cases in each. Before the colonoscopy, the control group received 2 bags of Heshuang diluted with warm water in 2 hours, while the observation group a combination of Mizone and Heshuang diluted with warm water. The time between the start of medication-taking and the first bowel movement, that between the first and last defecation, adverse reactions during colonoscopy and intestinal cleanliness in the two groups were compared. Results Colonoscopy was completed successfully in both groups. Time from the start of medication-taking to first bowel movement, that between the first and last defecation, and the incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group were significantly shorter and lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the intestinal cleanliness between the two groups (P>0.05). Taste satisfaction rate in the observation group were significantly higher than that in the control group (84% VS 51%), and 92% of the patients in the observation group could finish drinking the laxative, indicating significantly higher medication compliance (P<0.05). Conclusion The combination of Mizone and Heshuang in intestinal preparation during colonoscopy has the advantages of shorter intestinal preparation time, less adverse reactions, and better taste experience and medication compliance.

Key words: Mizone, polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder, Heshuang, colonoscopy, intestinal preparation

中图分类号: 

  • R473.57
[1] Hassan C, East J, Radaelli F, et al.Bowel preparation for colonoscopy:European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline-update 2019[J]. Endoscopy,2019,51(8):775-794.DOI:10.1055/a-0959-0505.
[2] 樊紫青,方海明,钱诚,等.不同服药速度对聚乙二醇电解质溶液肠道准备的效果评价[J].中国内镜杂志,2017,23(5):5-8.
[3] Barkun AN, Martel M, Epstein IL,et al.The bowel cleansing national initiative:high-volume split-dose vs low-volume split-dose polyethylene glycol preparations:a randomized controlled trial[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol,2022,20(6):e1469-e1477.DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.09.005.
[4] Seo M, Gweon TG, Huh CW, et al.Comparison of bowel cleansing efficacy,safety,bowel movement kinetics,and patient tolerability of same-day and split-dose bowel preparation using 41 of polyethylene glycol:a prospective randomized study[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2019 ,62(12):1518-1527.DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001499.
[5] Tian H, Li H,Zhu X,et al.Efficacy and tolerability of two different low-volume split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolytes solution bowel preparation for morning colonoscopy[J]. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2022, 2022:8169649. DOI:10.1155/2022/8169649.
[6] 李春燕,金伟端,黄泽芳.和爽添加果味调料在肠道准备中不良反应的效果观察[J].中国实用医药, 2010,5(5):152-153.DOI:10.14163/j.cnki.11-5547/r.2010.05.105.
[7] Choi HS, Shim CS, Kim GW, et al.Orange juice intake reduces patient discomfort and is effective for bowel cleansing with polyethylene glycol during bowel preparation[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2014,57(10):1220-1227.DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000195.
[8] Kwak MS, Cha JM,Yang HJ,et al.Safety and efficacy of low-volume preparation in the elderly:oral sulfate solution on the day before and split-dose regimens (SEE SAFE) study[J].Gut Liver,2019, 13(2):176-182.DOI:10.5009/gnl18214.
[9] Lu J, Cao Q, Wang X,et al.Application of oral lactulose in combination with polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder for colonoscopy bowel preparation in patients with constipation[J].Am J Ther,2016,23(4):e1020-e1024.
[10] 王秀华,刘荣耀,陈学芝,等.维生素饮料溶解复方聚乙二醇电解质散对结肠镜检查患者服药依从性及不良反应的影响[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2022,28(7):155-157.
[11] 谈碧波,何娜.不同溶媒口服复方聚乙二醇电解质散对患者结肠镜检查前肠道准备效果的比较研究[J].山西医药杂志,2021,50(2):235-237.
[12] 王新铭,郝振芝.维生素B6的药理作用与临床应用[J].医学理论与实践, 1990(2):38-40.DOI:10.19381/j.issn.1001-7585.1990.02.042.
[13] 苏桂棋,黄和林,蒋娜等.维生素C的作用及常见不良反应[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2019,19(8):120-121.DOI:10.19613/j.cnki.1671-3141.2019.08.056.
[14] Lee J,Lee E,Kim Y,et al.Effects of gum chewing on abdominal discomfort,nausea,vomiting and intake adherence to polyethylene glycol solution of patients in colonoscopy preparation[J].J Clin Nurs,2016,25(3/4):518-525.DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13086.
[15] 张钦. 电解质饮料对人体运动能力的作用[J].食品工业,2018,39(8):174-176.
[1] 蔡文文, 张星星, 叶敏珊, 罗艳霞, 阮伟清, 李加. 基于结构-过程-结果模型构建结肠镜检查患者护理敏感性质量指标体系[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(6): 1-6.
[2] 郭盛丽, 袁薇, 朱婷, 林威娜, 陈晓容, 夏美燕. 患者结肠镜检查前肠道准备失败风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(1): 35-40.
[3] 李萍, 靳小雯, 李燕玲, 徐玉兰, 喻姣花, 李卓颖, 李应, 邓睿. 成年患者结直肠镜检查肠道准备不充分的预防及管理证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9): 22-28.
[4] 刘颖, 黎丹, 黄燕波, 王倩, 贯华. 优化术前肠道准备方案对根治性膀胱全切加回肠通道术患者的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(9): 68-70.
[5] 纪浩旋, 陈秀迎, 樊红革, 郑少康, 司徒丽萍, 杜结玲. 辅助电子结肠镜进镜腹部按压器的研制与应用[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(9): 76-78.
[6] 彭瑶瑶, 师正燕, 李晓玲. 根治性膀胱切除术术前肠道准备的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(20): 27-31.
[7] 林俏, 张广清, 刘梅娟, 黄颖, 刘丹阳, 刘玉萍, 邢同印, 陈继华. 成人结肠镜检查前肠道准备的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(16): 28-34.
[8] 张苗, 聂燕, 刘洁, 薛鲜敏. 首次肠道准备患者应用床旁智能交互系统视频宣教的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(15): 74-76.
[9] 张萍, 徐中芹, 苏洁, 迮露. 结肠镜前肠道准备评估单的设计与应用[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(7): 57-60.
[10] 胡杏娟, 彭伟娇, 赖洁珊, 张伦, 江南燕, 李紫昕. 不同时长低纤维饮食对功能性便秘患者肠道准备的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(17): 61-64.
[11] 孙畅,何文英,王策,马俊骥,田慧. 住院患者肠道准备影响因素及相关护理干预的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(10): 41-44.
[12] 王国庆. 咀嚼口香糖对服用和爽患者肠道准备效果的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(7): 49-52.
[13] 刘玉翠,武曌,董莎,仇海燕. 追踪方法学在老年患者结肠镜检查管理中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(5): 19-22.
[14] 王晓媛,勇琴歌,石海燕,郭佳钰,赵诺,耿玲. 139例老年男性患者行无痛胃肠镜肠道准备的护理体会[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(15): 48-50.
[15] 闫丽,杜红娣,卢静. 降低结肠镜患者肠道准备不合格率的品管圈实践[J]. 护理学报, 2017, 24(13): 45-48.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
[1] 王若仙, 何斌, 王玉环, 刘柯汝, 唐雪婷, 赵淑华, 魏杉杉. 社区老年人骨质疏松性骨折风险感知偏差现况及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(15): 1 -5 .
[2] 王丽梅, 李露, 喻鹏, 罗倩, 张翀旎. 237名护理硕士研究生医学叙事能力现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 1 -4 .
[3] 李娜, 黄懿炘, 刘美兰, 邓银辉, 邹小芳. 老年人健康促进行为量表的汉化及信效度评价[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 5 -10 .
[4] 宁艳娇, 徐国辉, 冯亚静, 杨佳琦, 王华荣, 单伟颖. 新入职护士临床实践能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 11 -15 .
[5] 冯宪凌, 白杨, 杨鑫, 李玉霞. 基于核心能力的妇科专科护士培训方案的设计与实践[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 16 -19 .
[6] 薛翠翠, 滕宏旭, 张荣, 刘华平, 田建丽. 我国优质护理资源下沉政策文本研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 20 -23 .
[7] 刘羽佳, 陆方, 刘瑞韫. 政策工具视角下的国家医养结合试点城市养老护理员政策研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 24 -28 .
[8] 毛敏, 谢湘梅, 严婷. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者久坐行为相关研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 29 -33 .
[9] 王哲, 许惠靖, 王宇宇, 高歌, 王晓辉, 吴元虹, 吴善玉. 经济毒性对慢性病患者不良健康结局影响的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 34 -38 .
[10] 陈冉, 李春玉, 李美茜. 应用Rodgers演化概念分析法界定多重用药[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(17): 39 -44 .