2型糖尿病患者心脏病知识问卷的汉化及信效度研究

doi:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.15.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的汉化2型糖尿病患者心脏病知识问卷（Heart Diease Fact Questionnaire,HDFQ）,为我国2型糖尿病患者心脏病风险知识掌握情况提供评估工具。方法对2型糖尿病患者心脏病知识问卷进行翻译、回译、文化调适及预实验,形成中文版2型糖尿病患者心脏病知识问卷,并对408例2型糖尿病患者进行问卷调查,运用SPSS 23.0和AMOS 22.0对数据进行信效度检验。结果中文版2型糖尿病患者心脏病知识问卷共26条目,条目的内容效度指数（I-CVI）为0.750~1.000、问卷的内容效度指数（S-CVI）为0.938;探索性因子分析提取到2个公因子,累积方差贡献率为84.9%;验证性因子分析显示各指标均达到适配标准,模型拟合良好。问卷的总Cronbach α系数为0.881,分半信度为0.843,重测信度为0.867,决断值均>3.0,各条目与总分 Pearson相关系数为0.443~0.795。结论中文版2型糖尿病患者心脏病知识问卷包含2个维度26个条目,具有良好信效度,可作为我国2型糖尿病患者心脏病风险知识掌握程度的评价和测量工具。

关键词: 2型糖尿病, 心脏病, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To localize The Heart Disease Fact Questionnaire (HDFQ) and to provide an assessment tool for the knowledge of heart disease risk of type 2 diabetes patients in China. Methods The HDFQ was translated then back translation, cultural adjustment and pre-experiment were performed. A total of 408 patients with type 2 diabetes were surveyed with the translated questionnaire,and the reliability and validity were tested by SPSS 23.0 and AMOS 22.0. Results The Chinese version of HDFQ consisted of 26 items.The content validity index (I-CVI) of the items ranged from 0.750 to 1.000, and the content validity index (S-CVI) of the questionnaire was 0.938.Two factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 84.9%. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that all the indicators reached the fitness standard, and the model fitted well.The total Cronbach coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.881; the sub-half reliability 0.843 and the retest reliability 0.867,and the decision values were all greater than 3.0.The Pearson correlation coefficient between each item and the total score ranged from 0.443 to 0.795. Conclusion The Chinese version of the HDFQ consists of 26 items in 2 dimensions, and has good reliability and validity. It can be used as a tool to evaluate and measure the knowledge of heart disease risk in Chinese type 2 diabetes patients.

Key words: type 2 diabetics, heart disease, reliability, validity

中图分类号:

R471

孔海燕, 章新琼, 张洪辉, 王婷婷, 王爱梅. 2型糖尿病患者心脏病知识问卷的汉化及信效度研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(15): 1-4.

KONG Hai-yan, ZHANG Xin-qiong, ZHANG Hong-hui, WANG Ting-ting, WANG Ai-mei. Localization of Heart Disease Fact Questionnaire and Its Reliability and Validity[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(15): 1-4.

参考文献

[1] Xu F,Liu Y,Zhu X,et al.Protective Effects and Mechanisms of Vaccarin on Vascular Endothelial Dysfunction in Diabetic Angiopathy[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20(18):4587.DOI:10.3390/ijms20184587.
[2] Lemye Zehirlioglu, Hatice Mert, Dilek Sezgin, et al.Cardiovascular Risk, Risk Knowledge, and Related Factors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes[J].Clin Nurs Res, 2020, 29(5):322-330.DOI:10.1177/1054773819844070.
[3] 唐怀蓉,陈得才,杨晓妍,等.门诊糖尿病患者对其并发症知晓程度的调查研究[J].华西医学,2017, 32(6):875-879.DOI:10.7507/1002-0179.201701103.
[4] 顾敏敏,张一英,高雪琴,等.上海某社区2型糖尿病患者与居民的糖尿病相关知识知晓情况比较[J].上海预防医学,2019,31(6):479-483.DOI:10.19428/j.cnki.sjpm.2019.19244.
[5] 何明海,袁宁,赵玉章,等.南充市82225名社区居民2型糖尿病患病率、知晓率、治疗率及控制率调查[J].华西医学,2018,33(5):537-539.DOI:10.7507/1002-0179.201610196.
[6] Victor M, Ezekiel U, Ifeoma I, et al.Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in a Nigerian Population with Impaired Fasting Blood Glucose Level and Diabetes Mellitus[J]. BMC Public Health,2017,17(1):36.DOI:10.1186/s12889-016-3910-3.
[7] Julie Wagner, Kimberly Lacey,Deborah Chyun,et al.Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Heart Disease Risk Knowledge in People with Diabetes: The Heart Disease Fact Questionnaire[J].Patient Educ Couns,2005,58(1):82-87.DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2004.07.004.
[8] American Diabetes Association.Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus[J]. Diabetes Care, 2014,37(Suppl 1):S81-S90.DOI:10.2337/dc13-S067.
[9] 侯艳,张云,高蓉,等.恶性肿瘤患者疼痛认知量表的汉化和信效度检验[J].护理学报, 2021,28(4):62-66.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.04.062.
[10] Brislin RW.Back-translation for Cross-cultural Research[J].J Cross Cult Psychol,1970, 1(3):185-216.DOI:10.1177/135910457000100301.
[11] 沈志莹,丁四清,钟竹青.高血压患者服药依从性自我效能量表修订版的汉化及信度效度评价[J].中国护理管理,2020, 20(7):985-989.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2020.07.006.
[12] 于健,谌璐,许彬,等.临床教学问卷的跨文化调试及信效度研究[J].中华护理教育,2020,17(7):643-647.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2020.07.015.
[13] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型:AMOS的操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2017.
[14] 潘国翠,李梅.决策疲劳量表的汉化及其应用于 ICU 患者家属的信度效度评价[J].护理学报,2020,27(12):38-41.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.12.038.

相关文章 15

[1]	王琦, 李领侠, 和巾杰, 郑华东, 米晓芬, 胡艳粉. 医护人员低血糖症知信行问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9): 9-13.
[2]	郑丹丹, 任静, 李艳, 徐倩. 母亲感知育儿自我效能量表的汉化及其在早产儿母亲中的信效度研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9): 54-57.
[3]	刘瑜, 周春兰, 周君桂, 邓水娟, 何任红. 神经源性膀胱患者自我管理量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 64-68.
[4]	信博, 赵秋利, 王楠楠, 马得欣, 邢慧, 吴燕妮, 于洋. 消化系统癌症高危人群预防主动行为测评量表的编制与信效度评价[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(5): 6-11.
[5]	严佳丽, 裘慧颖, 贾芸, 刘倩静, 富晶晶, 金云秋. 模拟体验并发症健康教育在中青年初发2型糖尿病患者中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(5): 75-78.
[6]	夏杰, 段霞, 张佳男, 于婵, 王可可. 高危孕产妇病情预警评估表的构建及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 67-72.
[7]	侯艳, 张云, 高蓉, 刘宝吉, 赵卿. 恶性肿瘤患者疼痛认知量表的汉化和信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 62-66.
[8]	施赵维, 张扬, 官常荣, 郑晓佳, 陈敏华. 2型糖尿病患者营养干预联合家庭主要成员烹饪实践教育[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 73-76.
[9]	陈敏, 郑伟琴, 陈华, 蔡文智, 陈玲, 苏丹, 万星阳. 2型糖尿病患者便秘风险列线图预测模型的建立与验证[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(2): 58-61.
[10]	丁寒琴, 李立华, 何夏君. 精神科护士护理面谈能力培训体系的构建及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(13): 6-12.
[11]	刘云访, 喻姣花, 李素云, 柯卉, 晏蓉, 赵诗雨. 多准则护理决策评价量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(10): 52-56.
[12]	涂惠琼, 龙秀红, 沈琴庆. 148例先天性心脏病患儿术后主要照顾者的居家康复护理需求现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(1): 45-50.
[13]	刘丽萍, 周春兰, 吴艳妮, 从维莲, 胡明钰, 李晓霞. 情绪抑制量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(8): 6-10.
[14]	邓丽萍, 谢小华, 王亚萍, 杨洁, 潘璐, 马家惠, 肖静怡, 熊小云. 脑卒中高危人群保护动机问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(8): 1-5.
[15]	刘丹娜, 詹艳, 胡德雄, 沈婧, 王劼琼, 张淇. 中文完整版灵性需求问卷在慢性心力衰竭患者中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(24): 6-10.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared