以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

Journal of Nursing ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (17): 1-5.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.17.001

    Next Articles

Systematic Review/Meta-analysis of Intervention Published in Nursing Journal of Chinese Science Citation Database in Recent 5 Years

CHI Jun-ting1,2, CHEN Fei2, LI Si-yan2, ZHANG Jing2, TAO Hong-xia2, RUAN Hai-hui2, NIU Xiao-dan2, WANG Yan-hong2   

  1. 1. The First People's Hospital of Yunnan, Kunming 650034, China;
    2. School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2021-01-25 Published:2021-10-12

PDF (PC)

84

Like

Abstract: Objectives To evaluate the reporting quality of interventional systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) published in nursing journals included in the Chinese Science Citation Database in the past 5 years, to standardize the research process and reporting methods and to improve the quality of SRs/MAs. Methods CNKI、VIP、CBM and Wanfang electronically searched to collect interventional SRs/MAs published in nursing journals included in Chinese Science Citation Database from January 2015 to June 2020. Two researchers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the reporting quality using preferred reporting items for SRs/Mas. Excel 2019, and Stata15.0 software were then used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 176 SRs/MAs were included and their PRISMA scores ranged from 14.5 to 24.5 (20.17±2.00), including 1 study with a score ≤15 and serious information missing, 122 scoring from 15 to 21 showing some reporting defects; and 53 scoring from 21 to 27 with relatively complete reporting. The poor quality of reports was mainly manifested as structured summary (0/176), protocol and registration (0/176), search strategy reports (55/176), risk of bias in individual studies (26/176) and incomplete reporting of funding (0/176). Subgroup analysis showed that the quality of SRs/MAs could be significantly improved by funding, authors working in hospitals and only one unit(P<0.05); the number of authors had no significant effect on the quality of SRs/MAs (P>0.05). Conclusion Currently, the reporting quality of interventional SRs/MAs in the field of nursing varies greatly in China. Therefore, it is necessary to take corresponding measures to increase the publicity and popularity of PRISMA and promote its citation in nursing journal manuscripts. Researchers should strictly follow PRISMA related items and reports in a normative and detailed way. Editors and reviewers of nursing journals should also strictly follow PRISMA guidelines during peer review so as to improve the quality of SRs/MAs.

Key words: systematic review, Meta-analysis, nursing, reporting quality, PRISMA

CLC Number: 

  • R47
[1] 梁莉,葛龙,周为文,等. 我国诊断性试验系统评价/Meta分析的检索情况调查分析[J].中华医学图书情报杂志, 2013, 22(5):9-16. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3982.2013.05.002.
[2] Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al.Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses:The Prisma Statement[J].PLoS Med, 2009, 6(7):e1000097. DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
[3] Jin YH, Ma ET,Gao WJ,et al.Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews or Meta-analyses in Nursing Field in China[J]. Int J Nurs Pract, 2014, 20(1):70-78. DOI:10.1111/ijn.12123.
[4] 魏洪悦,靳英辉,谢雨露,等. 2012~2015年我国护理领域系统评价/Meta分析的报告学质量评价[J].护理学杂志, 2016, 31(16):95-97. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2016.16.095.
[5] 靳英辉,马恩婷,花巍,等. 国内护理领域系统评价/Meta分析的方法学与报告质量评价[J].中国循证医学杂志, 2012, 12(9):1148-1155.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2531.2012.09.019.
[6] Yang M, Jiang L,Wang A,et al.Epidemiology Characteristics, Reporting Characteristics,and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses on Traditional Chinese Medicine Nursing Interventions Published in Chinese Journals[J]. Int J Nurs Pract, 2017, 23(1):e12498. DOI:10.1111/ijn.12498.
[7] Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al.Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and Explanation[J]. BMJ, 2015, 350:g7647. DOI:10.1136/bmj.g7647.
[8] Tian J, Zhang J, Ge L, et al.The Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews from China and the USA are Similar[J]. J Clin Epidemiol,2017, 85:50-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.004.
[9] 杨克虎. 系统评价指导手册[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2010.
[10] Ge L, Tian JH, Li YN, et al.Association Between Prospective Registration and Overall Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews: A Meta-epidemiological Study[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2018, 93:45-55. DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.10.012.
[11] Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al.Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Statement[J]. Syst Rev, 2015, 4(1):1-9. DOI:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
[12] Kolychev AP, Terpilovskii MA, Uversky VN.Sequential and Asynchronous Strengthening of the Influence of Temperature on the Endo-and Exocytosis of Insulin in the Isolated Vertebrata Hepatocytes: Summing up Previous Studies[J]. Curr Protein Pept Sci, 2020,21(1):22-35.DOI:10.2174/1389203720666190325101804.
[13] De Vries RBM, Hooijmans CR, Langendam MW, et al.A Protocol Format for the Preparation, Registration and Publication of Systematic Reviews of Animal Intervention Studies[J]. Evidence-based Preclinical Medicine, 2015, 2(1): e00007. DOI:10.1002/ebm2.7.
[14] Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA, et al.Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias[J]. PLoS One, 2008, 3(8):e3081. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0003081.
[15] 熊俊,陈日新. 系统评价/Meta分析方法学质量的评价工具AMSTAR[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2011, 11(9):1084-1089. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2531.2011.09.017.
[16] 詹思延. 第一讲:如何报告系统综述和Meta分析——国际报告规范QUOROM和MOOSE解读[J]. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2010, 5(1):60-63. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5501.2010.01.009.
[1] LI Ping, JIN Xiao-wen, LI Yan-ling, XU Yu-lan, YU Jiao-hua, LI Zhuo-ying, LI Ying, DENG Rui. Evidence Summary for Prevention and Management of Poor Bowel Preparation of Adult Patients with Colorectoscopy [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(9): 22-28.
[2] ZHOU Tian-tian, WANG Qing, HUANG Ping, CHEN Yan. Effect of Quiet Time on Inpatients: A Systematic Review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(9): 29-34.
[3] CHENG Shuang, XIONG Zhen-fang, CAI Yi, CHEN Han-bin, HUI Jing-rui. Qualitative Studies on Parents’ Experiences of Diagnostic Process for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(9): 35-42.
[4] LIU Qing-xuan, ZHANG Zhen-xiang, GUO Yun-fei, ZHANG Le-yun, LIN Bei-lei, MEI Yong-xia. Post-traumatic Growth and Related Factors of Stroke Patients in China and Abroad: A Systematic Evaluation [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(8): 1-7.
[5] YAN Lu-pei, YAO Li-li, ZHAO Qing-hua, XIAO Ming-chao, LI Yue-rong. Maintenance of Effect of TeamSTEPPS Training in Medical Staff Based on Kirkpatrick Model: A Systematic Review [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(8): 17-22.
[6] HU Zheng-zhong, LIAO Yuan-yuan, ZHOU Yi-feng, PENG Jin, QIN Yue-lan. Risk Factors for Surgical Incision Infection in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(8): 23-27.
[7] LIU Ping, YOU Ao-lin, LIU Shu, LI Ya-nan, LUAN Xiao-rong. Qualitative Studies on Postgraduate Training Experience of Master of Nursing Specialist in China: A Meta-synthesis [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(7): 35-42.
[8] LI Huan-ze, CHEN Hong-fang, HUANG Li-qun, AN Fang-fang, XU Peng, ZHUANG Miao-qing, ZHANG Lu-yu, WANG Jia-yi. Qualitative Studies on Experience of Emergency Nurses in Hospice Care: A Meta-synthesis [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(7): 43-48.
[9] GAO Xing-lian, YU Wen-jing, XIAO Yao, HU Juan-juan, ZHAO Shi-yu, YANG Ying. Best Evidence Summary for Prevention and Management of Perioperative Stress Injury [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(6): 22-26.
[10] HE Yi-qing, ZHOU Hong, GAO Zu-mei. Qualitative Research on Compassion Fatigue in Nurses: A Meta Synthesis [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(6): 33-37.
[11] DING Cui-lu, LIU An-nuo, ZHU Gui-yue, ZHANG Meng, Ma Wen, LIU Min. Mediating Effect of Self-worth on Perceived Social Support and Meaning in Life among Nursing Undergraduates [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(6): 38-42.
[12] GUO Yue-hua, DANG Yan, ZHANG Peng, LIU Shu. Nursing of Premature Babies with High Location Enteric Necrosis Undergoing Bishop-koop Stoma Procedure: A 6-case Study [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(5): 59-61.
[13] ZHU Wei-wei, XU Yang-zi, HUO Wan-jun, CHEN Ci-yu, LI Yuan-tian, LING Dong-lan. Best Evidence Summary for Assessment and Management of Pain in Elderly Patients with Dementia [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(5): 32-37.
[14] GAO Zi-han, YANG Li, WEI Xiao, JIA Feng-ju, WANG Min. Visualization Analysis of Extended Nursing Based on Web of Science [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(4): 12-18.
[15] ZHI Meng-jia, JI Jia-lin, HU Lin-lin. Willingness of Elderly People for Community-home Medical Care Combined with Pension Services and Its Influence Factors: A 1,389-case Study [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(4): 50-56.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
[1] WU Cheng-kai, XU jun, HUANG Chen, LIU Qian, LI Wen-yuan. Healthy Fitness of Elderly People in Guangzhou and Its Influence Factors[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(17): 6 -10 .
[2] TANG He, QIAO Yu, ZHU Jia-mei, ZHANG Min. Cross-cultural Adaptation of Chinese Version of Questionnaire of Use of Sleep Medication in Elderly[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(17): 11 -14 .
[3] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(17): 15 -19 .
[4] YANG Zhen, HU Teng-fei, CAO Li-li, WANG Xiao-bin, YANG Guang. Effect of Videoblog in Teaching of Operating Room Nursing[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(17): 20 -22 .
[5] LI Xiao-mang, GAO Yan, ZHENG He-peng, ZHAO Jia. Effect of Network Platform-based Blended Assessment Model in Practical Examination of Fundamental Nursing[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(17): 23 -27 .
[6] GUO Wen-wen, TANG Zhi-ming, SU Li-huan, MENG Na-na, WEN Feng-rong. Effect of Transdisciplinary Teaching on Curriculum Reform of Maternal and Infant Health Care[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(17): 28 -32 .
[7] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(17): 33 -36 .
[8] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(17): 37 -40 .
[9] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(17): 41 -45 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2021, 28(17): 46 -52 .