颅内肿瘤患者行伽玛刀治疗体验质性研究

doi:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.11.006

护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 6-11.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.11.006

颅内肿瘤患者行伽玛刀治疗体验质性研究

钱大棣^1a,2, 周宏珍³, 王洪筱^1a, 邓水娟^1b, 龙浩^1a

1.南方医科大学南方医院 a.神经外科,b.康复科,广东广州 510515;
2.南方医科大学护理学院,广东广州 510515;
3.南方医科大学南方医院白云分院,广东广州 510410

收稿日期:2024-02-08 出版日期:2024-06-10 发布日期:2024-07-10
通讯作者: 周宏珍（1965-）,女,江苏扬州人,博士,主任护师,博士研究生导师。
作者简介:钱大棣（1988-）,男,广东肇庆人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,主管护师。
基金资助:
广东省自然科学基金项目（2023A1515012382）

Experience of undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery in patients with intracranial tumor: a qualitative research

QIAN Da-di^1a,2, ZHOU Hong-zhen³, WANG Hong-xiao^1a, DENG Shui-juan^1b, LONG Hao^1a

1a. Dept. of Neurosurgery; 1b. Dept. of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;
2. School of Nursing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China;
3. Baiyun Branch, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510410, China

Received:2024-02-08 Online:2024-06-10 Published:2024-07-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的了解颅内肿瘤患者行伽玛刀治疗的过程体验,为制定护理干预策略提供参考依据。方法采用目的抽样法,选取2023年6-9月入住某神经外科伽玛刀中心的12例患颅内肿瘤行伽玛刀治疗的患者,进行半结构式访谈,采用Colaizzi 7步分析法分析资料并提炼主题。结果归纳出以下5个主题。（1）确诊时的感受与应对：复杂情绪反应;积极调动应对资源。（2）对伽玛刀治疗的态度：犹豫不决;服从医生;欣然接受。（3）治疗中的感受：疼痛;病耻感;幽闭恐惧;轻松舒适;温暖有爱。（4）治疗中的内外部应对：内部应对为忍耐与回避、正念冥想、分散注意力、躯体放松;外部应对为家庭、朋友支持、医务人员支持、社会支持。（5）治疗后的感受：如释重负;顺其自然;期待重生。结论在伽玛刀治疗的不同阶段,颅内肿瘤患者情绪及其应对呈现动态变化的特点;患者对伽玛刀治疗的认知水平与接受程度逐渐提高;患者能调动内外部支持系统,积极应对治疗中的不适感受和负性情绪。提示应了解患者不同阶段的情绪反应和认知特点,帮助积极应对,以便降低患者对疾病及治疗的恐惧、焦虑、疼痛等不良反应,顺利完成伽玛刀的治疗。

关键词: 颅内肿瘤, 伽玛刀治疗, 治疗体验, 质性研究

Abstract: Objective To understand the experience of undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery in patients with intracranial tumor, and to provide reference for nursing intervention. Methods The purpose sampling method was adopted, 12 patients with intracranial tumors treated with gamma knife radiosurgery were interviewed from June 2023 to September 2023 by semi-structured interviews, and the data were analyzed by Colaizzi’s seven-step method. Results After the analysis of the interview data, 6 themes were extracted: (1) Feelings when diagnosed: shock and confusion, fear, and anxiety; (2) Response after diagnosis: Seeking help and medical treatment proactively; (3) Attitude towards gamma knife treatment: hesitancy, compliance with the doctor, and acceptance; (4) Feelings during treatment: pain, sense of stigma, claustrophobia, comfort and relaxation, andawarmth and care; (5) Internal and external coping style during treatment: internal coping (endurance and avoidance, mindfulness meditation, distraction, and physical relaxation); external coping (support from family, friends, and medical staff, and social support); (6) Feeling after treatment: relief, accept what happened, and hope for new life. Conclusion During different stages of gamma knife radiosurgery, patients with intracranial tumors exhibit dynamic changes in emotions, characterized by a negative-positive-negative-positive curve. Their level of understanding and acceptance of the treatment gradually improves. Patients are able to mobilize both internal and external support systems to actively cope with discomfort and negative emotions during treatment. It is important to understand the emotional and cognitive characteristics of patients at different stages and provide support to help them cope positively, thereby reducing their fear, anxiety, pain, and other adverse reactions to the disease and treatment, and facilitating the successful completion of the treatment.

Key words: intracranial tumor, gamma knife radiosurgery, therapeutic experience, qualitative research

中图分类号:

R473.73

钱大棣, 周宏珍, 王洪筱, 邓水娟, 龙浩. 颅内肿瘤患者行伽玛刀治疗体验质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(11): 6-11.

QIAN Da-di, ZHOU Hong-zhen, WANG Hong-xiao, DENG Shui-juan, LONG Hao. Experience of undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery in patients with intracranial tumor: a qualitative research[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2024, 31(11): 6-11.

参考文献

[1] Tripathi M, Agarwal D, Singh M,et al.Gamma knife radiosurgery: a delicate yet powerful neurosurgical knife[J]. Neurol India,2023,71(12 Suppl 2): S2.DOI:10.4103/0028-3886.373630.
[2] 蔡俊涛. 立体定向放射外科中图像引导技术的研究现状[J].中国医学物理学杂志,2023,40(7): 822-826.
[3] Pollock BE.Gamma knife radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations: long-term outcomes and late effects[J]. Prog Neurol Surg,2019,34:238-247.DOI:10.1159/000493070.
[4] 金正慧,王君一,陈新华. 伽玛刀治疗听神经瘤的临床疗效影响因素探讨[J]. 当代医学, 2021,27(6):85-87.
[5] 刘渊渊,仇斌,马志明,等.大型海绵窦海绵状血管瘤的体积分割伽玛刀治疗[J]. 国际神经病学神经外科学杂志,2022,49(1):8-12.
[6] 李震,王益全,宋淑悦,等. 伽玛刀治疗侵袭性垂体腺瘤手术后残余肿瘤的效果[J].临床外科杂志,2023,31(4): 398-399.
[7] Kandregula S,Guthikonda B.Gamma knife radiosurgery[J]. Neurol India, 2023, 71(12 Suppl 2): S1.DOI:10.4103/0028-3886.373629.
[8] 闫立辉. 心理护理对伽玛刀治疗肺癌患者焦虑、抑郁情绪的影响[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2017,17(48):230-231.
[9] 陈岩. 心理护理对伽玛刀治疗肺癌患者焦虑、抑郁情绪的影响[J]. 中国卫生标准管理, 2018,9(7):157-159.
[10] 王丽萍,王慧,侯铭,等. 222名颅内肿瘤患者家属决策冲突现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报,2022,29(20):11-16.
[11] 张姿怡,阮海涛. 基于时机理论的嵌合抗原受体T细胞免疫治疗病人照顾需求的质性研究[J]. 循证护理, 2023, 9(3): 478-482.
[12] 赵凤娟,任赟虹,韦珏伶,等. 基于时机理论的结构式心理教育模式在肝癌抑郁病人中的应用[J]. 护理研究, 2020, 34(21): 3813-3819.
[13] 李璐璐,李小妹,韩冬芳,等. 乳腺癌患者心理痛苦轨迹及影响因素的纵向研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2020, 55(08): 1140-1146.
[14] 谭健烽,王永存,郑秀莹,等. 乳腺癌青年患者康复心理体验与益处发现的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 73-78. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.23.073.
[15] 曹静文,李珍,窦莹,等. 肺癌病人心理韧性研究进展[J]. 全科护理, 2024, 22(8):1426-1429.
[16] 鲁大荣. 306例肿瘤患者不同心理分型及护理对策[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘, 2018, 18(82): 240-242. DOI:10.19613/j.cnki.1671-3141.2018.82.190.
[17] 杨晓清,戴凯茜,周如聪.赋能心理护理模式联合希望理论在颅内动脉瘤患者护理中的应用[J]. 2020, 26(31):4389-4393.
[18] 吕鹏, 王佳静, 刘晓明, 等. 伽玛刀治疗151例涉窦脑膜瘤的长期随访研究[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2021,37(11):6.
[19] Yutaro K, Takahiro A, Hiroshi T, et al.Changing trends in gamma knife surgery to linear accelerator brain stereotactic radiotherapy in Japan: a survey based on the nationwide claims database[J]. Jap J Radiol, 2023, 42(4):415-423.DOI:10.1007/S11604-023-01511-1.
[20] Nicol C, Pinkham MB,Lion K,et al.Individuals’ perceptions of health and well-being in the context of stereotactic radiosurgery for benign brain tumour: a longitudinal qualitative investigation[J]. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2023:1-24.DOI:10.1080/09602011.2023.2181190.
[21] 张聿浩,张小鹏,李林,等. CBCT提高Leksell ICON伽玛刀治疗精度的作用[J]. 中国微侵袭神经外科杂志, 2024, 28(2):125-128.
[22] 张凤霞,蔡晓娟,韩莎莎. 基于压力应对理论的正性心理护理对骨软组织肿瘤术后生命意义认知及自我心理调适的影响[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2024, 37(6): 1063-1065. DOI:10.19381/j.issn.1001-7585.2024.06.062.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

颅内肿瘤患者行伽玛刀治疗体验质性研究

Experience of undergoing gamma knife radiosurgery in patients with intracranial tumor: a qualitative research

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	冯春玲, 胡夏晴, 徐琳, 蔡鑫健, 徐琴鸿. 基于社会生态系统理论的电话指导公众实施心肺复苏行为动机及需求的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(9): 66-71.
[2]	曹依丽, 王玲, 王灿, 陈燕华, 秦虹云. 精神分裂症住院患者家属资源取向的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 74-78.
[3]	马瑞瑞, 范晓莉, 徐姝娟, 张伟, 陈婷, 谈飞飞. 护士参与终末期患者临终决策体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 6-11.
[4]	龙瑶, 卢春凤, 冯志仙. 临床护士对横向领导者特质感知的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 27-31.
[5]	张颖, 车晓艳, 万婠, 秦雪, 张恩思, 崇武, 郑淑娟. 我国性治疗护士工作范畴和核心能力的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 68-72.
[6]	张露心, 焦延超, 文稀, 田利, 王婷, 田凤美, 李惠玲. 护理本科生在“慕课西行”同步课堂学习体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 30-34.
[7]	胡晓涵, 占婷婷, 何望生, 乔疏桐, 李雪. 肝豆状核变性患者自我管理体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 17-21.
[8]	邓悦, 胡宇帆, 王冉, 张远星, 王芳, 袁萍, 陈璐. 老年患者接受远程医疗护理体验与需求质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 50-55.
[9]	李珂, 杨振楠, 韩舒羽, 张建霞, 张梦杰, 李君. 护士经历护理中断事件真实体验的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(5): 61-66.
[10]	商丽, 黄菲, 程利, 张桃桃, 王宏梅. 本科护生参与漫改剧学习体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 25-29.
[11]	刘慧敏, 姜蕾. 深圳市助产士核心胜任力培训优化策略的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 40-43.
[12]	李嘉琪, 叶向红, 左俊焘, 徐瑶, 姚红林. 终末期患者营养支持决策过程质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 53-58.
[13]	. 基于COM-B模型妊娠期糖尿病妇女产后自我管理促进与阻碍因素的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(12): 41-46.
[14]	许娇, 黄柳, 王娟, 韩利, 鲍玉洁, 邓季秋. 精神科医护人员共享决策促进和障碍因素质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(10): 53-58.
[15]	何旭斌, 宦宗素, 杜娜, 刘娇, 秦瑗, 吴冬梅, 岳玉川. 青少年非自杀性自伤主要照顾者真实体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(1): 46-51.