以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 73-78.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.10.073

• 临床护理※静疗护理 • 上一篇    

基于柯式模型构建静脉治疗专科护士实践培训效果评价体系

李丹丹1, 乔远静1, 刘佳欣2, 王旭1, 夏玉雪1, 梁文娜1, 秦光雅1, 冯梦轩1   

  1. 1.山东中医药大学 护理学院,山东 济南 250355;
    2.山东第一医科大学附属省立医院,山东 济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-24 出版日期:2023-05-25 发布日期:2023-06-08
  • 通讯作者: 乔远静（1976-）,女,山东济宁人,硕士,副教授。E-mail:threeqiao3790@163.com
  • 作者简介:李丹丹（1995-）,女,山东济宁人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,护师。
  • 基金资助:
    2017年度山东青少年研究规划课题（SDYSB170406）; 全国中医药高等教育“十四五”规划2021年度教育科研课题（ZC-20-05）; 山东省研究生教育质量提升计划（SDYAL20051）

Construction of practice training effect evaluation system of intravenous therapy nurse specialists based on Offset model

LI Dan-dan1, QIAO Yuan-jing1, LIU Jia-xin2, WANG Xu1, XIA Yu-xue1, LIANG Wen-na1, QIN Guang-ya1, FENG Meng-xuan1   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan 250355, China;
    2. Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250014, China
  • Received:2022-11-24 Online:2023-05-25 Published:2023-06-08

PDF (PC)

308

赞

摘要： 目的 构建静脉治疗专科护士实践培训效果评价体系,为评价临床实践教学效果提供客观、量化、系统的参考依据。方法 以柯式模型为依据,通过分析静脉治疗专科护士培训基地实践培训大纲内容,结合文献研究法、德尔菲（Delphi）法、层次分析法确定静脉治疗专科护士实践培训效果评价体系及指标权重。结果 纳入18名函询专家,2轮函询的应答率均为100%,专家群体权威系数为0.960;第1轮函询结果一、二、三级指标协调系数分别为0.322、0.215、0.151,第2轮函询结果一、二、三级指标协调系数分别为0.358、0.270、0.256,显著性检验均有统计学意义（P<0.001）。最终构建包含4个一级指标、15个二级指标、67个三级指标的静脉治疗实践培训效果评价体系。结论 函询专家的积极性、权威性、意见集中程度及协调程度均较高,构建的静脉治疗实践培训效果评价体系科学合理,可为静脉治疗专科护士的培训、考核、管理提供理论指导。

关键词: 静脉治疗, 专科护士, 评价指标, 德尔菲法, 柯式模型

Abstract: Objective To construct a practice training effect evaluation system of intravenous therapy nurse specialists, and to provide reference for evaluating the effect of clinical practice teaching. Methods Based on the Offset model, after analyzing the content of the practice training outline of the training base for intravenous therapy nurse specialists, combined with literature review, and Delphi technique to construct the effect evaluation system and the index weight was identified by using analytic hierarchy process. Results Eighteen experts were included in the consultation the response rate of the two rounds of correspondence was both 100%, and the authority coefficient of the experts was 0.960. The coordination coefficient of the first-, second-, and third- level indicators of the first round of correspondence was 0.322, 0.215, and 0.151, respectively. The coordination coefficient of the first-, second-, and third- level indicators of the second round of correspondence were 0.358, 0.270, and 0.256, respectively, and the difference was all statistically significant (P<0.001). The final evaluation system consisted of 4 first-level, 15 second-level, and 67 third-level indicators. Conclusion The enthusiasm, authority, degree of concentration of opinions and degree of coordination of the experts in correspondence are all high. The constructed evaluation system is scientific and practical, which provides theoretical guidance for the training, assessment and management of intravenous therapy nurse specialists.

Key words: intravenous therapy, nurse specialist, evaluation index, Delphi technique, Offset model

中图分类号: 

  • G424.1
[1] Dehon E, Robertson E, Barnard M, et al.Erratum: this article corrects: "development of a clinical teaching evaluation and feedback tool for emergency medicine faculty"[J]. West J Emerg Med, 2019, 20(5):838-839.DOI:10.5811/westjem.2019.7.44616.
[2] 赵路,黄静,李春燕.静脉治疗专业化发展的研究进展[J].中华护理杂志,2018,53(S1):11-15.
[3] 福建省护理学会. 福建省静脉输液护理学科发展研究报告[J].海峡科学,2018,142(10):128-131.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8683.2018.10.017.
[4] 潘洁. 全国部分三甲医院133个血液科静脉治疗护理发展现状的调查[J].中华现代护理杂志, 2016,22(13):1853-1856.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2016.13.020.
[5] Jean S, Desilets LD.An update on Kirkpatrick's model of evaluation: part two[J]. J Contin Educ Nurs, 2018,49(7):292-293.DOI:10.3928/00220124-20180613-02.
[6] Gorski LA.A look at 2021 infusion therapy standards of practice[J]. Home Healthc Now,2021,39(2):62-71. DOI:10.1097/NHH.0000000000000972.
[7] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.静脉治疗护理技术操作规范[J].中国护理管理,2014,14(1):1-4.
[8] Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Gonsalves C, et al.Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and nominal group in medical education research[J]. Med Teach, 2016,39(1):1-6.DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2017.1245856.
[9] Williams PL, Webb C.The Delphi technique: a methodological discussion[J].J Adv Nurs,2010,19(1):180-186.DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01066.x.
[10] Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M.Using and reporting the delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review[J]. PloS One, 2011, 6(6):e20476. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0020476.
[11] McPherson S, Reese C, Wendler MC. Methodology update: Delphi studies[J].Nurs Res,2018,67(5):404-410. DOI:10.1097/NNR.0000000000000297.
[12] 李炳桥,庞灵,王昊,等.康复专科护士核心能力评价指标构建[J].护理学杂志,2021, 36(7):3.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2021.07.104.
[13] 刘纬华,张红梅,白文辉,等.研究型医院护理学科建设评估指标体系的构建[J].护理学报,2022,29(6):20-25.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.06.020.
[14] 朱亮,杨小娇,张倩,等.医养结合社区居家养老中心供给服务质量评价指标体系的构建研究[J]. 中国全科医学,2019,22(2):199-205.DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.00.248.
[15] 陈娇,熊晓云,梅赣红,等.静脉输液治疗专科护理质量指标评价体系的构建[J].护理学报,2018,25(21):57-61.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.21.057.
[16] 朱亮. 医养结合社区居家养老中心供给服务质量评价指标体系构建[D].唐山:华北理工大学,2019.DOI:10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.00.248.
[17] 吴莹玉,黄霞,贾培培,等.护士工作场所暴力防范培训体系的构建[J].中华护理杂志,2020, 55(4):584-589.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2020.04.020.
[18] Cullinane M, Mclachlan HL, Newton MS, et al.Using the kirkpatrick model to evaluate the maternity and neonatal emergencies (MANE) programme: background and study protocol[J]. BMJ Open,2020, 10(1):e032873.DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032873.
[19] 李美璇,李雪,谷保荣,等.基于柯式模型构建手术室专科护士培训效果评价体系[J].解放军护理杂志,2015,32(17):4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2015.17.017.
[20] Schvaneveldt N, Diekema AR, Hopkins EBS, et al.New nurses apply only basic source evaluation criteria but realize their skills are lacking: more sophisticated approaches to teaching evaluation skills are required[J]. Health Info Libr J,2021 39(2):166-177. DOI:10.1111/hir.12395.Online ahead of print.
[21] Domensino AF, Winkens I, Haastregt JCMV, et al.Defining the content of a minimal dataset for acquired brain injury using a Delphi procedure[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes,2020,18(1):30.DOI:10.1186/s12955-020-01286-3.
[22] 程鹤,李东梅,刘晔,等.质量控制护士岗位胜任力指标体系的构建[J].中华护理杂志,2019,54(10):1463-1468.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.10.004.
[23] Myerholtz L, Reid A, Baker HM,et al.Residency faculty teaching evaluation: what do faculty, residents, and program directors want?[J].Fam Med, 2019, 51(6):509-515.DOI:10.22454/FamMed.2019.168353.
[24] 中华护理学会.第二届中华护理学会静脉治疗专科护士培训班顺利召开[EB/OL].(2021-06-16)[2021-06-16].http://www.zhhlxh.org.cn/cnaWebcn/article/3399-.
[25] 谢玉坤,德纯,柳颖.高校内部发展性教学评价实施研究[J].教育探索,2017(1):51-54.
[26] 张伟英,倪逸倩,沈美芳,等.行动研究法构建胸外科专科护士培训效果评价模式的实践[J].解放军护理杂志,2017,34(17):4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2017.17.017.
[1] 陈彤, 秘玉清, 陈倩, 薛梓晨, 黄静雯, 罗盛, 李伟. 老年社区慢性病护理服务能力评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 1-4.
[2] 谢婵娟, 熊静, 谌永毅, 张京慧, 李小燕, 王泽友. 精准护理内涵及其对护士的角色要求与机遇挑战[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 44-47.
[3] 郭玉, 魏薇, 白冰, 李胜云. 以患者为中心的临床护理干预创新质量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(6): 7-11.
[4] 陈玉平, 彭刚艺, 张莉, 何瑾云, 郑静, 林群燕, 王灵晓, 杨艳. 临床感控专科护士胜任力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(6): 15-21.
[5] 曹志琴, 张文瑾, 杜海亮, 傅瑶, 陈兴凤. 性医学领域护理专业学位研究生培养指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 1-6.
[6] 许燕鸿, 魏清风, 夏叶, 钟燕. 基于筛查平台的结直肠息肉镜下切除后患者医院-社区联动管理指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 33-37.
[7] 任攀, 陈小菊, 曾兢, 廖明姝, 荣欢, 钟红月, 李莉. 长期照护保险制度视域下成都市失智老人社会支持类居家上门照护服务标准构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 11-15.
[8] 卫平莲, 陈孝云, 金利萍, 范孝陈, 陈培培, 刘安诺. 儿科传染病专科护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 29-32.
[9] 田水清, 万永慧, 周炜, 沈月, 喻莹, 杨黎婷, 肖淑君. 迷你中线导管在肿瘤患者静脉治疗中的应用效果[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 75-78.
[10] 李佳, 梁嘉仪, 冯如芝, 高钰琳. 公共卫生护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(4): 16-22.
[11] 田恬, 李转珍, 都芳芳, 朱永燕, 李伟丽, 万菲菲. 基于转型冲击理论构建新护士护理安全培训内容体系[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 35-39.
[12] 刘蔚, 李育玲, 韩清华, 蔺彦丽. 基于社会学习理论实习护生同伴支持教育方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 16-19.
[13] 李亚杰, 李博, 王梅杰, 肖舒丹, 成巧梅. 养老机构失智护理单元疗愈环境评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(2): 73-78.
[14] 郭彤, 张莉, 吕春梅, 邝景云, 方艳红. 住院总护士核心能力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(10): 16-19.
[15] 杨淑芬, 肖丽娜, 刘佳, 张春玲, 娄方丽, 毕璠, 丁雅怡, 杨政宇. 护理专业案例教学教师胜任力评价指标体系的构建研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(10): 11-15.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!