以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (18): 63-68.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.18.063

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

139名肠造口患儿主要照顾者家庭坚韧性现状及影响因素分析

李新1, 韩月皎2, 王亚菲3a, 柳云4, 潘宁4, 刘峰3b   

  1. 1. 潍坊医学院 护理学院,山东 潍坊 261053;
    2. 济南市儿童医院 麻醉科,山东 济南 250022;
    3. 山东第一医科大学第一附属医院（山东省千佛山医院）a.护理学b.创面修复中心 山东 济南 250014;
    4. 山东第一医科大学（山东省医学科学院） 护理学院,山东 济南 250014
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-28 出版日期:2022-10-11 发布日期:2022-10-11
  • 通讯作者: 刘峰（1963-）,女,山东济南人,本科学历,硕士研究生,主任护师。E-mail:fengliu0607@163.com
  • 作者简介:李新（1998-）,女,山东威海人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,护士。

Current Status of Family Resilience of Primary Caregivers of Children with Enterostomy and Its Influencing Factors: A 139-case Study

LI Xin1, HAN Yue-jiao2, WANG Ya-fei3a, LIU Yun4, PAN Ning4, LIU Feng3b   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Weifang Medical College, Weifang 261053, China;
    2. Dept. of Anesthesiology, Jinan Children's Hospital, Jinan 250022, China;
    3a. Department of Nursing; 3b. Wound Repair Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital), Jinan 250014, China;
    4. School of Nursing, Shandong First Medical University (Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences), Jinan 250014, China;
  • Received:2022-03-28 Online:2022-10-11 Published:2022-10-11

PDF (PC)

275

赞

摘要： 目的 调查肠造口患儿主要照顾者家庭坚韧性现状,分析其影响因素,为寻求提升家庭坚韧性的干预措施提供参考。方法 采用便利抽样法,选取<14岁的肠造口患儿主要照顾者139名为研究对象,采用一般资料调查表、家庭功能量表-总的功能分量表、肠造口患儿家庭主要照顾者照护能力测评量表和家庭坚韧性表进行调查。采用多重线性回归分析其家庭坚韧性的影响因素。结果 本组肠造口患儿主要照顾者家庭坚韧性总分为（49.68±8.66）分,与家庭功能-总的功能呈负相关（r=-0.780,P<0.01）,与照护能力呈正相关（r=0.759,P<0.01）;多重线性回归分析结果显示,文化程度、家庭功能及主要照顾者照护能力3个因子可解释肠造口患儿主要照顾者家庭坚韧性总变异的71.1%。结论 本组肠造口患儿主要照顾者家庭坚韧性处于中等水平,提示医护人员通过评估肠造口患儿主要照顾者的家庭坚韧性水平来辨识家庭的弱势和资源,关注主要照顾者的情感心理健康,运用以家庭为中心的护理实践来促进肠造口患儿身体康复,为寻求提升家庭坚韧性的干预措施提供参考,以更好地为身处逆境中的家庭提供指导。

关键词: 儿童肠造口, 家庭坚韧性, 主要照顾者, 家庭功能, 照护能力

Abstract: Objective To investigate the current status of family resilience of the primary caregivers of children with enterostomy, to analyze its influencing factors, and to provide reference for intervention to improve family resilience. Methods A total of 139 primary caregivers of children with enterostomy who were younger than 14 years old were selected by convenient sampling and they were surveyed by using general information questionnaire, Family Assessment Device-General Functioning Scale, Care Ability Evaluation Scale of Primary Caregivers of Children with Enterostomy and Family Hardiness Index. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of family resilience. Results The total score of family resilience of the primary caregivers of children with enterostomy was 49.68±8.66, which was negatively correlated with family function-total function (r=-0.780, P<0.01), and positively with care ability (r=0.759, P<0.01). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that three factors of education background, family function and care ability of primary caregivers could explain 71.1% of the total variation. Conclusion Family resilience of the main caregivers of children with enterostomy in this group is at a medium level, suggesting that medical staff can identify the weaknesses and resources of the family by evaluating the family resilience of the main caregivers. Emotional and mental health of the main caregivers, and family-centered nursing practice are conducive to promoting physical rehabilitation of children with enterostomy, so as to provide reference for intervention measures to improve family resilience and guidance for families in adversity.

Key words: children with enterostomy, family resilience, primary caregiver, family function, care ability

中图分类号: 

  • R47
[1] 陈劼. 儿童造口护理[M].上海:世界图书出版公司,2021: 1.
[2] Massenga A, Chibwae A, Nuri AA, et al.Indications for and Complications of Intestinal Stomas in the Children and Adults at a Tertiary Care Hospital in a Resource-limited Setting: A Tanzanian Experience[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2019,19(1):157. DOI:10.1186/s12876-019-1070-5.
[3] The Members of the Global Paediatric Stoma Nurses Advisory Board (GPSNAB).Global Best Practice Guidelines for Neonates, Children and Teenagers[EB/OL].(2019-05-01)[2022-01-20].https://www.coloplastprofessional.com/coloplast-professional/ostomy-care/.
[4] Walsh F.Family Resilience: A Framework for Clinical Practice[J]. Fam Process, 2003,42(1):1-18.DOI:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2003.00001.x.
[5] American Academy of Pediatrics, Promoting?Resilience[EB/OL]. (2018-05-26) [2021-12-05]. https://www.aap.org/en-us/advocacy-and-policy/aap-health-initiatives/resilience/Pages/Promoting-Resilience.aspx.
[6] 欧阳雅琦,谢鑑辉,梅海波,等.364例先天性胫骨假关节患儿照顾者家庭抗逆力现状及影响因素分析[J].护理学报,2021,28(5):1-5.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.05.001.
[7] Al-Jadiri A, Tybor DJ, Mulé C, et al.Factors Associated with Resilience in Families of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder[J]. J Dev Behav Pediatr,2021,42(1):16-22. DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000867.
[8] 叶秀娟,王小燕,刘桂华,等.抽动障碍儿童主要照顾者家庭坚韧力及影响因素研究[J].中华护理教育,2021,18(3):279-284.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.03.018.
[9] 李峥,刘宇.护理学研究方法[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:58.
[10] McCubbin HI, Thompson AI, McCubbin MA. Family Assessment: ResiliEncy,Coping and Adaptation-inventories for Research and Practice[M].Madison: University of Wisconsin System,1996.
[11] 刘洋,杨金秋,叶本兰,等.中文版家庭坚韧性量表的信度和效度研究[J].护理管理杂志,2014,14(11):770-772.
[12] Epstein NB, Baldwin LM, Bishop DS.The McMaster Family Assessment Device[J].J Marital Fam Ther,1983,9(2):171-180.
[13] 李荣风,徐夫真,纪林芹,等.家庭功能评定量表的初步修订[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2013,21(7):996-1000.
[14] Cong CW, Tan SA, Nainee S, et al.Psychometric Qualities of the McMaster Family Assessment Device-general Functioning Subscale for Malaysian Samples[J]. Int J Env Res Pub He, 2022, 19(4):2440-2440. DOI:10.3390/IJERPH 19042440.
[15] 周彩峰,武恒双,李雅楠,等.孤独症患儿照顾者家庭功能对积极感受的影响研究[J].中华护理杂志, 2015, 50(12):1479-1484.DOI:10376/j.issn.0254-1796.2015.12.013.
[16] 周颖群,栾风焕,姚德胜,等.上海市独生子女家庭的家庭功能及其影响因素研究[J].中国儿童保健杂志,2019,27(9):953-957.DOI:10.11852/zgetbjzz2018-1701.
[17] 王亚菲,高振清,张楠,等.肠造口患儿家庭主要照顾者照护能力测评量表的编制及信效度检验[J].解放军护理杂志,2020,37(8):5-9.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2020.08.002.
[18] 贺佳,尹平.医学统计学[M].2版.北京:高等教育出版社,2020:296-297.
[19] Bajjani GJ, Hinds P, Insel K, et al.Well-being, Self-transcendence, and Resilience of Parental Caregivers of Children in Active Cancer Treatment: Where Do We Go From Here?[J]. Cancer Nurs, 2019,42(5):E41-E52.DOI:10.1097/NCC.0000000000000662.
[20] 徐玉英,刘桂华,李国凯,等.孤独症谱系障碍患儿照顾者家庭坚韧力状况及影响因素研究[J].护理学杂志,2017,32(7):65-68.DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2017.07.065.
[21] 贾莉莉,越丽霞,张国增,等.肠造口患儿家庭照顾者积极感受与照护能力的相关性研究[J].中华护理教育,2021,18(5):464-469.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2021.05.017.
[22] 同雪莉. 长期患病家庭的抗逆力叙事:两种模式的比较[J].首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), 2019(1):178-188.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-9142.2019.01.019.
[23] Gülbeyaz B, Hamdiye AS, Veysiye Hü. Resilience, Life Satisfaction, Care Burden and Social Support of Mothers with a Child with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: A Comparative Study[J].Scand J Caring Sci,2020,34(2):340-347. DOI:10.1111/scs.12734.
[24] Peng Y, Wang J, Sun G, et al.Family Hardiness in Patients with Heart Failure: Exploring Protective Factors and Identifying the Mediator[J]. Psychol Res Behav Ma, 2021, 14: 355-364.DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S301765.
[25] 张清,倪志红,赵雪萍,等.慢性病患儿家庭功能状况及影响因素的研究进展[J].中国护理管理, 2021,21(8):1276-1280.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2021.08.031.
[26] Marín-Maicas P, Corchón S, Ambrosio L, et al.Living with Long Term Conditions from the Perspective of Family Caregivers. A Scoping Review and Narrative Synthesis[J].Int J Environ Res Public Health,2021,18(14):7294. DOI:10.3390/ijerph18147294.
[27] David VL, Vardi A, Jacoby R.The Experiences of Parents of Children Undergoing Surgery for Congenital Heart Defects: A Holistic Model of Care[J].Front Psychol, 2019,27(10):2666. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02666.
[28] 潘小容,莫霖,刘倩,等.家庭正向行为支持方案的构建及应用研究[J].中华护理杂志志,2021,56(11):1618-1626.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.11.003.
[1] 罗爽, 尹华英, 雷莉, 王海梅. 父亲抑郁情绪和家庭功能在早产儿母亲抑郁情绪与母婴情感联结间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(9): 58-63.
[2] 张杰兰, 赖先婷, 余兆兰, 柯艾均, 徐铁飞, 鞠梅. 维持性血液透析患者配偶恐惧疾病进展的现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(7): 17-22.
[3] 孙彩云, 林征, 周美景, 顾子君, 王咪, 顾珺怡, 朱展慧. 炎症性肠病患者疾病获益感现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(6): 1-6.
[4] 赖先婷, 易子涵, 李茜, 张杰兰, 徐铁飞, 佘程宏, 鞠梅. 老化期望及自我效能在家庭功能与孤独间的中介调节效应分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(15): 7-13.
[5] 梁韵仪, 殷文君, 申乔乔, 周静静, 彭勇良, 高钰琳. 老化态度在老年人家庭功能与生命意义感的中介效应分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(8): 39-43.
[6] 李明士, 邓小岚, 葛兆霞. 164例老年痴呆患者主要照顾者哀伤现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(2): 52-57.
[7] 晏思琴, 范婧慧, 熊良昆. 对回肠造口患者主要照顾者实施家庭赋权的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(15): 74-78.
[8] 李荣华, 于红静, 黄敬烨, 刘晓青, 周英, 黎毅敏. ICU患者主要照顾者3个时间点睡眠质量影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(1): 51-56.
[9] 涂惠琼, 龙秀红, 沈琴庆. 148例先天性心脏病患儿术后主要照顾者的居家康复护理需求现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(1): 45-50.
[10] 官小莉, 李静, 卢俊, 邹嵘, 张惠荣, 周敏. 93例人工耳蜗植入患儿主要照顾者准备度现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(7): 51-54.
[11] 马丽莉, 彭幼清, 俞海萍, 张亚娟. 跨文化照护能力培训基地准入评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(2): 6-10.
[12] 肖兴米, 石英, 马燕, 胡铖曦, 鲁彦君. 家庭尊严干预在晚期癌症患者家庭主要照顾者中的应用研究[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(12): 68-72.
[13] 吴宗壁, 韩晓苇, 谭秋贞, 潘智鹍, 李瑾, 周华辉, 林珣, 姚东艳. 378例中青年维持性血液透析患者治疗依从性现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2020, 27(1): 47-51.
[14] 黄姝绮, 袁平乔, 李思琴, 杨蓉. 脑卒中居家主要照顾者需求及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(19): 1-6.
[15] 吕桂兰, 蔡芸, 黄丽璇, 王青尔, 景影, 朱玲. 115例维持性血液透析患者主要照顾者疲乏现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(22): 47-51.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!