以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 6-12.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.06.006

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

中老年脑卒中患者多维衰弱发展轨迹及其影响因素研究

薛荣1, 张开利1, 陈保云2a, 马荣慧2b, 张雨欣1   

  1. 1.徐州医科大学 护理学院,江苏 徐州 221000;
    2.徐州市中心医院 a.护理部;b.神经内科,江苏 徐州 221009
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-26 出版日期:2024-03-25 发布日期:2024-04-08
  • 通讯作者: 张开利(1984-),女,山东枣庄人,博士,副教授。E-mail:xiaokai20060@xzhmu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:薛荣(1998-),女,山西临汾人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。

Multidimensional frailty development trajectory and its influencing factors in middle-aged and elderly stroke patients

XUE Rong1, ZHANG Kai-li1, CHEN Bao-yun2a, MA Rong-hui2b, ZHANG Yu-xin1   

  1. 1. School of Nursing, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221000, China;
    2a. Dept. of Nursing Administration; 2b. Dept. of Neurology, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou 221009, China
  • Received:2023-11-26 Online:2024-03-25 Published:2024-04-08

摘要: 目的 探讨中老年脑卒中患者多维衰弱发展轨迹及其影响因素,为临床医护人员开展衰弱干预提供理论依据。方法 选取2022年10—12月徐州市某三级甲等医院神经内科住院的中老年脑卒中患者为研究对象,采用一般资料调查表、Zung焦虑自评量表和Zung抑郁自评量表收集患者的基线资料,采用Tilburg衰弱量表调查患者入院48 h、出院后3个月和出院后6个月多维衰弱得分情况,使用潜类别增长模型探究中老年脑卒中患者多维衰弱发展轨迹类别,采用无序多分类Logistic回归及决策树模型分析识别轨迹类别的影响因素。结果 中老年脑卒中患者多维衰弱发展轨迹可分为3种类别:非衰弱稳定组(42.8%)、低水平衰弱快速加重组(36.3%)和高水平衰弱缓慢加重组(20.9%)。Logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄、婚姻状况、文化程度、卒中严重程度评分、共病评分、日常生活活动能力评分和焦虑为中老年脑卒中患者多维衰弱发展轨迹的影响因素(P<0.05);决策树模型进一步分析结果显示,日常生活活动能力评分为最主要影响因素,其后依次为焦虑和卒中严重程度评分。结论 本研究识别出3种类别中老年脑卒中患者多维衰弱发展轨迹,验证了衰弱发展异质性的特点。未来医护人员可通过筛查识别不同类别患者多维衰弱发展轨迹,制定针对性衰弱干预和居家衰弱管理方案,延缓甚至逆转多维衰弱。

关键词: 中老年, 脑卒中, 多维衰弱, 轨迹, 潜类别增长模型

Abstract: Objective To explore the development trajectory of multidimensional frailty in middle-aged and elderly stroke patients and its influencing factors, and to provide theoretical basis for clinical staff to carry out frailty intervention. Methods Middle-aged and elderly stroke patients hospitalized in the Department of Neurology of a tertiary Grade-A hospital in Xuzhou City from October to December 2022 were selected as the study objects. The general information questionnaire, Zung Self-rating Anxiety Scale and Zung Self-rating Depression Scale were used to collect the baseline data of the patients. Tilburg Frailty Scale was used to collect the multidimensional frailty score of the patients 48 hours after admission, 3 months and 6 months after discharge, and the potential category growth model to explore the category of multidimensional frailty development trajectory of middle-aged and elderly stroke patients. Disordered multi-classification Logistic regression and decision tree model were used to analyze and identify the influencing factors of trajectory category. Results The multidimensional frailty development of middle-aged and elderly stroke patients could be divided into three categories: non-frail and stable group (42.8%), low level of frailty with rapid increase (36.3%) and high level of frailty with slow increase (20.9%). Logistic regression analysis showed that age, marital status, educational level, stroke severity score, comorbidity score, activity of daily living score and anxiety were the influencing factors of multidimensional frailty development trajectory in middle-aged and elderly stroke patients (P<0.05). Further analysis of decision tree model showed that the activity of daily living score was the most important factor, followed by anxiety and stroke severity score. Conclusion In this study, multidimensional frailty development trajectory of 3 categories of middle-aged and elderly stroke patients is identified, which verify the heterogeneity of frailty development. In the future, medical personnel can identify the development trajectory of multidimensional frailty in different categories of patients through screening, develop targeted frailty intervention and home frailty management programs, and delay or even reverse multidimensional frailty.

Key words: middle-aged and elderly people, stroke, multidimensional frailty, trajectory, latent class growth model

中图分类号: 

  • R473.74
[1] Wu Y, Jia M, Xiang C, et al.Latent trajectories of frailty and risk prediction models among geriatric community dwellers: an interpretable machine learning perspective[J].BMC Geriatr,2022,22(1):900.DOI:10.1186/s12877-022-03576-5.
[2] Álvarez-Bustos A, Carnicero-Carreño JA, Sanchez-Sanchez JL, et al.Associations between frailty trajectories and frailty status and adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older adults[J]. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle,2022,13(1):230-239.DOI:10.1002/jcsm.12888.
[3] Evans NR, Wall J, To B, et al.Clinical frailty independently predicts early mortality after ischaemic stroke[J]. Age Ageing, 2020, 49(4):588-591.DOI:10.1093/ageing/afaa004.
[4] 林卫,苏俐莉,余天智,等.老年缺血性脑卒中后遗症患者衰弱状况调查及其危险因素分析[J].中华老年心脑血管病杂志,2021,23(5):499-502.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-0126.2021.05.014.
[5] 张鑫宇,张磊,隋汝波.基于Logistic回归和人工神经网络构建老年脑卒中患者衰弱预测模型[J].军事护理,2023,40(2):10-14,19.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2097-1826.2023.02.003.
[6] Zhao Y, Hu Y, Smith JP, et al.Cohort profile: the China health and retirement longitudinal study (CHARLS)[J]. Int J Epidemiol, 2014,43(1):61-68.DOI:10.1093/ije/dys203.
[7] 中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国各类主要脑血管病诊断要点2019[J].中华神经科杂志,2019, 52(9):710-715.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2019.09.003.
[8] 项李娜,万宏伟,朱毓,等.接受放疗的头颈部肿瘤病人心理弹性变化轨迹及其影响因素[J].护理研究, 2022,36(18):3202-3208. DOI:10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2022.18.002.
[9] Luo Z, Luo B, Wang P, et al.Predictive model of functional exercise compliance of patients with breast cancer based on decision tree[J]. Int J Womens Health, 2023,15:397-410. DOI:10.2147/IJWH.S386405.
[10] Chalos V,van der Ende NAM,Lingsma HF,et al.National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale:an alternative primary outcome measure for trials of acute treatment for ischemic stroke[J].Stroke, 2020, 51(1):282-290.DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026791.
[11] 陈冉,李春玉,李美茜.应用Rodgers演化概念分析法界定多重用药[J].护理学报,2023,30(17):39-44. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.17.039.
[12] Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al.A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies:development and validation[J]. J Chronic Dis,1987,40(5):373-383.DOI:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
[13] Mahoney RI,Barthel DW.Functional evaluation:the Barthel Index[J].Md State Med,1965,14:61-65.
[14] Gobbens RJ,Luijkx KG,Wijnen-Sponselee MT,et al.Towards an integral conceptual model of frailty[J]. J Nutr Health Aging,2010,14(3):175-181.DOI:10.1007/s12603-010-0045-6.
[15] 奚兴,郭桂芳,孙静.中文版Tilburg衰弱评估量表的信效度研究[J].护理学报,2013,20(8B):1-4.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9969.2013.16.001.
[16] 钱军红,刘志薇,李妍,等.农村老年脑卒中患者衰弱轨迹及影响因素的纵向研究[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2023,26(6):748-754. DOI:10.12083/SYSJ.230529.
[17] Zung WW.A rating instrument for anxiety disorders[J].Psychosomatics,1971, 12(6):371-379.DOI:10.1016/S0033-3182(71)71479-0.
[18] 王征宇,迟玉芬.焦虑自评量表(SAS)[J].上海精神医学,1984,6(2):73-74.
[19] Dunstan DA, Scott N, Todd AK.Screening for anxiety and depression: reassessing the utility of the Zung scales[J]. BMC Psychiatry,2017,17(1):329. DOI:10.1186/s12888-017-1489-6.
[20] 王征宇,迟玉芬.抑郁自评量表(SDS)[J].上海精神医学,1984,6(2):71-72.
[21] 北京高血压防治协会,中国卒中学会高血压预防与管理分会,中国老年保健协会养老与健康专业委员会,等.基层冠心病与缺血性脑卒中共患管理专家共识2022[J].中国心血管病研究,2022,20(9):772-793.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-816x.2022.04.001.
[22] 吕雨梅,郭玉成,周郁秋. 脑卒中患者康复锻炼依从性发展轨迹及其潜在类别预测因素分析[J]. 中华护理杂志,2023,58(17):2103-2111.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2023.17.008.
[23] Hwang AC, Lee WJ, Huang N, et al.Longitudinal changes of frailty in 8 years: comparisons between physical frailty and frailty index[J]. BMC Geriatr,2021,21(1):726. DOI:10.1186/s12877-021-02665-1.
[24] Jang AR, Sagong H, Yoon JY.Frailty trajectory among community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults in Korea: evidence from the Korean longitudinal study of aging[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2022,22(1):524.DOI:10.1186/s12877-022-03229-7.
[25] Hu L,Liu G.Effects of early rehabilitation nursing on neurological functions and quality of life of patients with ischemic stroke hemiplegia[J]. Am J Transl Res,2021,13(4):3811-3818.
[26] Choi M, Kim H, Bae J.Does the combination of resistance training and a nutritional intervention have a synergic effect on muscle mass,strength,and physical function in older adults? A systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. BMC Geriatr,2021,21(1):639.DOI:10.1186/s12877-021-02491-5.
[27] Pinto M, Martins S, Mesquita E,et al.Frailty in portuguese older patients from convalescence units: a cross-sectional study[J]. J Clin Med Res, 2022, 14(9):364-376.DOI:10.14740/jocmr4806.
[28] Rojas Huerta AV.Trajectories of frailty and related factors of elderly people in Mexico[J].Poblac Salud Mesoam,2022,19(2):10.DOI:10.15517/psm.v19i2.46929.
[1] 郑亚楠, 郭惠娟, 张振香, 蔡姝倩. 脑卒中半失能患者自我接纳的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 1-6.
[2] 王冰冰, 马英芝, 孙小卫, 杨琴, 肖江琴. 中青年脑卒中患者与配偶二元应对潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 7-12.
[3] 袁佳琳, 杨玲玲, 刘晓慧, 甘茹, 杜瑄, 高海花, 杨小萍, 王慧娟. 308名脑卒中患者主要照顾者抑郁现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 27-31.
[4] 何叶, 王元姣, 谢珺, 苗姣娜. 心理资本在恢复期脑卒中患者领悟社会支持与患者积极度的中介效应分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 65-70.
[5] 李壮苗, 梦婷, 刘芳, 李霞, 李秀霞, 燕文娟. 艾盐包热熨手三阳经对脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢运动功能的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(6): 61-67.
[6] 郑思琪, 陈璐, 马晴, 王钰涵, 成杰, 王云龙. 双耳节拍音乐疗法对脑卒中偏瘫患者焦虑抑郁及疲劳的效果研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 72-78.
[7] 刘莎, 陈玲, 李甜甜, 张丹莉, 蔡文智. 孕产妇盆底肌训练自我效能发展轨迹及其对产后尿失禁的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 1-5.
[8] 陈坚, 王园, 崔艳丽, 罗彦嗣, 廖琳, 颜明玉, 张晓梅. 缺血性脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者经口摄食功能发展轨迹及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24): 1-6.
[9] 张鹏博, 梅永霞, 张振香, 林蓓蕾, 薛利红, 刘志薇. 脑卒中患者焦虑症状潜在剖面影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 12-17.
[10] 徐倩, 穆艳. 化学刺激治疗脑卒中后吞咽障碍的研究现状[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(22): 40-43.
[11] 李文雪, 包园, 陈翠, 王硕, 周芳. 成人ICU转出患者慢性疼痛发展轨迹的潜在类别及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(21): 65-70.
[12] 付爽, 刘祯, 崔玉顺. 中青年首发脑卒中患者心理一致感在领悟社会支持与创伤后应激障碍的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(20): 43-47.
[13] 周巧, 吴俊琪, 张翠娥, 游君, 许湘华. 老年脑卒中幸存者团体接纳承诺疗法干预方案构建与应用[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(19): 7-12.
[14] 王贝贝, 段思雨, 冉明, 孙瑶, 李萍. 251例缺血性脑卒中患者复发风险感知现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(15): 69-73.
[15] 张程婕, 井坤娟, 刘冬雪. 列线图与CART决策树模型对老年脑卒中患者病耻感预测效能的比较[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(11): 7-12.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
[1] 王晓娟. 急诊观察室输液患者如厕风险分析及对策[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(2): 56 -57 .
[2] 李筱琴,李媚姬,蔡燕君,蔡丽容. 1~5岁肿瘤患儿行PET-CT检查的护理[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(3): 60 -62 .
[3] 林梅芳,陈黎,廖建湘,邓丽娥,叶敬花. 难治性癫癎患儿生酮饮食治疗的全程健康教育[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 76 -78 .
[4] 白兰,张翠萍,李迅. 新疆维汉两族非霍奇金淋巴瘤化疗患者心理健康状况差异性比较[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(1): 4 -7 .
[5] 徐爱华,游云梅. 新护士临床血压测量误差的评估与分析[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(3): 41 -42 .
[6] 贾勇刚. 儿童疼痛行为评估工具的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(4): 18 -20 .
[7] 陈群,章雅萍,张芳燕. 手术室护士手术用物损坏风险感知及管理对策[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(4): 49 -50 .
[8] 龚伟,刘杰. 野战环境下双囊气压输液袋的研制[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(3): 77 -78 .
[9] 陈海英,黄雪芳. 1例妊娠合并尿毒症患者血液透析治疗的护理[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(4): 68 -69 .
[10] 龙纳. 功能独立能力评估量表的研究与应用进展[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(3): 9 -11 .