以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (11): 5-10.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.11.005

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

直肠癌患者保肛术1年后发生重度低位前切除综合征列线图预测模型的构建

庞雪滢1a, 胡少华1b, 李慧2, 尹丹乔2, 张尚鑫1a, 杨晓东1a   

  1. 1.安徽医科大学第一附属医院 a.胃肠外科;b.护理部,安徽 合肥 230022;
    2.安徽医科大学 护理学院,安徽 合肥 230032
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-15 出版日期:2022-06-10 发布日期:2022-07-07
  • 通讯作者: 胡少华(1971-),女,安徽池州人,博士学历,主任护师,护理部主任,硕士研究生导师。E-mail:hushaohua1003@qq.com
  • 作者简介:庞雪滢(1996-),女,安徽长丰人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    2021年度安徽高校自然科学研究项目(KJ2021ZD0020); 安徽省科技厅科技攻关项目(1804h08020275); 《中国护理管理》杂志2020年护理管理科研基金项目(CNM-2020-11)

Establishment of Nomogram Model to Predict Major Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Patients with Rectal Cancer One Year after Sphincter-preserving Surgery

PANG Xue-ying1a, HU Shao-hua1b, LI Hui2, YIN Dan-qiao2, ZHANG Shang-xin1a, YANG Xiao-dong1a   

  1. 1a. Dept. of Gastrointestinal Surgery; 1b. Dept. of Nursing Administration, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, China;
    2. School of Nursing ,Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, China
  • Received:2021-12-15 Online:2022-06-10 Published:2022-07-07

摘要: 目的 探讨直肠癌患者保肛术1年后发生重度低位前切除综合征的危险因素,并构建预测模型。方法 回顾性收集安徽省某三级甲等医院接受直肠癌保肛术1年后的患者,采用一般资料调查表、低位前切除综合征评分进行调查。通过二分类Logistic回归模型分析相关危险因素,采用R语言绘制列线图,构建风险预测模型。结果 本研究共纳入319例患者,其中57例(17.9%)直肠癌患者在保肛术1年以后仍存在重度低位前切除综合征。Logistic回归分析结果显示,肿瘤距肛缘的距离、预防性造口、吻合口漏、术前放疗、术后放疗是直肠癌患者保肛术1年后重度低位前切除综合征发生的独立危险因素。基于回归分析结果构建列线图预测模型,C-index为0.849(95%CI:0.790~0.907),ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.843(95%CI:0.784~0.901),均显示该模型区分度较好,Brier得分和校正曲线均显示校准度较好,H-L检验(χ2=9.313,P=0.231)表明模型拟合度较好。结论 本研究构建的预测模型具有较好的预测效果,可直观、简便地甄别保肛术1年后仍存在重度低位前切除综合征的高危患者,为早期筛查和干预提供参考。

关键词: 直肠癌, 保肛术, 低位前切除综合征, 危险因素, 风险预测模型, 列线图

Abstract: Objective To investigate the risk factors of major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in patients with rectal cancer one year after sphincter-preserving surgery, and to construct a predictive model. Methods The patients who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer in a tertiary grade-A hospital in Anhui Province were recruited retrospectively, and they were surveyed with the general information questionnaire and Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score. The binary logistic regression model was used to analyze the risk factors, and R language to draw the nomogram to construct a risk predictive model. Results A total of 319 patients were enrolled in this study, of which 57 (17.9%) patients with rectal cancer still had major LARS one year after sphincter-preserving surgery. Logistic regression analysis showed that the distance from the tumor to the anal margin, prophylactic stoma, anastomotic leakage, preoperative radiotherapy and postoperative radiotherapy were independent risk factors for major LARS in patients with rectal cancer one year after sphincter-preserving surgery. The nomogram prediction model was constructed based on the logistic regression analysis. The C-index was 0.849 (95%CI:0.790~0.907); the area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.843 (95%CI:0.784~0.901), which showed that the model had good discrimination. The Brier score and calibration curve showed good calibration, and H-L test(χ2=9.313,P=0.231)showed the model had good fitting. Conclusion The predictive model constructed in this study has a good prediction effect, which can intuitively identify high-risk patients with major LARS one year after sphincter-preserving surgery, and provide reference for early screening and intervention.

Key words: rectal cancer, sphincter-preserving surgery, low anterior resection syndrome, risk factor, risk predictive model, nomogram

中图分类号: 

  • R473.6
[1] Reinwalds M, Blixter A, Carlsson E.Living with a Resected Rectum after Rectal Cancer Surgery-struggling not to Let Bowel Function Control Life[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2018, 27(3/4):e623-e634. DOI:10.1111/jocn.14112.
[2] Pieniowski EHA, Nordenvall C, Palmer G, et al.Prevalence of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and Impact on Quality of Life after Rectal Cancer Surgery: Population- based Study[J]. BJS Open,2020,4(5):935-942. DOI:10.1002/bjs5.50312.
[3] Dulskas A, Kavaliauskas P, Pilipavicius L, et al.Long-term Bowel Dysfunction Following Low Anterior Resection[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1):11882. DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-68900-8.
[4] Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S.Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score: Development and Validation of a Symptom-based Scoring System for Bowel Dysfunction after Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer[J]. Ann Surg, 2012, 255(5):922-928. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824f1c21.
[5] 闫晶晶,牟绍玉,谭人福,等.直肠癌低位前切除综合征评分表中文版的实证研究[J].解放军护理杂志,2015,32(4):12-15.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2015.04.003.
[6] 张峻岭,董洁晶,吴涛,等. 直肠癌保肛根治术后低位前切除综合征危险因素的列线图分析[J].中华普通外科杂志, 2021,36(2):81-85.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn113855-20200819-00648.
[7] Croese AD, Lonie JM, Trollope AF, et al.A Meta-analysis of the Prevalence of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and Systematic Review of Risk Factors[J]. Int J Surg, 2018, 56:234-241. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.031.
[8] 蒲羽,邱远,李祥,等. 直肠癌保肛术后低位前切除综合征发生率、恢复情况及影响因素的回顾性分析[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2017, 39(10):1025-1030. DOI:10.16016/j.1000-5404.201611130.
[9] 卢先枝,程方园,王红丽.基于微信平台的护理干预对结肠造口患者自护能力及并发症的影响[J].护理学报,2018,25(14):58-61.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.14.058.
[10] Sacomori C, Lorca LA, Martinez-Mardones M, et al.A Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Effectiveness of Pre-and Post-surgical Pelvic Floor Physiotherapy for Bowel Symptoms, Pelvic Floor Function, and Quality of Life of Patients with Rectal Cancer: CARRET Protocol[J]. Trials, 2021, 22(1):448.DOI:10.1186/s13063-021-05396-1.
[11] Vogel I, Reeves N, Tanis PJ, et al.Impact of a Defunctioning Ileostomy and Time to Stoma Closure on Bowel Function after Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. Tech Coloproctol,2021,25(7):751-760. DOI:10.1007/s10151-021-02436-5.
[12] Qin Q, Huang B, Cao W,et al.Bowel Dysfunction after Low Anterior Resection with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy or Chemotherapy Alone for Rectal Cancer: A Cross-sectional Study from China[J]. Dis Colon Rectum,2017,60(7):697-705.DOI:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000801.
[13] Powell-Chandler A,Rees B,Broad C,et al.Physiotherapy and Anterior Resection Syndrome (PARiS) Trial: Feasibility Study Protocol[J].BMJ Open,2018,8(6):e021855. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021855.
[14] 郭帆,韩斌,黄琳凯,等. 腹腔镜直肠癌保肛根治术后低位前切除综合征的发生及影响因素分析[J]. 华中科技大学学报(医学版), 2021, 50(2):194-200. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1672-0741.2021.02.011.
[15] Hain E, Manceau G, Maggiori L, et al.Bowel Dysfunction after Anastomotic Leakage in Laparoscopic Sphincter-saving Operative Intervention for Rectal Cancer: A Case-matched Study in 46 Patients Using the Low Anterior Resection Score[J]. Surgery, 2017,161(4):1028-1039. DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.037.
[16] 于科讯,陈子华.直视结直肠癌患者术后吻合口漏及其风险规避[J].中南大学学报(医学版),2021,46(9):1031-1040. DOI:10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2021.200569.
[17] Jimenez-Gomez LM, Espin-Basany E, Trenti L, et al.Factors Associated with Low Anterior Resection Syndrome after Surgical Treatment of Rectal Cancer[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2018,20(3):195-200. DOI:10.1111/codi.13901.
[18] Sun R, Dai Z, Zhang Y, et al.The Incidence and Risk Factors of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) after Sphincter-preserving Surgery of Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J].Support Care Cancer, 2021, 29(12):7249-7258. DOI:10.1007/s00520-021-06326-2.
[19] Sung SY, Jang HS, Kim SH, et al.Oncologic Outcome and Morbidity in the Elderly Rectal Cancer Patients after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Total Mesorectal Excision: A Multi-institutional and Case-matched Control Study[J]. Ann Surg, 2019, 269(1):108-113. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002443.
[20] Christensen P, Im Baeten C, Espín-Basany E, et al.Management Guidelines for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome - the MANUEL Project[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2021, 23(2):461-475. DOI:10.1111/codi.15517.
[21] 马旭,李青科,何立芳.经肛门灌洗对直肠癌患者低前切除术综合征的治疗作用[J].现代肿瘤医学, 2022, 30(8):1416-1420. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2022.08.015.
[22] 郑美春,吴晓丹,姜武,等.生物反馈训练对预防直肠癌患者保肛术后前切除综合征的效果评价[J]. 中华护理杂志,2019, 54(7):1032-1037.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.07.014.
[1] 罗玉勤, 李孟璇, 程秋, 王婷, 郑晶予, 方进博, 龚玉萍. 血液肿瘤患者化疗后肛周感染危险因素病例对照研究[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(7): 7-11.
[2] 杨洁, 谢小华, 连万成, 杨梅, 邓丽萍, 潘璐. 急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓后出血预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(5): 10-14.
[3] 赵晓蕊, 龙云, 陈思齐, 白洁, 肖霄, 朱社宁. 妇科恶性肿瘤患者术后胃肠功能紊乱风险预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 72-78.
[4] 向御婷, 褚婕, 严敏, 乐曲, 余嘉欣. 孕产妇孕产期静脉血栓栓塞风险评估的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(3): 46-51.
[5] 陈静文, 徐林霞, 吴秀丽, 李显蓉. 基于Logistic回归与决策树模型的结直肠癌术后患者非计划性再入院影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(2): 1-6.
[6] 刘旭, 王文辰, 马春艳. 基于健康促进模型的结直肠癌永久性肠造口患者体力活动影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(11): 59-64.
[7] 石志宜, 刘玉凤, 王淑靖, 邢丽媛, 张红梅. 妊娠相关下腰痛风险预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(10): 67-72.
[8] 郭盛丽, 袁薇, 朱婷, 林威娜, 陈晓容, 夏美燕. 患者结肠镜检查前肠道准备失败风险预测模型的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(1): 35-40.
[9] 胡正中, 廖园园, 周毅峰, 彭瑨, 秦月兰. 结直肠癌患者手术切口感染危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(8): 23-27.
[10] 刘鑫, 江锦芳, 覃彦珠, 周帅, 施洁, 刘彦君. 215例结直肠癌造口患者家庭主要照顾者照顾能力现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 53-58.
[11] 谭天, 庞永慧, 左红群, 邓玉燕. 隔姜灸对结直肠癌行腹腔镜根治术后凝血功能的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 6-10.
[12] 严露培, 姚丽丽, 李跃荣, 陈豪, 刘文文, 赵庆华, 肖明朝. 手术患者非计划性术中低体温风险预测模型研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(6): 13-16.
[13] 蓝爱春, 包锦莹, 郑永克, 魏素妮, 潘静. 960名中老年人的颈围、小腿围对其血压、血脂、血糖的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(3): 53-57.
[14] 陆静钰, 杨连招, 陈玲, 杨永. 社区老年高血压患者轻度认知功能障碍风险预测模型的构建与验证[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(24): 42-50.
[15] 张锐, 叶向红, 赵泽华, 韩珍, 谢文慧, 吴翠丽. 腹部创伤患者肠内营养喂养不耐受预警评估指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(23): 1-5.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
[1] 陈蕾, 袁丙坤, 李文源. 压力知觉在研究生健康关注度和生活习惯间的中介调节效应[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(11): 1 -4 .
[2] 赵玉, 王品, 李娜, 郭曼杰, 宋菲菲, 季红. 枣庄9个农村社区老年人成功老龄的现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(11): 11 -15 .
[3] 李瑶, 黄美凌, 章雪玲, 邓海娴. 粤港澳大湾区助产本科师资核心胜任力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(11): 16 -19 .
[4] 汪苗, 杨燕, 李远珍, 管慧, 陶秀彬. 互联网+护理服务护士岗位胜任力评价指标体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(11): 20 -24 .
[5] 李滨, 马怡乐. 老龄化社会临终关怀的国际经验比较[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(11): 25 -30 .
[6] 陈伟, 秦楠, 李辉. 癌症患者及其配偶二元应对的相关研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(11): 31 -35 .
[7] 邓瑛瑛, 裴华清, 任英, 殷春梅, 文梅, 张小玲. 预防神经外科重症患者PICC相关性静脉血栓的循证护理实践[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(11): 36 -40 .
[8] 车小燕, 刘玉琳, 杨姝晖, 王倩, 杨帆. 儿童哮喘运动方案的最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(11): 41 -46 .
[9] 郑萍, 刘宁. 实施性研究的方法学综述[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(11): 47 -52 .
[10] 岳鑫彦, 王冬华. 1 319名三级甲等医院护士的住院患者自杀预防知信行现状及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(11): 53 -58 .