以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (10): 19-24.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.10.019

• 研究生园地 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于心理复原模型的动机性访谈对原发性肝癌患者创伤后成长的影响

蒋维a, 罗玲b, 张运芝a, 张函a, 王晓昊a, 李静c   

  1. 重庆医科大学附属第二医院 a.感染科; b.护理部; c.心理科,重庆 400010
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-20 出版日期:2022-05-25 发布日期:2022-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 罗玲（1973-）,女,四川达州人,本科学历,主任护师,教授,护理部副主任,硕士研究生导师。E-mail：LL7765@cqmu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:蒋维（1995-）,女,四川广安人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读。
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市自然科学基金面上项目（cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0646）; 重庆医科大学附属第二医院护理骨干科研资助计划项目（202006）

Effect of Motivational Interviewing based on Psychological Recovery Model on Post-traumatic Growth in Patients with Primary Liver Cancer

JIANG Weia, LUO Lingb, ZHANG Yun-zhia, Zhang Hana, Wang Xiao-haoa, Li Jingc   

  1. a. Dept. of Infectious Diseases;
    b. Dept. of Nursing Administration;
    c. Dept. of Psychology, the Second Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
  • Received:2021-10-20 Online:2022-05-25 Published:2022-06-09

PDF (PC)

57

赞

摘要： 目的 探讨基于心理复原模型的动机性访谈对原发性肝癌患者创伤后成长和焦虑、抑郁的影响。方法 便利抽样法选取2020年9月—2021年5月的100例原发性肝癌患者,采用Excel Rand函数生成随机数字的方法分为对照组50例和观察组50例。对照组给予常规心理护理,观察组在对照组基础上给予基于心理复原模型的动机性访谈干预,评估2组患者在干预前、干预后1个月末、干预后3个月末的创伤后成长和焦虑、抑郁得分情况。结果 干预前,2组患者创伤后成长各维度得分及总分、焦虑、抑郁得分比较,差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）;出院后1个月末及出院后3个月末,2 组患者创伤后成长各维度得分及总分、焦虑、抑郁得分比较,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;观察组的创伤后成长各维度得分及总分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;观察组的焦虑、抑郁得分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;不同时间点创伤后成长各维度得分及总分、焦虑、抑郁得分比较,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）,组别与时间存在交互效应（P<0.05）。结论 基于心理复原模型的动机性访谈干预可有效提升肝癌患者创伤后成长水平、改善焦虑和抑郁情绪,从而提高其心理适应水平和生活质量。

关键词: 原发性肝癌, 心理复原模型, 动机性访谈, 创伤后成长, 焦虑, 抑郁

Abstract: Objective To explore the effects of motivational interviewing based on psychological recovery model on anxiety, depression and post-traumatic growth (PTG) in patients with primary liver cancer. Methods Convenient sampling method was used to select 100 patients with primary liver cancer from September 2020 to May 2021. And they were divided into control group (n=50) and observation group (n=50). The control group was given conventional psychological care and the observation group an additional motivational interviewing based on psychological recovery model. The score of PTG, anxiety and depression in the 2 groups before intervention, 1 month and 3 months after discharge was compared. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the total score and the score of each dimension of PTG, and the score of anxiety and depression of the two groups before the intervention (P>0.05). There was statistically significant difference between the total score and the score of each dimension of PTG, and the score of anxiety and depression of the two groups 1 month and 3 months after intervention (P<0.05). The total score and the score of each dimension of PTG of the observation group were higher than those of the control group, indicating statistical significance (P<0.05). The score of anxiety and depression in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05) in terms of the total score, the score of each dimension of PTG and, anxiety and depression at different time points, and there was an interaction effect between group and time (P<0.05). Conclusion The motivational interviewing based on psychological recovery model can effectively enhance the level of PTG, improve the anxiety and depression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, and thus improve the level of psychological adaptation and quality of life.

Key words: primary liver cancer, psychological resilience model, motivational interviewing, post-traumatic growth, anxiety, depression

中图分类号: 

  • R471
[1] 秦如梦,周利华,陆彩云,等.癌症患者创伤后成长心理干预的研究进展[J].护理学报,2020, 27(1):19-22.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.01.019.
[2] 刘恋蕊,周利华,乔晓斐.原发性肝癌术后患者创伤后成长现状及影响因素分析[J].护理学报,2021, 28(24):6-11.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.24.006.
[3] 约瑟夫. 杀不死我的必使我强大:创伤后成长心理学[M].青涂,译.北京:北京联合出版公司,2016:170-204.
[4] 罗尔尼克. 医务工作者动机访谈:促进健康行为的改变[M].洪霞,魏镜,译.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2015:4-15.
[5] Berman A, Beckman M, Lindqvist H.The Handbook of Behavior Change[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2020:661-676.DOI:10.1017/9781108677318.045.
[6] 唐浪娟,彭雨燕,岳丽春.老年人首发脑卒中创伤后成长现状及影响因素[J].中国老年学志,2018,38(10):2527-2529.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2018.10.088.
[7] Graf J, Stengel A.Psychological Burden and Psycho-oncological Interventions for Patients with Hepatobiliary Cancers-A Systematic Review[J/OL]. Front Psychol, 2021,12:662777.[2021-07-25].https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.662777.
[8] 韩梅梅,范苗苗,李小峰.基于跨理论模型的动机性访谈对直肠癌结肠造口患者自我护理能力及自尊水平的影响[J].安徽医学,2021,42(11):1306-1309.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0399.2021.11.024.
[1] 夏青, 肖凤凤, 彭心雨, 游雅菲, 周婷格, 王冬华. 自主性感知在农村老年人死亡焦虑和自我养老能力间的中介作用[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(9): 52-57.
[2] 罗爽, 尹华英, 雷莉, 王海梅. 父亲抑郁情绪和家庭功能在早产儿母亲抑郁情绪与母婴情感联结间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(9): 58-63.
[3] 王云琼, 刘雪梅, 王瑶, 罗梦蕾, 严德萍. 快乐感知训练团体对抑郁症患者负性情绪及自杀风险干预的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(9): 73-78.
[4] 王晓旭, 丁兰, 傅胜惠, 张清. 认知评价、应对方式对血液透析患者及其照顾者创伤后成长的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(8): 59-65.
[5] 吴晓云, 毕清泉, 周桂琴, 潘海峰. 心理弹性在角膜移植患者情绪创造力与创伤后成长中的中介作用[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(6): 11-14.
[6] 余小燕, 刘于, 黄毅. 小丑照护对患儿焦虑疼痛干预效果的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(4): 21-26.
[7] 左倩倩, 曾文捷, 廖敏怡, 李景秋, 罗岚, 高钰琳. 199名安宁疗护护士职业悲伤现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(4): 46-52.
[8] 孙娟, 李岩, 郑蔚, 王丹丹, 杨展. 基于时机理论的赋能教育在PCI手术患者中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(2): 74-78.
[9] 李懿, 杨茜, 蔡果, 马英, 孙维. 高智能婴儿互动照料模拟人在母婴分离产妇健康管理中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2022, 29(1): 64-68.
[10] 刘清玄, 张振香, 郭云飞, 张乐芸, 林蓓蕾, 梅永霞. 国内外脑卒中患者创伤后成长水平及其相关因素的系统评价[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(8): 1-7.
[11] 周静, 毛嘉钰, 丁倍, 郑惠, 王君婧. 多维状态无聊在本科护生社交网络中的社会比较与错失焦虑间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(6): 43-47.
[12] 李爱军, 姚淳, 邝春燕, 谭行华, 林路平. 耳穴压豆联合八段锦对新型冠状病毒肺炎康复期患者焦虑抑郁的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(6): 48-52.
[13] 徐思英, 黄莹, 刘丽华, 胡雅. 基于互联网认知行为疗法对产妇负性情绪干预效果的Meta分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(4): 36-42.
[14] 刘恋蕊, 周利华, 乔晓斐. 原发性肝癌术后患者创伤后成长现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(24): 6-11.
[15] 李艳清, 张晓梅, 徐秀群. Skidmore焦虑病耻感量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(24): 17-21.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
No Suggested Reading articles found!