以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

Journal of Nursing ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (7): 75-78.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.07.075

Previous Articles    

Facilitators and barriers in structured handover from ICU to general ward based on theoretical domain framework

YANG Qi-di, WANG Yi, YUAN Cui, WANG Ying, XIAO Yan-yan, WANG Fang   

  1. Dept. of Critical Care Medicine, Dept. of Nursing Administration, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
  • Received:2023-01-08 Published:2023-05-12

Abstract: Objective To explore the facilitators and barriers in structured handover from ICU to general ward based on theoretical domain framework (TDF). Methods Twenty-six nurses from a tertiary grade-A hospital were selected conveniently for semi-structured interviews, and the interview outline and content analysis were formulated based on TDF. Results This study summarized the barriers and facilitators related to seven domains in TDF. Facilitators included the use of tools such as handover process and handover orders, and the participation of fixed transporters and nursing team leaders. Barriers included that handover ability of new nurses, interdisciplinary nursing knowledge and communication skills, patient participation and intelligent information system. Conclusion There are diverse factors affecting the structured handover of ICU patients transferred to general wards, and improved knowledge and skills of evidence implementers, more patient participation, and strengthened intelligent construction of information system are beneficial to promoting the implementation of structured handover.

Key words: ICU patient, structured handover, facilitators, barriers

CLC Number: 

  • R473.6
[1] Wibrandt I, Lippert A.Improving patient safety in handover from intensive care unit to general ward:a systematic review[J].J Patient Saf, 2020, 16(3):199-210.DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000000266.
[2] Yee, KC, Baggoly, C.The OSSIE guide to clinical handover Improvement[EB/OL].(2013-03-19)[2018-12-20].http://ecite.utas.edu.au/81664.
[3] 莫红平,王玉翠,蔡敏,等.护士对ICU转出患者在普通病房交接班现状调查分析[J].岭南现代临床外科, 2018,18(1):114-116;120.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-976X.2018.01.028.
[4] Lou A,Francis J,Islam R,et al.A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems[J]. Implement Sci,2017,12(1):77.DOI:10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9.
[5] 于书慧,庞冬,车新艳,等.护士临床应用导尿管固定装置依从性的障碍因素分析:一项基于理论域框架的质性研究[J].中华现代护理杂志,2020, 26(24):4729-4733.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20191230-04843.
[6] 付艳芬,王春青,胡雁.证据临床转化中障碍因素和促进因素的内容分析[J].护理学报, 2022,29(5):64-68.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.05.064.
[7] 李晶,高尚谦,邓俊,等. 循证转化护理专业组的建立及实践[J].中华护理杂志,2017,52(12):1505-1508. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2017.12.019.
[8] Sluisveld N, Oerlemans A,Westert G,et al.Barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods study[J]. BMC Health Serv Res,2017,17(1):251.DOI:10.1186/s12913-017-2139-x.
[9] Kauppi W,Proos M,Olausson S .Ward nurses' experiences of the discharge process between intensive care unit and general ward[J]. Nurs Crit Care,2018,23(3):127-133.DOI:10.1111/nicc.12336.
[10] 聂玲,沈婷,余婷,等.早产儿口腔运动干预护理证据的应用现状及障碍因素分析[J].中华现代护理杂志,2022,28(25):3405-3411.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20211211-05581.
[11] 高莹莹,徐佳卿,张文婷,等.ICU新护士临床路径式培训内容的构建[J].护理学报,2022,29(22):26-29.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.22.026.
[12] Powell M, Brown D, Davis C, et al.Handover practices of nurses transferring trauma patients from intensive care units to the ward:a multimethod observational study[J]. Aust Crit Care,2020,33(6):538-545.DOI:10.1016/j.aucc.2020.03.004.
[13] 齐建伟,张克标,古满平,等.SBAR交接模式在危重患者长途转运中的应用[J].护理学报,2018,25(8):13-17.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.08.013.
[14] 张翠翠,钟英,肖月,等.临床护理交接班流程及策略的最佳证据总结[J].护理学报,2022,29(20):32-38.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.20.032.
[15] 中央人民政府.中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《国家信息化发展战略纲要》.(2016-07-27)[2023-01-04]..中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《国家信息化发展战略纲要》.(2016-07-27)[2023-01-04].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2016-07/27/content_5095336.htm.
[1] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(6): 57-60.
[2] ZHANG Hai-bo, HUANG Run, WU Fang. Effect evaluation of optimized management process of stress-induced hyperglycemia in patients after cardiopulmonary bypass based on health failure mode and effect analysis [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(5): 28-32.
[3] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(5): 65-69.
[4] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(5): 70-71.
[5] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(4): 66-67.
[6] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(4): 68-71.
[7] CHU Wen-qiang, PENG Jun-xiang, LI Dan-ling. Dynamic changes of inflammatory indicators after cranial surgery and diagnostic value for intracranial infection: a Logistic regression analysis [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(1): 22-27.
[8] LI Mu-ling, ZHEN LI, ZHU Mu-lan,bai Xue-jie, WEN Hai-fei, ZHOU Hong-zhen. Best evidence summary for prevention and nursing of peristomal moisture-associated skin damage in patients with enterostomy [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(1): 41-46.
[9] ZHOU Yan, HU Qing-yue,Cai Ying, QIAO Tong. Nursing of 2 patients of infectious abdominal aneurysm combined with aortoenteric fistulae after in situ reconstruction with bovine pericardial graft [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(1): 64-66.
[10] ZHUO Mei-xiu, WANG Yi-ting, LIU Qian, ZHU Li-qun, BAO Lei, WU Jin, YIN Na. Evidence-based Practice of Perioperative Prevention and Treatment Strategies for Postoperative Sore Throat in Patients with Tracheal Intubation [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2022, 29(23): 33-38.
[11] CHEN Yi, YANG Sai, YAN Rong, XIONG Zhao-yu, WAN Ya-li, LI Su-yun. Construction of Perioperative Use of Oral Nutritional Supplements, Follow-up Program for Colorectal Cancer Patients Based on ORTCC Model [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2022, 29(23): 67-71.
[12] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2022, 29(22): 65-68.
[13] LIU Yue, ZHANG Qing-yue, YU Lin-tong, WANG Hui-qing, WANG Yan. Breast Reconstruction Decision-making Experience in Elderly Patients with Breast Cancer: A Qualitative Study [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2022, 29(21): 67-70.
[14] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2022, 29(18): 30-33.
[15] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2022, 29(18): 69-73.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
[1] CAI Wen-wen, ZHANG Xing-xing, YE Min-shan, LUO Yan-xia, RUAN Wei-qing, Li Jia. Construction of nursing sensitive quality indicator system for patients undergoing colonoscopy based on structure-process-outcome model[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(6): 1 -6 .
[2] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(6): 57 -60 .
[3] CHEN Tong, BI Yu-qing, CHEN Qian, XUE Zi-chen, HUANG Jing-wen, LUO Sheng, LI Wei. Construction of evaluation index system of chronic disease nursing competency for elderly people in communities[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(7): 1 -4 .
[4] FENG Ru-zhi, LI Jia, LIANG Jia-yi, GAO Yu-lin. Status quo of professional grief and its influencing factors among nursing 154 postgraduates[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(7): 5 -10 .
[5] REN Ying, YU Wei-hua, ZHANG Li, ZHENG Jun-jun, DENG Man, YANG Xia, ZHANG Yu-xi. Current status of life space level of community elderly people and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(7): 11 -15 .
[6] ZHENG Jing, GUAN Yu-xiang, ZHANG Ying, XU Juan, ZOU Ran, WANG Chao. Influencing factors of transformational leadership of head nurses in Hospitals of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Anhui Province: a 873-case study[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(7): 16 -19 .
[7] GUO Man-jie, LI Na, ZHAO Yu, WANG Pin, YOU Si-meng, WANG Qing, JI Hong. Mediating effect of loneliness between short video addiction and sleep quality among nursing undergraduates[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(7): 20 -24 .
[8] FENG Yu, YANG Hua-ying, GAN Lin, YANG Qian. Application of tree diagram in clinical practice of nursing undergraduates in gastroenterology department[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(7): 25 -28 .
[9] ZHAO Ling-yun, CHEN Si-yu, XIE Ying, LU Mei-xiu, HUANG Mei-fang, DAI Xiao-hong. Development and application of virtual reality teaching program for umbilical cord prolapse[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(7): 29 -32 .
[10] . [J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(7): 33 -37 .