以质量求发展,以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8): 1-6.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2024.08.001

• 研究生园地 •    下一篇

脑卒中半失能患者自我接纳的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究

郑亚楠1, 郭惠娟2, 张振香1, 蔡姝倩3   

  1. 1.郑州大学护理与健康学院,河南 郑州 450001;
    2.郑州大学附属洛阳中心医院,河南 洛阳 471000;
    3.郑州黄河护理职业学院,河南 郑州 450001
  • 收稿日期:2023-09-08 出版日期:2024-04-25 发布日期:2024-05-08
  • 通讯作者: 郭惠娟(1974-),女,河南洛阳人,硕士,主任护师,硕士研究生导师。E-mail:18537919128@163.com
  • 作者简介:郑亚楠(1998-),女,河南鹤壁人,本科学历,硕士研究生在读,护士。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(72174184)

Potential profile analysis of self-acceptance among semi-disabled patients with stroke and its influencing factors

ZHENG Ya-nan1, GUO Hui-juan2, ZHANG Zhen-xiang1, CAI Shu-qian3   

  1. 1. School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China;
    2. Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Luoyang 471000, China;
    3. Zhengzhou Yellow River Nursing Vocational College, Zhengzhou 450001, China
  • Received:2023-09-08 Online:2024-04-25 Published:2024-05-08

摘要: 目的 探讨脑卒中半失能患者自我接纳的潜在类别并分析其影响因素。方法 采用便利抽样法,选取河南省郑州市某2所三级甲等医院神经内科及神经康复科的308例脑卒中半失能患者为研究对象,采用一般资料调查表、自我接纳问卷、中文版事件相关性反刍性沉思问卷和慢性病自我效能量表对其进行调查。采用潜在剖面分析法分析患者自我接纳的潜在类别,采用无序多分类Logistic回归分析检验不同类别的影响因素。结果 脑卒中半失能患者自我接纳分为3种类别:低接纳-低自评组(27.9%)、中等接纳-自评中庸组(43.8%)与高接纳-理性自评组(28.3%)。无序多分类Logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄、文化程度、家庭人均月收入、症状数量、侵入性沉思、目的性沉思以及慢性病自我效能是脑卒中半失能患者自我接纳潜在剖面分类的影响因素(P<0.05)。结论 脑卒中半失能患者的自我接纳存在3种潜在类别,医护人员应重视年龄18~45岁、初中及以下文化程度、家庭人均月收入较低以及症状≥3个的脑卒中半失能患者,并通过减少患者的侵入性反刍、增强目的性反刍和自我效能感等干预措施来提升其自我接纳水平。

关键词: 脑卒中, 半失能, 自我接纳, 潜在剖面分析

Abstract: Objective To explore the potential categorization of self-acceptance in semi-disabled patients with stroke and to analyze the influencing factors. Methods Convenience sampling was used to select 308 semi-disabled patients with stroke from the departments of neurology and neurorehabilitation in two tertiary grade-A hospitals in Zhengzhou City, and they were surveyed using the general information questionnaire, the Self-Acceptance Questionnaire, the Chinese version of the Event-Related Rumination Questionnaire, and the Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scale. Potential categories of patients' self-acceptance were analyzed using potential profile analysis, and the influencing factors of different categories were analyzed using unordered multicategorical logistic regression analysis. Results Self-acceptance of semi-disabled patients with stroke was categorized into 3 categories: low acceptance-low self-assessment group (27.9%), medium acceptance-moderate self-assessment group (43.8%) & high acceptance-rational self-assessment group (28.3%). Unordered multicategorical logistic regression analysis showed that age, education background, per capita monthly household income, number of symptoms, intrusive contemplation, purposeful contemplation, and chronic disease self-efficacy were influencing factors in the classification of potential profiles of self-acceptance in semi-disabled patients with stroke (P<0.05). Conclusion There are 3 potential categories of self-acceptance in semi-disabled patients with stroke. Medical staff should focus on semi-disabled stroke patients aged 18~45 years, with education background of junior high school or lower, lower per capita monthly household income, and experiencing three or more symptoms. Intervention measures such as reducing patients' invasive rumination, enhancing purposeful rumination and self-efficacy should be considered to improve their level of self-acceptance.

Key words: stroke, semi-disabled, self-acceptance, latent profile analysis

中图分类号: 

  • R473.74
[1] 燕文娟,李壮苗,余梦婷,等.脑卒中患者病耻感影响因素的系统评价[J].护理学报,2022,29(8):46-52. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2022.08.046.
[2] Yao Y, Yao J, Chen S, et al.Psychological capital and self-acceptance modified the association of depressive tendency with self-rated health of college students in China during the COVID-19 pandemic[J]. Behav Sci (Basel),2023,13(7):552. DOI: 10.3390/bs13070552.
[3] Plexico LW, Erath S, Shores H, et al.Self-acceptance, resilience, coping and satisfaction of life in people who stutter[J].J Fluency Disord, 2019, 59:52-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.10.004.
[4] Li C, Lyu S, Yan J, et al.The effect of gender in binge eating behavior in Chinese culture: the serial mediation model of body dissatisfaction and self-acceptance[J]. Front Psychol,2023,14:1285272. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1285272.
[5] 同赟洁,刘艳梅,吕梅芬,等.恢复期脑卒中患者自我接纳现状及影响因素分析[J].护理学报,2021,28(19):13-16. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.19.013.
[6] 蔡伟衫,周洁球,陈瑞娜.脑卒中患者自我接纳水平调查及其影响因素分析[J].中国卫生标准管理,2023,14(1):124-128. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9316.2023.01.026.
[7] 王孟成,毕向阳.潜变量建模与Mplus应用:进阶篇[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2018:13-15.
[8] 中华医学会神经病学分会,中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组.中国各类主要脑血管病诊断要点2019[J].中华神经科杂志,2019(9):710-715.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-7876.2019.09.003.
[9] 丛中,高文凤.自我接纳问卷的编制与信度效度检验[J].中国行为医学科学, 1999(1):20.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-6554.1999.01.007.
[10] Cann A, Callhoun LG, Tedeschi RG, et al.Assessing posttraumatic cognitive processes: the event related rumination inventory[J].Anxiety, Stress Coping,2011,2(42):137-156.DOI: 10.1080/10615806.2010.529901.
[11] 董超群,巩树梅,刘晓虹.简体中文版事件相关反刍性沉思问卷在意外创伤者中应用的信效度分析[J].中华护理杂志,2013, 48(9):831-834.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2013.09.021.
[12] Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Ritter PL, et al.Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease[J].Effective clinical practice,2001,4(6):256-262.
[13] 尚刘文心,沈美芳,陈文瑶,等.慢性心力衰竭患者症状管理自我效能及其影响因素的调查研究[J]. 中华护理杂志,2014,49(6):674-679. DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2014.06.008.
[14] 王孟成,邓俏文,毕向阳,等.分类精确性指数Entropy在潜剖面分析中的表现:一项蒙特卡罗模拟研究[J].心理学报,2017,49(11):1473-1482. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01473.
[15] 汤丹丹,温忠麟.共同方法偏差检验:问题与建议[J].心理科学,2020,43(1):215-223.DOI:10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20200130.
[16] 张文彤,董伟. SPSS统计分析高级教程[M].2版.北京:高等教育出版社,2013:181-185.
[17] Luong V, Shields C, Petrie A, Neumann K.Does personality matter? Perceptions and experiences of introverts and extraverts as general surgeons[J]. Teach Learn Med,2022,34(3):255-265. DOI:10.1080/10401334.2021.1922284.
[18] Zheng Z, Song R, Zhao Y, et al.An investigation of the level of stigma and the factors influencing it in the rehabilitation of young and middle-aged stroke patients-a cross-sectional study[J]. BMC Neurol, 2023, 23(1):139. DOI:10.1186/s12883-023-03189-4.
[19] 王艳东,查梦培,郭宗海,等.脑出血偏瘫患者病耻感影响因素及其与自尊和希望水平的相关性[J].中国老年学杂志,2021, 41(13):2855-2858. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2021.13.048.
[20] Kim M, Lee YH.Comparison of psychological health problems between families living with stroke survivors and the general population in the community[J]. Chonnam Med J, 2021,57(2):118-125. DOI:10.4068/cmj.2021.57.2.118.
[21] 张晓萌,张延红.缺血性脑卒中患者个人掌控感现状及影响因素分析[J].中风与神经疾病杂志, 2022,39(8):699-703. DOI:10.19845/j.cnki.zfysjjbzz.2022.0176.
[22] Erduran Tekin Ö, Sirin A.Rumination mediates the relationship between childhood traumas with cognitive defusion, acceptance, and emotion regulation:a qualitative and quantitative study[J]. J Ration Emot Cogn Behav Ther,2023,8:1-28. DOI:10.1007/s10942-023-00503-4.
[23] 张格格,刘延锦,郭园丽,等.脑卒中患者反刍性沉思的研究进展[J].护理学杂志,2022,37(20):110-113. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2022.20.110.
[24] Yehene E, Lichtenstern G, Harel Y, et al.Self-efficacy and acceptance of disability following mild traumatic brain injury: a pilot study[J].Appl Neuropsychol Adult,2020,27(5):468-477. DOI:10.1080/23279095.2019.1569523.
[25] Yang L, Zhang H.The chain mediating effect of network behavior and decision self-efficacy between work skills andperceived employability based on Social Cognitive Theory[J]. Comput Intell Neurosci,2022,2022:5240947. DOI:10.1155/2022/5240947.
[26] Zhang X, Yue H, Sun J, et al.Regulatory emotional self-efficacy and psychological distress among medical students: multiple mediating roles of interpersonal adaptation and self-acceptance[J].BMC Med Educ, 2022, 22(1):283. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03338-2.
[1] 王冰冰, 马英芝, 孙小卫, 杨琴, 肖江琴. 中青年脑卒中患者与配偶二元应对潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(8): 7-12.
[2] 薛荣, 张开利, 陈保云, 马荣慧, 张雨欣. 中老年脑卒中患者多维衰弱发展轨迹及其影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 6-12.
[3] 张许婷, 罗彩凤, 魏兰芝, 邵校, 尚彬, 卞泽坤, 吕妃, 孙炜怡. 实习护生体面劳动感的潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(3): 12-16.
[4] 袁佳琳, 杨玲玲, 刘晓慧, 甘茹, 杜瑄, 高海花, 杨小萍, 王慧娟. 308名脑卒中患者主要照顾者抑郁现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 27-31.
[5] 韩双嵘, 李秋芳, 罗浩月, 杨佳音, 刘腊梅, 汪晓凯. 肺癌化疗患者自我同情的潜在剖面分析及其与失志的关系[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(2): 65-69.
[6] 何叶, 王元姣, 谢珺, 苗姣娜. 心理资本在恢复期脑卒中患者领悟社会支持与患者积极度的中介效应分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(7): 65-70.
[7] 李壮苗, 梦婷, 刘芳, 李霞, 李秀霞, 燕文娟. 艾盐包热熨手三阳经对脑卒中偏瘫患者上肢运动功能的影响[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(6): 61-67.
[8] 郑思琪, 陈璐, 马晴, 王钰涵, 成杰, 王云龙. 双耳节拍音乐疗法对脑卒中偏瘫患者焦虑抑郁及疲劳的效果研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(5): 72-78.
[9] 张玉芬, 汪晖, 胡凯利. 临床护士道德困境的潜在剖面分析及其与道德敏感性的关系研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(3): 20-25.
[10] 陈坚, 王园, 崔艳丽, 罗彦嗣, 廖琳, 颜明玉, 张晓梅. 缺血性脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者经口摄食功能发展轨迹及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24): 1-6.
[11] 张鹏博, 梅永霞, 张振香, 林蓓蕾, 薛利红, 刘志薇. 脑卒中患者焦虑症状潜在剖面影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(23): 12-17.
[12] 徐倩, 穆艳. 化学刺激治疗脑卒中后吞咽障碍的研究现状[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(22): 40-43.
[13] 魏兰芝, 罗彩凤, 吕妃. 基于潜在剖面分析的本科护生老年照护择业动机分型及其影响因素[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(21): 7-12.
[14] 王洋洋, 马骄娜, 尹斐, 杨楠, 田玲. 本科护生隐性逃课的潜在类别及影响因素决策树分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(20): 37-42.
[15] 付爽, 刘祯, 崔玉顺. 中青年首发脑卒中患者心理一致感在领悟社会支持与创伤后应激障碍的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(20): 43-47.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
[1] 孙素亚, 陈亚梅, 陈伟仙, 薄瑾, 刘晓红, 黄燕, 林梦月. 认知性访谈在过渡期炎症性肠病患者过渡准备量表文化调适中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(6): 1 -5 .
[2] 陈芮, 王梅, 唐晓霞, 朱傲雪, 毛惠娜. 基于ERG理论的免疫检查点抑制剂治疗癌症患者护理需求方案的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 1 -5 .
[3] 马瑞瑞, 范晓莉, 徐姝娟, 张伟, 陈婷, 谈飞飞. 护士参与终末期患者临终决策体验的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 6 -11 .
[4] 丁心舒, 孙乐菲, 高伟, 鲁琦, 闫畅, 刘德山. 矛盾年龄歧视量表在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 12 -16 .
[5] 赵洁, 宋雅玲, 畅盼, 郭倩, 王锦华. 慢性心力衰竭患者及其照顾者心理弹性在疾病不确定感与生活质量间的主客体互倚中介模型研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 17 -21 .
[6] 郑桃花, 高翔, 康梅, 魏海霞, 柳笑, 张丽. 4R危机管理理论在结肠镜围检查期低血糖风险管理中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 22 -26 .
[7] 龙瑶, 卢春凤, 冯志仙. 临床护士对横向领导者特质感知的质性研究[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 27 -31 .
[8] 白雅萍, 施婧. 共享决策在心脏瓣膜病介入治疗患者中的应用研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 32 -35 .
[9] 朱心悦, 嵇冰聪, 蓝雪芬, 季晓珍. 糖尿病患者电子健康素养研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 36 -39 .
[10] 郭俊晨, 刘超毅, 戴云云, 蒋思珊, 杨索, 谌永毅. 虚拟现实技术在生命末期患者中应用的范围综述[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(7): 40 -45 .