联合蒸汽清洗用于达芬奇机器人手术机械臂的效果对照及损坏研究

doi:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.24.057

护理学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (24): 57-60.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2023.24.057

• 临床护理※医院感染控制 • 上一篇下一篇

联合蒸汽清洗用于达芬奇机器人手术机械臂的效果对照及损坏研究

刘霞^a, 刘慰^a, 周芳芳^a, 周春燕^a, 陈虹^b

江苏省苏北人民医院 a.消毒供应中心; b.护理部,江苏扬州 225000

收稿日期:2023-02-14 出版日期:2023-12-25 发布日期:2024-01-09
通讯作者: 陈虹（1968-）,女,江苏扬州人,本科学历,主任护师。E-mail: yzsblx@163.com
作者简介:刘霞（1977-）,女,江苏泰兴人,本科学历,副主任护师。

Effect and damage of combined steam cleaning for da Vinci robotic surgical manipulator: a comparative study

LIU Xia^a, LIU Wei^a, ZHOU Fang-fang^a, ZHOU Chun-yan^a, CHEN Hong^b

a. Dept. of Central Sterile Supply; b. Dept. of Nursing Administration, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou 225000, China

Received:2023-02-14 Online:2023-12-25 Published:2024-01-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析联合蒸汽清洗对达芬奇机器人手术机械臂清洗质量、返洗率和损坏率的影响。方法将2021年9月—2022年9月被污染的达芬奇机器人手术机械臂2 400件,随机分为实验组和对照组,各1 200件。对照组采用纯手工清洗,具体流程为：流动水冲洗→水枪冲洗→酶洗→超声清洗→漂洗→干燥→消毒。实验组在超声清洗和漂洗之间增加蒸汽清洗,其他程序不变。使用目测和ATP生物荧光测试仪（包括表面采样检测和水质采样检测）观察2组的清洗合格率,并统计由清洗处理不当导致的达芬奇机器人手术机械臂的损坏率。结果目测和ATP生物荧光检测结果显示,实验组的清洗合格率优于对照组（P<0.05）;实验组机械臂损坏率低于对照组（P<0.05）。结论手工清洗联合蒸汽清洗达芬奇手术机械臂,降低了返洗率和损坏率,提高了清洗质量。

关键词: 蒸汽清洗, 达芬奇机器人手术机械臂, 清洗质量, 返洗率, 损坏率

Abstract: Objective To analyze the influence of combined steam cleaning on the cleaning quality, backwashing rate and damage rate of da Vinci robotic surgical manipulator. Methods A total of 2,400 contaminated da Vinci robotic surgical manipulators from September 2021 to September 2022 were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 1200 manipulators in each. The control group was cleaned by hand, and the specific process was as follows: flowing water washing → water gun washing → enzyme washing → ultrasonic cleaning → rinsing → drying → disinfection. In the experimental group, steam cleaning was added between ultrasonic cleaning and rinsing, and other procedures remained unchanged. Visual inspection and ATP bioluminescence test (including surface sampling detection and water quality sampling detection) were used to observe the cleaning qualification rate of the two groups, and the damage rate of da Vinci robotic surgical manipulator caused by improper cleaning treatment was calculated. Results Visual inspection and ATP bioluminescence test showed that the cleaning qualification rate of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05). The damage rate of manipulator in the experimental group was lower than that in control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Manual cleaning combined with steam cleaning can lower the backwashing rate and damage rate, and improve the cleaning quality.

Key words: steam cleaning, da Vinci surgical manipulator, cleaning quality, backwashing rate, damage rate

中图分类号:

R472.1

刘霞, 刘慰, 周芳芳, 周春燕, 陈虹. 联合蒸汽清洗用于达芬奇机器人手术机械臂的效果对照及损坏研究[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24): 57-60.

LIU Xia, LIU Wei, ZHOU Fang-fang, ZHOU Chun-yan, CHEN Hong. Effect and damage of combined steam cleaning for da Vinci robotic surgical manipulator: a comparative study[J]. Journal of Nursing, 2023, 30(24): 57-60.

参考文献

[1] 李晓林. 三磷酸腺苷生物荧光法评价达芬奇机器人手术器械清洗效果对照研究[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(9):68-70. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2018.09.068.
[2] Saito Y, Yasuhara H, Murakoshi S, et al.Challenging residual contamination of instruments for robotic surgery in Japan[J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol,2017, 38(2):143-146. DOI:10.1017/ice.2016.249.
[3] 张东芳, 底瑞青, 郭宏园,等. 不同清洗方式对达芬奇机器人手术器械清洗质量的影响研究[J].护士进修杂志, 2022, 37(7):650-653. DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2022.07.016.
[4] Wang G, Zeng Y, Sheng X.Robotic surgery and nursing[M]. Singapore:Springer Singapore, 2021:91-110.
[5] 王清妍, 孙建玲, 逄丽华. 不同清洗方法对可重复使用腹腔镜器械清洗质量的观察[J]. 中国感染控制杂志,2019,18(3):253-256. DOI:10.12138/j.issn.1671-9638.20193960.
[6] 王秀丽, 张东芳, 张敏, 等. 品管圈降低达芬奇管腔器械返洗率的实践[J]. 中国消毒学杂志,2022, 39(2):107-110. DOI:10.11726/j.issn.1001-7658.2022.02.010.
[7] 史玲玲, 白芳, 王锋玲,等. 减压沸腾清洗技术在达芬奇手臂清洗中的应用效果分析[J].中国消毒学杂志,2021,38(11):870-872. DOI:10.11726/j.issn.1001-7658.2021.11.021.
[8] 陈慧, 黄浩, 周晓丽. 蒸汽清洗机的应用对牙科手机清洗质量及损坏性研究[J]. 中国消毒学杂志,2016,33(5):481-482. DOI:10.11726/j.issn.1001-7658.2016.05.027.
[9] 周桂琴, 范恒梅, 谢少清,等. 蒸汽清洗机在超声刀头清洗中的应用效果研究[J]. 护理学杂志,2018,33(23):42-43. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2018.23.042.
[10] 黄云亚, 赵媛, 倪逸,等. 多功能蒸汽清洗机在腹腔镜管腔类器械清洗中的应用[J].齐鲁护理杂志,2021,27(24):162-164. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2021.24.065.
[11] 姚敏, 周林辉, 许丽, 等. 蒸汽清洗法对提高角弯鼻腔吸引管清洗质量的研究[J].护理学杂志,2016,31(22):83-85. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2016.22.083.
[12] Fitts LN,Yegge J, Goris A,etal. How clean is clean enough? An observational pilot study to assess central sterilization processing efficacy with adenosine triphosphate levels[J].Am J Infect Control, 2020, 48(4):420-422.DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2019.08.006.
[13] 钟钻南,毕小群.腔镜手术器械持针钳清洗及效果观察[J].实用临床护理学电子杂志,2020,5(32):97.
[14] 周菊梅,于海燕. 达芬奇机器人手术器械清洗质量改进的探讨[J].中国医疗管理科学,2021,11(6):90-92. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-7432.2021.06.018.
[15] 赵杰, 赵上坤, 牛畅, 等. 高效蒸汽清洗机在脑压管清洗中的应用效果[J].中华现代护理杂志,2021, 27(15):2070-2073. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20201228-06912.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

联合蒸汽清洗用于达芬奇机器人手术机械臂的效果对照及损坏研究

Effect and damage of combined steam cleaning for da Vinci robotic surgical manipulator: a comparative study

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	李静, 王艳, 徐萍. 9 S管理法在消毒供应中心去污区管理中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(11): 35-37.
[2]	刘明秀,王玲,朱堂琼,吴容勤. 降低消毒供应中心物品清洗质量缺陷率的品管圈实践[J]. 护理学报, 2015, (9): 20-22.
[3]	黄玉华,刘莉. 3种方法检测宫腔刮吸器清洗效果的对比研究[J]. 护理学报, 2012, 19(2): 70-72.