以质量求发展，以服务铸品牌

护理学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (15): 63-68.doi: 10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2021.15.063

• 临床护理：内科护理 • 上一篇    下一篇

构建支气管哮喘患者护理质量评价指标体系

周亚丽, 张焕梅, 刘小凡, 叶文娟, 陶晶   

  1. 华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院 小儿内科,湖北 武汉 430022
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-23 出版日期:2021-08-10 发布日期:2021-09-10
  • 通讯作者: 张焕梅（1980-）,女,湖北薪春人,硕士,主管护师,护士长。E-mail:285284220@qq.com
  • 作者简介:周亚丽（1986-）,女,湖北武汉人,本科学历,主管护师,护士。

Development of Nursing Quality Assessment Index System for Patients with Bronchial Asthma

ZHOU Ya-li, ZHANG Huan-mei, LIU Xiao-fan, YE Wen-juan, TAO Jing   

  1. Dept. of Pediatrics, Union Hospital, Union Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
  • Received:2021-04-23 Online:2021-08-10 Published:2021-09-10

PDF (PC)

358

赞

摘要： 目的 构建支气管哮喘患者护理质量评价指标体系,为实现客观科学的支气管哮喘患者护理质量监测、评价、管理提供参考依据。方法 采用“结构-过程-结果”理论框架,在研究证据及小组讨论的基础上初步拟订支气管哮喘患者护理质量评价指标,通过德尔菲法与层次分析法进一步确立质量评价指标体系及各指标的权重。结果 构建了包含3项一级指标、6项二级指标、27项三级指标在内的支气管哮喘患者护理质量评价指标体系,其中一级指标的权重分布最高的为过程指标（0.491）,二级指标的权重分布最高的为计划及实施指标（0.327）。2轮函询专家积极系数为90.00%与100%,权威系数为0.821与0.840,协调系数为0.312~0.361。结论 构建的支气管哮喘护理质量评价指标体系具有较强的科学性、实用性及可行性,可供临床护理人员使用参考,以不断改进支气管哮喘患者临床护理质量。

关键词: 支气管哮喘, 护理, 指标

Abstract: Objective To develop a nursing quality assessment index system for patients with bronchial asthma, and to provide reference for the monitor, assessment and management of nursing quality for patients with bronchial asthma. Methods With the structure-process-result theory framework, after literature review and group discussion, the initial system was developed. Then Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process were used to further improve the index system and identify the weight of each index. Results The final version of the nursing quality assessment index system for patients with bronchial asthma was constructed, including 3 first-level, 6 second-level and 27 third-level indexes. Among them, the index of process was with the highest weight distribution in the first-level indexes (0.491), and planning and implementation was the one with the highest weight distribution in second-level indexes (0.327). The positive coefficient of the two rounds of letter consultation was 90.00% and 100% respectively while the authority coefficient was 0.821 and 0.840 respectively. And the coordination coefficient was 0.312 to 0.361 respectively. Conclusion Being scientific and practical, the developed nursing quality assessment index system for patients with bronchial asthma could provide reference for clinical nursing staff to promote continuous improvement of clinical nursing quality for patients with bronchial asthma.

Key words: bronchial asthma, nursing, index

中图分类号: 

  • R473.56
[1] 中华医学会呼吸病学分会哮喘学组.支气管哮喘防治指南(2016年版)[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2016,39(9):675-697. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2016.09.007.
[2] Song WJ, Kang MG, Chang YS, et al.Epidemiology of Adult Asthma in Asia: Toward a Better Understanding[J].Asia Pac Allergy,2014,4(2):75-85.DOI:10.5415/apallergy.2014.4.2.75.
[3] Ding B, DiBonaventura M,Karlsson N,et al.A Cross-sectional Assessment of the Prevalence and Burden of Mild Asthma in Urban China Using the 2010,2012, and 2013 China National Health and Wellness Surveys[J]. J Asthma,2017,54(6):632-643. DOI:10.1080/02770903.2016.1255750.
[4] Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention[EB/OL]. (2019-11-14)[2019-12-02]. https://www.ginasthma.org/.
[5] 钮晓颖,李岩,王宇.应用移动互联网技术进行哮喘患者健康管理研究进展[J]. 护理学报,2017,24(22):18-22. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2017.22.018.
[6] Hodkinson A, Bower P, Grigoroglou C, et al.Self-management Interventions to Reduce Healthcare Use and Improve Quality of Life among Patients with Asthma: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis[J]. BMJ, 2020,370:2521. DOI:10.1136/bmj.m2521.
[7] 景阳,潘岁月,孙志琴.支气管哮喘护理质量评价指标体系的构建[J].护理学杂志,2017,32(21):67-71. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2017.21.067.
[8] 崔金锐,陈英.Donabedian 结构过程结果模式在护理敏感性质量指标构建中的应用进展[J].护理研究, 2015,29(7):769-772. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.10096493.2015.07.001.
[9] 杨婧,沈丽琼,金晓燕.层次分析法在护理管理领域中的应用进展[J].中华现代护理杂志,2016, 22(26):3837-3840. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2016.26.039.
[10] Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, et al.The Well-built Clinical Question:A Key to Evidence-based Decisions[J]. ACP J Club, 1995,123(3):A12-A13.
[11] 王春青,胡雁.JBI证据预分级及证据推荐级别系统(2014 版)[J].护士进修杂志,2015,30(11):964-967.DOI:10.16821/ j.cnki.hsjx.2015.11.002.
[12] The Joanna Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation Working Party. Supporting Document for the Joanna Briggs Institute Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation, the Joanna Briggs Institute[EB/ OL].[2017-07-15](2019-12-02).https://www.joannabriggs.org/ critical_appraisal_tools.
[13] Brouwers M C, Kho M E, Browman G P, et al.AGREE II: Advancing Guideline Development, Reporting, and Evaluation in Health Care[J].Prev Med, 2010, 51(5):421-424. DOI:10.1503/cmaj.090449.
[14] Christopher H. An Overview of Asthma Management [EB/OL]. [2019-10-27](2019-12-02). https://www-uptodate-com.ermg.femh.org.tw:8443/contents/an-overview-of-asthma-management.
[15] Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network.SIGN 153 British Guideline on the Management of Asthma[EB/OL].(2016-09-19)[2019-12-02].http://www.sign.ac.uk!sign-153-british-guideline-on-the-managementof-asthma.htmI.
[16] National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Asthma: Diagnosis, Monitoring and Chronic Asthma Management[EB/OL]. (2017-11-29)[2019-12-02].www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng80.
[17] Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario(RNAO). Adult Asthma Care: Promoting Control of Asthma, Second Edition[EB/OL]. (2017-05-02)[2019-12-02]. https://rnao.ca/bpg/guidelines/ adult-asthma-care.
[18] Plaza Moral V, Alonso Mostaza S, Alvarez Rodríguez C, et al.Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma[J]. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol, 2016, 26(Suppl 1):1-92. DOI:10.18176/jiaci.0065.
[19] AI-Moamary MS, Alhaider SA, Idrees MM, et al.The Saudi Initiative for Asthma - 2016 Update: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma in Adults and Children[J]. Ann Thorac Med,2016,11(1):3-42. DOI:10.4103/1817-1737.173196.
[20] 中华医学会呼吸病学分会哮喘学组,中国哮喘联盟.支气管哮喘急性发作评估及处理中国专家共识[J].中华内科杂志,2018,57(1):4-14. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1426.2018.01.002.
[21] 中华医学会呼吸病学分会哮喘学组.支气管哮喘患者自我管理中国专家共识[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2018,41(3):171-178.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2018.03.005.
[22] 詹昱新,杨中善,李素云,等.基于循证构建住院患者肠内营养护理质量评价指标体系[J].护理学报,2019,26(10):26-31. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2019.10.026.
[23] Burke H, Davis J, Evans S, et al.A Multidisciplinary Team Case Management Approach Reduces the Burden of Frequent Asthma Admissions[J]. ERJ Open Res, 2016, 2(3):00039-2016. DOI:10.1183/23120541.00039-2016.
[24] Murray B,O’Neill M.Supporting Self-management of Asthma Through Patient Education[J]. Br J Nurs, 2018,27(7):396-401. DOI:10.12968/bjon.2018.27.7.396.
[25] 王少娜,董瑞,谢晖,等.德尔菲法及其构建指标体系的应用进展[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2016,41(5):695-698. DOI:10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.05.048.
[26] 郭红艳,谢红.美国护理质量评价体系对我国护理质量管理的启示[J].中国护理管理,2014,14(5):459-462. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2014.05.004.
[27] 马莹,叶君荣,黄昭君,等.基于循证构建精神科护理质量敏感性指标[J].护理学报,2020,27(9):27-32. DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2020.09.027.
[1] 陈羽双, 杨斯钰, 张叶霞. 2010-2019年基于PubMed数据库家庭参与式护理研究热点的共词聚类分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9): 14-18.
[2] 李萍, 靳小雯, 李燕玲, 徐玉兰, 喻姣花, 李卓颖, 李应, 邓睿. 成年患者结直肠镜检查肠道准备不充分的预防及管理证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9): 22-28.
[3] 张丽娟, 李金兰, 钟巧玲, 罗庆华, 张慧珍, 谢新华, 覃惠英. 癌症患者术后下肢淋巴水肿行综合消肿治疗联合泡沫颗粒绷带的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9): 62-65.
[4] 李洁, 张斯秀, 徐翠荣. 以家庭为中心的护理对ICU患者家属满意度影响的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9): 19-21.
[5] 陈晓霞, 刘小民, 宋海娟, 张新芳, 谢庆. 7例胎儿行宫内肺动脉瓣成形术的术中护理[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(9): 71-73.
[6] 韦耀猛, 凌云, 宋亚敏, 陈官映. 5例肥胖患者在心脏术后发生低氧血症行俯卧位通气治疗的护理[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(8): 56-58.
[7] 吴晓珩, 杨元立, 胡馨予, 王翠萍, 张萦, 王艳春, 陶艳玲. 住院患者输血全流程管理的循证实践[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(8): 33-38.
[8] 黄海英, 苏小玲, 黄永贤, 曹燕锋, 李晓华. 4例血液肿瘤患儿PICC拔管困难的原因分析及对策[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(8): 69-71.
[9] 巫春兰, 黄佳诚, 常珍, 陈炜, 帅燕珍. 静脉输液管理系统的设计和应用[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(8): 62-64.
[10] 赵志勇, 徐筱. 皮试结果可视窗判断圆尺的研制及应用[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(8): 65-68.
[11] 刘雨安, 杨小文, 李乐之. 机器学习在疾病预测的应用研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 30-34.
[12] 刘鑫, 江锦芳, 覃彦珠, 周帅, 施洁, 刘彦君. 215例结直肠癌造口患者家庭主要照顾者照顾能力现状及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 53-58.
[13] 刘萍, 尤奥林, 刘姝, 李亚楠, 栾晓嵘. 我国护理硕士专业学位研究生就读期间培养体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 35-42.
[14] 杜金磊, 陈志美, 秦兰芳, 廉洁, 孙文静, 王翔, 徐巍, 邹晓月. 基于昼夜节律机制对ICU老年患者肠内营养延续性护理的对照研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(7): 1-5.
[15] 高兴莲, 余文静, 肖瑶, 胡娟娟, 赵诗雨, 杨英. 手术患者围术期压力性损伤预防及管理最佳证据总结[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(6): 22-26.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
[1] 谢小敏, 李亚莉, 梁亚红, 冯蓓, 林燕, 江逊. 功能失调性态度在父母教养方式与青少年抑郁症状间的中介效应[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(13): 52 -57 .
[2] 赵喜娟, 杨明莹, 张江, 钱阳凤, 陶诗琪, 耿艺, 王娅. 缺血性脑卒中偏瘫患者出院计划评估体系的构建[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(13): 58 -61 .
[3] 郑霞, 胡雅, 周洁, 尚攀婷, 韩辉, 卢惠明. 封闭负压引流术治疗阴茎癌腹股沟淋巴结清扫术后伤口二期愈合患者的护理[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(13): 62 -64 .
[4] 刘敏利, 周春兰, 龙艳娟, 肖秀英, 黄玉楼, 黄小娜, 李小贞, 龚秀群, 李苏城, 黄锦航, 彭小平, 耿丽, 梁美燕. 珠海市金湾区老年人轻度认知障碍现况调查及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(13): 74 -78 .
[5] 孔海燕, 章新琼, 张洪辉, 王婷婷, 王爱梅. 2型糖尿病患者心脏病知识问卷的汉化及信效度研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(15): 1 -4 .
[6] 李玮彤, 宋玉磊, 陈宇婧, 徐桂华. 养老机构老年人综合能力评估等级划分方式的研究[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(15): 5 -9 .
[7] 杜艳丽, 王璐, 廖雨风, 马纯华, 阮宏兵, 张雅, 牛耿. 临床情境模拟结合标准化病人教学法在培养护生压疮风险评估能力的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(15): 10 -14 .
[8] 王丽, 王海燕, 钟颖嫦, 李利, 陈丽珊, 佘凤华, 邹丹凤, 朱碧丽, 王媛媛. 特需医疗中心开展护理管家服务实践的效果观察[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(15): 15 -19 .
[9] 宋嘉婷, 黄绮华, 肖文莉, 杨钻钻, 罗辉芳. 灸法防治肿瘤患者化疗不良反应的文献计量学分析[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(15): 20 -24 .
[10] 陈思萍, 何小俊. 提高公众心肺复苏培训后技能保留率的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2021, 28(15): 25 -29 .